Texas Files Lawsuit at SCOTUS Against GA, PA, MI, and WI

[busybee01]

Already did. In fact, it’s in the quote to this very thread.

article 2, section 1, clause 4

The Congress may determine the Time of chusing the Electors, and the Day on which they shall give their Votes; which Day shall be the same throughout the United States.

It might interest you to know that if this whole thing keeps rolling to Jan. 6, then yes it will be the Congress (US House) that will select the electors. But it won't be by popular vote. It is done by STATES, each one having one vote, and that puts Donald Trump in the White House for 4 MORE YEARS, undoubtedly.

No it is not. It is over once electors vote on Monday,

 

[Indeependent]

The Trump campaign has long since dropped their claims that pollwatchers were not allowed. You need to catch up on the facts. Protestors screaming at poll workers are not poll watchers.

Your complaints are a FARCE. Even judges appointed by Trump have thrown your asses out of court you lying NAZI.

No one dropped claims that poll watchers were hampered and hindered by Biden monkeys.
Been visiting with your Old Grandad again?

"President Donald Trump's campaign has dropped the allegation from its federal lawsuit challenging the results of Pennsylvania's election which claimed that hundreds of thousands of ballots in the key swing state had been illegally counted without Republican poll observers present."

Trump campaign drops claim that GOP poll observers weren't allowed to watch Pennsylvania vote count (msn.com)

Nov 7...so?

 

[busybee01]

Dumbfuck, I quoted what is being reported about the Texas lawsuit.

And while a bunch of states have lined up behind Texas, a bunch of other states have lined up behind the Constitution...

WASHINGTON — More than two dozen states filed motions with the Supreme Court on Thursday opposing Texas' bid to invalidate President-elect Joe Biden's wins in four battleground states, a long-shot legal move that Pennsylvania blasted as a "seditious abuse of the judicial process."​

HA HA. But you have it BACKWARDS. It is Texas, Alabama, Mississippi, Florida, and many others who are lined up behind the Constitution. That is the crux of the case. It is the 4 cheater states who are in VIOLATION of the Constitution (Article 2, Section 1), that are the defendants.

And while you're washing out your mouth with soap, gargle with some strong mouthwash too.

No it is not. Texas, Alabama and the others are the cheater states.

 

[Eric Arthur Blair]

Nov 7...so?

So it's all bullshit.

 

[busybee01]

That's just Pennsylvania. And that's far left Salon doing that reporting.
Bullshit! Say hi to Old Grandad.

In the other states, judges threw out the claim. Worth noting that he has dropped the claims from all of the filings.

 

[Indeependent]

Nov 7...so?

So it's all bullshit.

Liberals should be grateful for the Internet.
Whenever I have discussions with them at someone's home, they usually turn red, start choking, get all bug eyed and walk off within 30 seconds.

 

[busybee01]

"This is about Texas challenging state laws, BECAUSE I WANT IT TO BE!!! FUCK EVERYTHING THAT HAS TOLD ME REPEATEDLY THAT THIS IS ABOUT THE CONSTITUTION, BECAUSE I DON'T LIKE THAT THING!!!"

No, it's because they don't have standing, dumbass.

It's like CA suing TX for allowing fracking.

God you guys are stupid.

See page 15 for standing....

Scotus Filing | PDF | Postal Voting | Absentee Ballot

texas ag

www.scribd.com

"The constitutional failures of Defendant States injure Plaintiff States because [the right of suffrage is denied]."

The right to suffrage isn't denied. The folks in Texas got to vote.

The idea that you've lost your right to sufferage if your candidate loses is silly.

You aren't thinking if you think it is simple. I hope that is an exception for you, and not the norm.

If states illegally change their voting rules, such that the election outcome is changed, all of the people in other states who voted for other candidates have effectively had their votes nullified, illegally.

It's somewhat analogous to water rights of states that share the same river. If an upstream state builds a dam, the other states still have access to the river basin, but when they turn on their taps, they don't get as much water as before.

And the proper forum for recourse is the Supreme Court.

It's my opinion that the Dems in some states used the plandemic to illegally steal the election, in violation of their, and the US Constitutions. It's similar to stealing the river water that adjacent states share.

Virginia also changed its voting regulations this year, rather dramatically, but they did it through the legislature, consistent with the Constitution.

Regards,
Jim

Which rules were changed illegally?

Mail-in voting, for one, asshole.

Nothing illegal about it.

If the legislature didn't approve it, then it's illegal.

It is not. Voters approved it. It does not need to be passed by the legislature. You think the legislature is a king.

 

[Indeependent]

That's just Pennsylvania. And that's far left Salon doing that reporting.
Bullshit! Say hi to Old Grandad.

In the other states, judges threw out the claim. Worth noting that he has dropped the claims from all of the filings.

Which has what to do with Texas, et al?

 

[busybee01]

That's exactly how Trump feels. What good is a Supreme Court if you can't use it to over turn a corrupt election, right?

I have to agree. The Supreme Court is like an umpire, ready to step in when one teams cheats
and ignores laws and rules.

The Supreme Court is not a umpire when it illegally steals a election.

 

[Eric Arthur Blair]

In the other states, judges threw out the claim. Worth noting that he has dropped the claims from all of the filings.

Also worth noting that the vote cheating is over now. NO one is doing that sort of work now.
So yeah, no one is claiming observers are blocked, harassed, hassled anymore.
But they were and we have the video to prove it.

Wake up, dip shit!

 

[Indeependent]

That's exactly how Trump feels. What good is a Supreme Court if you can't use it to over turn a corrupt election, right?

I have to agree. The Supreme Court is like an umpire, ready to step in when one teams cheats
and ignores laws and rules.

The Supreme Court is not a umpire when it illegally steals a election.

Are you claiming to be qualified to be on the Supreme Court?

 

[Eric Arthur Blair]

The Supreme Court is not a umpire when it illegally steals a election.

So, the Supreme Court has illegally stolen an election?

Glug, glug.....drinky drinky.

 

[Lesh]

The Supreme Court is not a umpire when it illegally steals a election.

So, the Supreme Court has illegally stolen an election?

Glug, glug.....drinky drinky.

That's what you folks are hoping for

 

[Eric Arthur Blair]

That's what you folks are hoping for

Yeah...I didn't make that ignorant claim. I actually think the court is going to restore order and
slap the Biden flying monkeys down.

 

[Sunsettommy]

Dan from squirrels hill blog

A Summary of the Texas Election Lawsuit


A Summary of the Texas Election Lawsuit

By Robert Madsen

December 10, 2020

Excerpt:

Texas claims that the presidential elections as held (and as directed by government officials outside the legislature) in Pennsylvania, Georgia, Wisconsin, and Michigan all flagrantly violated their own election laws by materially weakening or doing away with security measures. Further, according to the U.S. Constitution, the legislature (representing the citizens) of each state has absolute authority and responsibility for how presidential electors are chosen; the will of legislature being expressed through state law.

Texas claims that the violations of election law in these states created an environment where ballot fraud was enabled and likely to occur. The lawsuit lists the violations of law in each of the defendant states and provides evidence of fraud (the number of ballots handled unconstitutionally) in each of the states sufficient to change the outcome of the ballot counts.

Pennsylvania

Facts:

Vote Tally: 3,445,548 for Biden and 3,363,951 for Trump – margin 81,597.

Requests for mail-in ballots 70% Democrats and 25% Republicans.

Mail-in ballots increased from 266,208 in 2016 to over 3,000,000 in 2020.

Violations of Election Law:

The Secretary of State unilaterally abrogated signature verification requirements for mail-in ballots.

PA supreme court changed existing deadline for receiving mail-in ballots from 8:00 PM on the day of election to 3 days after the election and adopted a presumption that non-postmarked ballots be considered as valid.

Election officials in Philadelphia and Allegheny Counties did not follow state law permitting poll-watchers to be present for the opening, counting, and recording of mail-in ballots.

The Secretary of State directed election officials to remove ballots before 7:00 AM on the day of election in order to “cure” defective mail-in ballots. This was done only in Democrat majority counties.

Election officials did not segregate ballots received after 8:00 PM on election day breaking the promise made to the U.S. Supreme Court thus making it impossible to identify or remove those ballots.

Evidence of Fraud:

LINK for the rest and covers the other three states

 

[Moonglow]

That is yer jist from a media outlet have you researched to find that Pennsylvania did use the process of legislature to okay the changes to the election?

 

[Moonglow]

An AG that is under investigation in Texass for abuse of office and taking kickbacks is suing several states claiming they are violating law...Irony at its best.

 

[Sunsettommy]

That is yer jist from a media outlet have you researched to find that Pennsylvania did use the process of legislature to okay the changes to the election?

Why don't YOU tell us yourself, or are you a typical drive by poster?

 

[Moonglow]

That is yer jist from a media outlet have you researched to find that Pennsylvania did use the process of legislature to okay the changes to the election?

Why don't YOU tell us yourself, or are you a typical drive by poster?

I did just tell you about Pennsylvania and why the Pennsylvania SC rejected the argument that the legislature should have amended the state constitution yet the Penn. SC said it was argued past the statue of limitation had expired.
That is discussing the facts not pejorative projections and contemptable arrogance of your cult of personality.

 

[ReinyDays]

Why don't YOU tell us yourself, or are you a typical drive by poster?

Is that a dare? ...

PA has submitted their response to the Texas complaint ... Opposition to Motion ...

PA claims TX has no authority to enforce TX laws in PA elections ... among several other points of law ...