The best analysis yet on the Iran conflict from the viewpoint of identity...

[Churchill]

After 5000 years of flourishing dont bet on it.

2026 - 1948 = 78 not 5000, there's that high IQ of yours doing its stuff again.

 

[Dogmaphobe]

You're a Zionist shill pretending to be a normal human being.

Mr. Churchill to you.

I am sure sorry that you are the product of generational inbreeding.

 

[Hafar1014]

2026 - 1948 = 78 not 5000, there's that high IQ of yours doing its stuff again.

Jews beat the Philistines now called Syrians, the Romans couldnt beat them, the Egyptians got their asses kicked. Jews have a long history of beating the crap out of their persecutors.

 

[Churchill]

I am sure sorry that you are the product of generational inbreeding.

No, cousin and neice marriage isn't my thing, that will be Jewish traditions your thinking of.

 

[Churchill]

Jews beat the Philistines now called Syrians

How do you know that?

the Romans couldnt beat them

Romans killed huge numbers of Jews

the Egyptians got their asses kicked.

How do you know that?

Jews have a long history of beating the crap out of their persecutors.

Yes I guess 78 years seems long to you.

 

[rightwinger]

You have already made it clear that you support the Mullahs.

No need to elaborate.

Nice try

I oppose this and all senseless wars

 

[justoffal]

Oh.

Aljazera. Ok.

I don't quote them a lot but I do notice that some of the journalism seems to be pretty balanced. The conundrum of dealing with religious zealotry at a political level is something the United States does not have a great deal of experience with.

 

[Wild Bill Kelsoe]

I thought this article laid out quite accurately exactly what the motivation is in the country of Iran itself. I don't think this viewpoint represents 100% of the country in fact I don't think it represents a majority of the country but it does represent the viewpoint of those who are making the decisions.

How the US and Israel are making the Islamic republic stronger

The war is feeding into a theological narrative of martyrdom and sacrifice that is helping maintain the Islamic Republic

www.aljazeera.com

You think the propaganda arm of the Muslim Brotherhood is the best analysis of the war against Iran?...lol

 

[Wild Bill Kelsoe]

Except the Strait of Hormuz remains closed due to Trump

Trump is asking the people of Iran to choose himself and Israel over the Mullahs

The Iranian people are ready to depose the mullah's regime. Why do you think 130,000 of them were wounded and murdered during protests against the regime?

 

[BackAgain]

I don't quote them a lot but I do notice that some of the journalism seems to be pretty balanced.

Oh, come now. They have the same journalistic standards as Baghdad Bob.

The conundrum of dealing with religious zealotry at a political level is something the United States does not have a great deal of experience with.

Nor should we.

 

[Mac-7]

Iran can easily turn this into a holy war against the Great Satan and Israel

Hegseth continually bringing up Jesus as a justification only confirms it

During a Pentagon worship service amid the U.S.-Iran war, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth prayed for "
overwhelming violence of action" against enemies, invoking his Christian faith. He asked for "righteous targets for violence" in the name of Jesus, a move that brought scrutiny to his religious rhetoric and focus on Crusader themes,

Godless libs dont think Jesus is real

But He is

 

[jacksonlamb]

Thats the regime not the people

It's the people as well.

 

[iamwhatiseem]

I thought this article laid out quite accurately exactly what the motivation is in the country of Iran itself. I don't think this viewpoint represents 100% of the country in fact I don't think it represents a majority of the country but it does represent the viewpoint of those who are making the decisions.

How the US and Israel are making the Islamic republic stronger

The war is feeding into a theological narrative of martyrdom and sacrifice that is helping maintain the Islamic Republic

www.aljazeera.com

Utter nonsense.
The Iranian people detest and absolutely HATE the Mullahs.
They would like nothing better than they all die a horrible death.

 

[OldFlame]

Iran can easily turn this into a holy war against the Great Satan and Israel

Hegseth continually bringing up Jesus as a justification only confirms it

During a Pentagon worship service amid the U.S.-Iran war, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth prayed for "
overwhelming violence of action" against enemies, invoking his Christian faith. He asked for "righteous targets for violence" in the name of Jesus, a move that brought scrutiny to his religious rhetoric and focus on Crusader themes,

That's what it's always been, where the hell have you been? Rhetorical question, I already know the answer.

Our founders prayed at every opening session of Congress, you will not take away anyone's freedom of religion.

 

[Mac-7]

I don’t think it is that easy

Aside from the humanitarian aspects, I doubt it will lead to surrender

That is why Trump keeps kicking the can down the road

If you think trump is tap dancing I wont disagree

 

[RoshawnMarkwees]

No thats the fanatics who took over. The ;people are nothing like them

I hope so. But two generations is more than enough to significantly change a culture.

 

[struth]

He didn't close it, he asked for it to be closed like the clever little man he is.

Link to trump asking for it to be closed

 

[Churchill]

Link to trump asking for it to be closed

My dear chap, have you really never heard the expression "that's asking for trouble!" ? It means one actions will elicit the same outcome as if one had explicitly asked for that outcome.

I'm sorry your knowledge of English isn't up to the task of debating an Englishman.

Trump's actions in this case was to be played by Nazinyahu and start bombing Iran.

Arguing with me about this subject is - how shall I put it - oh yes, asking for trouble.

 

[rightwinger]

My dear chap, have you really never heard the expression "that's asking for trouble!" ? It means one actions will elicit the same outcome as if one had explicitly asked for that outcome.

I'm sorry your knowledge of English isn't up to the task of debating an Englishman.

Trump's actions in this case was to be played by Nazinyahu and start bombing Iran.

Arguing with me about this subject is - how shall I put it - oh yes, asking for trouble.

Trump bit off more than he can chew

In what world did he think they wouldn’t close the Strait?

 

[BackAgain]

My dear chap, have you really never heard the expression "that's asking for trouble!" ? It means one actions will elicit the same outcome as if one had explicitly asked for that outcome.

I'm sorry your knowledge of English isn't up to the task of debating an Englishman.

Trump's actions in this case was to be played by Nazinyahu and start bombing Iran.

Arguing with me about this subject is - how shall I put it - oh yes, asking for trouble.

Arguing with an imbecile such as you isn’t difficult.

Getting a pinhead like you to open your eyes and take a glimpse of reality, though, is damn near impossible.

Arguing with you is clearly in no way “asking for trouble.” You suck at this.