"This is about Texas challenging state laws, BECAUSE I WANT IT TO BE!!! FUCK EVERYTHING THAT HAS TOLD ME REPEATEDLY THAT THIS IS ABOUT THE CONSTITUTION, BECAUSE I DON'T LIKE THAT THING!!!"
No, it's because they don't have standing, dumbass.
It's like CA suing TX for allowing fracking.
God you guys are stupid.
See page 15 for standing....
texas ag
www.scribd.com
"The constitutional failures of Defendant States injure Plaintiff States because [the right of suffrage is denied]."
The right to suffrage isn't denied. The folks in Texas got to vote.
The idea that you've lost your right to sufferage if your candidate loses is silly.
You aren't thinking if you think it is simple. I hope that is an exception for you, and not the norm.
If states illegally change their voting rules, such that the election outcome is changed, all of the people in other states who voted for other candidates have effectively had their votes nullified, illegally.
It's somewhat analogous to water rights of states that share the same river. If an upstream state builds a dam, the other states still have access to the river basin, but when they turn on their taps, they don't get as much water as before.
And the proper forum for recourse is the Supreme Court.
It's my opinion that the Dems in some states used the plandemic to illegally steal the election, in violation of their, and the US Constitutions. It's similar to stealing the river water that adjacent states share.
Virginia also changed its voting regulations this year, rather dramatically, but they did it through the legislature, consistent with the Constitution.
Regards,
Jim