The American dream has been destroyed by the rights thinking that they deserve it all.

[jbander]

you accomplish the american dream by destroying that of your rival, my friends!

you have to outwit your business opponent who have not as thoroughly mastered the art of the game as you have...in this battle, the extremity of one is the opportunity of the other. it is the rule of competitive life that the time when the rival is on the downward road, the is the opportunity to strike the finishing blow and make merchandise out of the misery of your opponent.

The American Beauty Rose can be produced in the splendor and fragrance which bring cheer to its beholder only by sacrificing the early buds which grow up around it. this is not an evil tendency in business, but the working out of the laws of nature and the laws of God!

GOD BLESS AMERICA!

Bullshit , You only can accomplish the American dream, If first you get rid of all aspects of the trickle down lie ,second you have tax law and tax rates that will even allow anyone to get a piece of the new wealth of this country. Your comment says it all , in your mind the only people who deserve a piece of the American dream are business owners and the workers are just there to fuck over.

You only can accomplish the American dream, If first you get rid of all aspects of the trickle down lie

What is the "trickle down lie" and how do you get rid of all aspects?

first look up trickle down economics. This is something I assumed everyone knows. So that is your job. In 1981 Reagan took the advice of his economic cabinet head and decided to Go with supply side economics (trickle down economics) His premise was to run the tax cuts and money through the wealthy and it would trickle down. but it didn't , which then makes it a lie. If anyone has a argument with this ,address this .
View attachment 326459GEE I WONDER WHAT HAPPENED IN 1981.

first look up trickle down economics. This is something I assumed everyone knows.

Sounds like something you made up. So why don't you explain it?

In 1981 Reagan took the advice of his economic cabinet head and decided to Go with supply side economics

Supply side? Why don't you just say that?

His premise was to run the tax cuts and money through the wealthy and it would trickle down.

That's not what supply side is.....you should do more research, you'll sound less ignorant.

I made this as simple as possible for your type, I told you to respond to the chart, so even you had the substance needed to talk about this issue ,now if there is something misleading about the chart find one that differs.

I made this as simple as possible for your type

I'm just glad you realize that supply-side was the policy.
That old trickle-down tripe was funny, but played out.

So feel free to explain what supply-side means and why you feel it stops people from achieving the American Dream.

Or run away......

It is simpler then that I gave ayou a chart to respond to and that really the subject ,all your questions are crap until you respond to the all telling chart.

Yup, you gave me a chart.
If you have any proof that it happened because Reagan cut the top rate from 70% to 28%, post it.
Otherwise, why do you feel the cuts were a bad thing or that I have anything to respond to...….

You don't have to respond to a dam thing . Why would I care. Your offering nothing anyway.

 

[Oldestyle]

you accomplish the american dream by destroying that of your rival, my friends!

you have to outwit your business opponent who have not as thoroughly mastered the art of the game as you have...in this battle, the extremity of one is the opportunity of the other. it is the rule of competitive life that the time when the rival is on the downward road, the is the opportunity to strike the finishing blow and make merchandise out of the misery of your opponent.

The American Beauty Rose can be produced in the splendor and fragrance which bring cheer to its beholder only by sacrificing the early buds which grow up around it. this is not an evil tendency in business, but the working out of the laws of nature and the laws of God!

GOD BLESS AMERICA!

Bullshit , You only can accomplish the American dream, If first you get rid of all aspects of the trickle down lie ,second you have tax law and tax rates that will even allow anyone to get a piece of the new wealth of this country. Your comment says it all , in your mind the only people who deserve a piece of the American dream are business owners and the workers are just there to fuck over.

I hate to break this to you, J Bander but "Trickle Down Economics" only exists in the minds of liberal Political Science professors that don't have the faintest idea how businesses function in the real world. Anyone who's actually run a business is very aware that profits "trickle" up...not down! The rent gets paid...suppliers get paid...labor gets paid...insurance gets paid...taxes and fees get paid...and if there's anything left...the owner of the business gets paid! That's not trickle down.

You don't have to say anything more then your every business man remark as your reference, it is my total point ,Trickle down economics is moving the new wealth of the nation through business and the wealthy and the point was that it was suppose to trickle down, hence the very descriptive name of a disasterous economic policy. So ya I wonder what economic philosophy business would support. The whole question is tied up in the chart that I made available to you , respond to that. If you don't like that one show us one that shows something different. Other wise I'm not interested in your bullshit.

Wow...that was one of the more unintelligible posts I've read lately, J Bander! I hope for your sake that you're drunk or wicked stoned! If not...a lack of understanding about Economics is the least of your worries...your real problem is that you're border line illiterate!

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

Since 1981 business profits has soared ,there has been no time in history that these numbers even came close to the last 40 years. And every dime of new profit has gone to a small micro group at the top,

Please don't tell obvious lies.
In the last 40 years 600 million Chinese have gone from starvation level poverty to the middle class thanks to the switch to Republican capitalism away from libsocialism. It has not happened here because Democrats shipped all the jobs to China and then invited in 30 million illegals to take the remaining jobs and bid down wages still further. You've never heard of China have you??

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

I'm just glad you realize that supply-side was the policy.

supply side is freedom or Republican capitalism. It encourages the supply of goods and services so people can get rich rather than starve to death. When China switched to capitalism or supply- side 600 million were instantly transported into the middle class by the supply of goods and services. Do you understand now?

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

Trickle down economics is moving the new wealth of the nation through business and the wealthy and the point was that it was suppose to trickle down,

Wealth is moved by what free people buy in order to improve their standard of living. If many buy from Amazon for example they do so to improve their standard of living and inadvertantly to improve Bezos' standard of living. It's a free country; if you don't like people improving their standard of living by buying from Amazon convince them not to buy from Amazon, but don't use govt to steal from Amazon at gunpoint! Why is violence always the first liberal idea?

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

you accomplish the american dream by destroying that of your rival, my friends!

you have to outwit your business opponent who have not as thoroughly mastered the art of the game as you have...in this battle, the extremity of one is the opportunity of the other. it is the rule of competitive life that the time when the rival is on the downward road, the is the opportunity to strike the finishing blow and make merchandise out of the misery of your opponent.

The American Beauty Rose can be produced in the splendor and fragrance which bring cheer to its beholder only by sacrificing the early buds which grow up around it. this is not an evil tendency in business, but the working out of the laws of nature and the laws of God!

GOD BLESS AMERICA!

Bullshit , You only can accomplish the American dream, If first you get rid of all aspects of the trickle down lie ,second you have tax law and tax rates that will even allow anyone to get a piece of the new wealth of this country. Your comment says it all , in your mind the only people who deserve a piece of the American dream are business owners and the workers are just there to fuck over.

You only can accomplish the American dream, If first you get rid of all aspects of the trickle down lie

What is the "trickle down lie" and how do you get rid of all aspects?

first look up trickle down economics. This is something I assumed everyone knows. So that is your job. In 1981 Reagan took the advice of his economic cabinet head and decided to Go with supply side economics (trickle down economics) His premise was to run the tax cuts and money through the wealthy and it would trickle down. but it didn't , which then makes it a lie. If anyone has a argument with this ,address this .
View attachment 326459GEE I WONDER WHAT HAPPENED IN 1981.

first look up trickle down economics. This is something I assumed everyone knows.

Sounds like something you made up. So why don't you explain it?

In 1981 Reagan took the advice of his economic cabinet head and decided to Go with supply side economics

Supply side? Why don't you just say that?

His premise was to run the tax cuts and money through the wealthy and it would trickle down.

That's not what supply side is.....you should do more research, you'll sound less ignorant.

I made this as simple as possible for your type, I told you to respond to the chart, so even you had the substance needed to talk about this issue ,now if there is something misleading about the chart find one that differs.

I made this as simple as possible for your type

I'm just glad you realize that supply-side was the policy.
That old trickle-down tripe was funny, but played out.

So feel free to explain what supply-side means and why you feel it stops people from achieving the American Dream.

Or run away......

It is simpler then that I gave ayou a chart to respond to and that really the subject ,all your questions are crap until you respond to the all telling chart.

Yup, you gave me a chart.
If you have any proof that it happened because Reagan cut the top rate from 70% to 28%, post it.
Otherwise, why do you feel the cuts were a bad thing or that I have anything to respond to...….

Ya it's just a coincident that exactly what Reagan said would happened, happened exactly when he implemented the trickle down lie. Get a life. Your like talking to a a third grader.
View attachment 326762
Gee Golly Gee how did this get turned around so quickly.

Tcherneva is a simple MMT communist

"By highlighting the flexible and vast spending powers of the state, MMT opens new possibilities for solving our most pressing economic problems."

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

you accomplish the american dream by destroying that of your rival, my friends!

you have to outwit your business opponent who have not as thoroughly mastered the art of the game as you have...in this battle, the extremity of one is the opportunity of the other. it is the rule of competitive life that the time when the rival is on the downward road, the is the opportunity to strike the finishing blow and make merchandise out of the misery of your opponent.

The American Beauty Rose can be produced in the splendor and fragrance which bring cheer to its beholder only by sacrificing the early buds which grow up around it. this is not an evil tendency in business, but the working out of the laws of nature and the laws of God!

GOD BLESS AMERICA!

Bullshit , You only can accomplish the American dream, If first you get rid of all aspects of the trickle down lie ,second you have tax law and tax rates that will even allow anyone to get a piece of the new wealth of this country. Your comment says it all , in your mind the only people who deserve a piece of the American dream are business owners and the workers are just there to fuck over.

You only can accomplish the American dream, If first you get rid of all aspects of the trickle down lie

What is the "trickle down lie" and how do you get rid of all aspects?

first look up trickle down economics. This is something I assumed everyone knows. So that is your job. In 1981 Reagan took the advice of his economic cabinet head and decided to Go with supply side economics (trickle down economics) His premise was to run the tax cuts and money through the wealthy and it would trickle down. but it didn't , which then makes it a lie. If anyone has a argument with this ,address this .
View attachment 326459GEE I WONDER WHAT HAPPENED IN 1981.

first look up trickle down economics. This is something I assumed everyone knows.

Sounds like something you made up. So why don't you explain it?

In 1981 Reagan took the advice of his economic cabinet head and decided to Go with supply side economics

Supply side? Why don't you just say that?

His premise was to run the tax cuts and money through the wealthy and it would trickle down.

That's not what supply side is.....you should do more research, you'll sound less ignorant.

I made this as simple as possible for your type, I told you to respond to the chart, so even you had the substance needed to talk about this issue ,now if there is something misleading about the chart find one that differs.

I made this as simple as possible for your type

I'm just glad you realize that supply-side was the policy.
That old trickle-down tripe was funny, but played out.

So feel free to explain what supply-side means and why you feel it stops people from achieving the American Dream.

Or run away......

It is simpler then that I gave ayou a chart to respond to and that really the subject ,all your questions are crap until you respond to the all telling chart.

Yup, you gave me a chart.
If you have any proof that it happened because Reagan cut the top rate from 70% to 28%, post it.
Otherwise, why do you feel the cuts were a bad thing or that I have anything to respond to...….

Ya it's just a coincident that exactly what Reagan said would happened, happened exactly when he implemented the trickle down lie. Get a life. Your like talking to a a third grader.
View attachment 326762
Gee Golly Gee how did this get turned around so quickly.

Ya it's just a coincident that exactly what Reagan said would happened, happened

What did Reagan say, exactly?


exactly when he implemented the trickle down lie.

When he implemented what trickle down lie?

Wow! That's like 3 levels of BS stats in one sentence. Impressive!

Piketty, well, that explains it. GIGO

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

you accomplish the american dream by destroying that of your rival, my friends!

you have to outwit your business opponent who have not as thoroughly mastered the art of the game as you have...in this battle, the extremity of one is the opportunity of the other. it is the rule of competitive life that the time when the rival is on the downward road, the is the opportunity to strike the finishing blow and make merchandise out of the misery of your opponent.

The American Beauty Rose can be produced in the splendor and fragrance which bring cheer to its beholder only by sacrificing the early buds which grow up around it. this is not an evil tendency in business, but the working out of the laws of nature and the laws of God!

GOD BLESS AMERICA!

Bullshit , You only can accomplish the American dream, If first you get rid of all aspects of the trickle down lie ,second you have tax law and tax rates that will even allow anyone to get a piece of the new wealth of this country. Your comment says it all , in your mind the only people who deserve a piece of the American dream are business owners and the workers are just there to fuck over.

You only can accomplish the American dream, If first you get rid of all aspects of the trickle down lie

What is the "trickle down lie" and how do you get rid of all aspects?

first look up trickle down economics. This is something I assumed everyone knows. So that is your job. In 1981 Reagan took the advice of his economic cabinet head and decided to Go with supply side economics (trickle down economics) His premise was to run the tax cuts and money through the wealthy and it would trickle down. but it didn't , which then makes it a lie. If anyone has a argument with this ,address this .
View attachment 326459GEE I WONDER WHAT HAPPENED IN 1981.

first look up trickle down economics. This is something I assumed everyone knows.

Sounds like something you made up. So why don't you explain it?

In 1981 Reagan took the advice of his economic cabinet head and decided to Go with supply side economics

Supply side? Why don't you just say that?

His premise was to run the tax cuts and money through the wealthy and it would trickle down.

That's not what supply side is.....you should do more research, you'll sound less ignorant.

I made this as simple as possible for your type, I told you to respond to the chart, so even you had the substance needed to talk about this issue ,now if there is something misleading about the chart find one that differs.

I made this as simple as possible for your type

I'm just glad you realize that supply-side was the policy.
That old trickle-down tripe was funny, but played out.

So feel free to explain what supply-side means and why you feel it stops people from achieving the American Dream.

Or run away......

It is simpler then that I gave ayou a chart to respond to and that really the subject ,all your questions are crap until you respond to the all telling chart.

Yup, you gave me a chart.
If you have any proof that it happened because Reagan cut the top rate from 70% to 28%, post it.
Otherwise, why do you feel the cuts were a bad thing or that I have anything to respond to...….

You don't have to respond to a dam thing . Why would I care. Your offering nothing anyway.

You don't have to respond to a dam thing

You're right, for once.
Your garage assumptions don't deserve a response.

 

[jbander]

you accomplish the american dream by destroying that of your rival, my friends!

you have to outwit your business opponent who have not as thoroughly mastered the art of the game as you have...in this battle, the extremity of one is the opportunity of the other. it is the rule of competitive life that the time when the rival is on the downward road, the is the opportunity to strike the finishing blow and make merchandise out of the misery of your opponent.

The American Beauty Rose can be produced in the splendor and fragrance which bring cheer to its beholder only by sacrificing the early buds which grow up around it. this is not an evil tendency in business, but the working out of the laws of nature and the laws of God!

GOD BLESS AMERICA!

Bullshit , You only can accomplish the American dream, If first you get rid of all aspects of the trickle down lie ,second you have tax law and tax rates that will even allow anyone to get a piece of the new wealth of this country. Your comment says it all , in your mind the only people who deserve a piece of the American dream are business owners and the workers are just there to fuck over.

I hate to break this to you, J Bander but "Trickle Down Economics" only exists in the minds of liberal Political Science professors that don't have the faintest idea how businesses function in the real world. Anyone who's actually run a business is very aware that profits "trickle" up...not down! The rent gets paid...suppliers get paid...labor gets paid...insurance gets paid...taxes and fees get paid...and if there's anything left...the owner of the business gets paid! That's not trickle down.

You don't have to say anything more then your every business man remark as your reference, it is my total point ,Trickle down economics is moving the new wealth of the nation through business and the wealthy and the point was that it was suppose to trickle down, hence the very descriptive name of a disasterous economic policy. So ya I wonder what economic philosophy business would support. The whole question is tied up in the chart that I made available to you , respond to that. If you don't like that one show us one that shows something different. Other wise I'm not interested in your bullshit.

Wow...that was one of the more unintelligible posts I've read lately, J Bander! I hope for your sake that you're drunk or wicked stoned! If not...a lack of understanding about Economics is the least of your worries...your real problem is that you're border line illiterate!

Solution ,go someplace else , tell me about illiterate. Love these post that contribute nothing and then call you names , I mean really , I don't like you , you are dumb ,really. Who in the hell here do you think cares what you think of me. Simple question give it a try ace.

 

[jbander]

Since 1981 business profits has soared ,there has been no time in history that these numbers even came close to the last 40 years. And every dime of new profit has gone to a small micro group at the top,

Please don't tell obvious lies.
In the last 40 years 600 million Chinese have gone from starvation level poverty to the middle class thanks to the switch to Republican capitalism away from libsocialism. It has not happened here because Democrats shipped all the jobs to China and then invited in 30 million illegals to take the remaining jobs and bid down wages still further. You've never heard of China have you??

600 million Chinese, good grief , This is the thread respond to it or find someplace else to be stupid.

The question is simple I say that you can distribute the wealth anyway you want with tax law. The trickle down lie was created to give it all to the rich and it was suppose to trickle down. It didn't as the charts show. all the new wealth of this country has gone to the top exactly as I said as the charts show , if you deny the charts , show us one that says something different. Otherwise go someplace else. That is the thread .

you accomplish the american dream by destroying that of your rival, my friends!

you have to outwit your business opponent who have not as thoroughly mastered the art of the game as you have...in this battle, the extremity of one is the opportunity of the other. it is the rule of competitive life that the time when the rival is on the downward road, the is the opportunity to strike the finishing blow and make merchandise out of the misery of your opponent.

The American Beauty Rose can be produced in the splendor and fragrance which bring cheer to its beholder only by sacrificing the early buds which grow up around it. this is not an evil tendency in business, but the working out of the laws of nature and the laws of God!

GOD BLESS AMERICA!

Bullshit , You only can accomplish the American dream, If first you get rid of all aspects of the trickle down lie ,second you have tax law and tax rates that will even allow anyone to get a piece of the new wealth of this country. Your comment says it all , in your mind the only people who deserve a piece of the American dream are business owners and the workers are just there to fuck over.

You only can accomplish the American dream, If first you get rid of all aspects of the trickle down lie

What is the "trickle down lie" and how do you get rid of all aspects?

first look up trickle down economics. This is something I assumed everyone knows. So that is your job. In 1981 Reagan took the advice of his economic cabinet head and decided to Go with supply side economics (trickle down economics) His premise was to run the tax cuts and money through the wealthy and it would trickle down. but it didn't , which then makes it a lie. If anyone has a argument with this ,address this .
View attachment 326459GEE I WONDER WHAT HAPPENED IN 1981.

first look up trickle down economics. This is something I assumed everyone knows.

Sounds like something you made up. So why don't you explain it?

In 1981 Reagan took the advice of his economic cabinet head and decided to Go with supply side economics

Supply side? Why don't you just say that?

His premise was to run the tax cuts and money through the wealthy and it would trickle down.

That's not what supply side is.....you should do more research, you'll sound less ignorant.

I made this as simple as possible for your type, I told you to respond to the chart, so even you had the substance needed to talk about this issue ,now if there is something misleading about the chart find one that differs.

I made this as simple as possible for your type

I'm just glad you realize that supply-side was the policy.
That old trickle-down tripe was funny, but played out.

So feel free to explain what supply-side means and why you feel it stops people from achieving the American Dream.

Or run away......

It is simpler then that I gave ayou a chart to respond to and that really the subject ,all your questions are crap until you respond to the all telling chart.

Yup, you gave me a chart.
If you have any proof that it happened because Reagan cut the top rate from 70% to 28%, post it.
Otherwise, why do you feel the cuts were a bad thing or that I have anything to respond to...….

Ya it's just a coincident that exactly what Reagan said would happened, happened exactly when he implemented the trickle down lie. Get a life. Your like talking to a a third grader.
View attachment 326762
Gee Golly Gee how did this get turned around so quickly.

Ya it's just a coincident that exactly what Reagan said would happened, happened

What did Reagan say, exactly?


exactly when he implemented the trickle down lie.

When he implemented what trickle down lie?

View attachment 326799

Wow! That's like 3 levels of BS stats in one sentence. Impressive!

View attachment 326800

Piketty, well, that explains it. GIGO

You have no options here, I told you to respond to the charts , I don't have to prove anything. You can say the chart is wrong , then show me one that shows your reality. Or you can look at my proof , and tell us that it is just a coincident that when the trickle down lie was implemented in 1981 that its just a coincedent with the fact that all the new wealth of the country went to the top, as the charts prove. Or you can just go someplace else to blow smoke.

 

[jbander]

you accomplish the american dream by destroying that of your rival, my friends!

you have to outwit your business opponent who have not as thoroughly mastered the art of the game as you have...in this battle, the extremity of one is the opportunity of the other. it is the rule of competitive life that the time when the rival is on the downward road, the is the opportunity to strike the finishing blow and make merchandise out of the misery of your opponent.

The American Beauty Rose can be produced in the splendor and fragrance which bring cheer to its beholder only by sacrificing the early buds which grow up around it. this is not an evil tendency in business, but the working out of the laws of nature and the laws of God!

GOD BLESS AMERICA!

Bullshit , You only can accomplish the American dream, If first you get rid of all aspects of the trickle down lie ,second you have tax law and tax rates that will even allow anyone to get a piece of the new wealth of this country. Your comment says it all , in your mind the only people who deserve a piece of the American dream are business owners and the workers are just there to fuck over.

You only can accomplish the American dream, If first you get rid of all aspects of the trickle down lie

What is the "trickle down lie" and how do you get rid of all aspects?

first look up trickle down economics. This is something I assumed everyone knows. So that is your job. In 1981 Reagan took the advice of his economic cabinet head and decided to Go with supply side economics (trickle down economics) His premise was to run the tax cuts and money through the wealthy and it would trickle down. but it didn't , which then makes it a lie. If anyone has a argument with this ,address this .
View attachment 326459GEE I WONDER WHAT HAPPENED IN 1981.

first look up trickle down economics. This is something I assumed everyone knows.

Sounds like something you made up. So why don't you explain it?

In 1981 Reagan took the advice of his economic cabinet head and decided to Go with supply side economics

Supply side? Why don't you just say that?

His premise was to run the tax cuts and money through the wealthy and it would trickle down.

That's not what supply side is.....you should do more research, you'll sound less ignorant.

I made this as simple as possible for your type, I told you to respond to the chart, so even you had the substance needed to talk about this issue ,now if there is something misleading about the chart find one that differs.

I made this as simple as possible for your type

I'm just glad you realize that supply-side was the policy.
That old trickle-down tripe was funny, but played out.

So feel free to explain what supply-side means and why you feel it stops people from achieving the American Dream.

Or run away......

It is simpler then that I gave ayou a chart to respond to and that really the subject ,all your questions are crap until you respond to the all telling chart.

Yup, you gave me a chart.
If you have any proof that it happened because Reagan cut the top rate from 70% to 28%, post it.
Otherwise, why do you feel the cuts were a bad thing or that I have anything to respond to...….

You don't have to respond to a dam thing . Why would I care. Your offering nothing anyway.

You don't have to respond to a dam thing

You're right, for once.
Your garage assumptions don't deserve a response.

You have no response , because your response admits that you are full of shit. You have no options here, I told you to respond to the charts , I don't have to prove anything. You can say the chart is wrong , then show me one that shows your reality. Or you can look at my proof , and tell us that it is just a coincident that when the trickle down lie was implemented in 1981 that its just a coincedent with the fact that all the new wealth of the country went to the top, as the charts prove. Or you can just go someplace else to blow smoke.

 

[jbander]

I love stupid especially when it is worn as a banner for the right wing haters.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Since 1981 business profits has soared ,there has been no time in history that these numbers even came close to the last 40 years. And every dime of new profit has gone to a small micro group at the top,

Please don't tell obvious lies.
In the last 40 years 600 million Chinese have gone from starvation level poverty to the middle class thanks to the switch to Republican capitalism away from libsocialism. It has not happened here because Democrats shipped all the jobs to China and then invited in 30 million illegals to take the remaining jobs and bid down wages still further. You've never heard of China have you??

600 million Chinese, good grief , This is the thread respond to it or find someplace else to be stupid.
View attachment 326981View attachment 326982
The question is simple I say that you can distribute the wealth anyway you want with tax law. The trickle down lie was created to give it all to the rich and it was suppose to trickle down. It didn't as the charts show. all the new wealth of this country has gone to the top exactly as I said as the charts show , if you deny the charts , show us one that says something different. Otherwise go someplace else. That is the thread .

you accomplish the american dream by destroying that of your rival, my friends!

you have to outwit your business opponent who have not as thoroughly mastered the art of the game as you have...in this battle, the extremity of one is the opportunity of the other. it is the rule of competitive life that the time when the rival is on the downward road, the is the opportunity to strike the finishing blow and make merchandise out of the misery of your opponent.

The American Beauty Rose can be produced in the splendor and fragrance which bring cheer to its beholder only by sacrificing the early buds which grow up around it. this is not an evil tendency in business, but the working out of the laws of nature and the laws of God!

GOD BLESS AMERICA!

Bullshit , You only can accomplish the American dream, If first you get rid of all aspects of the trickle down lie ,second you have tax law and tax rates that will even allow anyone to get a piece of the new wealth of this country. Your comment says it all , in your mind the only people who deserve a piece of the American dream are business owners and the workers are just there to fuck over.

You only can accomplish the American dream, If first you get rid of all aspects of the trickle down lie

What is the "trickle down lie" and how do you get rid of all aspects?

first look up trickle down economics. This is something I assumed everyone knows. So that is your job. In 1981 Reagan took the advice of his economic cabinet head and decided to Go with supply side economics (trickle down economics) His premise was to run the tax cuts and money through the wealthy and it would trickle down. but it didn't , which then makes it a lie. If anyone has a argument with this ,address this .
View attachment 326459GEE I WONDER WHAT HAPPENED IN 1981.

first look up trickle down economics. This is something I assumed everyone knows.

Sounds like something you made up. So why don't you explain it?

In 1981 Reagan took the advice of his economic cabinet head and decided to Go with supply side economics

Supply side? Why don't you just say that?

His premise was to run the tax cuts and money through the wealthy and it would trickle down.

That's not what supply side is.....you should do more research, you'll sound less ignorant.

I made this as simple as possible for your type, I told you to respond to the chart, so even you had the substance needed to talk about this issue ,now if there is something misleading about the chart find one that differs.

I made this as simple as possible for your type

I'm just glad you realize that supply-side was the policy.
That old trickle-down tripe was funny, but played out.

So feel free to explain what supply-side means and why you feel it stops people from achieving the American Dream.

Or run away......

It is simpler then that I gave ayou a chart to respond to and that really the subject ,all your questions are crap until you respond to the all telling chart.

Yup, you gave me a chart.
If you have any proof that it happened because Reagan cut the top rate from 70% to 28%, post it.
Otherwise, why do you feel the cuts were a bad thing or that I have anything to respond to...….

Ya it's just a coincident that exactly what Reagan said would happened, happened exactly when he implemented the trickle down lie. Get a life. Your like talking to a a third grader.
View attachment 326762
Gee Golly Gee how did this get turned around so quickly.

Ya it's just a coincident that exactly what Reagan said would happened, happened

What did Reagan say, exactly?


exactly when he implemented the trickle down lie.

When he implemented what trickle down lie?

View attachment 326799

Wow! That's like 3 levels of BS stats in one sentence. Impressive!

View attachment 326800

Piketty, well, that explains it. GIGO

You have no options here, I told you to respond to the charts , I don't have to prove anything. You can say the chart is wrong , then show me one that shows your reality. Or you can look at my proof , and tell us that it is just a coincident that when the trickle down lie was implemented in 1981 that its just a coincedent with the fact that all the new wealth of the country went to the top, as the charts prove. Or you can just go someplace else to blow smoke.

Great, let's discuss your dishonest chart.
Bush and Clinton both raised taxes and still the top 10%, from 1991-2000 received over 70% of the "distribution of average income growth during expansions". Did I mention what a useless "stat" that even is? I wonder why it isn't used more often? LOL! DURR

Hey, it was even worse under Obama! So must for Dem presidents doing anything useful.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

you accomplish the american dream by destroying that of your rival, my friends!

you have to outwit your business opponent who have not as thoroughly mastered the art of the game as you have...in this battle, the extremity of one is the opportunity of the other. it is the rule of competitive life that the time when the rival is on the downward road, the is the opportunity to strike the finishing blow and make merchandise out of the misery of your opponent.

The American Beauty Rose can be produced in the splendor and fragrance which bring cheer to its beholder only by sacrificing the early buds which grow up around it. this is not an evil tendency in business, but the working out of the laws of nature and the laws of God!

GOD BLESS AMERICA!

Bullshit , You only can accomplish the American dream, If first you get rid of all aspects of the trickle down lie ,second you have tax law and tax rates that will even allow anyone to get a piece of the new wealth of this country. Your comment says it all , in your mind the only people who deserve a piece of the American dream are business owners and the workers are just there to fuck over.

You only can accomplish the American dream, If first you get rid of all aspects of the trickle down lie

What is the "trickle down lie" and how do you get rid of all aspects?

first look up trickle down economics. This is something I assumed everyone knows. So that is your job. In 1981 Reagan took the advice of his economic cabinet head and decided to Go with supply side economics (trickle down economics) His premise was to run the tax cuts and money through the wealthy and it would trickle down. but it didn't , which then makes it a lie. If anyone has a argument with this ,address this .
View attachment 326459GEE I WONDER WHAT HAPPENED IN 1981.

first look up trickle down economics. This is something I assumed everyone knows.

Sounds like something you made up. So why don't you explain it?

In 1981 Reagan took the advice of his economic cabinet head and decided to Go with supply side economics

Supply side? Why don't you just say that?

His premise was to run the tax cuts and money through the wealthy and it would trickle down.

That's not what supply side is.....you should do more research, you'll sound less ignorant.

I made this as simple as possible for your type, I told you to respond to the chart, so even you had the substance needed to talk about this issue ,now if there is something misleading about the chart find one that differs.

I made this as simple as possible for your type

I'm just glad you realize that supply-side was the policy.
That old trickle-down tripe was funny, but played out.

So feel free to explain what supply-side means and why you feel it stops people from achieving the American Dream.

Or run away......

It is simpler then that I gave ayou a chart to respond to and that really the subject ,all your questions are crap until you respond to the all telling chart.

Yup, you gave me a chart.
If you have any proof that it happened because Reagan cut the top rate from 70% to 28%, post it.
Otherwise, why do you feel the cuts were a bad thing or that I have anything to respond to...….

You don't have to respond to a dam thing . Why would I care. Your offering nothing anyway.

You don't have to respond to a dam thing

You're right, for once.
Your garage assumptions don't deserve a response.

You have no response , because your response admits that you are full of shit. You have no options here, I told you to respond to the charts , I don't have to prove anything. You can say the chart is wrong , then show me one that shows your reality. Or you can look at my proof , and tell us that it is just a coincident that when the trickle down lie was implemented in 1981 that its just a coincedent with the fact that all the new wealth of the country went to the top, as the charts prove. Or you can just go someplace else to blow smoke.

that when the trickle down lie was implemented in 1981

What is a trickle down lie?

its just a coincedent with the fact that all the new wealth of the country went to the top, as the charts prove

The "data" in the chart is "average income growth during expansions", not new wealth.

 

[Flash]

The thing that killed the American dream was the welfare state created by that jackass LBJ.

Not only did it it sap trillions from the productive economy but it also de incentivized work.

 

[Flash]

Big government has done tremendous damage to the American Dream. Nowadays the combined cost of Federal, State and Local government is almost 40% of the GDP.

How can Americans get ahead when the friggin government directly or indirectly takes so much of their money?

That is the culprit.

 

[jbander]

you accomplish the american dream by destroying that of your rival, my friends!

you have to outwit your business opponent who have not as thoroughly mastered the art of the game as you have...in this battle, the extremity of one is the opportunity of the other. it is the rule of competitive life that the time when the rival is on the downward road, the is the opportunity to strike the finishing blow and make merchandise out of the misery of your opponent.

The American Beauty Rose can be produced in the splendor and fragrance which bring cheer to its beholder only by sacrificing the early buds which grow up around it. this is not an evil tendency in business, but the working out of the laws of nature and the laws of God!

GOD BLESS AMERICA!

Bullshit , You only can accomplish the American dream, If first you get rid of all aspects of the trickle down lie ,second you have tax law and tax rates that will even allow anyone to get a piece of the new wealth of this country. Your comment says it all , in your mind the only people who deserve a piece of the American dream are business owners and the workers are just there to fuck over.

You only can accomplish the American dream, If first you get rid of all aspects of the trickle down lie

What is the "trickle down lie" and how do you get rid of all aspects?

first look up trickle down economics. This is something I assumed everyone knows. So that is your job. In 1981 Reagan took the advice of his economic cabinet head and decided to Go with supply side economics (trickle down economics) His premise was to run the tax cuts and money through the wealthy and it would trickle down. but it didn't , which then makes it a lie. If anyone has a argument with this ,address this .
View attachment 326459GEE I WONDER WHAT HAPPENED IN 1981.

first look up trickle down economics. This is something I assumed everyone knows.

Sounds like something you made up. So why don't you explain it?

In 1981 Reagan took the advice of his economic cabinet head and decided to Go with supply side economics

Supply side? Why don't you just say that?

His premise was to run the tax cuts and money through the wealthy and it would trickle down.

That's not what supply side is.....you should do more research, you'll sound less ignorant.

I made this as simple as possible for your type, I told you to respond to the chart, so even you had the substance needed to talk about this issue ,now if there is something misleading about the chart find one that differs.

I made this as simple as possible for your type

I'm just glad you realize that supply-side was the policy.
That old trickle-down tripe was funny, but played out.

So feel free to explain what supply-side means and why you feel it stops people from achieving the American Dream.

Or run away......

It is simpler then that I gave ayou a chart to respond to and that really the subject ,all your questions are crap until you respond to the all telling chart.

Yup, you gave me a chart.
If you have any proof that it happened because Reagan cut the top rate from 70% to 28%, post it.
Otherwise, why do you feel the cuts were a bad thing or that I have anything to respond to...….

You don't have to respond to a dam thing . Why would I care. Your offering nothing anyway.

You don't have to respond to a dam thing

You're right, for once.
Your garage assumptions don't deserve a response.

You have no response , because your response admits that you are full of shit. You have no options here, I told you to respond to the charts , I don't have to prove anything. You can say the chart is wrong , then show me one that shows your reality. Or you can look at my proof , and tell us that it is just a coincident that when the trickle down lie was implemented in 1981 that its just a coincedent with the fact that all the new wealth of the country went to the top, as the charts prove. Or you can just go someplace else to blow smoke.

that when the trickle down lie was implemented in 1981

What is a trickle down lie?

its just a coincedent with the fact that all the new wealth of the country went to the top, as the charts prove

The "data" in the chart is "average income growth during expansions", not new wealth.

Love it ,

 

[jbander]

you accomplish the american dream by destroying that of your rival, my friends!

you have to outwit your business opponent who have not as thoroughly mastered the art of the game as you have...in this battle, the extremity of one is the opportunity of the other. it is the rule of competitive life that the time when the rival is on the downward road, the is the opportunity to strike the finishing blow and make merchandise out of the misery of your opponent.

The American Beauty Rose can be produced in the splendor and fragrance which bring cheer to its beholder only by sacrificing the early buds which grow up around it. this is not an evil tendency in business, but the working out of the laws of nature and the laws of God!

GOD BLESS AMERICA!

Bullshit , You only can accomplish the American dream, If first you get rid of all aspects of the trickle down lie ,second you have tax law and tax rates that will even allow anyone to get a piece of the new wealth of this country. Your comment says it all , in your mind the only people who deserve a piece of the American dream are business owners and the workers are just there to fuck over.

You only can accomplish the American dream, If first you get rid of all aspects of the trickle down lie

What is the "trickle down lie" and how do you get rid of all aspects?

first look up trickle down economics. This is something I assumed everyone knows. So that is your job. In 1981 Reagan took the advice of his economic cabinet head and decided to Go with supply side economics (trickle down economics) His premise was to run the tax cuts and money through the wealthy and it would trickle down. but it didn't , which then makes it a lie. If anyone has a argument with this ,address this .
View attachment 326459GEE I WONDER WHAT HAPPENED IN 1981.

first look up trickle down economics. This is something I assumed everyone knows.

Sounds like something you made up. So why don't you explain it?

In 1981 Reagan took the advice of his economic cabinet head and decided to Go with supply side economics

Supply side? Why don't you just say that?

His premise was to run the tax cuts and money through the wealthy and it would trickle down.

That's not what supply side is.....you should do more research, you'll sound less ignorant.

I made this as simple as possible for your type, I told you to respond to the chart, so even you had the substance needed to talk about this issue ,now if there is something misleading about the chart find one that differs.

I made this as simple as possible for your type

I'm just glad you realize that supply-side was the policy.
That old trickle-down tripe was funny, but played out.

So feel free to explain what supply-side means and why you feel it stops people from achieving the American Dream.

Or run away......

It is simpler then that I gave ayou a chart to respond to and that really the subject ,all your questions are crap until you respond to the all telling chart.

Yup, you gave me a chart.
If you have any proof that it happened because Reagan cut the top rate from 70% to 28%, post it.
Otherwise, why do you feel the cuts were a bad thing or that I have anything to respond to...….

You don't have to respond to a dam thing . Why would I care. Your offering nothing anyway.

You don't have to respond to a dam thing

You're right, for once.
Your garage assumptions don't deserve a response.

You have no response , because your response admits that you are full of shit. You have no options here, I told you to respond to the charts , I don't have to prove anything. You can say the chart is wrong , then show me one that shows your reality. Or you can look at my proof , and tell us that it is just a coincident that when the trickle down lie was implemented in 1981 that its just a coincedent with the fact that all the new wealth of the country went to the top, as the charts prove. Or you can just go someplace else to blow smoke.

that when the trickle down lie was implemented in 1981

What is a trickle down lie?

its just a coincedent with the fact that all the new wealth of the country went to the top, as the charts prove

The "data" in the chart is "average income growth during expansions", not new wealth.

Love it ,

you accomplish the american dream by destroying that of your rival, my friends!

you have to outwit your business opponent who have not as thoroughly mastered the art of the game as you have...in this battle, the extremity of one is the opportunity of the other. it is the rule of competitive life that the time when the rival is on the downward road, the is the opportunity to strike the finishing blow and make merchandise out of the misery of your opponent.

The American Beauty Rose can be produced in the splendor and fragrance which bring cheer to its beholder only by sacrificing the early buds which grow up around it. this is not an evil tendency in business, but the working out of the laws of nature and the laws of God!

GOD BLESS AMERICA!

Bullshit , You only can accomplish the American dream, If first you get rid of all aspects of the trickle down lie ,second you have tax law and tax rates that will even allow anyone to get a piece of the new wealth of this country. Your comment says it all , in your mind the only people who deserve a piece of the American dream are business owners and the workers are just there to fuck over.

You only can accomplish the American dream, If first you get rid of all aspects of the trickle down lie

What is the "trickle down lie" and how do you get rid of all aspects?

first look up trickle down economics. This is something I assumed everyone knows. So that is your job. In 1981 Reagan took the advice of his economic cabinet head and decided to Go with supply side economics (trickle down economics) His premise was to run the tax cuts and money through the wealthy and it would trickle down. but it didn't , which then makes it a lie. If anyone has a argument with this ,address this .
View attachment 326459GEE I WONDER WHAT HAPPENED IN 1981.

first look up trickle down economics. This is something I assumed everyone knows.

Sounds like something you made up. So why don't you explain it?

In 1981 Reagan took the advice of his economic cabinet head and decided to Go with supply side economics

Supply side? Why don't you just say that?

His premise was to run the tax cuts and money through the wealthy and it would trickle down.

That's not what supply side is.....you should do more research, you'll sound less ignorant.

I made this as simple as possible for your type, I told you to respond to the chart, so even you had the substance needed to talk about this issue ,now if there is something misleading about the chart find one that differs.

I made this as simple as possible for your type

I'm just glad you realize that supply-side was the policy.
That old trickle-down tripe was funny, but played out.

So feel free to explain what supply-side means and why you feel it stops people from achieving the American Dream.

Or run away......

It is simpler then that I gave ayou a chart to respond to and that really the subject ,all your questions are crap until you respond to the all telling chart.

Yup, you gave me a chart.
If you have any proof that it happened because Reagan cut the top rate from 70% to 28%, post it.
Otherwise, why do you feel the cuts were a bad thing or that I have anything to respond to...….

You don't have to respond to a dam thing . Why would I care. Your offering nothing anyway.

You don't have to respond to a dam thing

You're right, for once.
Your garage assumptions don't deserve a response.

You have no response , because your response admits that you are full of shit. You have no options here, I told you to respond to the charts , I don't have to prove anything. You can say the chart is wrong , then show me one that shows your reality. Or you can look at my proof , and tell us that it is just a coincident that when the trickle down lie was implemented in 1981 that its just a coincedent with the fact that all the new wealth of the country went to the top, as the charts prove. Or you can just go someplace else to blow smoke.

that when the trickle down lie was implemented in 1981

What is a trickle down lie?

its just a coincedent with the fact that all the new wealth of the country went to the top, as the charts prove

The "data" in the chart is "average income growth during expansions", not new wealth.

Clown car passing through the center ring, income distributed is wealth. The charts beat you I see, they always do, you can't build any fact around them that will suit the hate partys goofy thinking. In 1981 there was a income break away from historic trends , income break was the distrobution of all the wealth to the top. Tell me what do you think would happen when Reagan dropped the top income tax from 70 to 28%. You clowns think that it didn't cause any effect. What it did was ran all the money through the top with the idea that it would trickle down(The trickle down lie) But it didn't as every chart in the world will show you,.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

you accomplish the american dream by destroying that of your rival, my friends!

you have to outwit your business opponent who have not as thoroughly mastered the art of the game as you have...in this battle, the extremity of one is the opportunity of the other. it is the rule of competitive life that the time when the rival is on the downward road, the is the opportunity to strike the finishing blow and make merchandise out of the misery of your opponent.

The American Beauty Rose can be produced in the splendor and fragrance which bring cheer to its beholder only by sacrificing the early buds which grow up around it. this is not an evil tendency in business, but the working out of the laws of nature and the laws of God!

GOD BLESS AMERICA!

Bullshit , You only can accomplish the American dream, If first you get rid of all aspects of the trickle down lie ,second you have tax law and tax rates that will even allow anyone to get a piece of the new wealth of this country. Your comment says it all , in your mind the only people who deserve a piece of the American dream are business owners and the workers are just there to fuck over.

You only can accomplish the American dream, If first you get rid of all aspects of the trickle down lie

What is the "trickle down lie" and how do you get rid of all aspects?

first look up trickle down economics. This is something I assumed everyone knows. So that is your job. In 1981 Reagan took the advice of his economic cabinet head and decided to Go with supply side economics (trickle down economics) His premise was to run the tax cuts and money through the wealthy and it would trickle down. but it didn't , which then makes it a lie. If anyone has a argument with this ,address this .
View attachment 326459GEE I WONDER WHAT HAPPENED IN 1981.

first look up trickle down economics. This is something I assumed everyone knows.

Sounds like something you made up. So why don't you explain it?

In 1981 Reagan took the advice of his economic cabinet head and decided to Go with supply side economics

Supply side? Why don't you just say that?

His premise was to run the tax cuts and money through the wealthy and it would trickle down.

That's not what supply side is.....you should do more research, you'll sound less ignorant.

I made this as simple as possible for your type, I told you to respond to the chart, so even you had the substance needed to talk about this issue ,now if there is something misleading about the chart find one that differs.

I made this as simple as possible for your type

I'm just glad you realize that supply-side was the policy.
That old trickle-down tripe was funny, but played out.

So feel free to explain what supply-side means and why you feel it stops people from achieving the American Dream.

Or run away......

It is simpler then that I gave ayou a chart to respond to and that really the subject ,all your questions are crap until you respond to the all telling chart.

Yup, you gave me a chart.
If you have any proof that it happened because Reagan cut the top rate from 70% to 28%, post it.
Otherwise, why do you feel the cuts were a bad thing or that I have anything to respond to...….

You don't have to respond to a dam thing . Why would I care. Your offering nothing anyway.

You don't have to respond to a dam thing

You're right, for once.
Your garage assumptions don't deserve a response.

You have no response , because your response admits that you are full of shit. You have no options here, I told you to respond to the charts , I don't have to prove anything. You can say the chart is wrong , then show me one that shows your reality. Or you can look at my proof , and tell us that it is just a coincident that when the trickle down lie was implemented in 1981 that its just a coincedent with the fact that all the new wealth of the country went to the top, as the charts prove. Or you can just go someplace else to blow smoke.

that when the trickle down lie was implemented in 1981

What is a trickle down lie?

its just a coincedent with the fact that all the new wealth of the country went to the top, as the charts prove

The "data" in the chart is "average income growth during expansions", not new wealth.

Love it ,

you accomplish the american dream by destroying that of your rival, my friends!

you have to outwit your business opponent who have not as thoroughly mastered the art of the game as you have...in this battle, the extremity of one is the opportunity of the other. it is the rule of competitive life that the time when the rival is on the downward road, the is the opportunity to strike the finishing blow and make merchandise out of the misery of your opponent.

The American Beauty Rose can be produced in the splendor and fragrance which bring cheer to its beholder only by sacrificing the early buds which grow up around it. this is not an evil tendency in business, but the working out of the laws of nature and the laws of God!

GOD BLESS AMERICA!

Bullshit , You only can accomplish the American dream, If first you get rid of all aspects of the trickle down lie ,second you have tax law and tax rates that will even allow anyone to get a piece of the new wealth of this country. Your comment says it all , in your mind the only people who deserve a piece of the American dream are business owners and the workers are just there to fuck over.

You only can accomplish the American dream, If first you get rid of all aspects of the trickle down lie

What is the "trickle down lie" and how do you get rid of all aspects?

first look up trickle down economics. This is something I assumed everyone knows. So that is your job. In 1981 Reagan took the advice of his economic cabinet head and decided to Go with supply side economics (trickle down economics) His premise was to run the tax cuts and money through the wealthy and it would trickle down. but it didn't , which then makes it a lie. If anyone has a argument with this ,address this .
View attachment 326459GEE I WONDER WHAT HAPPENED IN 1981.

first look up trickle down economics. This is something I assumed everyone knows.

Sounds like something you made up. So why don't you explain it?

In 1981 Reagan took the advice of his economic cabinet head and decided to Go with supply side economics

Supply side? Why don't you just say that?

His premise was to run the tax cuts and money through the wealthy and it would trickle down.

That's not what supply side is.....you should do more research, you'll sound less ignorant.

I made this as simple as possible for your type, I told you to respond to the chart, so even you had the substance needed to talk about this issue ,now if there is something misleading about the chart find one that differs.

I made this as simple as possible for your type

I'm just glad you realize that supply-side was the policy.
That old trickle-down tripe was funny, but played out.

So feel free to explain what supply-side means and why you feel it stops people from achieving the American Dream.

Or run away......

It is simpler then that I gave ayou a chart to respond to and that really the subject ,all your questions are crap until you respond to the all telling chart.

Yup, you gave me a chart.
If you have any proof that it happened because Reagan cut the top rate from 70% to 28%, post it.
Otherwise, why do you feel the cuts were a bad thing or that I have anything to respond to...….

You don't have to respond to a dam thing . Why would I care. Your offering nothing anyway.

You don't have to respond to a dam thing

You're right, for once.
Your garage assumptions don't deserve a response.

You have no response , because your response admits that you are full of shit. You have no options here, I told you to respond to the charts , I don't have to prove anything. You can say the chart is wrong , then show me one that shows your reality. Or you can look at my proof , and tell us that it is just a coincident that when the trickle down lie was implemented in 1981 that its just a coincedent with the fact that all the new wealth of the country went to the top, as the charts prove. Or you can just go someplace else to blow smoke.

that when the trickle down lie was implemented in 1981

What is a trickle down lie?

its just a coincedent with the fact that all the new wealth of the country went to the top, as the charts prove

The "data" in the chart is "average income growth during expansions", not new wealth.

Clown car passing through the center ring, income distributed is wealth. The charts beat you I see, they always do, you can't build any fact around them that will suit the hate partys goofy thinking. In 1981 there was a income break away from historic trends , income break was the distrobution of all the wealth to the top. Tell me what do you think would happen when Reagan dropped the top income tax from 70 to 28%. You clowns think that it didn't cause any effect. What it did was ran all the money through the top with the idea that it would trickle down(The trickle down lie) But it didn't as every chart in the world will show you,.

income distributed is wealth.

Income isn't distributed, it's earned.

What it did was ran all the money through the top with the idea that it would trickle down(The trickle down lie)

That isn't supply side economic theory.

Supply-side economics is a macroeconomic theory arguing that economic growth can be most effectively created by lowering taxes and decreasing regulation, by which it is directly opposed to demand-side economics.


Bush and Clinton both raised taxes and still the top 10%, from 1991-2000 received over 70% of the "distribution of average income growth during expansions". Did I mention what a useless "stat" that even is? I wonder why it isn't used more often? LOL! DURR

Hey, it was even worse under Obama! So must for Dem presidents doing anything useful.

 

[jbander]

you accomplish the american dream by destroying that of your rival, my friends!

you have to outwit your business opponent who have not as thoroughly mastered the art of the game as you have...in this battle, the extremity of one is the opportunity of the other. it is the rule of competitive life that the time when the rival is on the downward road, the is the opportunity to strike the finishing blow and make merchandise out of the misery of your opponent.

The American Beauty Rose can be produced in the splendor and fragrance which bring cheer to its beholder only by sacrificing the early buds which grow up around it. this is not an evil tendency in business, but the working out of the laws of nature and the laws of God!

GOD BLESS AMERICA!

Bullshit , You only can accomplish the American dream, If first you get rid of all aspects of the trickle down lie ,second you have tax law and tax rates that will even allow anyone to get a piece of the new wealth of this country. Your comment says it all , in your mind the only people who deserve a piece of the American dream are business owners and the workers are just there to fuck over.

You only can accomplish the American dream, If first you get rid of all aspects of the trickle down lie

What is the "trickle down lie" and how do you get rid of all aspects?

first look up trickle down economics. This is something I assumed everyone knows. So that is your job. In 1981 Reagan took the advice of his economic cabinet head and decided to Go with supply side economics (trickle down economics) His premise was to run the tax cuts and money through the wealthy and it would trickle down. but it didn't , which then makes it a lie. If anyone has a argument with this ,address this .
View attachment 326459GEE I WONDER WHAT HAPPENED IN 1981.

first look up trickle down economics. This is something I assumed everyone knows.

Sounds like something you made up. So why don't you explain it?

In 1981 Reagan took the advice of his economic cabinet head and decided to Go with supply side economics

Supply side? Why don't you just say that?

His premise was to run the tax cuts and money through the wealthy and it would trickle down.

That's not what supply side is.....you should do more research, you'll sound less ignorant.

I made this as simple as possible for your type, I told you to respond to the chart, so even you had the substance needed to talk about this issue ,now if there is something misleading about the chart find one that differs.

I made this as simple as possible for your type

I'm just glad you realize that supply-side was the policy.
That old trickle-down tripe was funny, but played out.

So feel free to explain what supply-side means and why you feel it stops people from achieving the American Dream.

Or run away......

It is simpler then that I gave ayou a chart to respond to and that really the subject ,all your questions are crap until you respond to the all telling chart.

Yup, you gave me a chart.
If you have any proof that it happened because Reagan cut the top rate from 70% to 28%, post it.
Otherwise, why do you feel the cuts were a bad thing or that I have anything to respond to...….

You don't have to respond to a dam thing . Why would I care. Your offering nothing anyway.

You don't have to respond to a dam thing

You're right, for once.
Your garage assumptions don't deserve a response.

You have no response , because your response admits that you are full of shit. You have no options here, I told you to respond to the charts , I don't have to prove anything. You can say the chart is wrong , then show me one that shows your reality. Or you can look at my proof , and tell us that it is just a coincident that when the trickle down lie was implemented in 1981 that its just a coincedent with the fact that all the new wealth of the country went to the top, as the charts prove. Or you can just go someplace else to blow smoke.

that when the trickle down lie was implemented in 1981

What is a trickle down lie?

its just a coincedent with the fact that all the new wealth of the country went to the top, as the charts prove

The "data" in the chart is "average income growth during expansions", not new wealth.

Love it ,

you accomplish the american dream by destroying that of your rival, my friends!

you have to outwit your business opponent who have not as thoroughly mastered the art of the game as you have...in this battle, the extremity of one is the opportunity of the other. it is the rule of competitive life that the time when the rival is on the downward road, the is the opportunity to strike the finishing blow and make merchandise out of the misery of your opponent.

The American Beauty Rose can be produced in the splendor and fragrance which bring cheer to its beholder only by sacrificing the early buds which grow up around it. this is not an evil tendency in business, but the working out of the laws of nature and the laws of God!

GOD BLESS AMERICA!

Bullshit , You only can accomplish the American dream, If first you get rid of all aspects of the trickle down lie ,second you have tax law and tax rates that will even allow anyone to get a piece of the new wealth of this country. Your comment says it all , in your mind the only people who deserve a piece of the American dream are business owners and the workers are just there to fuck over.

You only can accomplish the American dream, If first you get rid of all aspects of the trickle down lie

What is the "trickle down lie" and how do you get rid of all aspects?

first look up trickle down economics. This is something I assumed everyone knows. So that is your job. In 1981 Reagan took the advice of his economic cabinet head and decided to Go with supply side economics (trickle down economics) His premise was to run the tax cuts and money through the wealthy and it would trickle down. but it didn't , which then makes it a lie. If anyone has a argument with this ,address this .
View attachment 326459GEE I WONDER WHAT HAPPENED IN 1981.

first look up trickle down economics. This is something I assumed everyone knows.

Sounds like something you made up. So why don't you explain it?

In 1981 Reagan took the advice of his economic cabinet head and decided to Go with supply side economics

Supply side? Why don't you just say that?

His premise was to run the tax cuts and money through the wealthy and it would trickle down.

That's not what supply side is.....you should do more research, you'll sound less ignorant.

I made this as simple as possible for your type, I told you to respond to the chart, so even you had the substance needed to talk about this issue ,now if there is something misleading about the chart find one that differs.

I made this as simple as possible for your type

I'm just glad you realize that supply-side was the policy.
That old trickle-down tripe was funny, but played out.

So feel free to explain what supply-side means and why you feel it stops people from achieving the American Dream.

Or run away......

It is simpler then that I gave ayou a chart to respond to and that really the subject ,all your questions are crap until you respond to the all telling chart.

Yup, you gave me a chart.
If you have any proof that it happened because Reagan cut the top rate from 70% to 28%, post it.
Otherwise, why do you feel the cuts were a bad thing or that I have anything to respond to...….

You don't have to respond to a dam thing . Why would I care. Your offering nothing anyway.

You don't have to respond to a dam thing

You're right, for once.
Your garage assumptions don't deserve a response.

You have no response , because your response admits that you are full of shit. You have no options here, I told you to respond to the charts , I don't have to prove anything. You can say the chart is wrong , then show me one that shows your reality. Or you can look at my proof , and tell us that it is just a coincident that when the trickle down lie was implemented in 1981 that its just a coincedent with the fact that all the new wealth of the country went to the top, as the charts prove. Or you can just go someplace else to blow smoke.

that when the trickle down lie was implemented in 1981

What is a trickle down lie?

its just a coincedent with the fact that all the new wealth of the country went to the top, as the charts prove

The "data" in the chart is "average income growth during expansions", not new wealth.

Clown car passing through the center ring, income distributed is wealth. The charts beat you I see, they always do, you can't build any fact around them that will suit the hate partys goofy thinking. In 1981 there was a income break away from historic trends , income break was the distrobution of all the wealth to the top. Tell me what do you think would happen when Reagan dropped the top income tax from 70 to 28%. You clowns think that it didn't cause any effect. What it did was ran all the money through the top with the idea that it would trickle down(The trickle down lie) But it didn't as every chart in the world will show you,.

income distributed is wealth.

Income isn't distributed, it's earned.

What it did was ran all the money through the top with the idea that it would trickle down(The trickle down lie)

That isn't supply side economic theory.

Supply-side economics is a macroeconomic theory arguing that economic growth can be most effectively created by lowering taxes and decreasing regulation, by which it is directly opposed to demand-side economics.


Bush and Clinton both raised taxes and still the top 10%, from 1991-2000 received over 70% of the "distribution of average income growth during expansions". Did I mention what a useless "stat" that even is? I wonder why it isn't used more often? LOL! DURR

Hey, it was even worse under Obama! So must for Dem presidents doing anything useful.
[

You can control where income goes and you can control how wealth is distributed with tax rate and tax law , What the hell did anyone think was going to happen with Reagan's trickle down lie , changing the top rate from 70 to 28%. That is why since Reagan implemented the trickle down lie in 1981 all the new wealth of the richest country in the world and at profit levels that were through the roof. All went to the golden few at the top as shown in the two charts on post 50.