EvilCat Breath
Diamond Member
- Sep 23, 2016
- 82,122
- 57,347
- 2,645
They can't give testimony. The committee won't let them any more than their star witness would be cross examined.Please link their testimony.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
They can't give testimony. The committee won't let them any more than their star witness would be cross examined.Please link their testimony.
No Nate, he didn't want to stop the riot....that's already been shown in this and previous hearings.
Sure they can. They can make a public statement right now.They can't give testimony. The committee won't let them any more than their star witness would be cross examined.
Ohhhh. YOU asked for testimony. A public statement isn't testimony. I gave you a link.Sure they can. They can make a public statement right now.
LOL, how can anyone take this sham shit show seriously?
January 6 Witness Cassidy Hutchinson Claims Trump Lunged at Secret Service Agent on Jan. 6, Shouted, "I'm the F*cking President!" (VIDEO) | The Gateway Pundit | by Cristina Laila
The January 6 Committee on Tuesday trotted out a grifter no one has ever heard of to breathe life into the Maoist show trials.www.thegatewaypundit.com
more threats for the demafacistHe gets away with the shit we will throw it right back at. Looking forward to it.
This isn't a trial.They can't give testimony. The committee won't let them any more than their star witness would be cross examined.
so now there were two agents in the front seat with him when he attacked them and grabbed for the wheel?? wowThe two SS men attacked by the president in the car, told her....they were there, but you are correct, she wasn't in the car.
It would take a DOJ investigation to subpoena and get their direct testimony imo, cuz I doubt they would for the committee, claiming executive privilege.....?
This is a show trial worthy of Stalin.This isn't a trial.
Was there cross examination for Nixon's side in The Watergate Hearings? NO!
----------------------------------------------------------
Those guys need to go under oath, and give their first hand account!
Insurrection upon limo driver is brand new shiny criminal charge
The two SS men attacked by the president in the car, told her....they were there, but you are correct, she wasn't in the car.
It would take a DOJ investigation to subpoena and get their direct testimony imo, cuz I doubt they would for the committee, claiming executive privilege.....?
i don't watch that bs... but what exactly do you mean here.. that Jordan could have cried Hearsay! but he didn't??
apparently after her 4th time. she reported she felt she was being forced to testify…she then got a new attorney and felt she could “say more” like how she was told by somebody about trump’s amazing feat of taking out two federal agentsHeh.
Why didn't they call the Secret Service agents? This woman had already testified 4 times in secret. We know why.
Oh, and Pelosi still refused the National Guard prior to January 6.
It doesn't elude me.... It's a fact finding committee, and her testimony, flushed these other SS guys out, allegedly to now come forward with their information, and if they really do want to testify and do, they will get a lot of other questions shot at them, and who knows? They might actually give up some pertinent information on someone or some thing, else....then the committee moves forward with that....and getting testimony on that....What eludes YOU is why they didn't pay attention to her not being a witness thus her testimony is a waste of time.
you’re just jealous you aren’t quick enough to jump from the back of a moving limo to the front and grab the wheel from a federal agentI must say....trump and his cultists certainly deserve each other.
this is the 5th time she testified how come these agents were flushed out sooner?It doesn't elude me.... It's a fact finding committee, and her testimony, flushed these other SS guys out, allegedly to now come forward with their information, and if they really do want to testify and do, they will get a lot of other questions shot at them, and who knows? They might actually give up some pertinent information on someone or some thing, else....then the committee moves forward with that....and getting testimony on that....
Isn't that how it always works?