The Mustang 2 was an outrage that it had the Mustang tag on it.
Ford lost their minds with that one. "Oh... let's take a Pinto, change the body a little... and call it Mustang!!"
I can't fault Ford too badly for this.
The Mustang II was a product of a gasoline crisis, and a rapidly-tightening grip of government regulations. It was probably the only way that they were going to keep the Mustang brand alive across that period.
I'm not so willing to excuse the new
“‘Bronco’ Sport¨.
After a quarter of a century, Ford has revived the Bronco brand, and they've come out with a truly spectacular vehicle that is more than worthy to bear that name.
But for whatever reason, they've also brought out a pretender, which is really just an Escape with the Bronco name and and some of the Bronco features grafted on to it. It might be a fine vehicle for what it is, but it would have been more honest to just sell it as some special, off-road-capable trim of the Escape, than to call it a Bronco.
One thing that I just cannot get past about the
“‘Bronco’ Sport¨, is that unless you get the top-of-the-line version, you only get a three-cylinder motor. What the f•••?
In automotive applications, the only valid place for a three-cylinder, four-stroke engine, is in either a hybrid drivetrain, or a crappy subcompact. If you understand how a four-stroke engine works, you have to understand that for acceptably smooth power output, four cylinders is the absolute bare minimum. The Badlads trim of the
“‘Bronco’ Sport¨ gets a four-cylinder, as did the First Edition trim that was only offered, in very limited quantities, for the 2021 model year.
The real Bronco gets either a four-cylinder engine, bigger than that of the top-level
“‘Bronco’ Sport¨, or a six-cylinder engine.