The AP in deep doo-doo for it's misleading Hillary Clinton "Clinton Foundation" Exposé.

[rdean]

Associated Press botches Hillary Clinton report and response

Hillary Clinton is surrounded by suggestions of controversy. Terms like "Clinton Foundation," "email server," and "Benghazi" hover around her like a faint smoke that hints at the existence of fire.

But finding the fire -- the lie, the misdeed, the unethical act -- is proving to be rather difficult, as evidenced this week by an inaccurate tweet and arguably misleading story from the Associated Press that were quickly rebutted by the Clinton campaign and dismissed by many media outlets

"The AP's big exposé on Hillary meeting with Clinton Foundation donors is a mess," his headline read.

------------
Oops!
------------

The AP’s defense of its bad Clinton Foundation story is also bad

But having looked into it, the reporters do not seem to have found any special favors. That in and of itself is an interesting conclusion. There has been a lot of discussion around potential conflicts of interest related to the Clinton Foundation, so the absence of any clear evidence of actual misconduct is a useful contribution to our understanding.

The story the AP wrote — full of arbitrary math, sensationalistic tweets, and strange insinuations — is not.

----------------------------------------

Trump and the GOP has put themselves into the position of needing to apologize to Hillary Clinton. Republicans say where there is smoke, there's fire. Only Republicans create the smoke and then look for the fire. 30 years of smoke and no fire.

 

[SuperDemocrat]

I'm sure someone is thinking "God could I lose my job over this". They then do a retraction to save it.

 

[Lakhota]

Associated Press botches Hillary Clinton report and response

Hillary Clinton is surrounded by suggestions of controversy. Terms like "Clinton Foundation," "email server," and "Benghazi" hover around her like a faint smoke that hints at the existence of fire.

But finding the fire -- the lie, the misdeed, the unethical act -- is proving to be rather difficult, as evidenced this week by an inaccurate tweet and arguably misleading story from the Associated Press that were quickly rebutted by the Clinton campaign and dismissed by many media outlets

"The AP's big exposé on Hillary meeting with Clinton Foundation donors is a mess," his headline read.

------------
Oops!
------------

The AP’s defense of its bad Clinton Foundation story is also bad

But having looked into it, the reporters do not seem to have found any special favors. That in and of itself is an interesting conclusion. There has been a lot of discussion around potential conflicts of interest related to the Clinton Foundation, so the absence of any clear evidence of actual misconduct is a useful contribution to our understanding.

The story the AP wrote — full of arbitrary math, sensationalistic tweets, and strange insinuations — is not.

----------------------------------------

Trump and the GOP has put themselves into the position of needing to apologize to Hillary Clinton. Republicans say where there is smoke, there's fire. Only Republicans create the smoke and then look for the fire. 30 years of smoke and no fire.

Thank you. I've read various reports about how the AP screwed that up. It just seems like a sexist hit piece with no basis in fact.

 

[Esmeralda]

Associated Press botches Hillary Clinton report and response

Hillary Clinton is surrounded by suggestions of controversy. Terms like "Clinton Foundation," "email server," and "Benghazi" hover around her like a faint smoke that hints at the existence of fire.

But finding the fire -- the lie, the misdeed, the unethical act -- is proving to be rather difficult, as evidenced this week by an inaccurate tweet and arguably misleading story from the Associated Press that were quickly rebutted by the Clinton campaign and dismissed by many media outlets

"The AP's big exposé on Hillary meeting with Clinton Foundation donors is a mess," his headline read.

------------
Oops!
------------

The AP’s defense of its bad Clinton Foundation story is also bad

But having looked into it, the reporters do not seem to have found any special favors. That in and of itself is an interesting conclusion. There has been a lot of discussion around potential conflicts of interest related to the Clinton Foundation, so the absence of any clear evidence of actual misconduct is a useful contribution to our understanding.

The story the AP wrote — full of arbitrary math, sensationalistic tweets, and strange insinuations — is not.

----------------------------------------

Trump and the GOP has put themselves into the position of needing to apologize to Hillary Clinton. Republicans say where there is smoke, there's fire. Only Republicans create the smoke and then look for the fire. 30 years of smoke and no fire.

It's a very sad, frustrating, dangerous thing that the press is to such an extent no longer reliable. The press these days, almost exclusively, seem to be only interested in getting attention rather than reporting factual news. Why would anyone be a reporter, anyone who cares about facts?

 

[depotoo]

Haha! I said to myself it had to be a hit job by either cnn, msnbc, or thiink progress. I was right, on the money!

 

[2aguy]

Associated Press botches Hillary Clinton report and response

Hillary Clinton is surrounded by suggestions of controversy. Terms like "Clinton Foundation," "email server," and "Benghazi" hover around her like a faint smoke that hints at the existence of fire.

But finding the fire -- the lie, the misdeed, the unethical act -- is proving to be rather difficult, as evidenced this week by an inaccurate tweet and arguably misleading story from the Associated Press that were quickly rebutted by the Clinton campaign and dismissed by many media outlets

"The AP's big exposé on Hillary meeting with Clinton Foundation donors is a mess," his headline read.

------------
Oops!
------------

The AP’s defense of its bad Clinton Foundation story is also bad

But having looked into it, the reporters do not seem to have found any special favors. That in and of itself is an interesting conclusion. There has been a lot of discussion around potential conflicts of interest related to the Clinton Foundation, so the absence of any clear evidence of actual misconduct is a useful contribution to our understanding.

The story the AP wrote — full of arbitrary math, sensationalistic tweets, and strange insinuations — is not.

----------------------------------------

Trump and the GOP has put themselves into the position of needing to apologize to Hillary Clinton. Republicans say where there is smoke, there's fire. Only Republicans create the smoke and then look for the fire. 30 years of smoke and no fire.

No...it wasn't misleading....it told the truth.....the minions in the media are now covering for hilary.....they don't want the Dr. Drew treatment.....

 

[2aguy]

Associated Press botches Hillary Clinton report and response

Hillary Clinton is surrounded by suggestions of controversy. Terms like "Clinton Foundation," "email server," and "Benghazi" hover around her like a faint smoke that hints at the existence of fire.

But finding the fire -- the lie, the misdeed, the unethical act -- is proving to be rather difficult, as evidenced this week by an inaccurate tweet and arguably misleading story from the Associated Press that were quickly rebutted by the Clinton campaign and dismissed by many media outlets

"The AP's big exposé on Hillary meeting with Clinton Foundation donors is a mess," his headline read.

------------
Oops!
------------

The AP’s defense of its bad Clinton Foundation story is also bad

But having looked into it, the reporters do not seem to have found any special favors. That in and of itself is an interesting conclusion. There has been a lot of discussion around potential conflicts of interest related to the Clinton Foundation, so the absence of any clear evidence of actual misconduct is a useful contribution to our understanding.

The story the AP wrote — full of arbitrary math, sensationalistic tweets, and strange insinuations — is not.

----------------------------------------

Trump and the GOP has put themselves into the position of needing to apologize to Hillary Clinton. Republicans say where there is smoke, there's fire. Only Republicans create the smoke and then look for the fire. 30 years of smoke and no fire.

Oh.....I see.....Vox is saying this.......well, why didn't you say so......just because they have their heads so far up hilary's butt they can't see straight....why didn't you say so.......

The minions in the media are now trying to cover for the Borg Queen and they will do anything they have to do to make it happen....

 

[2aguy]

And here is the truth....


US: Clinton Calendars Won't Be Released Until after Election - Breitbart

The schedules drew new attention this week after the AP analyzed the ones released so far. The news agency found that more than half the people outside the government who met or spoke by telephone with Clinton while she was secretary of state had given money — either personally or through companies or groups — to the Clinton Foundation. The AP’s analysis focused on people with private interests and excluded her meetings or calls with U.S. federal employees or foreign government representatives.

The AP’s reporting was based on official calendars covering Clinton’s entire term plus the more-detailed daily schedules covering roughly half her time as secretary of state. The AP first asked for Clinton’s calendars in 2010 and again in 2013. It then sued the State Department in federal court to obtain the detailed schedules, and the department so far has provided about half of them under court order.

Clinton has said the AP’s analysis was flawed because it did not account fully for all meetings and phone calls during her entire term as secretary. She also said the analysis should have included meetings with federal employees and foreign diplomats.

The AP said it focused on her meetings with outsiders because those were more discretionary, as Clinton would normally meet with federal officials and foreign officials as part of her job.

-------------------------
The State Department is now estimating there are about 2,700 pages of schedules left. Under its process, it is reviewing and censoring them page-by-page to remove personal details such as private phone numbers or email addresses.

In some cases it has censored names of people who met privately with Clinton or the subjects they discussed.

 

[Dale Smith]

Anyone that believes that the Clinton Foundation is anything other than a slush fund for them have their heads up their collective asses. Leftards believe in Hitlery because they WANT to believe that she is pristine....fact of the matter is that she is filthy and as corrupt as they come.She is guilty of theft, guilty of extortion and bribery. She has used agencies to intimidate opponenents and now that she is in the final stages of the election, dead bodies are popping up but leftards say "Nothing to see here, folks!!! Move along!!!"....

If I have said it once, I have said it a THOUSAND times over the last 20 plus years...when it comes to the Clintons, the leftard clown posse has a huge blind spot.

 

[Ernie S.]

Associated Press botches Hillary Clinton report and response

Hillary Clinton is surrounded by suggestions of controversy. Terms like "Clinton Foundation," "email server," and "Benghazi" hover around her like a faint smoke that hints at the existence of fire.

But finding the fire -- the lie, the misdeed, the unethical act -- is proving to be rather difficult, as evidenced this week by an inaccurate tweet and arguably misleading story from the Associated Press that were quickly rebutted by the Clinton campaign and dismissed by many media outlets

"The AP's big exposé on Hillary meeting with Clinton Foundation donors is a mess," his headline read.

------------
Oops!
------------

The AP’s defense of its bad Clinton Foundation story is also bad

But having looked into it, the reporters do not seem to have found any special favors. That in and of itself is an interesting conclusion. There has been a lot of discussion around potential conflicts of interest related to the Clinton Foundation, so the absence of any clear evidence of actual misconduct is a useful contribution to our understanding.

The story the AP wrote — full of arbitrary math, sensationalistic tweets, and strange insinuations — is not.

----------------------------------------

Trump and the GOP has put themselves into the position of needing to apologize to Hillary Clinton. Republicans say where there is smoke, there's fire. Only Republicans create the smoke and then look for the fire. 30 years of smoke and no fire.

Once again a clinton is involved in a scandal and hides evidence that would be needed to ensure a successful prosecution and her sycophants claim she is innocent.
If nothing else Dweeb, you can be relied upon to amuse sentient beings the world over. Thank you.

 

[Ernie S.]

Anyone that believes that the Clinton Foundation is anything other than a slush fund for them have their heads up their collective asses. Leftards believe in Hitlery because they WANT to believe that she is pristine....fact of the matter is that she is filthy and as corrupt as they come.She is guilty of theft, guilty of extortion and bribery. She has used agencies to intimidate opponenents and now that she is in the final stages of the election, dead bodies are popping up but leftards say "Nothing to see here, folks!!! Move along!!!"....

If I have said it once, I have said it a THOUSAND times over the last 20 plus years...when it comes to the Clintons, the leftard clown posse has a huge blind spot.

They all know that the clintons are dirty and admire their ability to hide evidence that would get them locked up were they not in positions of power.

 

[Dale Smith]

Anyone that believes that the Clinton Foundation is anything other than a slush fund for them have their heads up their collective asses. Leftards believe in Hitlery because they WANT to believe that she is pristine....fact of the matter is that she is filthy and as corrupt as they come.She is guilty of theft, guilty of extortion and bribery. She has used agencies to intimidate opponenents and now that she is in the final stages of the election, dead bodies are popping up but leftards say "Nothing to see here, folks!!! Move along!!!"....

If I have said it once, I have said it a THOUSAND times over the last 20 plus years...when it comes to the Clintons, the leftard clown posse has a huge blind spot.

They all know that the clintons are dirty and admire their ability to hide evidence that would get them locked up were they not in positions of power.

In the minds of the leftard clown posse, the end justifies the means and any tactic regardless of how dirty, is justified in order to reach the objective.

 

[2aguy]

In a moral world, hilary clinton and her husband would be in jail.....and would never have made it through the primaries....if she is elected, the United States will finally be the banana republic the left has always wanted it to be.....

 

[BuckToothMoron]

Hellary has never done anything unethical while serving in an elected or appointed position. Nothing Trump has ever done is worthy or ethical. Can I please seed the next liberal bumper sticker?

 

[Flopper]

Associated Press botches Hillary Clinton report and response

Hillary Clinton is surrounded by suggestions of controversy. Terms like "Clinton Foundation," "email server," and "Benghazi" hover around her like a faint smoke that hints at the existence of fire.

But finding the fire -- the lie, the misdeed, the unethical act -- is proving to be rather difficult, as evidenced this week by an inaccurate tweet and arguably misleading story from the Associated Press that were quickly rebutted by the Clinton campaign and dismissed by many media outlets

"The AP's big exposé on Hillary meeting with Clinton Foundation donors is a mess," his headline read.

------------
Oops!
------------

The AP’s defense of its bad Clinton Foundation story is also bad

But having looked into it, the reporters do not seem to have found any special favors. That in and of itself is an interesting conclusion. There has been a lot of discussion around potential conflicts of interest related to the Clinton Foundation, so the absence of any clear evidence of actual misconduct is a useful contribution to our understanding.

The story the AP wrote — full of arbitrary math, sensationalistic tweets, and strange insinuations — is not.

----------------------------------------

Trump and the GOP has put themselves into the position of needing to apologize to Hillary Clinton. Republicans say where there is smoke, there's fire. Only Republicans create the smoke and then look for the fire. 30 years of smoke and no fire.

All the exposes on the Clinton foundation are a mess because there is just not much to expose. The work they do is extensively documented and they have more financial information available on line than the Red Cross or most any charity. The foundation spends 88% of all donations on charitable programs in dozens of underdeveloped countries. The fact that dozens of foundations are donating tens of millions of dollars to the Clinton Foundation is a good sign that the money is being well spend. These foundations such as the Melinda and Bill Gates Foundation spend a lot time and resources investigation before they donate. They not only look at the statistics that show were the money is going but they investigate how effective the programs are.

Republicans have to be getting pretty desperate to attack the Clinton Foundation in an attempt to discredit Hillary. Like most of the Clinton attacks, this one will fail.

 

[Dale Smith]

Associated Press botches Hillary Clinton report and response

Hillary Clinton is surrounded by suggestions of controversy. Terms like "Clinton Foundation," "email server," and "Benghazi" hover around her like a faint smoke that hints at the existence of fire.

But finding the fire -- the lie, the misdeed, the unethical act -- is proving to be rather difficult, as evidenced this week by an inaccurate tweet and arguably misleading story from the Associated Press that were quickly rebutted by the Clinton campaign and dismissed by many media outlets

"The AP's big exposé on Hillary meeting with Clinton Foundation donors is a mess," his headline read.

------------
Oops!
------------

The AP’s defense of its bad Clinton Foundation story is also bad

But having looked into it, the reporters do not seem to have found any special favors. That in and of itself is an interesting conclusion. There has been a lot of discussion around potential conflicts of interest related to the Clinton Foundation, so the absence of any clear evidence of actual misconduct is a useful contribution to our understanding.

The story the AP wrote — full of arbitrary math, sensationalistic tweets, and strange insinuations — is not.

----------------------------------------

Trump and the GOP has put themselves into the position of needing to apologize to Hillary Clinton. Republicans say where there is smoke, there's fire. Only Republicans create the smoke and then look for the fire. 30 years of smoke and no fire.

All the exposes on the Clinton foundation are a mess because there is just not much to expose. The foundation spends 88% of all donations on charitable programs in dozens of underdeveloped countries. The fact that dozens of foundations are donating tens of millions of dollars to the Clinton Foundation is a good sign that the money is being well spend. These foundations such as the Melinda and Bill Gates Foundation spend a lot time and resources investigation before they donate. They not only look at the statistics that show were the money is going but how effective the programs are.

Republicans have to be getting pretty desperate to attack the Clinton Foundation in an attempt to discredit Hillary. Like most of the Clinton attacks, this one will fail.

88 percent????? BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!! Only if that charity is the Clinton crime family......

 

[Flopper]

Associated Press botches Hillary Clinton report and response

Hillary Clinton is surrounded by suggestions of controversy. Terms like "Clinton Foundation," "email server," and "Benghazi" hover around her like a faint smoke that hints at the existence of fire.

But finding the fire -- the lie, the misdeed, the unethical act -- is proving to be rather difficult, as evidenced this week by an inaccurate tweet and arguably misleading story from the Associated Press that were quickly rebutted by the Clinton campaign and dismissed by many media outlets

"The AP's big exposé on Hillary meeting with Clinton Foundation donors is a mess," his headline read.

------------
Oops!
------------

The AP’s defense of its bad Clinton Foundation story is also bad

But having looked into it, the reporters do not seem to have found any special favors. That in and of itself is an interesting conclusion. There has been a lot of discussion around potential conflicts of interest related to the Clinton Foundation, so the absence of any clear evidence of actual misconduct is a useful contribution to our understanding.

The story the AP wrote — full of arbitrary math, sensationalistic tweets, and strange insinuations — is not.

----------------------------------------

Trump and the GOP has put themselves into the position of needing to apologize to Hillary Clinton. Republicans say where there is smoke, there's fire. Only Republicans create the smoke and then look for the fire. 30 years of smoke and no fire.

All the exposes on the Clinton foundation are a mess because there is just not much to expose. The foundation spends 88% of all donations on charitable programs in dozens of underdeveloped countries. The fact that dozens of foundations are donating tens of millions of dollars to the Clinton Foundation is a good sign that the money is being well spend. These foundations such as the Melinda and Bill Gates Foundation spend a lot time and resources investigation before they donate. They not only look at the statistics that show were the money is going but how effective the programs are.

Republicans have to be getting pretty desperate to attack the Clinton Foundation in an attempt to discredit Hillary. Like most of the Clinton attacks, this one will fail.

88 percent????? BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!! Only if that charity is the Clinton crime family......

The Clinton Foundation is rated A by Charity Watch. The foundation spends 88% of donations on Charitable Programs.
Charity Ratings | America's Most Independent, Assertive Charity Watchdog | CharityWatch

 

[Dale Smith]

Associated Press botches Hillary Clinton report and response

Hillary Clinton is surrounded by suggestions of controversy. Terms like "Clinton Foundation," "email server," and "Benghazi" hover around her like a faint smoke that hints at the existence of fire.

But finding the fire -- the lie, the misdeed, the unethical act -- is proving to be rather difficult, as evidenced this week by an inaccurate tweet and arguably misleading story from the Associated Press that were quickly rebutted by the Clinton campaign and dismissed by many media outlets

"The AP's big exposé on Hillary meeting with Clinton Foundation donors is a mess," his headline read.

------------
Oops!
------------

The AP’s defense of its bad Clinton Foundation story is also bad

But having looked into it, the reporters do not seem to have found any special favors. That in and of itself is an interesting conclusion. There has been a lot of discussion around potential conflicts of interest related to the Clinton Foundation, so the absence of any clear evidence of actual misconduct is a useful contribution to our understanding.

The story the AP wrote — full of arbitrary math, sensationalistic tweets, and strange insinuations — is not.

----------------------------------------

Trump and the GOP has put themselves into the position of needing to apologize to Hillary Clinton. Republicans say where there is smoke, there's fire. Only Republicans create the smoke and then look for the fire. 30 years of smoke and no fire.

All the exposes on the Clinton foundation are a mess because there is just not much to expose. The foundation spends 88% of all donations on charitable programs in dozens of underdeveloped countries. The fact that dozens of foundations are donating tens of millions of dollars to the Clinton Foundation is a good sign that the money is being well spend. These foundations such as the Melinda and Bill Gates Foundation spend a lot time and resources investigation before they donate. They not only look at the statistics that show were the money is going but how effective the programs are.

Republicans have to be getting pretty desperate to attack the Clinton Foundation in an attempt to discredit Hillary. Like most of the Clinton attacks, this one will fail.

88 percent????? BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!! Only if that charity is the Clinton crime family......

The Clinton Foundation is rated A by Charity Watch. The foundation spends 88% of donations on Charitable Programs.
Charity Ratings | America's Most Independent, Assertive Charity Watchdog | CharityWatch

Hillary Clinton's Clinton Foundation scandal can't be defended

 

[BuckToothMoron]

Associated Press botches Hillary Clinton report and response

Hillary Clinton is surrounded by suggestions of controversy. Terms like "Clinton Foundation," "email server," and "Benghazi" hover around her like a faint smoke that hints at the existence of fire.

But finding the fire -- the lie, the misdeed, the unethical act -- is proving to be rather difficult, as evidenced this week by an inaccurate tweet and arguably misleading story from the Associated Press that were quickly rebutted by the Clinton campaign and dismissed by many media outlets

"The AP's big exposé on Hillary meeting with Clinton Foundation donors is a mess," his headline read.

------------
Oops!
------------

The AP’s defense of its bad Clinton Foundation story is also bad

But having looked into it, the reporters do not seem to have found any special favors. That in and of itself is an interesting conclusion. There has been a lot of discussion around potential conflicts of interest related to the Clinton Foundation, so the absence of any clear evidence of actual misconduct is a useful contribution to our understanding.

The story the AP wrote — full of arbitrary math, sensationalistic tweets, and strange insinuations — is not.

----------------------------------------

Trump and the GOP has put themselves into the position of needing to apologize to Hillary Clinton. Republicans say where there is smoke, there's fire. Only Republicans create the smoke and then look for the fire. 30 years of smoke and no fire.

All the exposes on the Clinton foundation are a mess because there is just not much to expose. The foundation spends 88% of all donations on charitable programs in dozens of underdeveloped countries. The fact that dozens of foundations are donating tens of millions of dollars to the Clinton Foundation is a good sign that the money is being well spend. These foundations such as the Melinda and Bill Gates Foundation spend a lot time and resources investigation before they donate. They not only look at the statistics that show were the money is going but how effective the programs are.

Republicans have to be getting pretty desperate to attack the Clinton Foundation in an attempt to discredit Hillary. Like most of the Clinton attacks, this one will fail.

88 percent????? BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!! Only if that charity is the Clinton crime family......

Hellary and her supporters will tell you it's midnight when the sun is in the middle of the sky, and then most of the press will report a polar shift which has resulted in the atomic clock losing 12 hours.

 

[Bush92]

Associated Press botches Hillary Clinton report and response

Hillary Clinton is surrounded by suggestions of controversy. Terms like "Clinton Foundation," "email server," and "Benghazi" hover around her like a faint smoke that hints at the existence of fire.

But finding the fire -- the lie, the misdeed, the unethical act -- is proving to be rather difficult, as evidenced this week by an inaccurate tweet and arguably misleading story from the Associated Press that were quickly rebutted by the Clinton campaign and dismissed by many media outlets

"The AP's big exposé on Hillary meeting with Clinton Foundation donors is a mess," his headline read.

------------
Oops!
------------

The AP’s defense of its bad Clinton Foundation story is also bad

But having looked into it, the reporters do not seem to have found any special favors. That in and of itself is an interesting conclusion. There has been a lot of discussion around potential conflicts of interest related to the Clinton Foundation, so the absence of any clear evidence of actual misconduct is a useful contribution to our understanding.

The story the AP wrote — full of arbitrary math, sensationalistic tweets, and strange insinuations — is not.

----------------------------------------

Trump and the GOP has put themselves into the position of needing to apologize to Hillary Clinton. Republicans say where there is smoke, there's fire. Only Republicans create the smoke and then look for the fire. 30 years of smoke and no fire.

How dare the AP not tow the robotic mainstream media message and support Billary campaign through bogus reports.