There is currently a discussion about term limits. I'm against term limits. The reason is two fold. First off...if you look at the folks who were in charge when you were growing up 30-40 years ago and you look at the elected officials of today; you'll find that with very few exceptions there are new faces and new names. Did the "corruption" go away with new faces? Nope. So thinking that it will go away if you force by statute a revolving door of new faces is rather silly. In fact, it will likely make corruption more of an issue since, if you want to look at it from the standpoint of an employer, employees who remain at their job longer are less apt to become corrupt and corrupt employees are usually discovered pretty quickly and terminated. The second reason is this. If I like my rep; I want to continue voting for her or him.
Most of the silly angst I hear on this board is usually about something those on the right call "the deep state." It has become their crutch (aka excuse) to explain whatever outcome they don't favor. You can't get a straight answer from anyone about what the "deep state" is but most often it is called the un-elected appointed officials who remain at their jobs and are able to make all sorts of mischief counter to the wishes of whatever conservative overlord is installed.
My question is this. Shouldn't there be "term limits" for these folks too--all government employees? Postal workers, teachers, the lady at the DMV, the guys in the NRO, CIA etc...
Yes, for term limits. Most of these politicians get entrenched in there so long, I think they are starting to grow roots. Remember, our current version of Washington was never supposed to be this way. It wasn’t supposed to be a full time job, so to speak. They were supposed to be in session a couple times a year to discuss business, the go home. Somewhere along the way, we allowed them to take root, and become full time politicians, with the best benefits package you could ever hope for. I mean really…they make 3 times the median salary, plus get the best insurance, as much vacation time as one could ever ask for, plus they are immune from prosecution for most things that would land anyone else in jail, they are allowed to trade in insider information (and if you believe the stock act stopped all that, then you’re fooling yourself). You get lobbyists stuffing your pockets with money to sway your vote, plus you get lifetime pay for just a few years served!
Gee, being in “public service” sure is nice…
I’ll go even further, not only do I support term limits, I also support bi partisan yearly audits of every elected official. I want to know how someone can enter congress at less than 200k per year, and end up retiring wealthy, and then after they retire, they can use their time in office to make them even more money.
First off...if you look at the folks who were in charge when you were growing up 30-40 years ago and you look at the elected officials of today; you'll find that with very few exceptions there are new faces and new names. Did the "corruption" go away with new faces? Nope. So thinking that it will go away if you force by statute a revolving door of new faces is rather silly.
No, because now, like then, members can serve in congress for a lifetime, so, the corruption didn’t go away, but neither did the ability for them to make a career in office.
In fact, it will likely make corruption more of an issue since, if you want to look at it from the standpoint of an employer, employees who remain at their job longer are less apt to become corrupt and corrupt employees are usually discovered pretty quickly and terminated.
But this isn’t like any normal job, where as long as you are pleasing your base, you can keep getting re elected for decades. With most people being very partisan, as we have seen here repeatedly, if your congress person is accused of a crime, your base will came out and defend you vigorously, and then they will vote for you again!
That does nothing to curb corruption because, they get too entrenched, and become part of “the club”, also, congressmen are generally never even looked at, even if they are accused of something, they just deny it…the media may talk about it for awhile, then it goes away…they are never held accountable for their actions.
I say, let’s not let them get entrenched. 6 terms in the house, 3 terms in senate…and you’re done. Maybe if they realize their time in congress is finite, they will actually *gasp* work for the people!
The second reason is this. If I like my rep; I want to continue voting for her or him.
Yeah, but that also means that the other side gets to keep re electing mgt and boebert!
I just think too much time in congress will allow corruption to fester.