Zone1 The "Baby Mama" phenomenon in Black culture. The flip side of 75 percent Fatherless homes.

Status
Not open for further replies.
That you think that is a good reason proves what a loathsome person you are. :mad:

It would be easy for me to think of a contemptuous name for you. I decline to descend with you into the lowest form of discourse where you are so comfortable. I prefer to deal with facts. :cool:

Jews are the most superior 0.2% of the world's population. They are also wonderful people. :yes_text12:
He’s a disgusting bigot who lambasts others for non-existent racism.

Biggest hypocrite on the board.
 
'Baby Mama' first entered the vernacular of Black culture through Hip Hop music as artists of the 90s began speaking about the tendency for Black men to have multiple children with multiple mothers out of wedlock. This almost never spoken about as it immediately evokes screams of RACIST! But I could care less what anyone thinks of me so I'll bring it up.

Black men like Nick Cannon may be able to support a dozen kids with as many mothers but 99 percent of them cannot. That leaves Black communities with single mothers struggling to feed multiple kids with insufficient income and emotional support. I don't know what the solution is, but not talking about it at all will make the problem worse.

Again, how many mamas does the felon have?

Would that qualify him as a black fascist?
 
He’s a disgusting bigot who lambasts others for non-existent racism.

Biggest hypocrite on the board.
Show me a Jew hater and I will show you a self hating angry failure.

JoeB131's hatred for Jews, and especially his lame excuse for hating them, are reasons I doubt his claim of graduating from college. There are other reasons, such as his inability to evaluate evidence. Like the high school dropout he probably is he believes what he wants to believe.
 
University admissions are based mainly on merit,
No, they aren't. The fact that you can have SO many other factors besides GPA and Test Scores says otherwise.

Why should Children of Staff get a leg up? That's pure nepotism, as are legacies. Athletics would be fine, for sports schools, but Title IX is a lot of bullshit in general. No one gives a flip about women's sports, and they don't care about men's sports outside the Big Ten.

Do you really think any college is making money on their athletics programs outside of the Big Ten?

and only secondly on financial advantages legacy admissions and athletic scholarships bring to the university.

They charge $65K a year to go to an Ivy League school, they don't need to show favoritism to the alumni.

Lowering objective standares of excellence for poor Negroes who lack talent in foortall and basketball does not fall into either of these catagories.

Sure it does. It achieves diversity and equity, both audible goals.

Negroes are responsible for their own problems, and many of ours.
Nope, 400 years of oppressive polices are the problem.

That you think that is a good reason proves what a loathsome person you are.
I point out the obvious. Sure, the Holocaust was bad. The way the Jewish bankers and Socialists screwed Germany after WWI was still inexcusable. Sure, the Spanish Inquisition was bad, but the fact was, the Jews of Spain collaborated with the Caliphate for centuries. You screw people, they'll want to screw you back. it's human nature.

It would be easy for me to think of a contemptuous name for you. I decline to descend with you into the lowest form of discourse where you are so comfortable. I prefer to deal with facts.
Nope, you like to embrace your bigotries to feel better about your own failed life.

Jews are the most superior 0.2% of the world's population. They are also wonderful people.
Tell that to the Palestinian Children they are murdering right now. Wonderful people don't commit genocide.
 
He’s a disgusting bigot who lambasts others for non-existent racism.

Biggest hypocrite on the board.

Not at all. Religion is a choice. You choose to believe in stupid shit and you decided to use that as a justification for really shitty behavior.



Show me a Jew hater and I will show you a self hating angry failure.
Nope, that would be racists. Anyone who has had the bad luck to work for a Jewish manager knows better.

JoeB131's hatred for Jews, and especially his lame excuse for hating them, are reasons I doubt his claim of graduating from college. There are other reasons, such as his inability to evaluate evidence. Like the high school dropout he probably is he believes what he wants to believe.

Uh, guy, tell you what, go to a real university with your "Race Realism", and see how long it is before they call campus security on you.
 
Show me a Jew hater and I will show you a self hating angry failure.

JoeB131's hatred for Jews, and especially his lame excuse for hating them, are reasons I doubt his claim of graduating from college. There are other reasons, such as his inability to evaluate evidence. Like the high school dropout he probably is he believes what he wants to believe.
I’m with you. His contempt for a successful minority that has overcome the worst bigotry of any group is indicative of a poorly educated, jealous man.
 
Becoming 'successful' by screwing people is nothing to be proud of.

Eventually, they want to screw back.
The idea that someone will succeed by "screwing peopler" is an idea that comes to someone who has not been able to succeed at anything. It is the consolation of a failure.

Jews succeed by being very good at tasks others value and are willing to pay well for.
 
Sure it does. It achieves diversity and equity, both audible goals.
What are the tangible benefits of admitting unqualified Negroes? By tangible benefit I mean a benefit that will be acknowledged by someone who does not like Negroes.

For example, a boss may dislike Jews, and recognize begrudgingly that Jews tend to be very intelligent, so he will hire Jews anyway. That right there is the reason for Jewish prosperity.

So, if someone does not like blacks, why should he hire any? The average IQ for an Aemrican Negro is 85. The average for a white Gentile is 100. The average for a Jew is 115.

A boss who hires a Negro whose qualification are objectively inferior to the other applicants is hiring trouble. The Negro will not perform well. When he is told he is not performing well he will make a racial issue out of it.

The only kind of diversity that is of real value is diversity of opinion. The partisans of diversity of race, sex, sexual orientating, and diversity of sexual identity are opposed to diversity of opinion.

That is why they try to suppress the writings of men like Charles Murray, Jared Taylor, and Professors Arthur Jensen, Richard Herrnstein, and J. Philippe Rushton.

Democracy is most effective when the voters have access to many different points of view.
 
The idea that someone will succeed by "screwing peopler"

Some people do exactly that. Welcome to the real world.

What are the tangible benefits of admitting unqualified Negroes? By tangible benefit I mean a benefit that will be acknowledged by someone who does not like Negroes.
1) They aren't unqualified. Maybe "less qualified", whatever that means.

So who is more deserving, the black kid who got a 3.8 GPA and a 1550 test score despite going to a run down public school, or the guy who got a 3.9 GPA going to a private school with a 1560 after his parents hired an SAT coach? Anyone with a shred of humanity and fair play (not you and Lisa, obviously) would give it to the black kid just based on his effort.

But they'll probably both lose out to the Legacy who had a 3.7 GPA and a 1540 SAT.

For example, a boss may dislike Jews, and recognize begrudgingly that Jews tend to be very intelligent, so he will hire Jews anyway. That right there is the reason for Jewish prosperity.
Or he might be reluctant given their propensity to swindle. I'm sure whoever hired Bernie Madoff regrets it now. So is whoever hired Jonathan Pollard.

I value intelligence, but I value integrity a lot more.

A boss who hires a Negro whose qualification are objectively inferior to the other applicants is hiring trouble. The Negro will not perform well. When he is told he is not performing well he will make a racial issue out of it.

Probably because he could point to the white chick with the big tits, who takes a two-hour lunch and does far less work than he does.

The only kind of diversity that is of real value is diversity of opinion. The partisans of diversity of race, sex, sexual orientating, and diversity of sexual identity are opposed to diversity of opinion.
I think you are confused, as usual, cockroach.

Hiring people of difference races, genders, and sexual orientation gets you a wider array of viewpoints than if you just hired a bunch of white dudes.
 
Hiring people of difference races, genders, and sexual orientation gets you a wider array of viewpoints than if you just hired a bunch of white dudes.
Because you approve of efforts to suppress race realism it is hypocritical for you to advocate diversity of opinion.
 
No, they aren't. The fact that you can have SO many other factors besides GPA and Test Scores says otherwise.

Why should Children of Staff get a leg up? That's pure nepotism, as are legacies. Athletics would be fine, for sports schools, but Title IX is a lot of bullshit in general. No one gives a flip about women's sports, and they don't care about men's sports outside the Big Ten.

Do you really think any college is making money on their athletics programs outside of the Big Ten?



They charge $65K a year to go to an Ivy League school, they don't need to show favoritism to the alumni.



Sure it does. It achieves diversity and equity, both audible goals.


Nope, 400 years of oppressive polices are the problem.


I point out the obvious. Sure, the Holocaust was bad. The way the Jewish bankers and Socialists screwed Germany after WWI was still inexcusable. Sure, the Spanish Inquisition was bad, but the fact was, the Jews of Spain collaborated with the Caliphate for centuries. You screw people, they'll want to screw you back. it's human nature.


Nope, you like to embrace your bigotries to feel better about your own failed life.


Tell that to the Palestinian Children they are murdering right now. Wonderful people don't commit genocide.
Wonderful people don’t falsely accuse Israelis of “genocide.” That is a nasty lie and is done by antisemites such as yourself.
 
The idea that someone will succeed by "screwing peopler" is an idea that comes to someone who has not been able to succeed at anything. It is the consolation of a failure.

Jews succeed by being very good at tasks others value and are willing to pay well for.
Jews tend to be good at the things that require above-average intelligence, and as you note as useful to society, such as engineering and medicine.
 
Jews tend to be good at the things that require above-average intelligence, and as you note as useful to society, such as engineering and medicine.
I am pleased that my doctor has a Jewish sounding name. I do not trust the credentials of a black doctor because medical schools have decided to drop entrance exams. They say they have a "disparate effect" against Negroes. Of course they do. Any objective test of merit will have a disparate effect against people who lack the intelligence to pass the test.
 
Because you approve of efforts to suppress race realism it is hypocritical for you to advocate diversity of opinion.

Anyone who expressed your views in a workplace would be fired before the other employees beat the snot out of him.

Jews tend to be good at the things that require above-average intelligence, and as you note as useful to society, such as engineering and medicine.

Again, white privilege is nice.

Wonderful people don’t falsely accuse Israelis of “genocide.” That is a nasty lie and is done by antisemites such as yourself.

Sorry, what the Zionists are doing IS genocide.

To constitute genocide, there must be a proven intent on the part of perpetrators to physically destroy a national, ethnical, racial or religious group.

 
15th post
Anyone who expressed your views in a workplace would be fired before the other employees beat the snot out of him.
You would like that wouldn't you? You know your prejudices can only survive in an environment of coersion and violence.

All I ask for is an environment that respects logic and facts.

logicandfacts.webp
 
IF you know that you can't say something out loud because it's so obnoxious, you probably shouldn't say it online.
What have I said about durable racial differences that is not true?

Post it. Let's discuss it.

What I have said about durable racial differences is obviouly true.

What you have said about Jews is lies and should get you into trouble.
 
What have I said about durable racial differences that is not true?
Everything, which is why it is debunked and discredited.

Yup. And he conveniently ignores that 850,000 Jews were driven from their homes in countries throughout the Middle East by Muslims. Now THAT is ethnic cleansing.

I don't ignore it, I just put it in context. For instance, Egypt's Jews were fine, until the Zionists conspired with the British and French to seize the Suez Canal. Iran's Jews were fine, until the Shah got thrown out and the Iranians realized how much the Zionists were propping him up.

His warped viewpoint is of course driven by very extreme antisemitism.
The Arabs are also Semites... that even other Semites don't like you is telling.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom