Thank God for secularism

[martybegan]

Hmm, that's an idea, maybe gay bars and clubs can all start claiming tax exemptions...

It's advocacy I am talking about, not the fact of being gay.

 

[martybegan]

When that is done then it would be equally unConstitutional.

It's amazing how the left hides behind only the parts of the Constitution it likes and only for things it likes.

 

[Sherlock Holmes]

You accepted my points on history and then you had to try to insult me? Snorting what?

Whatever hallucinogen is giving you the persecution complex, that "democrats" want "religion wiped out".

Are you claiming that statement ("Democrats want religion wiped out") is not induced by drug intoxication? are you insinuating that you really meant it?

 

[TheGreatSatan]

View attachment 1152254

Lindsey Graham?

 

[Sherlock Holmes]

It's advocacy I am talking about, not the fact of being gay.

Hey, if we can advocate for guns then surely anything goes.

 

[Sherlock Holmes]

Lindsey Graham?

Could be, that's a girls name after all.

 

[martybegan]

Hey, if we can advocate for guns then surely anything goes.

As usual you add nothing to the conversation, oxygen thief.

 

[Sherlock Holmes]

Democrats push that idea.

I bet some magats do too

 

[TheGreatSatan]

Could be, that's a girls name after all.

He's a perverted freak.

That's why he gets along with democrats.

Lindsey Graham = war criminal

He should switch parties.

 

[Zincwarrior]

It's amazing how the left hides behind only the parts of the Constitution it likes and only for things it likes.

How is that hiding? I am agreeing that if it were legally found to be a religion, then the Constitution would also apply.

 

[martybegan]

How is that hiding? I am agreeing that if it were legally found to be a religion, then the Constitution would also apply.

You are dismissing the comparison.

 

[MisterBeale]

The constitution talks explicitly about religion, it says nothing about people's sexual lifestyle,

That is because the founders recognized that religion was necessary to a stable republic, and lack of morals and ethics would doom the nation. It would not have even occurred to them to put anything in there about a licentious lifestyle.

If the day came when the family was attacked, and the basic dignity of society eroded? The Constitution would no longer be necessary, as we would just go the way of Rome.

Founders Online: From John Adams to Massachusetts Militia, 11 October 1798

From John Adams to Massachusetts Militia, 11 October 1798

founders.archives.gov

 

[Zincwarrior]

You are dismissing the comparison.

I am indeed. However if a court found it persuasive then the same holding would apply. I am agreeing with you.

 

[Sherlock Holmes]

You are dismissing the comparison.

Why shouldn't he? its complete idiocy as usual from a magat.

 

[martybegan]

I am indeed. However if a court found it persuasive then the same holding would apply. I am agreeing with you.

Theres that dodging again.

 

[martybegan]

Why shouldn't he? its complete idiocy as usual from a magat.

It makes perfect sense if you aren't an SJW ideological hack.

Why should pride be taught in public schools if religion can't be?

 

[Robert W]

The Federal Bill of Rights protections have been extended to the states as well.

Several things come to mind. States can do acts not approved by the constitution. For instance, abortions. States can vary on laws about that. Schools are created by locals and their taxes. When the Feds send school funds to states, the congress never passed a law telling schools to include pride flags in the school or to ban the ten commandments. Finally, money has religion included. All that was banned was congress establishing religion.

 

[Sherlock Holmes]

That is because the founders recognized that religion was necessary to a stable republic, and lack of morals and ethics would doom the nation. It would not have even occurred to them to put anything in there about a licentious lifestyle.

If the day came when the family was attacked, and the basic dignity of society eroded? The Constitution would no longer be necessary, as we would just go the way of Rome.

Founders Online: From John Adams to Massachusetts Militia, 11 October 1798

From John Adams to Massachusetts Militia, 11 October 1798

founders.archives.gov

Shame he didn't manage to get that inserted into the constitution, he probably tried then got laughed at.

 

[Robert W]

I bet some magats do too

It seems you accept that Democrats push for it.

 

[Zincwarrior]

States can do acts not approved by the constitution.

Not acts that violate the Bill of Rights.

When the Feds send school funds to states, the congress never passed a law telling schools to include pride flags in the school or to ban the ten commandments.

Are you arguing the Fed could withhold funds to states with Pride Flags? I imagine they could. The ban came from the federal courts not the school/state however.