Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
hilariously sad thay you think this has anytbing to do with obamacare
it is an interesting ethical question. with medical care a finite resource do we have an obligation to prolong the life of every individual for as long as possible or do we need to take a more utilitarian approach and use the resources to provide the most benefit overall, which might mean the terminally ill or very old receive less caredenied treatment by the Insurance's Drug plan....not by the Doctor....
and that is just horrible!
So, will obamacare kick in? I thought treatment was not allowed to be denied?denied treatment by the Insurance's Drug plan....not by the Doctor....
and that is just horrible!
Spoken like a true Hitler boy.it is an interesting ethical question. with medical care a finite resource do we have an obligation to prolong the life of every individual for as long as possible or do we need to take a more utilitarian approach and use the resources to provide the most benefit overall, which might mean the terminally ill or very old receive less caredenied treatment by the Insurance's Drug plan....not by the Doctor....
and that is just horrible!
it is an interesting ethical question. with medical care a finite resource do we have an obligation to prolong the life of every individual for as long as possible or do we need to take a more utilitarian approach and use the resources to provide the most benefit overall, which might mean the terminally ill or very old receive less caredenied treatment by the Insurance's Drug plan....not by the Doctor....
and that is just horrible!
i would say not.it is an interesting ethical question. with medical care a finite resource do we have an obligation to prolong the life of every individual for as long as possible or do we need to take a more utilitarian approach and use the resources to provide the most benefit overall, which might mean the terminally ill or very old receive less caredenied treatment by the Insurance's Drug plan....not by the Doctor....
and that is just horrible!
Ahhhh yes the ever popular "utilitarian" approach to government. So, tell me. Is it OK to allow a mob to murder one person in the hope that no one else will be killed?
Round up those Christians and use their wealth for the good of the State! ZEIG HEIL!So, will obamacare kick in? I thought treatment was not allowed to be denied?denied treatment by the Insurance's Drug plan....not by the Doctor....
and that is just horrible!
you've gone off the deep end.Round up those Christians and use their wealth for the good of the State! ZEIG HEIL!So, will obamacare kick in? I thought treatment was not allowed to be denied?denied treatment by the Insurance's Drug plan....not by the Doctor....
and that is just horrible!
How did you arrive at that analogy from the story? You went off into the weeds to find a strawman.i would say not.it is an interesting ethical question. with medical care a finite resource do we have an obligation to prolong the life of every individual for as long as possible or do we need to take a more utilitarian approach and use the resources to provide the most benefit overall, which might mean the terminally ill or very old receive less caredenied treatment by the Insurance's Drug plan....not by the Doctor....
and that is just horrible!
Ahhhh yes the ever popular "utilitarian" approach to government. So, tell me. Is it OK to allow a mob to murder one person in the hope that no one else will be killed?
but if you have two patients needing an immediate heart transplant, one 90 and one 15, and one heart compatible with both, who gets it?
that answer seems obvious enough, but somewhere there is a decision that will be much tougher - so where do we draw the line?
She got drugs finally...So, will obamacare kick in? I thought treatment was not allowed to be denied?denied treatment by the Insurance's Drug plan....not by the Doctor....
and that is just horrible!
I don't know of any non-profit insurance companies or how they could supply superior care. What does her contract say though?you've gone off the deep end.Round up those Christians and use their wealth for the good of the State! ZEIG HEIL!So, will obamacare kick in? I thought treatment was not allowed to be denied?denied treatment by the Insurance's Drug plan....not by the Doctor....
and that is just horrible!
are you willing to admit that this decision to deny the different chemo drug is coming out of the for-profit insurance company?
We all know the government will provide her healthcare, just ask the thousands of dead Vets who got turned away by the VA.you've gone off the deep end.Round up those Christians and use their wealth for the good of the State! ZEIG HEIL!So, will obamacare kick in? I thought treatment was not allowed to be denied?denied treatment by the Insurance's Drug plan....not by the Doctor....
and that is just horrible!
are you willing to admit that this decision to deny the different chemo drug is coming out of the for-profit insurance company?
no, i'm just illustrating that at a certain point we recognize a utilitarian argument as ethically correct in health care decisions.How did you arrive at that analogy from the story? You went off into the weeds to find a strawman.i would say not.it is an interesting ethical question. with medical care a finite resource do we have an obligation to prolong the life of every individual for as long as possible or do we need to take a more utilitarian approach and use the resources to provide the most benefit overall, which might mean the terminally ill or very old receive less caredenied treatment by the Insurance's Drug plan....not by the Doctor....
and that is just horrible!
Ahhhh yes the ever popular "utilitarian" approach to government. So, tell me. Is it OK to allow a mob to murder one person in the hope that no one else will be killed?
but if you have two patients needing an immediate heart transplant, one 90 and one 15, and one heart compatible with both, who gets it?
that answer seems obvious enough, but somewhere there is a decision that will be much tougher - so where do we draw the line?
Wrong. Contracts are two sided, HOWEVER, thanks to liberals some states will be down to ONE choice. Less choice means less options, correct?She got drugs finally...So, will obamacare kick in? I thought treatment was not allowed to be denied?denied treatment by the Insurance's Drug plan....not by the Doctor....
and that is just horrible!
Health Insurance was not to be denied to those with pre-existing conditions...
Sadly, the Insurance companies still make all the decisions on what they will cover, as they ALWAYS have done...
Let everyone over 40 die, that would be economical.no, i'm just illustrating that at a certain point we recognize a utilitarian argument as ethically correct in health care decisions.How did you arrive at that analogy from the story? You went off into the weeds to find a strawman.i would say not.it is an interesting ethical question. with medical care a finite resource do we have an obligation to prolong the life of every individual for as long as possible or do we need to take a more utilitarian approach and use the resources to provide the most benefit overall, which might mean the terminally ill or very old receive less caredenied treatment by the Insurance's Drug plan....not by the Doctor....
and that is just horrible!
Ahhhh yes the ever popular "utilitarian" approach to government. So, tell me. Is it OK to allow a mob to murder one person in the hope that no one else will be killed?
but if you have two patients needing an immediate heart transplant, one 90 and one 15, and one heart compatible with both, who gets it?
that answer seems obvious enough, but somewhere there is a decision that will be much tougher - so where do we draw the line?
so where is that point?
it wasn'tShe got drugs finally...So, will obamacare kick in? I thought treatment was not allowed to be denied?denied treatment by the Insurance's Drug plan....not by the Doctor....
and that is just horrible!
Health Insurance was not to be denied to those with pre-existing conditions...
agreedSadly, the Insurance companies still make all the decisions on what they will cover in situations like this, as they ALWAYS have done...
Obamacare passed and this is the result - death panels.it wasn'tShe got drugs finally...So, will obamacare kick in? I thought treatment was not allowed to be denied?denied treatment by the Insurance's Drug plan....not by the Doctor....
and that is just horrible!
Health Insurance was not to be denied to those with pre-existing conditions...
agreedSadly, the Insurance companies still make all the decisions on what they will cover in situations like this, as they ALWAYS have done...