The Big Lie

This is not a conspiracy. These are things that have happened. THAT MAKES THEM FACTS.

At the same time, I noted, the 2020 presidential election violated internationally accepted criteria for a free and fair election. “Voters were denied the ‘absolute’ right to a secret ballot [through flawed vote-by-mail systems]. They were denied ‘equal opportunity of access to the media, particularly the mass communications media, in order to put forward their political views.’ They were denied ‘security with respect to their lives and property.’ And they were denied “freedom of movement, assembly, association and expression.’

Someone tell me that did not happen.
How was the 2020 election different from the 2016 election?
It was 4 years later. Next.
 
This is not a conspiracy. These are things that have happened. THAT MAKES THEM FACTS.

At the same time, I noted, the 2020 presidential election violated internationally accepted criteria for a free and fair election. “Voters were denied the ‘absolute’ right to a secret ballot [through flawed vote-by-mail systems]. They were denied ‘equal opportunity of access to the media, particularly the mass communications media, in order to put forward their political views.’ They were denied ‘security with respect to their lives and property.’ And they were denied “freedom of movement, assembly, association and expression.’

Someone tell me that did not happen.
Maybe we should bring back the fairness doctrine.

Just to clarify, so you think the government should force left wing media to give equal time to Republicans? That's what you're saying?

The Fairness Doctrine never did that either. Broadcast networks had to give time for opposing opinions but not equal time. Possible when there were three networks, not today.

Fair enough, Republicans don't need equal time on left wing networks, just the ability to respond would do it.

So that's what you want, Sealy?
Yes. I would love Republicans to come on MSNBC at the end of a show and explain why Rachel Maddow is full of shit and I wish Randi Rhodes was allowed to go on for 4 hours right after Rush. She was just as popular as he was on the radio. In head to head markets, she beat Rush. But putting that liberal bullshit was not what the 6 corporations wanted. Instead they put a guy just like rush on after rush. Then another guy just like rush on after him. Brainwashing.

Yes, I would love one radio station that has Rush and Randi on it. Give her the shittiest hours of the day I'm sure but still I'm sure out of 24 hours she could get better ratings than whatever they have on at that shitty hour. But they'd rather not have her on and you know it.


There is no need for liberal talk radio. I find it hard to believe that her ratings were ever good.
They were. I loved Air America. Sad that it went out of business. The point is, whatever channel Rush was on, they have 24 hours to fill. It's obvious that there is a slow 4 hours during the night or day where a liberal talk show would get better ratings than whatever they have on now. Us liberals have no show to listen to. Trust me, there is a market out there.

But like Air America, whatever channel Rush was on, is a conservative radio channel. No question about it. It's not fair and balanced. Same with every show on Fox. You could say the same thing about MSNBC. It's got a liberal slant.

I would love a new channel that has liberal and conservative shows throughout the day. Whoever is number 1 gets the 8pm time slot.


Talk Radio flourished because it was a counter point to the conventional wisdom pushed by the MSM.

Liberals already get their voices "heard" in MSM, and pop culture.

THey have no need for a counter point.

It flourished because the hate filled rhetoric is like opium to some people. It's addictive qualities have made it's way to Main Stream Neo-GOP land.


It is not our people that are rioting and burning and looting and killing in the streets, for 4 and a half years and counting now.

Seems your side might be the hate side.
 
This is not a conspiracy. These are things that have happened. THAT MAKES THEM FACTS.

At the same time, I noted, the 2020 presidential election violated internationally accepted criteria for a free and fair election. “Voters were denied the ‘absolute’ right to a secret ballot [through flawed vote-by-mail systems]. They were denied ‘equal opportunity of access to the media, particularly the mass communications media, in order to put forward their political views.’ They were denied ‘security with respect to their lives and property.’ And they were denied “freedom of movement, assembly, association and expression.’

Someone tell me that did not happen.
Maybe we should bring back the fairness doctrine.

Just to clarify, so you think the government should force left wing media to give equal time to Republicans? That's what you're saying?

The Fairness Doctrine never did that either. Broadcast networks had to give time for opposing opinions but not equal time. Possible when there were three networks, not today.

Fair enough, Republicans don't need equal time on left wing networks, just the ability to respond would do it.

So that's what you want, Sealy?
Yes. I would love Republicans to come on MSNBC at the end of a show and explain why Rachel Maddow is full of shit and I wish Randi Rhodes was allowed to go on for 4 hours right after Rush. She was just as popular as he was on the radio. In head to head markets, she beat Rush. But putting that liberal bullshit was not what the 6 corporations wanted. Instead they put a guy just like rush on after rush. Then another guy just like rush on after him. Brainwashing.

Yes, I would love one radio station that has Rush and Randi on it. Give her the shittiest hours of the day I'm sure but still I'm sure out of 24 hours she could get better ratings than whatever they have on at that shitty hour. But they'd rather not have her on and you know it.


There is no need for liberal talk radio. I find it hard to believe that her ratings were ever good.
They were. I loved Air America. Sad that it went out of business. The point is, whatever channel Rush was on, they have 24 hours to fill. It's obvious that there is a slow 4 hours during the night or day where a liberal talk show would get better ratings than whatever they have on now. Us liberals have no show to listen to. Trust me, there is a market out there.

But like Air America, whatever channel Rush was on, is a conservative radio channel. No question about it. It's not fair and balanced. Same with every show on Fox. You could say the same thing about MSNBC. It's got a liberal slant.

I would love a new channel that has liberal and conservative shows throughout the day. Whoever is number 1 gets the 8pm time slot.


Talk Radio flourished because it was a counter point to the conventional wisdom pushed by the MSM.

Liberals already get their voices "heard" in MSM, and pop culture.

THey have no need for a counter point.

Leftists like media where they don't have to defend their views. That's a lot harder when you take callers.

Sam Greenberg had a solution though. He was a leftist in New York. If conservatives called and said they wanted to make a conservative point, his screener wouldn't let them on the air. Some lied and said they wanted to make a liberal point, then made a conservative point. Did he cut them off? Yes. Did he say because they made a conservative point? Nope. He said they lied to the screener, and he won't have a liar on the air!

Democrats, dumbest people on the planet
 
The death of our democracy, will likely suck for everyone. And I want to put the blame where it belongs.

So dramatic. You’re just upset that you guy lost.

Cry for me some more. I enjoy it. :laugh:

We can all see that you are afraid to address the points raised.


You are quite comfortable with derailing the thread into personal insults.

Almost like it is a tactic you use when you know that you cannot actually refute the points raised.

Go raise your points with the proper authorities. They already told you that you lost.

There’s nothing that can be said or done that will convince you that your guy lost.

So I say enjoy the next four years and keep those MAGA tears flowing for me. :itsok:


So why are you in the thread then?


Rhetorical question.


To derail the thread into pointless partisan smears to prevent or bury any real discussion of the flaws of the election.


You are here to troll, because you know that the election was flawed and you WANT flawed elections, because you know that in a honest debate of ideas, that you would lose badly.
sure its flawed, but its the least flawed in history:



My point(s) were about the control of the means of information and the intimidation factor of having violent lefty mobs rioting in the streets.

Your link did not address that.
 
This is not a conspiracy. These are things that have happened. THAT MAKES THEM FACTS.

At the same time, I noted, the 2020 presidential election violated internationally accepted criteria for a free and fair election. “Voters were denied the ‘absolute’ right to a secret ballot [through flawed vote-by-mail systems]. They were denied ‘equal opportunity of access to the media, particularly the mass communications media, in order to put forward their political views.’ They were denied ‘security with respect to their lives and property.’ And they were denied “freedom of movement, assembly, association and expression.’

Someone tell me that did not happen.
Maybe we should bring back the fairness doctrine.
We should not do what Democrats did after 2016, and spend four years chasing conspiracy theories.
How did the Dems react in 2000 when GWB was given presidency through the Supreme Court? Did they storm the Capitol? Threaten to kidnap legislatures? Hang the VP?
 
So why are you in the thread then?


Rhetorical question.


To derail the thread into pointless partisan smears to prevent or bury any real discussion of the flaws of the election.


You are here to troll, because you know that the election was flawed and you WANT flawed elections, because you know that in a honest debate of ideas, that you would lose badly.

I’m here because I think it’s amusing to see the Trumpster crybabies whining about their candidate losing.

:crybaby:


And again, you make no on topic comments at all, and instead make several personal attacks.


You fear this discussion taking place. You are here to troll and shut it down.
Would you like a tissue? You seem upset.

And again, you make no on topic comments at all, and instead make several personal attacks.


You fear this discussion taking place. You are here to troll and shut it down.
 
This is not a conspiracy. These are things that have happened. THAT MAKES THEM FACTS.

At the same time, I noted, the 2020 presidential election violated internationally accepted criteria for a free and fair election. “Voters were denied the ‘absolute’ right to a secret ballot [through flawed vote-by-mail systems]. They were denied ‘equal opportunity of access to the media, particularly the mass communications media, in order to put forward their political views.’ They were denied ‘security with respect to their lives and property.’ And they were denied “freedom of movement, assembly, association and expression.’

Someone tell me that did not happen.
Maybe we should bring back the fairness doctrine.

Just to clarify, so you think the government should force left wing media to give equal time to Republicans? That's what you're saying?

The Fairness Doctrine never did that either. Broadcast networks had to give time for opposing opinions but not equal time. Possible when there were three networks, not today.

Fair enough, Republicans don't need equal time on left wing networks, just the ability to respond would do it.

So that's what you want, Sealy?
Don't forget AM radio is a broadcast media and Faux OAN and NewsMaxine would all be subject too. But in all honesty both audiences are so entrenched that the oppositions message would be just a fucking joke anyway.

,

Again, Fox already has leftists on all day long on the programs.

It just kills you to hear two sides, you just want the leftists to decide what you think and like a good leftist, you think it!
 
This is not a conspiracy. These are things that have happened. THAT MAKES THEM FACTS.

At the same time, I noted, the 2020 presidential election violated internationally accepted criteria for a free and fair election. “Voters were denied the ‘absolute’ right to a secret ballot [through flawed vote-by-mail systems]. They were denied ‘equal opportunity of access to the media, particularly the mass communications media, in order to put forward their political views.’ They were denied ‘security with respect to their lives and property.’ And they were denied “freedom of movement, assembly, association and expression.’

Someone tell me that did not happen.
Maybe we should bring back the fairness doctrine.
We should not do what Democrats did after 2016, and spend four years chasing conspiracy theories.
How did the Dems react in 2000 when GWB was given presidency through the Supreme Court? Did they storm the Capitol? Threaten to kidnap legislatures? Hang the VP?
Who cares? The election was stolen and the lie you keep repeating simply is not believed.
 
So why are you in the thread then?


Rhetorical question.


To derail the thread into pointless partisan smears to prevent or bury any real discussion of the flaws of the election.


You are here to troll, because you know that the election was flawed and you WANT flawed elections, because you know that in a honest debate of ideas, that you would lose badly.

I’m here because I think it’s amusing to see the Trumpster crybabies whining about their candidate losing.

:crybaby:


And again, you make no on topic comments at all, and instead make several personal attacks.


You fear this discussion taking place. You are here to troll and shut it down.
Would you like a tissue? You seem upset.

And again, you make no on topic comments at all, and instead make several personal attacks.


You fear this discussion taking place. You are here to troll and shut it down.
You’re welcome to think what you want.

Enjoy the next four years, crybaby. :crybaby:
 
So why are you in the thread then?


Rhetorical question.


To derail the thread into pointless partisan smears to prevent or bury any real discussion of the flaws of the election.


You are here to troll, because you know that the election was flawed and you WANT flawed elections, because you know that in a honest debate of ideas, that you would lose badly.

I’m here because I think it’s amusing to see the Trumpster crybabies whining about their candidate losing.

:crybaby:


And again, you make no on topic comments at all, and instead make several personal attacks.


You fear this discussion taking place. You are here to troll and shut it down.
Would you like a tissue? You seem upset.

And again, you make no on topic comments at all, and instead make several personal attacks.


You fear this discussion taking place. You are here to troll and shut it down.
That is what he does. When you run out of flies to pull the wings off, you got to do something.
 
This is not a conspiracy. These are things that have happened. THAT MAKES THEM FACTS.

At the same time, I noted, the 2020 presidential election violated internationally accepted criteria for a free and fair election. “Voters were denied the ‘absolute’ right to a secret ballot [through flawed vote-by-mail systems]. They were denied ‘equal opportunity of access to the media, particularly the mass communications media, in order to put forward their political views.’ They were denied ‘security with respect to their lives and property.’ And they were denied “freedom of movement, assembly, association and expression.’

Someone tell me that did not happen.
Maybe we should bring back the fairness doctrine.

LOL, poor Democrats, you just have no access to broadcast media. LOL. What a propagandist you are
I'm sorry but when the media is deregulated in the 90's and 95% of it is now owned by a handful of mega corporations. The internet is horrible for spreading misinformation but also thank god for it too because otherwise we'd all be brainwashed by companies like

About 15 billionaires and six corporations own most of the U.S. media outlets. The biggest media conglomerates in America are AT&T, Comcast, The Walt Disney Company, National Amusements (which includes Viacom Inc.

And they have you convinced they are liberal. Meanwhile the gap between us and the billionaires keeps getting wider and your side encourages that widening gap.

So you defend the media because you defend the billionaires and mega corporations. Right?

And you don't even realize it.

What the fuck? You think the media is not left? How far left do you lean? Can you even walk?
It's only left socially. Not fiscally.

Gotcha. So the Democrat Party being Marxist isn't far enough economically for you. So what is it you want to hear?
 
This is not a conspiracy. These are things that have happened. THAT MAKES THEM FACTS.

At the same time, I noted, the 2020 presidential election violated internationally accepted criteria for a free and fair election. “Voters were denied the ‘absolute’ right to a secret ballot [through flawed vote-by-mail systems]. They were denied ‘equal opportunity of access to the media, particularly the mass communications media, in order to put forward their political views.’ They were denied ‘security with respect to their lives and property.’ And they were denied “freedom of movement, assembly, association and expression.’

Someone tell me that did not happen.
How was the 2020 election different from the 2016 election?
It was 4 years later. Next.
In other words...you had the same exact election rules. But since your orange fuhrer did not win, you now claim it violated international accepted criteria.

Yeah, figured you would have no answer. Trumptards can quote wing-nut media but confront them with facts and they get reduced to incoherency.
 
So why are you in the thread then?


Rhetorical question.


To derail the thread into pointless partisan smears to prevent or bury any real discussion of the flaws of the election.


You are here to troll, because you know that the election was flawed and you WANT flawed elections, because you know that in a honest debate of ideas, that you would lose badly.

I’m here because I think it’s amusing to see the Trumpster crybabies whining about their candidate losing.

:crybaby:


And again, you make no on topic comments at all, and instead make several personal attacks.


You fear this discussion taking place. You are here to troll and shut it down.
Would you like a tissue? You seem upset.

And again, you make no on topic comments at all, and instead make several personal attacks.


You fear this discussion taking place. You are here to troll and shut it down.
That is what he does. When you run out of flies to pull the wings off, you got to do something.
And yet Biden is still your president. Sucks for you huh?
 
This is not a conspiracy. These are things that have happened. THAT MAKES THEM FACTS.

At the same time, I noted, the 2020 presidential election violated internationally accepted criteria for a free and fair election. “Voters were denied the ‘absolute’ right to a secret ballot [through flawed vote-by-mail systems]. They were denied ‘equal opportunity of access to the media, particularly the mass communications media, in order to put forward their political views.’ They were denied ‘security with respect to their lives and property.’ And they were denied “freedom of movement, assembly, association and expression.’

Someone tell me that did not happen.
Maybe we should bring back the fairness doctrine.

Just to clarify, so you think the government should force left wing media to give equal time to Republicans? That's what you're saying?

The Fairness Doctrine never did that either. Broadcast networks had to give time for opposing opinions but not equal time. Possible when there were three networks, not today.

Fair enough, Republicans don't need equal time on left wing networks, just the ability to respond would do it.

So that's what you want, Sealy?
Yes. I would love Republicans to come on MSNBC at the end of a show and explain why Rachel Maddow is full of shit and I wish Randi Rhodes was allowed to go on for 4 hours right after Rush. She was just as popular as he was on the radio. In head to head markets, she beat Rush. But putting that liberal bullshit was not what the 6 corporations wanted. Instead they put a guy just like rush on after rush. Then another guy just like rush on after him. Brainwashing.

Yes, I would love one radio station that has Rush and Randi on it. Give her the shittiest hours of the day I'm sure but still I'm sure out of 24 hours she could get better ratings than whatever they have on at that shitty hour. But they'd rather not have her on and you know it.


There is no need for liberal talk radio. I find it hard to believe that her ratings were ever good.
They were. I loved Air America. Sad that it went out of business. The point is, whatever channel Rush was on, they have 24 hours to fill. It's obvious that there is a slow 4 hours during the night or day where a liberal talk show would get better ratings than whatever they have on now. Us liberals have no show to listen to. Trust me, there is a market out there.

But like Air America, whatever channel Rush was on, is a conservative radio channel. No question about it. It's not fair and balanced. Same with every show on Fox. You could say the same thing about MSNBC. It's got a liberal slant.

I would love a new channel that has liberal and conservative shows throughout the day. Whoever is number 1 gets the 8pm time slot.


Talk Radio flourished because it was a counter point to the conventional wisdom pushed by the MSM.

Liberals already get their voices "heard" in MSM, and pop culture.

THey have no need for a counter point.

It flourished because the hate filled rhetoric is like opium to some people. It's addictive qualities have made it's way to Main Stream Neo-GOP land.

You're a joke. You hear "hate" in disagreeing with Democrats but not in Democrats.

What a stupid fuck
 
This is not a conspiracy. These are things that have happened. THAT MAKES THEM FACTS.

At the same time, I noted, the 2020 presidential election violated internationally accepted criteria for a free and fair election. “Voters were denied the ‘absolute’ right to a secret ballot [through flawed vote-by-mail systems]. They were denied ‘equal opportunity of access to the media, particularly the mass communications media, in order to put forward their political views.’ They were denied ‘security with respect to their lives and property.’ And they were denied “freedom of movement, assembly, association and expression.’

Someone tell me that did not happen.
How was the 2020 election different from the 2016 election?
It was 4 years later. Next.
In other words...you had the same exact election rules. But since your orange fuhrer did not win, you now claim it violated international accepted criteria.

Yeah, figured you would have no answer. Trumptards can quote wing-nut media but confront them with facts and they get reduced to incoherency.
The exact same election rules? Are you serious? :auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg:My God you are stupid.
 
This is not a conspiracy. These are things that have happened. THAT MAKES THEM FACTS.

At the same time, I noted, the 2020 presidential election violated internationally accepted criteria for a free and fair election. “Voters were denied the ‘absolute’ right to a secret ballot [through flawed vote-by-mail systems]. They were denied ‘equal opportunity of access to the media, particularly the mass communications media, in order to put forward their political views.’ They were denied ‘security with respect to their lives and property.’ And they were denied “freedom of movement, assembly, association and expression.’

Someone tell me that did not happen.
Maybe we should bring back the fairness doctrine.
We should not do what Democrats did after 2016, and spend four years chasing conspiracy theories.
How did the Dems react in 2000 when GWB was given presidency through the Supreme Court? Did they storm the Capitol? Threaten to kidnap legislatures? Hang the VP?
Who cares? The election was stolen and the lie you keep repeating simply is not believed.
LOL. Poor snowflake trumptards. Cannot accept a loss. :itsok:
 
This is not a conspiracy. These are things that have happened. THAT MAKES THEM FACTS.

At the same time, I noted, the 2020 presidential election violated internationally accepted criteria for a free and fair election. “Voters were denied the ‘absolute’ right to a secret ballot [through flawed vote-by-mail systems]. They were denied ‘equal opportunity of access to the media, particularly the mass communications media, in order to put forward their political views.’ They were denied ‘security with respect to their lives and property.’ And they were denied “freedom of movement, assembly, association and expression.’

Someone tell me that did not happen.
Maybe we should bring back the fairness doctrine.

Just to clarify, so you think the government should force left wing media to give equal time to Republicans? That's what you're saying?

The Fairness Doctrine never did that either. Broadcast networks had to give time for opposing opinions but not equal time. Possible when there were three networks, not today.

Fair enough, Republicans don't need equal time on left wing networks, just the ability to respond would do it.

So that's what you want, Sealy?
Yes. I would love Republicans to come on MSNBC at the end of a show and explain why Rachel Maddow is full of shit and I wish Randi Rhodes was allowed to go on for 4 hours right after Rush. She was just as popular as he was on the radio. In head to head markets, she beat Rush. But putting that liberal bullshit was not what the 6 corporations wanted. Instead they put a guy just like rush on after rush. Then another guy just like rush on after him. Brainwashing.

Yes, I would love one radio station that has Rush and Randi on it. Give her the shittiest hours of the day I'm sure but still I'm sure out of 24 hours she could get better ratings than whatever they have on at that shitty hour. But they'd rather not have her on and you know it.


There is no need for liberal talk radio. I find it hard to believe that her ratings were ever good.

No, her ratings were not good, but she was funny as shit. She belongs on the air or in a mental institution. Those aren't mutually exclusive ...
She was great. You only don't like her because you lean so far right. Trust me because I'm a moderate centrist who leans left. Like you I'm white, male, well off, educated, working, saving enough to be able to retire. I have no reason to lie for the left. You however, see things the way you do because you are a white, male, well off, entitled racist homophobe.

In other words you're the kind of guy Fox and Trump dupe. I see how/why it works on you guys but it didn't work on me no matter how much money I have.

I said I did like her, jackass. You gotta respect nuts like that
 
This is not a conspiracy. These are things that have happened. THAT MAKES THEM FACTS.

At the same time, I noted, the 2020 presidential election violated internationally accepted criteria for a free and fair election. “Voters were denied the ‘absolute’ right to a secret ballot [through flawed vote-by-mail systems]. They were denied ‘equal opportunity of access to the media, particularly the mass communications media, in order to put forward their political views.’ They were denied ‘security with respect to their lives and property.’ And they were denied “freedom of movement, assembly, association and expression.’

Someone tell me that did not happen.
Maybe we should bring back the fairness doctrine.

Just to clarify, so you think the government should force left wing media to give equal time to Republicans? That's what you're saying?

The Fairness Doctrine never did that either. Broadcast networks had to give time for opposing opinions but not equal time. Possible when there were three networks, not today.

Fair enough, Republicans don't need equal time on left wing networks, just the ability to respond would do it.

So that's what you want, Sealy?
Yes. I would love Republicans to come on MSNBC at the end of a show and explain why Rachel Maddow is full of shit and I wish Randi Rhodes was allowed to go on for 4 hours right after Rush. She was just as popular as he was on the radio. In head to head markets, she beat Rush. But putting that liberal bullshit was not what the 6 corporations wanted. Instead they put a guy just like rush on after rush. Then another guy just like rush on after him. Brainwashing.

Yes, I would love one radio station that has Rush and Randi on it. Give her the shittiest hours of the day I'm sure but still I'm sure out of 24 hours she could get better ratings than whatever they have on at that shitty hour. But they'd rather not have her on and you know it.


There is no need for liberal talk radio. I find it hard to believe that her ratings were ever good.
They were. I loved Air America. Sad that it went out of business. The point is, whatever channel Rush was on, they have 24 hours to fill. It's obvious that there is a slow 4 hours during the night or day where a liberal talk show would get better ratings than whatever they have on now. Us liberals have no show to listen to. Trust me, there is a market out there.

But like Air America, whatever channel Rush was on, is a conservative radio channel. No question about it. It's not fair and balanced. Same with every show on Fox. You could say the same thing about MSNBC. It's got a liberal slant.

I would love a new channel that has liberal and conservative shows throughout the day. Whoever is number 1 gets the 8pm time slot.

Air America was funny as shit. I listened to it regularly. Especially Randy Rhodes. That was one mental chick
Rush was funny too.

Yes, Rush had a great sense of humor. And no one could goad leftists like him, it was classic
 
This is not a conspiracy. These are things that have happened. THAT MAKES THEM FACTS.

At the same time, I noted, the 2020 presidential election violated internationally accepted criteria for a free and fair election. “Voters were denied the ‘absolute’ right to a secret ballot [through flawed vote-by-mail systems]. They were denied ‘equal opportunity of access to the media, particularly the mass communications media, in order to put forward their political views.’ They were denied ‘security with respect to their lives and property.’ And they were denied “freedom of movement, assembly, association and expression.’

Someone tell me that did not happen.
How was the 2020 election different from the 2016 election?
It was 4 years later. Next.
In other words...you had the same exact election rules. But since your orange fuhrer did not win, you now claim it violated international accepted criteria.

Yeah, figured you would have no answer. Trumptards can quote wing-nut media but confront them with facts and they get reduced to incoherency.
The exact same election rules? Are you serious? :auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg:My God are you stupid.
Well, prove me wrong. Or, has those talking points not yet been published in the wing-nut media?
 
This is not a conspiracy. These are things that have happened. THAT MAKES THEM FACTS.

At the same time, I noted, the 2020 presidential election violated internationally accepted criteria for a free and fair election. “Voters were denied the ‘absolute’ right to a secret ballot [through flawed vote-by-mail systems]. They were denied ‘equal opportunity of access to the media, particularly the mass communications media, in order to put forward their political views.’ They were denied ‘security with respect to their lives and property.’ And they were denied “freedom of movement, assembly, association and expression.’

Someone tell me that did not happen.
Maybe we should bring back the fairness doctrine.
We should not do what Democrats did after 2016, and spend four years chasing conspiracy theories.
How did the Dems react in 2000 when GWB was given presidency through the Supreme Court? Did they storm the Capitol? Threaten to kidnap legislatures? Hang the VP?
Who cares? The election was stolen and the lie you keep repeating simply is not believed.
LOL. Poor snowflake trumptards. Cannot accept a loss. :itsok:
Correct. It will not be accepted. There will be more audits. Deal with it dumbass.
 

Forum List

Back
Top