Texas masturbation bill is now in the hands of the Texas state affairs commitee

[danielpalos]

In March, Texas State Rep. Jessica Farrar, D-Houston, filed a bill that would penalize men for "unregulated masturbatory emissions" and the bill has now made its way into the hands of the Texas State Affairs Committee on Tuesday.

The committee is typically the panel that hears abortion-related legislation and it will now address Farrar's House Bill 4620, which is named the "Men's Right to Know Act."


RELATED



Texas masturbation bill is now in the hands of the Texas State Affairs Committee
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The article is from April it doesn't change the fact this bill is still taking place, It also proves what nutjobs these radical feminist jackasses are.

I can't stand the thought of jerking off, but really does this dumbass think she will stop men from jerking off. What kind of control freak even thinks about wanting to do this.

I mean it's almost as if you have to ask the Doctor if you can jerk off , get permission, or how about a license to jack off.

Jesus these people are totally nuts.

I prefer to "goad" women by informing them, play my "game", or I get, "manuela and her twin sister involved".

 

[BULLDOG]

http://www.legis.state.tx.us/tlodocs/85R/billtext/pdf/HB04260I.pdf#navpanes=0

"ensure a doctor ’s right to invoke their personal, moralistic, or religious beliefs in refusing to perform an elective vasectomy or prescribe Viagra;"

What? A doctor gets to impose his religious beliefs on people? So if a doctor's religious beliefs mean he hates black people, he can simply not give black people stuff like viagra or vasectomies. Great.

"and promote fully-abstinent sexual relations or occasional masturbatory emissions inside health care and medical facilities, as a means of the healthiest way to ensure men ’s health."

So, allowing doctors not to do their job is somehow the healthiest way to ensure men's health. Er... no, I don't get it.

"An attending physician must administer a medically-unnecessary digital rectal exam and magnetic resonance imagining of the rectum before administering an elective vasectomy or colonoscopy procedure, or prescribing Viagra."

Holy SHIT. So, a physician must carry out a "medically-unnecessary" exam of the guy's ass before doing a vasectomy or prescribing viagra. WHY?

"Emissions outside of a woman ’s vagina, or created outside of a health or medical facility, will be charged a $100 civil penalty for each emission, and will be considered an act against an unborn child, and failing to preserve the sanctity of life."

Wait, wanking is "failing to preserve the sanctity of life", what about eating meat? Executions? Texas loves them steaks and executions more than anything else. What about war? They're talking about the sanctity of life and going off and having meat for lunch, what a bunch of ******* hypocrites.

So, what next? Banning condoms because they "fail to preserve the sanctity of life"? **** off.

But yes, I don't GET IT.

Then coitus interruptus would be illegal too?

Not too sure about illegal, but it sure is disappointing.

 

[Bruce_T_Laney]

I believe my fine will be near a half of a million dollars by now... ( hey I am horny )

Too many stupid people in the damn world!

 

[danielpalos]

http://www.legis.state.tx.us/tlodocs/85R/billtext/pdf/HB04260I.pdf#navpanes=0

"ensure a doctor ’s right to invoke their personal, moralistic, or religious beliefs in refusing to perform an elective vasectomy or prescribe Viagra;"

What? A doctor gets to impose his religious beliefs on people? So if a doctor's religious beliefs mean he hates black people, he can simply not give black people stuff like viagra or vasectomies. Great.

"and promote fully-abstinent sexual relations or occasional masturbatory emissions inside health care and medical facilities, as a means of the healthiest way to ensure men ’s health."

So, allowing doctors not to do their job is somehow the healthiest way to ensure men's health. Er... no, I don't get it.

"An attending physician must administer a medically-unnecessary digital rectal exam and magnetic resonance imagining of the rectum before administering an elective vasectomy or colonoscopy procedure, or prescribing Viagra."

Holy SHIT. So, a physician must carry out a "medically-unnecessary" exam of the guy's ass before doing a vasectomy or prescribing viagra. WHY?

"Emissions outside of a woman ’s vagina, or created outside of a health or medical facility, will be charged a $100 civil penalty for each emission, and will be considered an act against an unborn child, and failing to preserve the sanctity of life."

Wait, wanking is "failing to preserve the sanctity of life", what about eating meat? Executions? Texas loves them steaks and executions more than anything else. What about war? They're talking about the sanctity of life and going off and having meat for lunch, what a bunch of ******* hypocrites.

So, what next? Banning condoms because they "fail to preserve the sanctity of life"? **** off.

But yes, I don't GET IT.

Then coitus interruptus would be illegal too?

Not too sure about illegal, but it sure is disappointing.

There is still no law that says, women are prohibited from asking guys to practice full body massage with happy ending, just for fun.

 

[danielpalos]

In March, Texas State Rep. Jessica Farrar, D-Houston, filed a bill that would penalize men for "unregulated masturbatory emissions" and the bill has now made its way into the hands of the Texas State Affairs Committee on Tuesday.

The committee is typically the panel that hears abortion-related legislation and it will now address Farrar's House Bill 4620, which is named the "Men's Right to Know Act."


RELATED



Texas masturbation bill is now in the hands of the Texas State Affairs Committee
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The article is from April it doesn't change the fact this bill is still taking place, It also proves what nutjobs these radical feminist jackasses are.

I can't stand the thought of jerking off, but really does this dumbass think she will stop men from jerking off. What kind of control freak even thinks about wanting to do this.

I mean it's almost as if you have to ask the Doctor if you can jerk off , get permission, or how about a license to jack off.

Jesus these people are totally nuts.

Fun women insist on National Thong Day and "cornering men in confined spaces"; and proclaim they are willing to play, "whack a mole", should it come up.

 

[DigitalDrifter]

Guys, please, try not to overthink this.
Using parody, this is simply a bill designed to show men what they put women through when they try to regulate what they do with their bodies.

 

[DigitalDrifter]

In March, Texas State Rep. Jessica Farrar, D-Houston, filed a bill that would penalize men for "unregulated masturbatory emissions" and the bill has now made its way into the hands of the Texas State Affairs Committee on Tuesday.

The committee is typically the panel that hears abortion-related legislation and it will now address Farrar's House Bill 4620, which is named the "Men's Right to Know Act."


RELATED



Texas masturbation bill is now in the hands of the Texas State Affairs Committee
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The article is from April it doesn't change the fact this bill is still taking place, It also proves what nutjobs these radical feminist jackasses are.

I can't stand the thought of jerking off, but really does this dumbass think she will stop men from jerking off. What kind of control freak even thinks about wanting to do this.

I mean it's almost as if you have to ask the Doctor if you can jerk off , get permission, or how about a license to jack off.

Jesus these people are totally nuts.

Perhaps you don't get it:

* The state must create a booklet called "A Man's Right to Know" that contains information on the benefits of and risks of vasectomies, Viagra prescriptions and colonoscopies. A man must review the booklet before getting the procedure.

* A doctor must get consent from the man before providing any of the treatments. The man may only get the treatment after waiting 24 hours and reviewing "A Man's Right to Know."

But yes, I don't GET IT.

So here's what you do. Grip your penis with one or two hands (one or two fingers will likely do just fine for you).
Thrusting up and down faster and faster, thinking of naked women helps (in your case naked men).
Soon you'll begin to feel a sensation that is heightened by the minute (seconds for you).
Inevitably there will be a climaxing moment and white sticky stuff will be all over your hands (in your case on a Sears catalog).

 

[Toro]

OMG I'll be on the FBI's 10 Most Wanted list!

 

[Toro]

Guys, please, try not to overthink this.
Using parody, this is simply a bill designed to show men what they put women through when they try to regulate what they do with their bodies.

Well, if they're going to do that, they should pass a law requiring couples to have sex at least three times a week!

 

[BULLDOG]

Guys, please, try not to overthink this.
Using parody, this is simply a bill designed to show men what they put women through when they try to regulate what they do with their bodies.

Well, if they're going to do that, they should pass a law requiring couples to have sex at least three times a week!

With each other?

 

[Pogo]

Guys, please, try not to overthink this.
Using parody, this is simply a bill designed to show men what they put women through when they try to regulate what they do with their bodies.

Thank you. Perspective.
Actually this came up (uh no pun intended) a while back and it was explained as legislative satire then. But there's always some wanker who needs to take satire literally in order to stroke their agenda and poke it into political discourse as if it were like a real thing.

 

[BULLDOG]

http://www.legis.state.tx.us/tlodocs/85R/billtext/pdf/HB04260I.pdf#navpanes=0

"ensure a doctor ’s right to invoke their personal, moralistic, or religious beliefs in refusing to perform an elective vasectomy or prescribe Viagra;"

What? A doctor gets to impose his religious beliefs on people? So if a doctor's religious beliefs mean he hates black people, he can simply not give black people stuff like viagra or vasectomies. Great.

"and promote fully-abstinent sexual relations or occasional masturbatory emissions inside health care and medical facilities, as a means of the healthiest way to ensure men ’s health."

So, allowing doctors not to do their job is somehow the healthiest way to ensure men's health. Er... no, I don't get it.

"An attending physician must administer a medically-unnecessary digital rectal exam and magnetic resonance imagining of the rectum before administering an elective vasectomy or colonoscopy procedure, or prescribing Viagra."

Holy SHIT. So, a physician must carry out a "medically-unnecessary" exam of the guy's ass before doing a vasectomy or prescribing viagra. WHY?

"Emissions outside of a woman ’s vagina, or created outside of a health or medical facility, will be charged a $100 civil penalty for each emission, and will be considered an act against an unborn child, and failing to preserve the sanctity of life."

Wait, wanking is "failing to preserve the sanctity of life", what about eating meat? Executions? Texas loves them steaks and executions more than anything else. What about war? They're talking about the sanctity of life and going off and having meat for lunch, what a bunch of ******* hypocrites.

So, what next? Banning condoms because they "fail to preserve the sanctity of life"? **** off.

But yes, I don't GET IT.

Then coitus interruptus would be illegal too?

Not too sure about illegal, but it sure is disappointing.

There is still no law that says, women are prohibited from asking guys to practice full body massage with happy ending, just for fun.

When is the last time that happened to you, other than in your dreams?

 

[Borillar]

In March, Texas State Rep. Jessica Farrar, D-Houston, filed a bill that would penalize men for "unregulated masturbatory emissions" and the bill has now made its way into the hands of the Texas State Affairs Committee on Tuesday.

The committee is typically the panel that hears abortion-related legislation and it will now address Farrar's House Bill 4620, which is named the "Men's Right to Know Act."


RELATED



Texas masturbation bill is now in the hands of the Texas State Affairs Committee
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The article is from April it doesn't change the fact this bill is still taking place, It also proves what nutjobs these radical feminist jackasses are.

I can't stand the thought of jerking off, but really does this dumbass think she will stop men from jerking off. What kind of control freak even thinks about wanting to do this.

I mean it's almost as if you have to ask the Doctor if you can jerk off , get permission, or how about a license to jack off.

Jesus these people are totally nuts.

I'm sure it's in good hands now. The committee will stroke it along until it comes before the legislature.

 

[Davebd1985]

Wow this is gonna have an explosive outcome!

 

[frigidweirdo]

http://www.legis.state.tx.us/tlodocs/85R/billtext/pdf/HB04260I.pdf#navpanes=0

"ensure a doctor ’s right to invoke their personal, moralistic, or religious beliefs in refusing to perform an elective vasectomy or prescribe Viagra;"

What? A doctor gets to impose his religious beliefs on people? So if a doctor's religious beliefs mean he hates black people, he can simply not give black people stuff like viagra or vasectomies. Great.

"and promote fully-abstinent sexual relations or occasional masturbatory emissions inside health care and medical facilities, as a means of the healthiest way to ensure men ’s health."

So, allowing doctors not to do their job is somehow the healthiest way to ensure men's health. Er... no, I don't get it.

"An attending physician must administer a medically-unnecessary digital rectal exam and magnetic resonance imagining of the rectum before administering an elective vasectomy or colonoscopy procedure, or prescribing Viagra."

Holy SHIT. So, a physician must carry out a "medically-unnecessary" exam of the guy's ass before doing a vasectomy or prescribing viagra. WHY?

"Emissions outside of a woman ’s vagina, or created outside of a health or medical facility, will be charged a $100 civil penalty for each emission, and will be considered an act against an unborn child, and failing to preserve the sanctity of life."

Wait, wanking is "failing to preserve the sanctity of life", what about eating meat? Executions? Texas loves them steaks and executions more than anything else. What about war? They're talking about the sanctity of life and going off and having meat for lunch, what a bunch of ******* hypocrites.

So, what next? Banning condoms because they "fail to preserve the sanctity of life"? **** off.

But yes, I don't GET IT.

Then coitus interruptus would be illegal too?

I think it sets dangerous precedent. If you can ban anything with fails "to preserve the sanctity of life", then what can't be banned?

 

[danielpalos]

http://www.legis.state.tx.us/tlodocs/85R/billtext/pdf/HB04260I.pdf#navpanes=0

"ensure a doctor ’s right to invoke their personal, moralistic, or religious beliefs in refusing to perform an elective vasectomy or prescribe Viagra;"

What? A doctor gets to impose his religious beliefs on people? So if a doctor's religious beliefs mean he hates black people, he can simply not give black people stuff like viagra or vasectomies. Great.

"and promote fully-abstinent sexual relations or occasional masturbatory emissions inside health care and medical facilities, as a means of the healthiest way to ensure men ’s health."

So, allowing doctors not to do their job is somehow the healthiest way to ensure men's health. Er... no, I don't get it.

"An attending physician must administer a medically-unnecessary digital rectal exam and magnetic resonance imagining of the rectum before administering an elective vasectomy or colonoscopy procedure, or prescribing Viagra."

Holy SHIT. So, a physician must carry out a "medically-unnecessary" exam of the guy's ass before doing a vasectomy or prescribing viagra. WHY?

"Emissions outside of a woman ’s vagina, or created outside of a health or medical facility, will be charged a $100 civil penalty for each emission, and will be considered an act against an unborn child, and failing to preserve the sanctity of life."

Wait, wanking is "failing to preserve the sanctity of life", what about eating meat? Executions? Texas loves them steaks and executions more than anything else. What about war? They're talking about the sanctity of life and going off and having meat for lunch, what a bunch of ******* hypocrites.

So, what next? Banning condoms because they "fail to preserve the sanctity of life"? **** off.

But yes, I don't GET IT.

Then coitus interruptus would be illegal too?

Not too sure about illegal, but it sure is disappointing.

There is still no law that says, women are prohibited from asking guys to practice full body massage with happy ending, just for fun.

When is the last time that happened to you, other than in your dreams?

If Only, there were nice girls to be found for free, when the guy has not enough money.

 

[danielpalos]

How about a law that proclaims, women cannot "talk smack to men", until After they do us?