elektra
Diamond Member
No they wontIt's a rifle. The defense attorney will point out that far more people are killed with hand guns than with rifles. Furthermore, this won't even go to trial.
I think he will plea to manslaughter, if he is smart.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
No they wontIt's a rifle. The defense attorney will point out that far more people are killed with hand guns than with rifles. Furthermore, this won't even go to trial.
One person on the jury must vote innocent on all charges, not just one. He will only walk on everything if that person calls bullshit, to use your term, on each individual charge.What about it is not true?If that was true, nobody would go to jail for murder. There are plenty of people who lose when they face a Jury, and this young man has to beat all 6 charges. Of course there may be more charges than just six. It will not be easy..
But that doesn't change the fact that all it takes is one person on a jury to call bullshit, and the kid walks on everything...…. and there are plenty of people out there who will do so.
If the kid really believes he is innocent he should just have a trail with a judge. If he is smart he gets a lawyer that pleas the case to lesser charges.
Kid shouldn't have been there, but that's not the same as having no right to be there. And it sure as hell doesn't mean he can't defend himself.yet, the post that states, he was simply, standing there, is not as funny, if you are to be honest with yourself?"running into a peaceful riot"He just stood there? He said nothing? He was just standing and a peaceful protest formed around him. Suddenly someone tried to take his borrowed assault rifle away and that is justification for murder?The act of standing there, is not legal justification for assault.
Your claim is just not true.
And self defense is not murder.
Yep, running into a peaceful riot brandishing a deadly assault rifle will get you attacked. The kid lost, regardless of how you try to call it self defense, the kid faced murder charges as an adult.
People have every right to self defense, even if that is defending themselves against an armed teen threatening them with an assault rifle.
"peaceful riot"
LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL
I guess there is only one side that can falsely claim what happened. Of course, you called out the other post as not to be a hypocrite? Or you did not recognize the absurdity my post mocks. That rittenhouse was simply standing around and found himself in a life or death situation?
And you don't think that's possible?One person on the jury must vote innocent on all charges, not just one. He will only walk on everything if that person calls bullshit, to use your term, on each individual charge.What about it is not true?If that was true, nobody would go to jail for murder. There are plenty of people who lose when they face a Jury, and this young man has to beat all 6 charges. Of course there may be more charges than just six. It will not be easy..
But that doesn't change the fact that all it takes is one person on a jury to call bullshit, and the kid walks on everything...…. and there are plenty of people out there who will do so.
If the kid really believes he is innocent he should just have a trail with a judge. If he is smart he gets a lawyer that pleas the case to lesser charges.
Was he simply standing there? I guess you are using what you accuse others of, pretzel logic.Yeah, I caught that. The pretzel logic these lefties have to do, to hold all their conflicting ideas in their heads at one time, is unbelievable.
No, I do not think it is possible.And you don't think that's possible?
I think it's probable.
Kyle's legal team sees this as classic self defense
Nothing the internet unlicensed lawyers have come up with is as reasonable

Wrong.No they wontIt's a rifle. The defense attorney will point out that far more people are killed with hand guns than with rifles. Furthermore, this won't even go to trial.
I think he will plea to manslaughter, if he is smart.
Okay.No, I do not think it is possible.And you don't think that's possible?
I think it's probable.
He's going to be traumatized, scarred, and disillusioned at a core level.Kyle's legal team sees this as classic self defense
Nothing the internet unlicensed lawyers have come up with is as reasonable
Of course it's self defense.
He'll be ok.
Neither you nor I are the lawyers involved. It will come out in court whether he can claim it and if it will be effective.Now all you have to do is prove it, and feelz aren't proof.How do arrest someone for self defense!? If we don’t get this child out of jail we are doing to let them![]()
Kenosha violence: Juvenile arrested in deadly shooting amid Jacob Blake unrest, Illinois police say
A 17-year-old suspect has been arrested in connection to at least one of the two shooting deaths amid the unrest Tuesday night in Kenosha, Wis., Illinois police confirmed on Wednesday.www.foxnews.com
Arrest all of us! We need to fight back!
he willingly went to another state with a loaded weapon to hunt brown people.
guilty.
& his mama drove him.
guilty.
he cannot claim self defense when he actively took a gun that he is not allowed to own because he is a minor - crime #1.
he actively crossed state lines with said gun - crime #2
he killed 2 people & maimed a 3rd - crimes #3, 4,& 5.
Was he simply standing there? I guess you are using what you accuse others of, pretzel logic.Yeah, I caught that. The pretzel logic these lefties have to do, to hold all their conflicting ideas in their heads at one time, is unbelievable.
The headline, "he was simply standing there", there was no riot? He did not have an assault rifle, he was not breaking any curfew? Just standing?
In denial much?
Nope. He's going to be just fine. He might develop a real hatred for democrats but that's all.He's going to be traumatized, scarred, and disillusioned at a core level.Kyle's legal team sees this as classic self defense
Nothing the internet unlicensed lawyers have come up with is as reasonable
Of course it's self defense.
He'll be ok.
And his dreams of a career in LE are over.
Sometimes, the process IS the punishment.
Then the card should say thatElectra believes there is some clause in the law that says you can possess a rifle only while hunting, however that is definedState the statute asswipe . I think the ten guy’s chasing him created the situation. How did you miss that? Hmm odd you didn’t even watch the videosIllinois residents who are minors are not allowed to borrow assault rifles and confront rioters in Wisconsin. He created the situation where as he had to murder two people.He is allowed to stand there and defend himself if attacked.
The better question is, why does a sane human charge a dude with a AR15Was he simply standing there? I guess you are using what you accuse others of, pretzel logic.Yeah, I caught that. The pretzel logic these lefties have to do, to hold all their conflicting ideas in their heads at one time, is unbelievable.
The headline, "he was simply standing there", there was no riot? He did not have an assault rifle, he was not breaking any curfew? Just standing?
In denial much?
He was not rioting. Indeed, supposedly these protests are "mostly peaceful".
Having an assault rifle is not a provocation. If anything, for the attackers to see the rifle and still attack indicates a very high level of commitment and seriousness in their attacking.
There is no pretzel to my logic nor am I in denial.
gee, I only wipe my ass to get jc456 off of it, shit stinks.State the statute asswipe . I think the ten guy’s chasing him created the situation. How did you miss that? Hmm odd you didn’t even watch the videos
That never happened. You need to educate yourself as to the facts instead of making them up as you go along.gee, I only wipe my ass to get jc456 off of it, shit stinks.State the statute asswipe . I think the ten guy’s chasing him created the situation. How did you miss that? Hmm odd you didn’t even watch the videos
You have proof I did not watch the videos?
When he left Illinois with the intent to obtain an assault rifle and confront the protestors in Wisconsin, that created situation. When you take an assault rifle to a fist fight you are a murderer. Nobody was armed in this situation except the person charged with murder. Sad as well, is that fact that Rittenhouse shot a man in the back. It will be hard to prove that it was not the shot in the back that killed the victim. How did you miss that.
The statue? Wisconsin statue 940.01  First-degree intentional homicide.
The better question is, why does a sane human charge a dude with a AR15Was he simply standing there? I guess you are using what you accuse others of, pretzel logic.Yeah, I caught that. The pretzel logic these lefties have to do, to hold all their conflicting ideas in their heads at one time, is unbelievable.
The headline, "he was simply standing there", there was no riot? He did not have an assault rifle, he was not breaking any curfew? Just standing?
In denial much?
He was not rioting. Indeed, supposedly these protests are "mostly peaceful".
Having an assault rifle is not a provocation. If anything, for the attackers to see the rifle and still attack indicates a very high level of commitment and seriousness in their attacking.
There is no pretzel to my logic nor am I in denial.
You ever been prosecuted to benefit someone's agenda, despite doing nothing wrong?Nope. He's going to be just fine. He might develop a real hatred for democrats but that's all.He's going to be traumatized, scarred, and disillusioned at a core level.Kyle's legal team sees this as classic self defense
Nothing the internet unlicensed lawyers have come up with is as reasonable
Of course it's self defense.
He'll be ok.
And his dreams of a career in LE are over.
Sometimes, the process IS the punishment.