Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The native residents of Kenosha will acquit him for defending their town.
That is a complete delusion. YOu should seek profession help.The native residents of Kenosha will acquit him for defending their town.
There’s no way this gun toting punk gets a self defense acquittal. And unless the first person he shot and killed was in the process of killing or raping someone he won’t convince any jury that he was defending Kenosha’s own.
A 2ndAmend cult member should know that you can’t shoot to kill somebody in defense of someone else’s property on a public street.
This punk is a murderer. He drove from Chicago to Kenosha to incite violence because KELLY ANN says violence will help his beloved Trump to win.
You still have a right of self defense in this country....watch the mans lawyer he explains the first shooting....The native residents of Kenosha will acquit him for defending their town.
There’s no way this gun toting punk gets a self defense acquittal. And unless the first person he shot and killed was in the process of killing or raping someone he won’t convince any jury that he was defending Kenosha’s own.
A 2ndAmend cult member should know that you can’t shoot to kill somebody in defense of someone else’s property on a public street.
This punk is a murderer. He drove from Chicago to Kenosha to incite violence because KELLY ANN says violence will help his beloved Trump to win.
The native residents of Kenosha will acquit him for defending their town.
There’s no way this gun toting punk gets a self defense acquittal. And unless the first person he shot and killed was in the process of killing or raping someone he won’t convince any jury that he was defending Kenosha’s own.
A 2ndAmend cult member should know that you can’t shoot to kill somebody in defense of someone else’s property on a public street.
This punk is a murderer. He drove from Chicago to Kenosha to incite violence because KELLY ANN says violence will help his beloved Trump to win.
How do arrest someone for self defense!? If we don’t get this child out of jail we are doing to let them
Kenosha violence: Juvenile arrested in deadly shooting amid Jacob Blake unrest, Illinois police say
A 17-year-old suspect has been arrested in connection to at least one of the two shooting deaths amid the unrest Tuesday night in Kenosha, Wis., Illinois police confirmed on Wednesday.www.foxnews.com
Arrest all of us! We need to fight back!
No, idiot. I'm concerned with upholding the law. People can't just kill others and claim it's self defense when the law says it's not self defense. WTF is wrong with you?LOLOLOLLiar. My argument is more reasonable than yours. I pointed out he employed more force than was necessary to prevent being attacked. I also pointed out he may not have legally been allowed to carry that gun.He's not innocent.Not if he was in the commission of a crime himself.The law states he must be hunting.Not if it's a shotgun or long gun, moron. This law has already been discussed ad nauseum.
Either way, it is not self-defense to cross state borders, take an assault rifle from somebody, then to go to a riot to attempt to enforce peace, as a minor.
He is allowed to stand there and defend himself if attacked.
Standing there is not a crime. YOu are trying to dodge the ill intent and responsibility of your violent brown shirt mobs, on a technicality, and rail road an innocent man in the process.
You are vile beyond measure.
See the thing is, I supported my conclusion with a reasoned argument based on the facts of the case.
All you had to attempt to counter that, was a flat unsupported assertion.
We all saw that you were unable to explain how he was guilty of something, by the act of just standing there.
1. It is insane and unjust to hold a man defending himself in a life and death situation to such a standard of behavior.
2. Any gun rule, is a minor technicality in comparison to whether or not Ritterhouse was being attacked by a violent mob and had the right to defend himself or if he had to let himself be beaten possibly to death.
Yeah, we can't hold him to the law. We should hold him to what makes you feel warm and fuzzy.
And no, it's not a technicality. It's the law. Or better known to you, a pesky law.
You are literally more concerned with the legality of gun possession than the legality of a mob's murderous assault.
Because you support the "right" of the marxist mob to use violence to terrorize or kill your political enemies, more than you support the actual right of self defense.
You are a vile person.
How do arrest someone for self defense!? If we don’t get this child out of jail we are doing to let themKenosha violence: Juvenile arrested in deadly shooting amid Jacob Blake unrest, Illinois police say
A 17-year-old suspect has been arrested in connection to at least one of the two shooting deaths amid the unrest Tuesday night in Kenosha, Wis., Illinois police confirmed on Wednesday.
Arrest all of us! We need to fight back!
HuhHow do arrest someone for self defense!? If we don’t get this child out of jail we are doing to let themKenosha violence: Juvenile arrested in deadly shooting amid Jacob Blake unrest, Illinois police say
A 17-year-old suspect has been arrested in connection to at least one of the two shooting deaths amid the unrest Tuesday night in Kenosha, Wis., Illinois police confirmed on Wednesday.
Arrest all of us! We need to fight back!
Well put on your tactical costumre, strap on your guns and tote that AR-15 and briung it ther fuck on. A pack of stupid fiucking idiots vs the smart people.
Maybe they were standing their ground being harassed my an armed Asshole.How do arrest someone for self defense!? If we don’t get this child out of jail we are doing to let themKenosha violence: Juvenile arrested in deadly shooting amid Jacob Blake unrest, Illinois police say
A 17-year-old suspect has been arrested in connection to at least one of the two shooting deaths amid the unrest Tuesday night in Kenosha, Wis., Illinois police confirmed on Wednesday.
Arrest all of us! We need to fight back!
A look at the charges.....
On August 27th, prosecutors in Kenosha County filed six charges against Kyle Rittenhouse which read as follows:
A detailed breakdown of the facts of the case can be found here. What follows is a breakdown of the law applicable to the case.
- First degree reckless homicide, use of a dangerous weapon
- First degree recklessly endangering safety, use of a dangerous weapon
- First degree intentional homicide, use of a dangerous weapon
- Attempt first degree intentional homicide, use of a dangerous weapon
- First degree recklessly endangering safety, use of a dangerous weapon
- Possession of a dangerous weapon by a person under 18.
Counts 1, 3, and 4 relate to shots fired at Joseph Rosenbaum, Anthony Huber, and Gaige Grosskreutz respectively, all of whom are on film attacking Kyle Rittenhouse as he attempts to flee. Count 2 is ancillary to Count 1, relating to Daily Caller reporter Richard McGinnis, who was following Rosenbaum at the time of the incident and was therefore in Kyle’s line of fire. Count 5 refers to the two shots fired at the unknown male who attempted a jumping stomp on Kyle’s head after he tripped and fell while fleeing a violent mob. Both shots missed and the man fled the scene. Count 6 is an attempt to punish Kyle for merely having the gun.
The defense against Counts 1 to 5 will be Wisconsin’s broad self-defense laws. Citizens have no duty to flee when endangered (although Kyle did) and maintain self-defense privileges even if attacked by those one provokes (so long as the provocation did not include criminal entrapment). There is no duty to use the least possible force when threatened, only reasonable force, a standard judged by the person in question. In other words, prosecutors must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Kyle Rittenhouse did not believe he had risk of great bodily harm and that the force he used was unreasonable according to Kyle’s own standards. Unlikely, given the facts of the case.
Additionally, both men killed by Rittenhouse had their hands on Kyle’s gun at the time of being shot, a detail confirmed by eyewitness Richard McGinnis and videos of the incident, making the men in possession of a gun. Both Rosenbaum and Huber were convicted felons and therefore may not possess firearms in Wisconsin. Bizarrely, even the charges mention that the men had grabbed Rittenhouse’s gun, undermining the prosecutors’ allegations. Worse yet, Gaige Grosskreutz, the third felon shot by Rittenhouse, had an illegal handgun drawn and pointed at Rittenhouse just before being shot. Grosskreutz later admitted through a third party that “his only regret was not killing the kid and hesitating to pull the gun before emptying the entire mag into him.” Grosskreutz has not been charged with a crime.
The Charges Against Kyle Rittenhouse
On August 27th, prosecutors in Kenosha County filed six charges against Kyle Rittenhouse which read as follows: First degree reckless homicide, use of a dangerous weapon First degree recklessly endangering safety, use of a dangerous weapon ...www.americanthinker.com
He was retreatingMaybe they were standing their ground being harassed my an armed Asshole.How do arrest someone for self defense!? If we don’t get this child out of jail we are doing to let themKenosha violence: Juvenile arrested in deadly shooting amid Jacob Blake unrest, Illinois police say
A 17-year-old suspect has been arrested in connection to at least one of the two shooting deaths amid the unrest Tuesday night in Kenosha, Wis., Illinois police confirmed on Wednesday.
Arrest all of us! We need to fight back!
A look at the charges.....
On August 27th, prosecutors in Kenosha County filed six charges against Kyle Rittenhouse which read as follows:
A detailed breakdown of the facts of the case can be found here. What follows is a breakdown of the law applicable to the case.
- First degree reckless homicide, use of a dangerous weapon
- First degree recklessly endangering safety, use of a dangerous weapon
- First degree intentional homicide, use of a dangerous weapon
- Attempt first degree intentional homicide, use of a dangerous weapon
- First degree recklessly endangering safety, use of a dangerous weapon
- Possession of a dangerous weapon by a person under 18.
Counts 1, 3, and 4 relate to shots fired at Joseph Rosenbaum, Anthony Huber, and Gaige Grosskreutz respectively, all of whom are on film attacking Kyle Rittenhouse as he attempts to flee. Count 2 is ancillary to Count 1, relating to Daily Caller reporter Richard McGinnis, who was following Rosenbaum at the time of the incident and was therefore in Kyle’s line of fire. Count 5 refers to the two shots fired at the unknown male who attempted a jumping stomp on Kyle’s head after he tripped and fell while fleeing a violent mob. Both shots missed and the man fled the scene. Count 6 is an attempt to punish Kyle for merely having the gun.
The defense against Counts 1 to 5 will be Wisconsin’s broad self-defense laws. Citizens have no duty to flee when endangered (although Kyle did) and maintain self-defense privileges even if attacked by those one provokes (so long as the provocation did not include criminal entrapment). There is no duty to use the least possible force when threatened, only reasonable force, a standard judged by the person in question. In other words, prosecutors must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Kyle Rittenhouse did not believe he had risk of great bodily harm and that the force he used was unreasonable according to Kyle’s own standards. Unlikely, given the facts of the case.
Additionally, both men killed by Rittenhouse had their hands on Kyle’s gun at the time of being shot, a detail confirmed by eyewitness Richard McGinnis and videos of the incident, making the men in possession of a gun. Both Rosenbaum and Huber were convicted felons and therefore may not possess firearms in Wisconsin. Bizarrely, even the charges mention that the men had grabbed Rittenhouse’s gun, undermining the prosecutors’ allegations. Worse yet, Gaige Grosskreutz, the third felon shot by Rittenhouse, had an illegal handgun drawn and pointed at Rittenhouse just before being shot. Grosskreutz later admitted through a third party that “his only regret was not killing the kid and hesitating to pull the gun before emptying the entire mag into him.” Grosskreutz has not been charged with a crime.
The Charges Against Kyle Rittenhouse
On August 27th, prosecutors in Kenosha County filed six charges against Kyle Rittenhouse which read as follows: First degree reckless homicide, use of a dangerous weapon First degree recklessly endangering safety, use of a dangerous weapon ...
Maybe they were standing their ground being harassed my an armed Asshole.How do arrest someone for self defense!? If we don’t get this child out of jail we are doing to let themKenosha violence: Juvenile arrested in deadly shooting amid Jacob Blake unrest, Illinois police say
A 17-year-old suspect has been arrested in connection to at least one of the two shooting deaths amid the unrest Tuesday night in Kenosha, Wis., Illinois police confirmed on Wednesday.
Arrest all of us! We need to fight back!
A look at the charges.....
On August 27th, prosecutors in Kenosha County filed six charges against Kyle Rittenhouse which read as follows:
A detailed breakdown of the facts of the case can be found here. What follows is a breakdown of the law applicable to the case.
- First degree reckless homicide, use of a dangerous weapon
- First degree recklessly endangering safety, use of a dangerous weapon
- First degree intentional homicide, use of a dangerous weapon
- Attempt first degree intentional homicide, use of a dangerous weapon
- First degree recklessly endangering safety, use of a dangerous weapon
- Possession of a dangerous weapon by a person under 18.
Counts 1, 3, and 4 relate to shots fired at Joseph Rosenbaum, Anthony Huber, and Gaige Grosskreutz respectively, all of whom are on film attacking Kyle Rittenhouse as he attempts to flee. Count 2 is ancillary to Count 1, relating to Daily Caller reporter Richard McGinnis, who was following Rosenbaum at the time of the incident and was therefore in Kyle’s line of fire. Count 5 refers to the two shots fired at the unknown male who attempted a jumping stomp on Kyle’s head after he tripped and fell while fleeing a violent mob. Both shots missed and the man fled the scene. Count 6 is an attempt to punish Kyle for merely having the gun.
The defense against Counts 1 to 5 will be Wisconsin’s broad self-defense laws. Citizens have no duty to flee when endangered (although Kyle did) and maintain self-defense privileges even if attacked by those one provokes (so long as the provocation did not include criminal entrapment). There is no duty to use the least possible force when threatened, only reasonable force, a standard judged by the person in question. In other words, prosecutors must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Kyle Rittenhouse did not believe he had risk of great bodily harm and that the force he used was unreasonable according to Kyle’s own standards. Unlikely, given the facts of the case.
Additionally, both men killed by Rittenhouse had their hands on Kyle’s gun at the time of being shot, a detail confirmed by eyewitness Richard McGinnis and videos of the incident, making the men in possession of a gun. Both Rosenbaum and Huber were convicted felons and therefore may not possess firearms in Wisconsin. Bizarrely, even the charges mention that the men had grabbed Rittenhouse’s gun, undermining the prosecutors’ allegations. Worse yet, Gaige Grosskreutz, the third felon shot by Rittenhouse, had an illegal handgun drawn and pointed at Rittenhouse just before being shot. Grosskreutz later admitted through a third party that “his only regret was not killing the kid and hesitating to pull the gun before emptying the entire mag into him.” Grosskreutz has not been charged with a crime.
The Charges Against Kyle Rittenhouse
On August 27th, prosecutors in Kenosha County filed six charges against Kyle Rittenhouse which read as follows: First degree reckless homicide, use of a dangerous weapon First degree recklessly endangering safety, use of a dangerous weapon ...
Maybe they were standing their ground being harassed my an armed Asshole.How do arrest someone for self defense!? If we don’t get this child out of jail we are doing to let themKenosha violence: Juvenile arrested in deadly shooting amid Jacob Blake unrest, Illinois police say
A 17-year-old suspect has been arrested in connection to at least one of the two shooting deaths amid the unrest Tuesday night in Kenosha, Wis., Illinois police confirmed on Wednesday.
Arrest all of us! We need to fight back!
A look at the charges.....
On August 27th, prosecutors in Kenosha County filed six charges against Kyle Rittenhouse which read as follows:
A detailed breakdown of the facts of the case can be found here. What follows is a breakdown of the law applicable to the case.
- First degree reckless homicide, use of a dangerous weapon
- First degree recklessly endangering safety, use of a dangerous weapon
- First degree intentional homicide, use of a dangerous weapon
- Attempt first degree intentional homicide, use of a dangerous weapon
- First degree recklessly endangering safety, use of a dangerous weapon
- Possession of a dangerous weapon by a person under 18.
Counts 1, 3, and 4 relate to shots fired at Joseph Rosenbaum, Anthony Huber, and Gaige Grosskreutz respectively, all of whom are on film attacking Kyle Rittenhouse as he attempts to flee. Count 2 is ancillary to Count 1, relating to Daily Caller reporter Richard McGinnis, who was following Rosenbaum at the time of the incident and was therefore in Kyle’s line of fire. Count 5 refers to the two shots fired at the unknown male who attempted a jumping stomp on Kyle’s head after he tripped and fell while fleeing a violent mob. Both shots missed and the man fled the scene. Count 6 is an attempt to punish Kyle for merely having the gun.
The defense against Counts 1 to 5 will be Wisconsin’s broad self-defense laws. Citizens have no duty to flee when endangered (although Kyle did) and maintain self-defense privileges even if attacked by those one provokes (so long as the provocation did not include criminal entrapment). There is no duty to use the least possible force when threatened, only reasonable force, a standard judged by the person in question. In other words, prosecutors must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Kyle Rittenhouse did not believe he had risk of great bodily harm and that the force he used was unreasonable according to Kyle’s own standards. Unlikely, given the facts of the case.
Additionally, both men killed by Rittenhouse had their hands on Kyle’s gun at the time of being shot, a detail confirmed by eyewitness Richard McGinnis and videos of the incident, making the men in possession of a gun. Both Rosenbaum and Huber were convicted felons and therefore may not possess firearms in Wisconsin. Bizarrely, even the charges mention that the men had grabbed Rittenhouse’s gun, undermining the prosecutors’ allegations. Worse yet, Gaige Grosskreutz, the third felon shot by Rittenhouse, had an illegal handgun drawn and pointed at Rittenhouse just before being shot. Grosskreutz later admitted through a third party that “his only regret was not killing the kid and hesitating to pull the gun before emptying the entire mag into him.” Grosskreutz has not been charged with a crime.
The Charges Against Kyle Rittenhouse
On August 27th, prosecutors in Kenosha County filed six charges against Kyle Rittenhouse which read as follows: First degree reckless homicide, use of a dangerous weapon First degree recklessly endangering safety, use of a dangerous weapon ...
Damn white democrats are lynching Latinos now?Maybe they were standing their ground being harassed my an armed Asshole.How do arrest someone for self defense!? If we don’t get this child out of jail we are doing to let themKenosha violence: Juvenile arrested in deadly shooting amid Jacob Blake unrest, Illinois police say
A 17-year-old suspect has been arrested in connection to at least one of the two shooting deaths amid the unrest Tuesday night in Kenosha, Wis., Illinois police confirmed on Wednesday.
Arrest all of us! We need to fight back!
A look at the charges.....
On August 27th, prosecutors in Kenosha County filed six charges against Kyle Rittenhouse which read as follows:
A detailed breakdown of the facts of the case can be found here. What follows is a breakdown of the law applicable to the case.
- First degree reckless homicide, use of a dangerous weapon
- First degree recklessly endangering safety, use of a dangerous weapon
- First degree intentional homicide, use of a dangerous weapon
- Attempt first degree intentional homicide, use of a dangerous weapon
- First degree recklessly endangering safety, use of a dangerous weapon
- Possession of a dangerous weapon by a person under 18.
Counts 1, 3, and 4 relate to shots fired at Joseph Rosenbaum, Anthony Huber, and Gaige Grosskreutz respectively, all of whom are on film attacking Kyle Rittenhouse as he attempts to flee. Count 2 is ancillary to Count 1, relating to Daily Caller reporter Richard McGinnis, who was following Rosenbaum at the time of the incident and was therefore in Kyle’s line of fire. Count 5 refers to the two shots fired at the unknown male who attempted a jumping stomp on Kyle’s head after he tripped and fell while fleeing a violent mob. Both shots missed and the man fled the scene. Count 6 is an attempt to punish Kyle for merely having the gun.
The defense against Counts 1 to 5 will be Wisconsin’s broad self-defense laws. Citizens have no duty to flee when endangered (although Kyle did) and maintain self-defense privileges even if attacked by those one provokes (so long as the provocation did not include criminal entrapment). There is no duty to use the least possible force when threatened, only reasonable force, a standard judged by the person in question. In other words, prosecutors must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Kyle Rittenhouse did not believe he had risk of great bodily harm and that the force he used was unreasonable according to Kyle’s own standards. Unlikely, given the facts of the case.
Additionally, both men killed by Rittenhouse had their hands on Kyle’s gun at the time of being shot, a detail confirmed by eyewitness Richard McGinnis and videos of the incident, making the men in possession of a gun. Both Rosenbaum and Huber were convicted felons and therefore may not possess firearms in Wisconsin. Bizarrely, even the charges mention that the men had grabbed Rittenhouse’s gun, undermining the prosecutors’ allegations. Worse yet, Gaige Grosskreutz, the third felon shot by Rittenhouse, had an illegal handgun drawn and pointed at Rittenhouse just before being shot. Grosskreutz later admitted through a third party that “his only regret was not killing the kid and hesitating to pull the gun before emptying the entire mag into him.” Grosskreutz has not been charged with a crime.
The Charges Against Kyle Rittenhouse
On August 27th, prosecutors in Kenosha County filed six charges against Kyle Rittenhouse which read as follows: First degree reckless homicide, use of a dangerous weapon First degree recklessly endangering safety, use of a dangerous weapon ...
Sadly for you, an eyewitness saw the convicted felon, rosenbaum, attacking the hispanic teenager, and the video shows the hispanic teenager in full flight mode before he is attacked by the other two convicted felons, one of them with an illegal gun...since he is a felon and can't buy, own or carry it.....or point it at the hispanic teen.
How do arrest someone for self defense!? If we don’t get this child out of jail we are doing to let themKenosha violence: Juvenile arrested in deadly shooting amid Jacob Blake unrest, Illinois police say
A 17-year-old suspect has been arrested in connection to at least one of the two shooting deaths amid the unrest Tuesday night in Kenosha, Wis., Illinois police confirmed on Wednesday.
Arrest all of us! We need to fight back!
Well put on your tactical costumre, strap on your guns and tote that AR-15 and briung it ther fuck on. A pack of stupid fiucking idiots vs the smart people.
Wrong.Maybe they were standing their ground being harassed my an armed Asshole.How do arrest someone for self defense!? If we don’t get this child out of jail we are doing to let themKenosha violence: Juvenile arrested in deadly shooting amid Jacob Blake unrest, Illinois police say
A 17-year-old suspect has been arrested in connection to at least one of the two shooting deaths amid the unrest Tuesday night in Kenosha, Wis., Illinois police confirmed on Wednesday.
Arrest all of us! We need to fight back!
A look at the charges.....
On August 27th, prosecutors in Kenosha County filed six charges against Kyle Rittenhouse which read as follows:
A detailed breakdown of the facts of the case can be found here. What follows is a breakdown of the law applicable to the case.
- First degree reckless homicide, use of a dangerous weapon
- First degree recklessly endangering safety, use of a dangerous weapon
- First degree intentional homicide, use of a dangerous weapon
- Attempt first degree intentional homicide, use of a dangerous weapon
- First degree recklessly endangering safety, use of a dangerous weapon
- Possession of a dangerous weapon by a person under 18.
Counts 1, 3, and 4 relate to shots fired at Joseph Rosenbaum, Anthony Huber, and Gaige Grosskreutz respectively, all of whom are on film attacking Kyle Rittenhouse as he attempts to flee. Count 2 is ancillary to Count 1, relating to Daily Caller reporter Richard McGinnis, who was following Rosenbaum at the time of the incident and was therefore in Kyle’s line of fire. Count 5 refers to the two shots fired at the unknown male who attempted a jumping stomp on Kyle’s head after he tripped and fell while fleeing a violent mob. Both shots missed and the man fled the scene. Count 6 is an attempt to punish Kyle for merely having the gun.
The defense against Counts 1 to 5 will be Wisconsin’s broad self-defense laws. Citizens have no duty to flee when endangered (although Kyle did) and maintain self-defense privileges even if attacked by those one provokes (so long as the provocation did not include criminal entrapment). There is no duty to use the least possible force when threatened, only reasonable force, a standard judged by the person in question. In other words, prosecutors must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Kyle Rittenhouse did not believe he had risk of great bodily harm and that the force he used was unreasonable according to Kyle’s own standards. Unlikely, given the facts of the case.
Additionally, both men killed by Rittenhouse had their hands on Kyle’s gun at the time of being shot, a detail confirmed by eyewitness Richard McGinnis and videos of the incident, making the men in possession of a gun. Both Rosenbaum and Huber were convicted felons and therefore may not possess firearms in Wisconsin. Bizarrely, even the charges mention that the men had grabbed Rittenhouse’s gun, undermining the prosecutors’ allegations. Worse yet, Gaige Grosskreutz, the third felon shot by Rittenhouse, had an illegal handgun drawn and pointed at Rittenhouse just before being shot. Grosskreutz later admitted through a third party that “his only regret was not killing the kid and hesitating to pull the gun before emptying the entire mag into him.” Grosskreutz has not been charged with a crime.
The Charges Against Kyle Rittenhouse
On August 27th, prosecutors in Kenosha County filed six charges against Kyle Rittenhouse which read as follows: First degree reckless homicide, use of a dangerous weapon First degree recklessly endangering safety, use of a dangerous weapon ...
He seemed to be running away from thugs. Self defense.
Judy Miller Fox contributor, just made the claim that Kyle stole the rifle and illegally took it across state lines. After all that we already know. There is no amount of truth or facts that will penetrate the concrete.It has already been proved, you fucking dumbass, and he didn't bring the gun to work.Let's give him the benefit of the doubt and agree that he worked there. That.'s something that can be easily proved.According to his lawyers, he worked in Kenosha. And there is video of him pointing to police the night of the shooting, saying he works over there, as he pointed in some direction.Does he live in Illinois? Was it about 20 miles from Kenosha?Why on Earth would you ask me to show you something I never said??A lot of things are part of the Constitution. We were still talking about the Constitution. Replying "it," as you did, can only rationally be about the Constitution. I accept this as you confessing you're not rational.Which is about the Constitution. That's what we were discussing, the Constitution. You said that about the Constitution ^^^the least you can do is be honest about what I said,,,LOLOLLOLEXACTLY,,,LOLOLliving means it changes naturally through time,,,the constitution requires intentional direct action through many small actions to change it,,,Dumbfuck, if the Constitution wasn't a living document, there would be no amendments.the 2nd doesnt say anything about guns,,nor does it say you have to be in a militia,,if I'm wrong dont tell me show me,,,are you ever going to respond to my statement??There's no reason you shouldn't own an air-to-air missile. Of course, owning a nuke would be impossible because the technology is classified.who cares what his intentions were,,the 2nd amendment is specifically for weapons of war,,,It is if you are 17 years old in Wisconsin you can not open carry, that is breaking the law.It is not wrong to leave your house with your gun, nor to go to a public place and stand there.
It was also breaking the curfew law in place.
It is also against the law to take an assault rifle to a riot with the intent to kill.
It is going to be very hard for the teenager to defend his actions when the prosecutor holds up a terrifying assault weapon to the jury and proclaims, "this is the military assault weapon this man intended to murder somebody with"
View attachment 382165
So far you are wrong on just about everything you posted....
The hispanic teenager may not have been breaking the law....there is an exception for long guns for under 21 year olds....and you have no evidence to show he wanted to kill people, in fact, the actual video evidence shows the exact opposite, you dumb shit.....
And it isn't a military weapon you dumb ass........the AR-15 has never been used by the military....
You don't know what you are talking about.
Family of AR-15 Inventor Eugene Stoner: He Didn't Intend It for Civilians
June 16, 2016, 11:19 AM UTC / Updated June 16, 2016, 6:24 PM UTC
By Tony Dokoupil
Family of AR-15 creator speaks out
June 16, 201601:56
The AR-15 is the most talked about gun in America.
But the AR-15’s creator died before the weapon became a popular hit and his family has never spoken out.
Until now.
"Our father, Eugene Stoner, designed the AR-15 and subsequent M-16 as a military weapon to give our soldiers an advantage over the AK-47,” the Stoner family told NBC News late Wednesday. "He died long before any mass shootings occurred. But, we do think he would have been horrified and sickened as anyone, if not more by these events."
Once Banned, These Assault Rifles Are Hugely Popular in the U.S.
June 14, 201600:52
The inventor’s surviving children and adult grandchildren spoke exclusively to NBC News by phone and email, commenting for the first time on their family’s uneasy legacy. They requested individual anonymity in order to speak freely about such a sensitive topic. They also stopped short of policy prescriptions or legal opinions.
But their comments add unprecedented context to their father’s creation, shedding new light on his intentions and adding firepower to the effort to ban weapons like the AR-15. The comments could also bolster a groundbreaking new lawsuit, which argues that the weapon is a tool of war — never intended for civilians.
Eugene Stoner would have agreed, his family said.
The ex-Marine and "avid sportsman, hunter and skeet shooter" never used his invention for sport. He also never kept it around the house for personal defense. In fact, he never even owned one.
And though he made millions from the design, his family said it was all from military sales.
"After many conversations with him, we feel his intent was that he designed it as a military rifle," his family said, explaining that Stoner was "focused on making the most efficient and superior rifle possible for the military."
He designed the original AR-15 in the late 1950s, working on it in his own garage and later as the chief designer for ArmaLite, a then small company in southern California. He made it light and powerful and he fashioned a new bullet for it — a .223 caliber round capable of piercing a metal helmet at 500 yards.
The Army loved it and renamed it the M16.
Family of AR-15 Inventor: He Didn’t Intend It for Civilians
CASE CLOSED,,,
the 2nd amendment has its legal limits.
why can't you own a ground to air missile launcher? hell, how about yer own little nuke? those are shirley weapons of war.
uh-huh uh-huh uh-huh.
case blown wide open.
thanx for proving just how insane you really are.
the 2nd doesnt say anything about guns or their capacity nor does it say you need to be in a militia,,,
nor does it allow for restrictions of any arms,,,,
i answered you several times. you don't like the answers.
assault weapons weren't around when the constitution was written - therefore your question/statement is moot. the constitution is a living document. do you understand what that means?
' well regulated ' means what then? that anyone can own anything at any time?
LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! there was a legal ban on assault rifles at one time, & it can happen again.
sorry its not a living document,,again if im wrong show me where it says that,,,
anything else stupid you want to say???
Dumbfuck, It's a piece of parchment with words on on it. It can't change naturally, it needs people to change it.
and it hasnt been changed with an amendment,,,
Dayum, you're a fucking retard. Yes, the Constitution has been changed with amendments...
Passed by Congress March 4, 1794. Ratified February 7, 1795.Note: Article III, section 2, of the Constitution was modified by amendment 11.The Judicial power of the United States shall not be construed to extend to any suit in law or equity, commenced or prosecuted against one of the United States by Citizens of another State, or by Citizens or Subjects of any Foreign State.
[emphasis added to educate the uninformed]
I never said it hasnt happened,,just the the 2nd A hasnt been,,
my god youre dense,,,
You're more retarded than I thought. I was talking about the Constitution being a living document, to which you replied, "it hasnt been changed with an amendment,,," Since I was talking about the Constitution and not the 2nd Amendment, you prove to be a nut who doesn't understand the difference between the Constitution and an amendment.
this is what I said in #3082
living means it changes naturally through time,,,the constitution requires intentional direct action through many small actions to change it,,,
Then I pointed out you're a retard about the Constitution...
Then you responded back saying "it..." -- which can only rationally be about the Constitution since that's what we were talking about.
But now you say you suffered a brain fart and were actually talking about the 2nd Amendment.
the 2nd is part of the constitution,,,
so youre bailing out???
have a nice day,,,
then show me where the 2nd amendment to the constitution was changed or repealed by amendment the process,,,
Again, I chalk this up to you not being a rational person.
you said their were restrictions,,,so ,,
show me where the 2nd amendment to the constitution was changed or repealed by amendment the process???
because by definition restrictions violate the text and context of the 2nd A
you obviously are not aware of the facts of the case,,,What then was he defending? He owned no property in Kenosha.He may have been from out of state and if true then he has problems.
He grabbed his gun and drove to where he could use it on people.
And they call him a patriot. What manner of patriotism is this?
please do educate yourself before further comments,,,
I ask again, what was he defending in Kenosha? Why did he go there with his gun?
A 17 year old with an AR-15 he brought to work. Is that a situation framed by good old common sense?
Would you want cadres of armed teenagers loose on your streets?
You morons keep repeating the fake media narrative which has already been dis-proven a dozen times over.
The owner of the car lot certain thought it was a good idea to have armed people defending his business. Otherwise it would be a pike of smoking ashes today.
He seemed to be running away from thugs. Self defense.
They were chasing him because he had shot an unarmed man and was trying to escape
