The 2nd Amendment (Why we our Founders wrote it)

[danielpalos]

The Right to Bear Arms (i.e. the 2nd Amendment) was seen by our Founding Fathers as the last check against tyranny. They knew that the best line of defense against a standing army was an armed populace.

"If the representatives of the people betray their constituents, there is then no resource left but in the exertion of that original right of self-defense which is paramount to all positive forms of government, and which against the usurpations of the national rulers, may be exerted with infinitely better prospect of success than against those of the rulers of an individual state. In a single state, if the persons intrusted with supreme power become usurpers, the different parcels, subdivisions, or districts of which it consists, having no distinct government in each, can take no regular measures for defense. The citizens must rush tumultuously to arms, without concert, without system, without resource; except in their courage and despair."

- Alexander Hamilton, Federalist No. 28

"f circumstances should at any time oblige the government to form an army of any magnitude that army can never be formidable to the liberties of the people while there is a large body of citizens, little, if at all, inferior to them in discipline and the use of arms, who stand ready to defend their own rights and those of their fellow-citizens. This appears to me the only substitute that can be devised for a standing army, and the best possible security against it, if it should exist."

- Alexander Hamilton, Federalist No. 28

The people who wish to preserve liberty and are capable of bearing arms are the militia.

“A militia when properly formed are in fact the people themselves…and include, according to the past and general usuage of the states, all men capable of bearing arms… "To preserve liberty, it is essential that the whole body of the people always possess arms, and be taught alike, especially when young, how to use them."

- Richard Henry Lee, Federal Farmer No. 18, January 25, 1788

The Founding Fathers believed that peaceable law abiding citizens should never have their right to bear arms be infringed upon.

"And that the said Constitution be never construed to authorize Congress to infringe the just liberty of the Press, or the rights of Conscience; or to prevent the people of the United States, WHO ARE PEACEABLE CITIZENS, from keeping their own arms; …"

Samuel Adams quoted in the Philadelphia Independent Gazetteer, August 20, 1789, "Propositions submitted to the Convention of this State"

The fundamental purpose of the militia is to serve as a check upon a standing army, the words “well regulated” referred to the necessity that the armed citizens making up the militia have the level of equipment and training necessary to be an effective and formidable check upon the national government’s standing army.

"I ask who are the militia? They consist now of the whole people, except a few public officers." - George Mason, Address to the Virginia Ratifying Convention, June 4, 1788

"Before a standing army can rule, the people must be disarmed, as they are in almost every country in Europe. The supreme power in America cannot enforce unjust laws by the sword; because the whole body of the people are armed, and constitute a force superior to any band of regular troops." - Noah Webster, An Examination of the Leading Principles of the Federal Constitution, October 10, 1787

"The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed. A well regulated militia, composed of the body of the people, trained to arms, is the best and most natural defense of a free country." - James Madison, I Annals of Congress 434, June 8, 1789

“A militia when properly formed are in fact the people themselves…and include, according to the past and general usuage of the states, all men capable of bearing arms… "To preserve liberty, it is essential that the whole body of the people always possess arms, and be taught alike, especially when young, how to use them." - Richard Henry Lee, Federal Farmer No. 18, January 25, 1788

Well regulated does not mean regulations. When the Constitution specifies regulations it specifically states who and what is being regulated. The phrase "well-regulated" was in common use long before 1789, and remained so for a century thereafter. It referred to the property of something being in proper working order. Something that was well-regulated was calibrated correctly, functioning as expected. The fundamental purpose of the militia was to serve as a check upon a standing army, the words “well regulated” referred to the necessity that the armed citizens making up the militia have the necessary equipment and training necessary to be an effective and formidable check upon the national government’s standing army. Establishing government oversight of the people's arms was not only not the intent in using the phrase in the 2nd amendment, it was precisely to render the government powerless to do so that the founders wrote it.

Wellness of regulation must be prescribed by our federal Congress for the Militia of the United States. It is in Article 1, Section 8.

Well regulated does not mean regulations. When the Constitution specifies regulations it specifically states who and what is being regulated. The phrase "well-regulated" was in common use long before 1789, and remained so for a century thereafter. It referred to the property of something being in proper working order. Something that was well-regulated was calibrated correctly, functioning as expected. The fundamental purpose of the militia was to serve as a check upon a standing army, the words “well regulated” referred to the necessity that the armed citizens making up the militia have the necessary equipment and training necessary to be an effective and formidable check upon the national government’s standing army. Establishing government oversight of the people's arms was not only not the intent in using the phrase in the 2nd amendment, it was precisely to render the government powerless to do so that the founders wrote it.

Yes, it does. To claim otherwise is to appeal to ignorance of the law. Wellness of Regulation Must be Prescribed by our federal Congress, for the Militia of the United States.

I'm happy enough to let others decide who has made the more compelling argument.

lol. nobody takes the right wing seriously about the law.

there is no appeal to ignorance of the law, unlike on these political forums.

 

[Spare_change]

The Right to Bear Arms (i.e. the 2nd Amendment) was seen by our Founding Fathers as the last check against tyranny. They knew that the best line of defense against a standing army was an armed populace.

"If the representatives of the people betray their constituents, there is then no resource left but in the exertion of that original right of self-defense which is paramount to all positive forms of government, and which against the usurpations of the national rulers, may be exerted with infinitely better prospect of success than against those of the rulers of an individual state. In a single state, if the persons intrusted with supreme power become usurpers, the different parcels, subdivisions, or districts of which it consists, having no distinct government in each, can take no regular measures for defense. The citizens must rush tumultuously to arms, without concert, without system, without resource; except in their courage and despair."

- Alexander Hamilton, Federalist No. 28

"f circumstances should at any time oblige the government to form an army of any magnitude that army can never be formidable to the liberties of the people while there is a large body of citizens, little, if at all, inferior to them in discipline and the use of arms, who stand ready to defend their own rights and those of their fellow-citizens. This appears to me the only substitute that can be devised for a standing army, and the best possible security against it, if it should exist."

- Alexander Hamilton, Federalist No. 28

The people who wish to preserve liberty and are capable of bearing arms are the militia.

“A militia when properly formed are in fact the people themselves…and include, according to the past and general usuage of the states, all men capable of bearing arms… "To preserve liberty, it is essential that the whole body of the people always possess arms, and be taught alike, especially when young, how to use them."

- Richard Henry Lee, Federal Farmer No. 18, January 25, 1788

The Founding Fathers believed that peaceable law abiding citizens should never have their right to bear arms be infringed upon.

"And that the said Constitution be never construed to authorize Congress to infringe the just liberty of the Press, or the rights of Conscience; or to prevent the people of the United States, WHO ARE PEACEABLE CITIZENS, from keeping their own arms; …"

Samuel Adams quoted in the Philadelphia Independent Gazetteer, August 20, 1789, "Propositions submitted to the Convention of this State"

The fundamental purpose of the militia is to serve as a check upon a standing army, the words “well regulated” referred to the necessity that the armed citizens making up the militia have the level of equipment and training necessary to be an effective and formidable check upon the national government’s standing army.

"I ask who are the militia? They consist now of the whole people, except a few public officers." - George Mason, Address to the Virginia Ratifying Convention, June 4, 1788

"Before a standing army can rule, the people must be disarmed, as they are in almost every country in Europe. The supreme power in America cannot enforce unjust laws by the sword; because the whole body of the people are armed, and constitute a force superior to any band of regular troops." - Noah Webster, An Examination of the Leading Principles of the Federal Constitution, October 10, 1787

"The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed. A well regulated militia, composed of the body of the people, trained to arms, is the best and most natural defense of a free country." - James Madison, I Annals of Congress 434, June 8, 1789

“A militia when properly formed are in fact the people themselves…and include, according to the past and general usuage of the states, all men capable of bearing arms… "To preserve liberty, it is essential that the whole body of the people always possess arms, and be taught alike, especially when young, how to use them." - Richard Henry Lee, Federal Farmer No. 18, January 25, 1788

Well regulated does not mean regulations. When the Constitution specifies regulations it specifically states who and what is being regulated. The phrase "well-regulated" was in common use long before 1789, and remained so for a century thereafter. It referred to the property of something being in proper working order. Something that was well-regulated was calibrated correctly, functioning as expected. The fundamental purpose of the militia was to serve as a check upon a standing army, the words “well regulated” referred to the necessity that the armed citizens making up the militia have the necessary equipment and training necessary to be an effective and formidable check upon the national government’s standing army. Establishing government oversight of the people's arms was not only not the intent in using the phrase in the 2nd amendment, it was precisely to render the government powerless to do so that the founders wrote it.

Wellness of regulation must be prescribed by our federal Congress for the Militia of the United States. It is in Article 1, Section 8.

Well regulated does not mean regulations. When the Constitution specifies regulations it specifically states who and what is being regulated. The phrase "well-regulated" was in common use long before 1789, and remained so for a century thereafter. It referred to the property of something being in proper working order. Something that was well-regulated was calibrated correctly, functioning as expected. The fundamental purpose of the militia was to serve as a check upon a standing army, the words “well regulated” referred to the necessity that the armed citizens making up the militia have the necessary equipment and training necessary to be an effective and formidable check upon the national government’s standing army. Establishing government oversight of the people's arms was not only not the intent in using the phrase in the 2nd amendment, it was precisely to render the government powerless to do so that the founders wrote it.

OMG!!!

You exceed the left's capacity for logic wayyy too much!!! Daniel's head probably exploded. We'll never hear from him again --- or he will be exceedingly brain damaged.

The real question is: Will we notice?

all the right wing knows how to do, is appeal to ignorance of the law and blame less fortunate illegals, for being illegal.

You are what you are ... you can only strive to be what you dream to be.

 

[Skull Pilot]

The Right to Bear Arms (i.e. the 2nd Amendment) was seen by our Founding Fathers as the last check against tyranny. They knew that the best line of defense against a standing army was an armed populace.

"If the representatives of the people betray their constituents, there is then no resource left but in the exertion of that original right of self-defense which is paramount to all positive forms of government, and which against the usurpations of the national rulers, may be exerted with infinitely better prospect of success than against those of the rulers of an individual state. In a single state, if the persons intrusted with supreme power become usurpers, the different parcels, subdivisions, or districts of which it consists, having no distinct government in each, can take no regular measures for defense. The citizens must rush tumultuously to arms, without concert, without system, without resource; except in their courage and despair."

- Alexander Hamilton, Federalist No. 28

"f circumstances should at any time oblige the government to form an army of any magnitude that army can never be formidable to the liberties of the people while there is a large body of citizens, little, if at all, inferior to them in discipline and the use of arms, who stand ready to defend their own rights and those of their fellow-citizens. This appears to me the only substitute that can be devised for a standing army, and the best possible security against it, if it should exist."

- Alexander Hamilton, Federalist No. 28

The people who wish to preserve liberty and are capable of bearing arms are the militia.

“A militia when properly formed are in fact the people themselves…and include, according to the past and general usuage of the states, all men capable of bearing arms… "To preserve liberty, it is essential that the whole body of the people always possess arms, and be taught alike, especially when young, how to use them."

- Richard Henry Lee, Federal Farmer No. 18, January 25, 1788

The Founding Fathers believed that peaceable law abiding citizens should never have their right to bear arms be infringed upon.

"And that the said Constitution be never construed to authorize Congress to infringe the just liberty of the Press, or the rights of Conscience; or to prevent the people of the United States, WHO ARE PEACEABLE CITIZENS, from keeping their own arms; …"

Samuel Adams quoted in the Philadelphia Independent Gazetteer, August 20, 1789, "Propositions submitted to the Convention of this State"

The fundamental purpose of the militia is to serve as a check upon a standing army, the words “well regulated” referred to the necessity that the armed citizens making up the militia have the level of equipment and training necessary to be an effective and formidable check upon the national government’s standing army.

"I ask who are the militia? They consist now of the whole people, except a few public officers." - George Mason, Address to the Virginia Ratifying Convention, June 4, 1788

"Before a standing army can rule, the people must be disarmed, as they are in almost every country in Europe. The supreme power in America cannot enforce unjust laws by the sword; because the whole body of the people are armed, and constitute a force superior to any band of regular troops." - Noah Webster, An Examination of the Leading Principles of the Federal Constitution, October 10, 1787

"The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed. A well regulated militia, composed of the body of the people, trained to arms, is the best and most natural defense of a free country." - James Madison, I Annals of Congress 434, June 8, 1789

“A militia when properly formed are in fact the people themselves…and include, according to the past and general usuage of the states, all men capable of bearing arms… "To preserve liberty, it is essential that the whole body of the people always possess arms, and be taught alike, especially when young, how to use them." - Richard Henry Lee, Federal Farmer No. 18, January 25, 1788

Well regulated does not mean regulations. When the Constitution specifies regulations it specifically states who and what is being regulated. The phrase "well-regulated" was in common use long before 1789, and remained so for a century thereafter. It referred to the property of something being in proper working order. Something that was well-regulated was calibrated correctly, functioning as expected. The fundamental purpose of the militia was to serve as a check upon a standing army, the words “well regulated” referred to the necessity that the armed citizens making up the militia have the necessary equipment and training necessary to be an effective and formidable check upon the national government’s standing army. Establishing government oversight of the people's arms was not only not the intent in using the phrase in the 2nd amendment, it was precisely to render the government powerless to do so that the founders wrote it.

Wellness of regulation must be prescribed by our federal Congress for the Militia of the United States. It is in Article 1, Section 8.

Well regulated does not mean regulations. When the Constitution specifies regulations it specifically states who and what is being regulated. The phrase "well-regulated" was in common use long before 1789, and remained so for a century thereafter. It referred to the property of something being in proper working order. Something that was well-regulated was calibrated correctly, functioning as expected. The fundamental purpose of the militia was to serve as a check upon a standing army, the words “well regulated” referred to the necessity that the armed citizens making up the militia have the necessary equipment and training necessary to be an effective and formidable check upon the national government’s standing army. Establishing government oversight of the people's arms was not only not the intent in using the phrase in the 2nd amendment, it was precisely to render the government powerless to do so that the founders wrote it.

OMG!!!

You exceed the left's capacity for logic wayyy too much!!! Daniel's head probably exploded. We'll never hear from him again --- or he will be exceedingly brain damaged.

The real question is: Will we notice?

all the right wing knows how to do, is appeal to ignorance of the law and blame less fortunate illegals, for being illegal.

You are what you are ... you can only strive to be what you dream to be.

which in his case is an unemployed still living with Mommy lazy fuck who wants to get paid 30K a year for jerking off

 

[danielpalos]

Wellness of regulation must be prescribed by our federal Congress for the Militia of the United States. It is in Article 1, Section 8.

Well regulated does not mean regulations. When the Constitution specifies regulations it specifically states who and what is being regulated. The phrase "well-regulated" was in common use long before 1789, and remained so for a century thereafter. It referred to the property of something being in proper working order. Something that was well-regulated was calibrated correctly, functioning as expected. The fundamental purpose of the militia was to serve as a check upon a standing army, the words “well regulated” referred to the necessity that the armed citizens making up the militia have the necessary equipment and training necessary to be an effective and formidable check upon the national government’s standing army. Establishing government oversight of the people's arms was not only not the intent in using the phrase in the 2nd amendment, it was precisely to render the government powerless to do so that the founders wrote it.

OMG!!!

You exceed the left's capacity for logic wayyy too much!!! Daniel's head probably exploded. We'll never hear from him again --- or he will be exceedingly brain damaged.

The real question is: Will we notice?

all the right wing knows how to do, is appeal to ignorance of the law and blame less fortunate illegals, for being illegal.

You are what you are ... you can only strive to be what you dream to be.

which in his case is an unemployed still living with Mommy lazy fuck who wants to get paid 30K a year for jerking off

i prefer to be social enough to not be a crony capitalist.

 

[Spare_change]

Well regulated does not mean regulations. When the Constitution specifies regulations it specifically states who and what is being regulated. The phrase "well-regulated" was in common use long before 1789, and remained so for a century thereafter. It referred to the property of something being in proper working order. Something that was well-regulated was calibrated correctly, functioning as expected. The fundamental purpose of the militia was to serve as a check upon a standing army, the words “well regulated” referred to the necessity that the armed citizens making up the militia have the necessary equipment and training necessary to be an effective and formidable check upon the national government’s standing army. Establishing government oversight of the people's arms was not only not the intent in using the phrase in the 2nd amendment, it was precisely to render the government powerless to do so that the founders wrote it.

OMG!!!

You exceed the left's capacity for logic wayyy too much!!! Daniel's head probably exploded. We'll never hear from him again --- or he will be exceedingly brain damaged.

The real question is: Will we notice?

all the right wing knows how to do, is appeal to ignorance of the law and blame less fortunate illegals, for being illegal.

You are what you are ... you can only strive to be what you dream to be.

which in his case is an unemployed still living with Mommy lazy fuck who wants to get paid 30K a year for jerking off

i prefer to be social enough to not be a crony capitalist.

Got rejected, huh? How's that job at the 7-11?

 

[Skull Pilot]

OMG!!!

You exceed the left's capacity for logic wayyy too much!!! Daniel's head probably exploded. We'll never hear from him again --- or he will be exceedingly brain damaged.

The real question is: Will we notice?

all the right wing knows how to do, is appeal to ignorance of the law and blame less fortunate illegals, for being illegal.

You are what you are ... you can only strive to be what you dream to be.

which in his case is an unemployed still living with Mommy lazy fuck who wants to get paid 30K a year for jerking off

i prefer to be social enough to not be a crony capitalist.

Got rejected, huh? How's that job at the 7-11?

he doesn't have a job Mama still supports him

 

[Spare_change]

all the right wing knows how to do, is appeal to ignorance of the law and blame less fortunate illegals, for being illegal.

You are what you are ... you can only strive to be what you dream to be.

which in his case is an unemployed still living with Mommy lazy fuck who wants to get paid 30K a year for jerking off

i prefer to be social enough to not be a crony capitalist.

Got rejected, huh? How's that job at the 7-11?

he doesn't have a job Mama still supports him

She pays for the lights in the basement, and the 14 cases of Twinkies, then?

 

[Skull Pilot]

You are what you are ... you can only strive to be what you dream to be.

which in his case is an unemployed still living with Mommy lazy fuck who wants to get paid 30K a year for jerking off

i prefer to be social enough to not be a crony capitalist.

Got rejected, huh? How's that job at the 7-11?

he doesn't have a job Mama still supports him

She pays for the lights in the basement, and the 14 cases of Twinkies, then?

and the Resolve to clean up the stains on the couch

 

[Chuz Life]

The Right to Bear Arms (i.e. the 2nd Amendment) was seen by our Founding Fathers as the last check against tyranny. They knew that the best line of defense against a standing army was an armed populace.

"If the representatives of the people betray their constituents, there is then no resource left but in the exertion of that original right of self-defense which is paramount to all positive forms of government, and which against the usurpations of the national rulers, may be exerted with infinitely better prospect of success than against those of the rulers of an individual state. In a single state, if the persons intrusted with supreme power become usurpers, the different parcels, subdivisions, or districts of which it consists, having no distinct government in each, can take no regular measures for defense. The citizens must rush tumultuously to arms, without concert, without system, without resource; except in their courage and despair."

- Alexander Hamilton, Federalist No. 28

"f circumstances should at any time oblige the government to form an army of any magnitude that army can never be formidable to the liberties of the people while there is a large body of citizens, little, if at all, inferior to them in discipline and the use of arms, who stand ready to defend their own rights and those of their fellow-citizens. This appears to me the only substitute that can be devised for a standing army, and the best possible security against it, if it should exist."

- Alexander Hamilton, Federalist No. 28

The people who wish to preserve liberty and are capable of bearing arms are the militia.

“A militia when properly formed are in fact the people themselves…and include, according to the past and general usuage of the states, all men capable of bearing arms… "To preserve liberty, it is essential that the whole body of the people always possess arms, and be taught alike, especially when young, how to use them."

- Richard Henry Lee, Federal Farmer No. 18, January 25, 1788

The Founding Fathers believed that peaceable law abiding citizens should never have their right to bear arms be infringed upon.

"And that the said Constitution be never construed to authorize Congress to infringe the just liberty of the Press, or the rights of Conscience; or to prevent the people of the United States, WHO ARE PEACEABLE CITIZENS, from keeping their own arms; …"

Samuel Adams quoted in the Philadelphia Independent Gazetteer, August 20, 1789, "Propositions submitted to the Convention of this State"

The fundamental purpose of the militia is to serve as a check upon a standing army, the words “well regulated” referred to the necessity that the armed citizens making up the militia have the level of equipment and training necessary to be an effective and formidable check upon the national government’s standing army.

"I ask who are the militia? They consist now of the whole people, except a few public officers." - George Mason, Address to the Virginia Ratifying Convention, June 4, 1788

"Before a standing army can rule, the people must be disarmed, as they are in almost every country in Europe. The supreme power in America cannot enforce unjust laws by the sword; because the whole body of the people are armed, and constitute a force superior to any band of regular troops." - Noah Webster, An Examination of the Leading Principles of the Federal Constitution, October 10, 1787

"The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed. A well regulated militia, composed of the body of the people, trained to arms, is the best and most natural defense of a free country." - James Madison, I Annals of Congress 434, June 8, 1789

“A militia when properly formed are in fact the people themselves…and include, according to the past and general usuage of the states, all men capable of bearing arms… "To preserve liberty, it is essential that the whole body of the people always possess arms, and be taught alike, especially when young, how to use them." - Richard Henry Lee, Federal Farmer No. 18, January 25, 1788

Well regulated does not mean regulations. When the Constitution specifies regulations it specifically states who and what is being regulated. The phrase "well-regulated" was in common use long before 1789, and remained so for a century thereafter. It referred to the property of something being in proper working order. Something that was well-regulated was calibrated correctly, functioning as expected. The fundamental purpose of the militia was to serve as a check upon a standing army, the words “well regulated” referred to the necessity that the armed citizens making up the militia have the necessary equipment and training necessary to be an effective and formidable check upon the national government’s standing army. Establishing government oversight of the people's arms was not only not the intent in using the phrase in the 2nd amendment, it was precisely to render the government powerless to do so that the founders wrote it.

Wellness of regulation must be prescribed by our federal Congress for the Militia of the United States. It is in Article 1, Section 8.

Well regulated does not mean regulations. When the Constitution specifies regulations it specifically states who and what is being regulated. The phrase "well-regulated" was in common use long before 1789, and remained so for a century thereafter. It referred to the property of something being in proper working order. Something that was well-regulated was calibrated correctly, functioning as expected. The fundamental purpose of the militia was to serve as a check upon a standing army, the words “well regulated” referred to the necessity that the armed citizens making up the militia have the necessary equipment and training necessary to be an effective and formidable check upon the national government’s standing army. Establishing government oversight of the people's arms was not only not the intent in using the phrase in the 2nd amendment, it was precisely to render the government powerless to do so that the founders wrote it.

Winner!

Show me an intellectually honest liberal and I will show you a Conservative in the making.

 

[danielpalos]

10USC311 is federal law, right wingers; when are y'all going to, "get legal" to federal law?

 

[Chuz Life]

10USC311 is federal law, right wingers; when are y'all going to, "get legal" to federal law?

How are any right wingers not legal on this?

Show me an intellectually honest liberal and I will show you a Conservative in the making.

 

[danielpalos]

10USC311 is federal law, right wingers; when are y'all going to, "get legal" to federal law?

How are any right wingers not legal on this?

Show me an intellectually honest liberal and I will show you a Conservative in the making.

We have security problems in our free States.

The defense and protection of the state and of the United States is an obligation of all persons within the state. The legislature shall provide for the discharge of this obligation and for the maintenance and regulation of an organized militia.

 

[Chuz Life]

10USC311 is federal law, right wingers; when are y'all going to, "get legal" to federal law?

How are any right wingers not legal on this?

Show me an intellectually honest liberal and I will show you a Conservative in the making.

We have security problems in our free States.

The defense and protection of the state and of the United States is an obligation of all persons within the state. The legislature shall provide for the discharge of this obligation and for the maintenance and regulation of an organized militia.

Still not illegal.

Show me an intellectually honest liberal and I will show you a Conservative in the making.

 

[danielpalos]

10USC311 is federal law, right wingers; when are y'all going to, "get legal" to federal law?

How are any right wingers not legal on this?

Show me an intellectually honest liberal and I will show you a Conservative in the making.

We have security problems in our free States.

The defense and protection of the state and of the United States is an obligation of all persons within the state. The legislature shall provide for the discharge of this obligation and for the maintenance and regulation of an organized militia.

Still not illegal.

Show me an intellectually honest liberal and I will show you a Conservative in the making.

negligence?

Why is there any security problem in our free States.

 

[Chuz Life]

10USC311 is federal law, right wingers; when are y'all going to, "get legal" to federal law?

How are any right wingers not legal on this?

Show me an intellectually honest liberal and I will show you a Conservative in the making.

We have security problems in our free States.

The defense and protection of the state and of the United States is an obligation of all persons within the state. The legislature shall provide for the discharge of this obligation and for the maintenance and regulation of an organized militia.

Still not illegal.

Show me an intellectually honest liberal and I will show you a Conservative in the making.

negligence?

Why is there any security problem in our free States.

You haven't provided any evidence that there is such a security problem that is in any way beyond our capacity for dealing with.

Show me an intellectually honest liberal and I will show you a Conservative in the making.

 

[danielpalos]

10USC311 is federal law, right wingers; when are y'all going to, "get legal" to federal law?

How are any right wingers not legal on this?

Show me an intellectually honest liberal and I will show you a Conservative in the making.

We have security problems in our free States.

The defense and protection of the state and of the United States is an obligation of all persons within the state. The legislature shall provide for the discharge of this obligation and for the maintenance and regulation of an organized militia.

Still not illegal.

Show me an intellectually honest liberal and I will show you a Conservative in the making.

negligence?

Why is there any security problem in our free States.

You haven't provided any evidence that there is such a security problem that is in any way beyond our capacity for dealing with.

Show me an intellectually honest liberal and I will show you a Conservative in the making.

Why do we have the expense and cost, of alleged, wars on crime, drugs, poverty, and terror?

We don't need an income tax, with our Second Amendment.

 

[Chuz Life]

How are any right wingers not legal on this?

Show me an intellectually honest liberal and I will show you a Conservative in the making.

We have security problems in our free States.

The defense and protection of the state and of the United States is an obligation of all persons within the state. The legislature shall provide for the discharge of this obligation and for the maintenance and regulation of an organized militia.

Still not illegal.

Show me an intellectually honest liberal and I will show you a Conservative in the making.

negligence?

Why is there any security problem in our free States.

You haven't provided any evidence that there is such a security problem that is in any way beyond our capacity for dealing with.

Show me an intellectually honest liberal and I will show you a Conservative in the making.

Why do we have the expense and cost, of alleged, wars on crime, drugs, poverty, and terror?

We don't need an income tax, with our Second Amendment.

Why do you speak only in riddles and platitudes?

Show me an intellectually honest liberal and I will show you a Conservative in the making.

 

[danielpalos]

We have security problems in our free States.

Still not illegal.

Show me an intellectually honest liberal and I will show you a Conservative in the making.

negligence?

Why is there any security problem in our free States.

You haven't provided any evidence that there is such a security problem that is in any way beyond our capacity for dealing with.

Show me an intellectually honest liberal and I will show you a Conservative in the making.

Why do we have the expense and cost, of alleged, wars on crime, drugs, poverty, and terror?

We don't need an income tax, with our Second Amendment.

Why do you speak only in riddles and platitudes?

Show me an intellectually honest liberal and I will show you a Conservative in the making.

We don't need an income tax, with our Second Amendment.

An income tax is necessary for real times of war.

 

[Chuz Life]

Still not illegal.

Show me an intellectually honest liberal and I will show you a Conservative in the making.

negligence?

Why is there any security problem in our free States.

You haven't provided any evidence that there is such a security problem that is in any way beyond our capacity for dealing with.

Show me an intellectually honest liberal and I will show you a Conservative in the making.

Why do we have the expense and cost, of alleged, wars on crime, drugs, poverty, and terror?

We don't need an income tax, with our Second Amendment.

Why do you speak only in riddles and platitudes?

Show me an intellectually honest liberal and I will show you a Conservative in the making.

We don't need an income tax, with our Second Amendment.

An income tax is necessary for real times of war.

So don't pay any.

They ARE voluntary, you know.

Show me an intellectually honest liberal and I will show you a Conservative in the making.

 

[danielpalos]

negligence?

Why is there any security problem in our free States.

You haven't provided any evidence that there is such a security problem that is in any way beyond our capacity for dealing with.

Show me an intellectually honest liberal and I will show you a Conservative in the making.

Why do we have the expense and cost, of alleged, wars on crime, drugs, poverty, and terror?

We don't need an income tax, with our Second Amendment.

Why do you speak only in riddles and platitudes?

Show me an intellectually honest liberal and I will show you a Conservative in the making.

We don't need an income tax, with our Second Amendment.

An income tax is necessary for real times of war.

So don't pay any.

They ARE voluntary, you know.

Show me an intellectually honest liberal and I will show you a Conservative in the making.

We have a Second Amendment; there is no need for "wartime" powers.