The alarmists have no faith in science.

[Robert W]

Alarmists daily use science as their scapegoat over Climate. They blame scientists for alerting us bastards about climate. But per the alarmists who tell us daily man can't manage climate that we better damned well manage climate or Earth is in major trouble. How you ask? Supposedly if we rid the atmosphere of super minute amounts of Carbon, too little for you to notice, it fixes the problem. This of course is what is called Climate managing. But the Alarmists tell us loudly Man can't manage climate. Why the hell tell us about it then?

 

[1srelluc]

The first clue is that they have been listening to Herman Munster for too long

Don't even get me started about Mr. Internet.

 

[Crick]

Alarmists daily use science as their scapegoat over Climate.

Scapegoat?

SCAPEGOAT
noun

1. 1.
   a person who is blamed for the wrongdoings, mistakes, or faults of others, especially for reasons of expediency.
   
   
2. 2.
   (in the Bible) a goat sent into the wilderness after the Jewish chief priest had symbolically laid the sins of the people upon it (Lev. 16).

They blame scientists for alerting us bastards about climate.

I do not BLAME scientists. I credit them. A minor distinction Robert.

But per the alarmists who tell us daily man can't manage climate that we better damned well manage climate or Earth is in major trouble.

Robert, why do you carry on with this semantical bullshit?

How you ask?

No, no one asked. They already know the answer.

Supposedly if we rid the atmosphere of super minute amounts of Carbon, too little for you to notice, it fixes the problem.

We have increased the level of CO2 in the atmosphere by over 50%. That is not a "super minute"amount Robert.

This of course is what is called Climate managing.

No, it's not.

But the Alarmists tell us loudly Man can't manage climate. Why the hell tell us about it then?

Because we made what, in your case, may have been a faulty assumption concerning the intelligence and reasonability of our audience.

 

[Robert W]

We have increased the level of CO2 in the atmosphere by over 50%. That is not a "super minute"amount Robert.

Why you jerk. Now we know who to blame.

 

[Robert W]

Because we made what, in your case, may have been a faulty assumption concerning the intelligence and reasonability of our audience.

I am supposed to get upset at you for doing what you claim you do all the time. Raise Global temperatures. And I say to you that man does not manage climate and it does not please you. And even you agree that Man is not the master of Climate. I am picking the wrong person to discuss this with. You admit you harm Earth. I want you to stop today. Promise you will.

 

[Crick]

I am supposed to get upset at you for doing what you claim you do all the time. Raise Global temperatures. And I say to you that man does not manage climate and it does not please you. And even you agree that Man is not the master of Climate. I am picking the wrong person to discuss this with. You admit you harm Earth. I want you to stop today. Promise you will.

I have almost no idea what you're trying to say here Robert.

My purpose here is to convince you that you can trust the science that tells us human CO2 emissions are causing the planet to warm and that warming presents a very real threat to us for generations to come. We should have begun acting on it decades ago. I encourage you to do your personal best to minimize the amount of fossil fuels you burn and vote for politicians who will do the same.

 

[Robert W]

I have almost no idea what you're trying to say here Robert.

My purpose here is to convince you that you can trust the science that tells us human CO2 emissions are causing the planet to warm and that warming presents a very real threat to us for generations to come. We should have begun acting on it decades ago. I encourage you to do your personal best to minimize the amount of fossil fuels you burn and vote for politicians who will do the same.

You fell in love with saying fossil fuels. This term to the vast majority of people means nothing at all to them. It sounds like you blame skeletons for human mass murders.

Do as little warming as I do and I will tip my hat to you. You are far more a danger than I can ever be.

 

[Crick]

You fell in love with saying fossil fuels. This term to the vast majority of people means nothing at all to them. It sounds like you blame skeletons for human mass murders.

I think you're projecting. I think almost everyone know what the term fossil fuels means.

Do as little warming as I do and I will tip my hat to you. You are far more a danger than I can ever be.

That seems unlikely. What sort of car do you drive? Who do you vote for?

 

[Robert W]

Who do you vote for?

I voted for Trump. What does that have to do with you emitting what you speak of daily is awesome amounts of CO2?

When I drive, My son owns a PU that on the very rare times I drive, it is in his truck.
You no doubt drive a lot more per year than I do. Oh and distance for me is maybe a mile. Several times per year I drive to appointments with my doctor. He is just about 3 miles Away.

 

[Robert W]

What sort of car do you drive? Who do you vote for?

Lacks relevance so what about you? Same two questions at you.

 

[Crick]

Lacks relevance so what about you? Same two questions at you.

If they lack relevance, why would you want an answer?

 

[Robert W]

If they lack relevance, why would you want an answer?

Well, what I hoped to get from you is a confession by you why you did to this planet what you keep accusing others of doing??? Care to explain your motive?

 

[Crick]

Well, what I hoped to get from you is a confession by you why you did to this planet what you keep accusing others of doing??? Care to explain your motive?

The bulk of my postings here, Robert, deal with the validity of mainstream science and the invalidity of the "science" your fellow deniers have been attempting to push. My most common accusations against other posters here is that they are ignorant and that they are lying.