Texas explained clearly

[Marener]

Look at how the western part is interlinked, look how the suburbs reach into the city center. All designed to dilute suburban and rural populations.

My point was made by the map created by Dems in 2020.

Maybe you could design a district to be Republican, but it would look like a very gerrymandered district that you'd really have to work to make it happen.

If you go off 2020 data, it's even harder since Dems were doing better.

Massachusetts 2020 election results

See full 2020 election results for Massachusetts.

www.cnn.com

 

[martybegan]

Maybe you could design a district to be Republican, but it would look like a very gerrymandered district that you'd really have to work to make it happen.

If you go off 2020 data, it's even harder since Dems were doing better.

Massachusetts 2020 election results

See full 2020 election results for Massachusetts.

www.cnn.com

They designed the districts to dilute Republicans, because that's what Dems do in States they control.

Just like Republicans do and SHOULD DO AS MUCH AS DEMS DO in States they control.

You only have an issue when Republicans do it.

 

[Marener]

They designed the districts to dilute Republicans, because that's what Dems do in States they control

They’re already dilute. That’s the nature of Massachusetts. Princeton generates a million different maps and the outcome is 7-9 seats for Dems.

 

[martybegan]

They’re already dilute. That’s the nature of Massachusetts. Princeton generates a million different maps and the outcome is 7-9 seats for Dems.

Princeton contains progressive hacks.

But keep referencing hack biased sources and ignoring what you can see.

 

[Marener]

Princeton contains progressive hacks.

You're a hack, and don't know anything about who does this analysis.

But that doesn't stop you from running your mouth.

 

[Failzero]

You're a hack, and don't know anything about who does this analysis.

But that doesn't stop you from running your mouth.

Oh look AI is learning how to use “ Hack
“ in a 4th way

 

[Robert W]

You're a hack, and don't know anything about who does this analysis.

But that doesn't stop you from running your mouth.

What stops you from running your mouth?

 

[Marener]

What stops you from running your mouth?

I use factual analysis. Marty just says whatever he wants to believe.

 

[martybegan]

You're a hack, and don't know anything about who does this analysis.

But that doesn't stop you from running your mouth.

I've shown the idiocy of that "Princeton" group giving Massachusetts a "good" rating.

You use your mouth to type?

 

[martybegan]

I use factual analysis. Marty just says whatever he wants to believe.

"factual"

Says the guy who thinks women having penises is reality.

 

[Marener]

I've shown the idiocy of that "Princeton" group giving Massachusetts a "good" rating.

No, you haven't. You used one data point to make a conclusion, which is foolish. Of course you won't consider any info otherwise.

 

[martybegan]

No, you haven't. You used one data point to make a conclusion, which is foolish. Of course you won't consider any info otherwise.

I used the actual map, and the voter results from the last presidential election.

even your "heat" map of the votes shows the districts were designed to dilute the red areas in the central south and southwest of Boston proper.

 

[Winco]

The funniest thing I have seen through all this is the party who claims to support democracy has left the state because they don't like what the outcome of a democratic vote would be.

Is that the way you see it?

If you were playing Heads-Up POKER, and the dealer dealt the other player 5 additional hole cards, would you be OK with that?

You know, you could still win, but your chances decreased dramatically.

 

[martybegan]

Is that the way you see it?

If you were playing Heads-Up POKER, and the dealer dealt the other player 5 additional hole cards, would you be OK with that?

You know, you could still win, but your chances decreased dramatically.

That's one of the dumbest analogies I have seen on this board.

 

[Independent thinker]

Is that the way you see it?

If you were playing Heads-Up POKER, and the dealer dealt the other player 5 additional hole cards, would you be OK with that?

You know, you could still win, but your chances decreased dramatically.

Democrats have already done that in several states, where their districts are already drawn up to give democrats an outsized representation disproportional to the number of Republicans in their states.

 

[martybegan]

Democrats have already done that in several states, where their districts are already drawn up to give democrats an outsized representation disproportional to the number of Republicans in their states.

Massachusetts is an example, with zero republican house members despite 35% of the 2024 vote going to Republicans. California is another, with a 60/40 Dem/Rep vote split resulting in an 80/20 Dem/Rep house split.

 

[Independent thinker]

Massachusetts is an example, with zero republican house members despite 35% of the 2024 vote going to Republicans. California is another, with a 60/40 Dem/Rep vote split resulting in an 80/20 Dem/Rep house split.

And both California and New York have passed laws against gerrymandering because they have already gerrymandered the districts to their advantage and have passed those laws in order to stop that from changing.

 

[Winco]

That's one of the dumbest analogies I have seen on this board.

No, it's correct.
Is this better?

You are playing at a full table (10 players).
Texas Hold Em. Hole Cards are dealt Face Up to ALL 10 Players.

Your opponents (5 of them, and ONLY those 5) look at all the cards in each players hand, shuffle them around to their liking, but each player still holds 2 hole cards before the flop.

The flop comes, and you could still win.
You gonna continue playing with this corrupt group of 5 players?

 

[martybegan]

No, it's correct.
Is this better?

You are playing at a full table (10 players).
Texas Hold Em. Hole Cards are dealt Face Up to ALL 10 Players.

Your opponents (5 of them, and ONLY those 5) look at all the cards in each players hand, shuffle them around to their liking, but each player still holds 2 hole cards before the flop.

The flop comes, and you could still win.
You gonna continue playing with this corrupt group of 5 players?

That person is only mad because he's at a table where his people aren't getting that advantage, at the next table over his friends are and he would get it.

 

[Winco]

Democrats have already done that in several states, where their districts are already drawn up to give democrats an outsized representation disproportional to the number of Republicans in their states.

Read my previous "Gerrymandering" comments from the past.
I have always said that Gerrymandering is wrong and should be outlawed.
Regardless of which corrupt party has done it.
Gerrymandering is WRONG.

Search results for query: gerrymandering

www.usmessageboard.com