Well, he [Obama] did mention terror.
Too bad it was at the end of the speech AND a general reference; NOT a specific one.
“No acts of terror will ever shake the resolve of this great nation.”
ThatÂ’s certainly not the same thing as saying this act of terror will not shake our resolve; or even acts of terror like these will never shake our resolve.
The short of it is this. When the president gave that speech in the Rose Garden, he was being intentionally vague. The passage in question is the epitome of saying something and absolutely nothing at the same time.
Think about it this way. If facts came out that this was not an act of terrorism and the president began taking criticism for calling it one, how long do you think it would have taken the White House to put out a press release clarifying that the president was speaking in general terms rather than about the Benghazi attack specifically? And would it not be an argument the mainstream media would run with?
....
The fact that this administration paraded Susan Rice around on the Sunday political shows (FIVE of them) after that Rose Garden speech to disavow the terrorist language is all the evidence one needs to figure out where the president and his administration stood on that issue. As he said in reference to Hillary Clinton at the debate, “she works for me” (him); and she said it was a spontaneous response to a YouTube video, not terrorism.
Obama Rose Garden Transcript; Candy Crowley Got it Wrong (VIDEO) | Opinion - Conservative