What does the phrase 'absolutely no justification' mean to you?
Just because someone made a movie against your religion you do not have the right to kill them.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
What does the phrase 'absolutely no justification' mean to you?
"Justice done for this terrible act" is not calling it an act of terror.
"Justice done for this terrible act" is not calling it an act of terror.
It does when you've just referenced 'acts of terror', plural.
If you say, I have 3 kids,
the youngest is named John, are you claiming that no sensible person would think that John was one of your kids?
Please stop.
What does the phrase 'absolutely no justification' mean to you?
Just because someone made a movie against your religion you do not have the right to kill them.
He did justify it. They all justified it. Every single time they said idiotic things like "we're sorry" and "this is not representative of" and "vile youtube video" and "abuse of the first amendment"
Dumbass.
"In fact, if you go back to Obama's 9/12 rose garden speech, you find that he was blaming the video for the "senseless violence" in Benghazi. That's front and center in the 4th paragraph of Obama's speech. His reference to "acts of terror" is an aside in the 10th paragraph after he has been discussing 9/11/01 and the loss of American lives in Iraq and Afghanistan."
Fact Check: 'Act of Terror' Not Same as 'Terrorism'
So when he says
But there is absolutely no justification to this type of senseless violence. None.
Who is he blaming, exactly???
"Justice done for this terrible act" is not calling it an act of terror.
It does when you've just referenced 'acts of terror', plural.
If you say, I have 3 kids,
the youngest is named John, are you claiming that no sensible person would think that John was one of your kids?
Please stop.
He referenced 911 attacks just preceding it....plural
What does the phrase 'absolutely no justification' mean to you?
Just because someone made a movie against your religion you do not have the right to kill them.
1. Do you find that to be a position you do not agree with?
2. Do you believe that it is impossible to call an act of violence terrorism unless you do not in any way mention what may have been the reason for the terrorism?
It does when you've just referenced 'acts of terror', plural.
If you say, I have 3 kids,
the youngest is named John, are you claiming that no sensible person would think that John was one of your kids?
Please stop.
He referenced 911 attacks just preceding it....plural
So what?
He also included the Benghazi attack in his reference to the past 9/11 attacks:
We mourned with the families who were lost on that day. I visited the graves of troops who made the ultimate sacrifice in Iraq and Afghanistan at the hallowed grounds of Arlington Cemetery, and had the opportunity to say thank you and visit some of our wounded warriors at Walter Reed. And then last night, we learned the news of this attack in Benghazi.
THAT was the 'preceding' reference(s) you thought excluded Benghazi. Sorry, they INCLUDED Benghazi.
Checkmate.
OK, I havent followed the Libya attacks as closely as some of you. But I have a legit question. I have been reading for the last couple weeks about how some people are bent out of shape about Obama waiting 14 days to call the attacks an act of terrorism. But when I read the transcripts, I notice Obama calls the attacks an act of terror.
My question is: why does it matter? I mean, does it REALLY make a difference what the attacks are referred to? Stevens is still dead, verbage wont change that, right? I just dont get it, honestly. Can anyone shed some light on why the lack of a couple of little words makes such a difference?
He referenced 911 attacks just preceding it....plural
So what?
He also included the Benghazi attack in his reference to the past 9/11 attacks:
We mourned with the families who were lost on that day. I visited the graves of troops who made the ultimate sacrifice in Iraq and Afghanistan at the hallowed grounds of Arlington Cemetery, and had the opportunity to say thank you and visit some of our wounded warriors at Walter Reed. And then last night, we learned the news of this attack in Benghazi.
THAT was the 'preceding' reference(s) you thought excluded Benghazi. Sorry, they INCLUDED Benghazi.
Checkmate.
not so fast....if he knew it was a TERRORIST ATTACK why did he and his minions continue to blame the video.....?
Just because someone made a movie against your religion you do not have the right to kill them.
1. Do you find that to be a position you do not agree with?
2. Do you believe that it is impossible to call an act of violence terrorism unless you do not in any way mention what may have been the reason for the terrorism?
This adminstration has tried to make every terrorist act on their watch.......... "not terrorist."
Checkmate my ass. You are not going to word fuck your way out with the American people on this one.
Sorry, it was YOUR measure I used. You hung your hat on the claim that the president preceded the 'acts of terror' reference with only a 9/11 reference so he couldn't have been talking about Benghazi.
Sorry, he specifically mentioned Benghazi. You lose the argument.
So what?
He also included the Benghazi attack in his reference to the past 9/11 attacks:
We mourned with the families who were lost on that day. I visited the graves of troops who made the ultimate sacrifice in Iraq and Afghanistan at the hallowed grounds of Arlington Cemetery, and had the opportunity to say thank you and visit some of our wounded warriors at Walter Reed. And then last night, we learned the news of this attack in Benghazi.
THAT was the 'preceding' reference(s) you thought excluded Benghazi. Sorry, they INCLUDED Benghazi.
Checkmate.
not so fast....if he knew it was a TERRORIST ATTACK why did he and his minions continue to blame the video.....?
That's not relevant to this specific discussion. Do you wish to acknowledge that yes the President did call it an act of terror, and yes Mitt Romney was lying in the debate, and yes Paul Ryan lied in the VP debate?
The spin has come from the WH. Now why in the world would they spin a terrorist attack as angry mob reaction over some Muslim hating film? Makes you wonder.
American Crossroads: "Act of Terror" - YouTube
Dickweed, Obama baldfaced lied to the American people by trying to convince us that this Al Qaeda RPG attack was just a spontaneous riot caused by a video that mocked Muhammed.
It was a coordinated deception perped on the public for political reasons.
So fuck him and his entire team of incompetent liars.