The Bolton Bombshell (from his book)

[Care4all]

Claim endless witnesses are out there, although none discovered when ball was in your court, and thus endless impeachment seeking the never ending mystery “witnesses”

THEY DIDN'T HAVE YEARS TO BATTLE IT OUT IN THE COURTS, with Trump's endless appeals, using our tax dollars....

the trial Senators and the defense lawyers, can ask for suits to be expedited and leap straight (with minor bumps) to the supreme court.... 3 weeks or so at most, and not years, to get witnesses!

 

[protectionist]

Did you read what Bolton wrote? And we all been saying even if trump did what democrats are accusing ITS NOT AGAINST THE LAW. Lol biden is clearly corrupt and if he’s nots asking wtf was his son doing is absolutely ok. Your just deranged.. trump has powers

What was his son doing? You mean his daddy got him a good paying job? Happens all the time. Look at every Republican Senator's son's. Look at GW Bush. You think he purchased the Texas Rangers baseball team with his own money that he earned? How about Trump? Without Trump's daddy Don is just a real estate guy in lower manhattan.

Yes, what Trump did was against the law. Please tell me you don't think it's ok for the president to strongarm another country into making up fake news against his opponent. Funny how much you guys bashed Bill for lying about one BJ because he was under oath but you embrace a pathalogical liar.

Can you cite in US Code what law was broken?
Or will you continue to lie, and spout off propaganda and falsehoods?
When you face your Creator, will you be able to tell Him that you are a man of truth?
Or will you hang your head in shame as a condemned and unrepentant man?

18 US Code 201
18 U.S. Code § 201 - Bribery of public officials and witnesses
(B) being a public official, former public official, or person selected to be a public official, otherwise than as provided by law for the proper discharge of official duty, directly or indirectly demands, seeks, receives, accepts, or agrees to receive or accept anything of value personally for or because of any official act performed or to be performed by such official or person;

Omg you have evidence of bribery!?

solicitation, with a quid pro quo for personal gain.... government corruption, corrupt use of govt power or position..... still looking for the Statute number,

but found those other two in my search!

There is nothing "for personal gain"

 

[colfax_m]

Every time Democrats say they need witnesses in Senate .. I say they failed miserably in the House of TDS Democrat morons..

They failed because Trump obstructed. The Senate doesn’t even want to try. Why wouldn’t they want to even try?

 

[colfax_m]

What was his son doing? You mean his daddy got him a good paying job? Happens all the time. Look at every Republican Senator's son's. Look at GW Bush. You think he purchased the Texas Rangers baseball team with his own money that he earned? How about Trump? Without Trump's daddy Don is just a real estate guy in lower manhattan.

Yes, what Trump did was against the law. Please tell me you don't think it's ok for the president to strongarm another country into making up fake news against his opponent. Funny how much you guys bashed Bill for lying about one BJ because he was under oath but you embrace a pathalogical liar.

Can you cite in US Code what law was broken?
Or will you continue to lie, and spout off propaganda and falsehoods?
When you face your Creator, will you be able to tell Him that you are a man of truth?
Or will you hang your head in shame as a condemned and unrepentant man?

18 US Code 201
18 U.S. Code § 201 - Bribery of public officials and witnesses
(B) being a public official, former public official, or person selected to be a public official, otherwise than as provided by law for the proper discharge of official duty, directly or indirectly demands, seeks, receives, accepts, or agrees to receive or accept anything of value personally for or because of any official act performed or to be performed by such official or person;

Omg you have evidence of bribery!?

solicitation, with a quid pro quo for personal gain.... government corruption, corrupt use of govt power or position..... still looking for the Statute number,

but found those other two in my search!

There is nothing "for personal gain"

He’s trying to steal the election.

 

[sealybobo]

4 years of "Anonymous Bullshit Says".....

Key players in the Trump impeachment probe and what they testified to Congress
Over a dozen officials have come forward so far.

Kurt Volker
Bill Taylor
Michael Atkinson
Marie Yovanovitch
Fiona Hill
George Kent
Michael McKinley
Gordon Sondland
Bill Taylor
Laura Cooper,
Philip Reeker
Army Lt. Col. Alexander Vindman
Christopher Anderson
Catherine Croft
Tim Morrison
David Hale
Jennifer Williams
David Holmes
Mark Sandy


All of them are liars and part of the deep state? So no matter who comes out against Trump, even if it's Bolton or Rudy or Pence, you guys won't believe any of them. Is that right? All RINO deep staters?

Key players in the Trump impeachment probe and what they testified to Congress

 

[sealybobo]

WHO CARES! In 1776 we didn’t even have a doj,, we didn’t have osha, we investigated our selves.. you don’t like it move out

It ain’t 1776 champ. Trump didn’t want to involve the DoJ because they are accountable to the country. Rudy ain’t.

If you break the law you break the law.. it is 1776,, you will never change the bill of rights

You mean like due process? That was denied to Joe Biden.

Investigation continues,, he will get his time to answer for his crimes

Biden has constitutional protections against meritless investigations. Those protections are being ignored.

What's great is they got caught trying to smear Joe Biden's good name and they got caught. And rather than admit it or change the subject, these mother fuckers are going to double down and try to make this about Biden's son getting a job because of who his father is. As if a man like Trump gives a **** about that. A guy who got where he is because of his father and his sons are where they are because of their father.

What hypocrites.

 

[jc456]

How do you assess the credibility of statements?

I don't.

That would make you very easy to manipulate.

I look at evidence. hard evidence, like statements from party's directly involved, like the PM. He said nope! you said yep. he was on the call, you weren't and yet..... you know something he doesn't. wow. see that's called stupid. but hey, you work hard at it.

People lie, buddy. They do it for all sorts of reasons. Sorry to upset you.

funny, we have a documented call. scribbed by others. and you're calling out a president of another country saying he lies. dude, I give a shit what you think that's for fking sure.

dudette! Do you think President Velensky had any kind of choice, but to lie? Seriously? It's call self and Nation preservation! the Wrath of Don, ain't pretty little girl!

simply amazing. can't make it up at all. thanks for playing show us your ignorance!!!

Care4all I enjoy handing out the stupid's award to ignorance like yours.

 

[sealybobo]

So the whistleblower and all the people from them down to Bolton are lying to sell books?

see what’s wrong with republican thinking? The scientists are lying not the oil companies and everyone trump hired is lying not trump.

how many trump supporters have you thrown under the bus? Bolton is no liberal. If he’s warning you about hitler don’t call him a liberal

gibberish ,, did you just say the whistle blower? Like he’s legit lol that’s funny.

But think about all the people who you refuse to believe. Like there is a vast RIGHT wing conspiracy from the deep state RINO's to take Trump down. So you blow off anyone who comes forward. The whistleblower, sondlund, that woman, and everyone else who testified that what Trump did was wrong and made them very uncomfortable.

If you won't listen to these people that Trump is corrupt, you won't listen to anyone.

WASHINGTON ― The bombshell revelation that former national security adviser John Bolton has written a book essentially confirming the Democrats’ case against President Donald Trump went curiously unaddressed by the president’s lawyers on Monday in the Senate impeachment trial.

Bolton’s book alleges that Trump tied the release of congressionally approved Ukraine aid to the Ukrainians’ announcing investigations of former Vice President Joe Biden and his son Hunter Biden.

Trump Lawyers Ignore John Bolton Bombshell In Senate Trial | HuffPost

This is the shit we couldn't prove in the Mueller report. Now we have proof he is a criminal and Republicans are defending him? I hope they pay this November for their loyalty.

Trump has full authority to investigate corruption overseas

He wasn't investigating corruption. He was trying to make up fake news on his political opponent.

Bolton confirms it. How many more need to confirm it? You are like OJ supporters. No proof will convince you.

Now you guys admit even if he did it, nothing wrong with doing it? Bullshit. It's an abuse of his power and he's not putting the country first he's putting himself first. He's corrupt and a liar. Got to go.

If you watch videos of Biden even from a couple years ago, He is Deteriorating Mentally and he needs to drop out.

The only reason he is running is to protect his son.

What a bullshit artist you are. The only reason Trump brought up his son is because Joe's running.

You did this to Hillary. Said she was deteriorating. But the truth is Trump is.

Trump's on some drugs

Dementia drugs.

 

[jc456]

Claim endless witnesses are out there, although none discovered when ball was in your court, and thus endless impeachment seeking the never ending mystery “witnesses”

Well the witnesses were discovered but wouldn't testify without court orders that would have taken months. But it's clear that the gop senate isn't gonna do anything even if Trump shoots someone on 5th ave.

Four Gop senators may want some show of witnesses to try and claim they had open minds to an already foregone vote.

And it doesn't matter to the polling. The only actual effect may be if this stretches out into the SOTU speech and Trump loses it on TV and goes into a rage for all to see

all legal, they chose not to wait, it's on them, no one else.

 

[colfax_m]

Claim endless witnesses are out there, although none discovered when ball was in your court, and thus endless impeachment seeking the never ending mystery “witnesses”

Well the witnesses were discovered but wouldn't testify without court orders that would have taken months. But it's clear that the gop senate isn't gonna do anything even if Trump shoots someone on 5th ave.

Four Gop senators may want some show of witnesses to try and claim they had open minds to an already foregone vote.

And it doesn't matter to the polling. The only actual effect may be if this stretches out into the SOTU speech and Trump loses it on TV and goes into a rage for all to see

all legal, they chose not to wait, it's on them, no one else.

Incorrect. Guess what would happen if you ignored a subpoena?

 

[Meister]

Let him testify, then we get Biden Jr.

What do you expect Hunter Biden will be asked, and what do you expect he will say in response?

He will show that there was reason for concern over corruption. Hell, the Heinz kid distanced himself and his employer
from what Biden Jr. was doing and emailed the State Dept of his concerns, wry.

Where do you get your information?

For the Readers, see:

What Hunter Biden did on the board of Ukrainian energy company Burisma

Hunter Biden says taking a job at a Ukrainian energy company was "poor judgment"

https://www.washingtonpost.com/worl...adff70-dfd9-11e9-8fd3-d943b4ed57e0_story.html

It was brought into evidence by Bondi yesterday, actually, showed the documents, wry.

Please post a summary of what Bondi showed. Yesterday I had outside appointments and didn't see much of the defense.

No, that's on you, wry...not me.

 

[Lumpy 1]

Every time Democrats say they need witnesses in Senate .. I say they failed miserably in the House of TDS Democrat morons..

They failed because Trump obstructed. The Senate doesn’t even want to try. Why wouldn’t they want to even try?

Nope, Democrats failed to make the case so now it's TDS crybaby time again and again and again and again and again etc.etc etc....

 

[bendog]

It ain’t 1776 champ. Trump didn’t want to involve the DoJ because they are accountable to the country. Rudy ain’t.

If you break the law you break the law.. it is 1776,, you will never change the bill of rights

You mean like due process? That was denied to Joe Biden.

Investigation continues,, he will get his time to answer for his crimes

Biden has constitutional protections against meritless investigations. Those protections are being ignored.

What's great is they got caught trying to smear Joe Biden's good name and they got caught. And rather than admit it or change the subject, these mother fuckers are going to double down and try to make this about Biden's son getting a job because of who his father is. As if a man like Trump gives a **** about that. A guy who got where he is because of his father and his sons are where they are because of their father.

What hypocrites.

In a nutshell, Hunter's no different really than Ivanka or any of the 3 Trump boychinkins. BUT Biden's reason to run is him being some kind of tonic to the spite and incivility of Trump. Biden's actually less about issues than was Trump in 16.

 

[Jitss617]

Can you cite in US Code what law was broken?
Or will you continue to lie, and spout off propaganda and falsehoods?
When you face your Creator, will you be able to tell Him that you are a man of truth?
Or will you hang your head in shame as a condemned and unrepentant man?

18 US Code 201
18 U.S. Code § 201 - Bribery of public officials and witnesses
(B) being a public official, former public official, or person selected to be a public official, otherwise than as provided by law for the proper discharge of official duty, directly or indirectly demands, seeks, receives, accepts, or agrees to receive or accept anything of value personally for or because of any official act performed or to be performed by such official or person;

Omg you have evidence of bribery!?

solicitation, with a quid pro quo for personal gain.... government corruption, corrupt use of govt power or position..... still looking for the Statute number,

but found those other two in my search!

There is nothing "for personal gain"

He’s trying to steal the election.

Hahah omg any evidence?

 

[Meister]

Let him testify, then we get Biden Jr.

What do you expect Hunter Biden will be asked, and what do you expect he will say in response?

He will show that there was reason for concern over corruption. Hell, the Heinz kid distanced himself and his employer
from what Biden Jr. was doing and emailed the State Dept of his concerns, wry.

Where do you get your information?

For the Readers, see:

What Hunter Biden did on the board of Ukrainian energy company Burisma

Hunter Biden says taking a job at a Ukrainian energy company was "poor judgment"

https://www.washingtonpost.com/worl...adff70-dfd9-11e9-8fd3-d943b4ed57e0_story.html

It was brought into evidence by Bondi yesterday, actually, showed the documents, wry.

Bondi failed to show any rational basis that could be consider a basis for an investigation.

If Hunter exercised bad judgement, so be it. But bad judgement isn’t a crime.

According to you, colfax. I will take that for what it's worth.

 

[Elusivebutterfly]

AG Barr corrects bolten's lies about him

NY Times' Bolton Claims Get Destroyed Yet Again, This Time by the DOJ and Bill Barr

 

[colfax_m]

Every time Democrats say they need witnesses in Senate .. I say they failed miserably in the House of TDS Democrat morons..

They failed because Trump obstructed. The Senate doesn’t even want to try. Why wouldn’t they want to even try?

Nope, Democrats failed to make the case so now it's TDS crybaby time again and again and again and again and again etc.etc etc....

Now the Senate is failing to hold a fair trial.

 

[bendog]

Claim endless witnesses are out there, although none discovered when ball was in your court, and thus endless impeachment seeking the never ending mystery “witnesses”

Well the witnesses were discovered but wouldn't testify without court orders that would have taken months. But it's clear that the gop senate isn't gonna do anything even if Trump shoots someone on 5th ave.

Four Gop senators may want some show of witnesses to try and claim they had open minds to an already foregone vote.

And it doesn't matter to the polling. The only actual effect may be if this stretches out into the SOTU speech and Trump loses it on TV and goes into a rage for all to see

all legal, they chose not to wait, it's on them, no one else.

Incorrect. Guess what would happen if you ignored a subpoena?

It would take 6 mos minimum for a subpoena to work its way throught the courts. And that assumes the gop Sup Ct would say Trump cannot keep Bolton's testimony a secret because of Exec Privilege.

The dems didn't have a way to force testimony. all taht's just more TRumpanzee LIES. It's like "the dems leaked boltons' book." ummm, no it was not the dems. LOL

But again, any testimony isn't going to change the result. It may though Trump into a orange-red mushrooming rage on TV, which would be way cool. LOL

 

[colfax_m]

18 US Code 201
18 U.S. Code § 201 - Bribery of public officials and witnesses
(B) being a public official, former public official, or person selected to be a public official, otherwise than as provided by law for the proper discharge of official duty, directly or indirectly demands, seeks, receives, accepts, or agrees to receive or accept anything of value personally for or because of any official act performed or to be performed by such official or person;

Omg you have evidence of bribery!?

solicitation, with a quid pro quo for personal gain.... government corruption, corrupt use of govt power or position..... still looking for the Statute number,

but found those other two in my search!

There is nothing "for personal gain"

He’s trying to steal the election.

Hahah omg any evidence?

Provided.

 

[colfax_m]

What do you expect Hunter Biden will be asked, and what do you expect he will say in response?

He will show that there was reason for concern over corruption. Hell, the Heinz kid distanced himself and his employer
from what Biden Jr. was doing and emailed the State Dept of his concerns, wry.

Where do you get your information?

For the Readers, see:

What Hunter Biden did on the board of Ukrainian energy company Burisma

Hunter Biden says taking a job at a Ukrainian energy company was "poor judgment"

https://www.washingtonpost.com/worl...adff70-dfd9-11e9-8fd3-d943b4ed57e0_story.html

It was brought into evidence by Bondi yesterday, actually, showed the documents, wry.

Bondi failed to show any rational basis that could be consider a basis for an investigation.

If Hunter exercised bad judgement, so be it. But bad judgement isn’t a crime.

According to you, colfax. I will take that for what it's worth.

I watched Bondi. She provided the case for why Biden needed to be investigated. However, as we know, law enforcement is not allowed to ignore exculpatory evidence when making that decision. Bondi ignored mountains of exculpatory evidence. Her case was weak.