Texans and their gun fetish!

[JimBowie1958]

No one has yet assplained why a gun fetish is a bad thing.

Pretty much the same reason any fetish is -- that it's a psychotic obsession -- except in this case the fetish object is deadly.

It's like, you know, if you had a hobby of keeping tigers. Or alligators. Or nuclear waste. Or perhaps being a mosquito breeder. You know, a developer of anthrax. That sort of thing.

So in your deviant mind, is eating food and breathing air a fetish?

That is the same as being allowed a weapon to defend yourself.


Since the dawn of mankind we have had them and to deprive us of weapons is to make us less than fully human. It makes us into libtard wards.

 

[Iceweasel]

Sorry, you don't have to agree for it to be true.

Since the kind of truth you are yammering about is subjective agreeing or disagreeing is meaningless.
Fail.

Truth isn't subjective. Facts are facts.

false. Subjectivity

Subjectivity is a personal process, and as such, subjective truth is also personal. There is no method, mechanism, or process, by which one can project their own subjective knowledge onto another person.

There's no such thing as subjective truth. That's dogma from the political religion of liberalism.

How did I know you say something as asinine as that.

Objective : sounds like the word object. You should be objective whenever you are discussing an object, something concrete that you can hold or touch. The facts that make up your objective statement should also be concrete, solid objects.
Subjective : is just the opposite. You can’t point to subjective subjects. They are all in your head and your past experiences. Subjective opinions are ephemeral and subject to any number of factors that can range from facts to emotions.

Things in your head are not facts, just stuff you believe.

IDIOT!

 

[daws101]

Since the kind of truth you are yammering about is subjective agreeing or disagreeing is meaningless.
Fail.

Truth isn't subjective. Facts are facts.

false. Subjectivity

Subjectivity is a personal process, and as such, subjective truth is also personal. There is no method, mechanism, or process, by which one can project their own subjective knowledge onto another person.

There's no such thing as subjective truth. That's dogma from the political religion of liberalism.

How did I know you say something as asinine as that.

Objective : sounds like the word object. You should be objective whenever you are discussing an object, something concrete that you can hold or touch. The facts that make up your objective statement should also be concrete, solid objects.
Subjective : is just the opposite. You can’t point to subjective subjects. They are all in your head and your past experiences. Subjective opinions are ephemeral and subject to any number of factors that can range from facts to emotions.

Things in your head are not facts, just stuff you believe.

IDIOT!

Excellent self description of your condition.

 

[Brynmr]

define is also an interpretation.

LMAO!!!!!! I think Liberals are trying to outdo their own idiotic assertion! LOL! And they're succeeding!! LOLOL

Gods in Heaven - you can't make this stuff up.

 

[Pogo]

So in your deviant mind, is eating food and breathing air a fetish?

Nope. Those are necessities to live. They don't kill anybody; they do the opposite.

I can't believe it's necessary to explain this elemental a level on the internet. It's like talking to a three-year-old, only with a slog of stupid sauce on it.

That is the same as being allowed a weapon to defend yourself.

In the same way a Michelin 215/65 tire is "the same as" the nation of Ethiopia.

Since the dawn of mankind we have had them and to deprive us of weapons is to make us less than fully human. It makes us into libtard wards.

I'll just let that speak for itself.

 

[JimBowie1958]

So in your deviant mind, is eating food and breathing air a fetish?

Nope. Those are necessities to live. They don't kill anybody; they do the opposite.

I can't believe it's necessary to explain this elemental a level on the internet. It's like talking to a three-year-old, only with a slog of stupid sauce on it.

That is the same as being allowed a weapon to defend yourself.

In the same way a Michelin 215/65 tire is "the same as" the nation of Ethiopia.

Since the dawn of mankind we have had them and to deprive us of weapons is to make us less than fully human. It makes us into libtard wards.

I'll just let that speak for itself.

Lol, it is a fact.

Without weapons we human beings would have not been able to defend ourselves from the wild animals that threatened us and, even worse, the mentally ill criminal humans that would have preyed on us given the chance.

And this is true of almost every human society up to WW1. In London you could carry a gun in public up to 1903. In Manchu China you could carry a pistol despite it being a regressive feudal society as even a townsman was expected to be able to defend themselves against criminals.

You libtards are quite the idiots on this whole topic.

Human beings did not need fang and claw as we could make tools for self defense and that is a vital part of being completely and fully human.

You want everyone to be dependent on the government to defend them, and that has NEVER worked.

You say you want to empower people, and that is horse shit when you wont agree to empower them to protect their very lives.

 

[Iceweasel]

Truth isn't subjective. Facts are facts.

false. Subjectivity

Subjectivity is a personal process, and as such, subjective truth is also personal. There is no method, mechanism, or process, by which one can project their own subjective knowledge onto another person.

There's no such thing as subjective truth. That's dogma from the political religion of liberalism.

How did I know you say something as asinine as that.

Objective : sounds like the word object. You should be objective whenever you are discussing an object, something concrete that you can hold or touch. The facts that make up your objective statement should also be concrete, solid objects.
Subjective : is just the opposite. You can’t point to subjective subjects. They are all in your head and your past experiences. Subjective opinions are ephemeral and subject to any number of factors that can range from facts to emotions.

Things in your head are not facts, just stuff you believe.

IDIOT!

Excellent self description of your condition.

You have no response because you can't THINK.

 

[daws101]

false. Subjectivity

Subjectivity is a personal process, and as such, subjective truth is also personal. There is no method, mechanism, or process, by which one can project their own subjective knowledge onto another person.

There's no such thing as subjective truth. That's dogma from the political religion of liberalism.

How did I know you say something as asinine as that.

Objective : sounds like the word object. You should be objective whenever you are discussing an object, something concrete that you can hold or touch. The facts that make up your objective statement should also be concrete, solid objects.
Subjective : is just the opposite. You can’t point to subjective subjects. They are all in your head and your past experiences. Subjective opinions are ephemeral and subject to any number of factors that can range from facts to emotions.

Things in your head are not facts, just stuff you believe.

IDIOT!

Excellent self description of your condition.

You have no response because you can't THINK.

another fine example of subjectivity .

 

[daws101]

So in your deviant mind, is eating food and breathing air a fetish?

Nope. Those are necessities to live. They don't kill anybody; they do the opposite.

I can't believe it's necessary to explain this elemental a level on the internet. It's like talking to a three-year-old, only with a slog of stupid sauce on it.

That is the same as being allowed a weapon to defend yourself.

In the same way a Michelin 215/65 tire is "the same as" the nation of Ethiopia.

Since the dawn of mankind we have had them and to deprive us of weapons is to make us less than fully human. It makes us into libtard wards.

I'll just let that speak for itself.

Lol, it is a fact.

Without weapons we human beings would have not been able to defend ourselves from the wild animals that threatened us and, even worse, the mentally ill criminal humans that would have preyed on us given the chance.

And this is true of almost every human society up to WW1. In London you could carry a gun in public up to 1903. In Manchu China you could carry a pistol despite it being a regressive feudal society as even a townsman was expected to be able to defend themselves against criminals.

You libtards are quite the idiots on this whole topic.

Human beings did not need fang and claw as we could make tools for self defense and that is a vital part of being completely and fully human.

You want everyone to be dependent on the government to defend them, and that has NEVER worked.

You say you want to empower people, and that is horse shit when you wont agree to empower them to protect their very lives.

imaginative but completely false tale of why humans developed weapons.

 

[Pogo]

Without weapons we human beings would have not been able to defend ourselves from the wild animals that threatened us and, even worse, the mentally ill criminal humans that would have preyed on us given the chance.

And this is true of almost every human society up to WW1. In London you could carry a gun in public up to 1903. In Manchu China you could carry a pistol despite it being a regressive feudal society as even a townsman was expected to be able to defend themselves against criminals.

1903... Manchu China..... --- that's in the distant past, innit?

Why do you think that is?

Take your time. Take the whole weekend. Looks like you need it.

You want everyone to be dependent on the government to defend them, and that has NEVER worked.

Do I now.
Link?

You say you want to empower people, and that is horse shit when you wont agree to empower them to protect their very lives.

Won't I now.
Link?

 

[Brynmr]

You have no response because you can't THINK.

another fine example of subjectivity .

Dodge. It's kind of funny how Leftists latch on to a concept and use it to avoid addressing issues. The 'where's the quote' is another one. LOL

 

[Brynmr]

Or, wait wait ..... "depends on what the meaning of 'is' is."

LMAO!!!!!

 

[daws101]

You have no response because you can't THINK.

another fine example of subjectivity .

Dodge. It's kind of funny how Leftists latch on to a concept and use it to avoid addressing issues. The 'where's the quote' is another one. LOL

really how so?
weasel dick made this statement " You have no response because you can't THINK"
he made two false assumptions any assumption is subjective .

 

[Brynmr]

Refuge of the radical Left.

 

[daws101]

Refuge of the radical Left.

View attachment 86922

a variation on the I got jack shit disclaimer.

 

[saintmichaeldefendthem]

Without weapons we human beings would have not been able to defend ourselves from the wild animals that threatened us and, even worse, the mentally ill criminal humans that would have preyed on us given the chance.

And this is true of almost every human society up to WW1. In London you could carry a gun in public up to 1903. In Manchu China you could carry a pistol despite it being a regressive feudal society as even a townsman was expected to be able to defend themselves against criminals.

1903... Manchu China..... --- that's in the distant past, innit?

Why do you think that is?

Take your time. Take the whole weekend. Looks like you need it.

You want everyone to be dependent on the government to defend them, and that has NEVER worked.

Do I now.
Link?

You say you want to empower people, and that is horse shit when you wont agree to empower them to protect their very lives.

Won't I now.
Link?

Ah, the "link" tactic again. Have you learned nothing?

 

[daws101]

Without weapons we human beings would have not been able to defend ourselves from the wild animals that threatened us and, even worse, the mentally ill criminal humans that would have preyed on us given the chance.

And this is true of almost every human society up to WW1. In London you could carry a gun in public up to 1903. In Manchu China you could carry a pistol despite it being a regressive feudal society as even a townsman was expected to be able to defend themselves against criminals.

1903... Manchu China..... --- that's in the distant past, innit?

Why do you think that is?

Take your time. Take the whole weekend. Looks like you need it.

You want everyone to be dependent on the government to defend them, and that has NEVER worked.

Do I now.
Link?

You say you want to empower people, and that is horse shit when you wont agree to empower them to protect their very lives.

Won't I now.
Link?

Ah, the "link" tactic again. Have you learned nothing?

no that would be you
if a poster can't or won't produce a link any statement they make would be subjective .

 

[saintmichaeldefendthem]

Without weapons we human beings would have not been able to defend ourselves from the wild animals that threatened us and, even worse, the mentally ill criminal humans that would have preyed on us given the chance.

And this is true of almost every human society up to WW1. In London you could carry a gun in public up to 1903. In Manchu China you could carry a pistol despite it being a regressive feudal society as even a townsman was expected to be able to defend themselves against criminals.

1903... Manchu China..... --- that's in the distant past, innit?

Why do you think that is?

Take your time. Take the whole weekend. Looks like you need it.

You want everyone to be dependent on the government to defend them, and that has NEVER worked.

Do I now.
Link?

You say you want to empower people, and that is horse shit when you wont agree to empower them to protect their very lives.

Won't I now.
Link?

Ah, the "link" tactic again. Have you learned nothing?

no that would be you
if a poster can't or won't produce a link any statement they make would be subjective .

Link?

 

[daws101]

Without weapons we human beings would have not been able to defend ourselves from the wild animals that threatened us and, even worse, the mentally ill criminal humans that would have preyed on us given the chance.

And this is true of almost every human society up to WW1. In London you could carry a gun in public up to 1903. In Manchu China you could carry a pistol despite it being a regressive feudal society as even a townsman was expected to be able to defend themselves against criminals.

1903... Manchu China..... --- that's in the distant past, innit?

Why do you think that is?

Take your time. Take the whole weekend. Looks like you need it.

You want everyone to be dependent on the government to defend them, and that has NEVER worked.

Do I now.
Link?

You say you want to empower people, and that is horse shit when you wont agree to empower them to protect their very lives.

Won't I now.
Link?

Ah, the "link" tactic again. Have you learned nothing?

no that would be you
if a poster can't or won't produce a link any statement they make would be subjective .

Link?

sure to what?

 

[daws101]

Without weapons we human beings would have not been able to defend ourselves from the wild animals that threatened us and, even worse, the mentally ill criminal humans that would have preyed on us given the chance.

And this is true of almost every human society up to WW1. In London you could carry a gun in public up to 1903. In Manchu China you could carry a pistol despite it being a regressive feudal society as even a townsman was expected to be able to defend themselves against criminals.

1903... Manchu China..... --- that's in the distant past, innit?

Why do you think that is?

Take your time. Take the whole weekend. Looks like you need it.

You want everyone to be dependent on the government to defend them, and that has NEVER worked.

Do I now.
Link?

You say you want to empower people, and that is horse shit when you wont agree to empower them to protect their very lives.

Won't I now.
Link?

Ah, the "link" tactic again. Have you learned nothing?

no that would be you
if a poster can't or won't produce a link any statement they make would be subjective .

Link?

Attachments & Links:

• A 15 Post Minimum is required before a member can "Link" or "Copy and Paste". After the 15 Post minimum is reached, each "Copy and Paste" needs to be linked to it's source. Only paste a portion of the piece, not the entire piece.
• Graphic Images, material or links to images, Videos, and or material, whether real, satirical or implied, depicting obscene, indecent, pornography, pornographic acts, or Morbid Images (at Moderator/Admin discretion) are not permitted. This includes Gifs and cartoons.
• Morbid Images may be Linked, not posted, when appropriate. A Clear Warning Sign Must precede the Link. "Warning Graphic Image" Or "Warning Morbid Image"
• You may not post images that show Human genitalia or Human Female aureola or nipples.
• Please Either Report or Ignore these Posts. Do Not Quote or Link to These Offending Posts.