No he was cornered for the singular purpose to attack him with phony questions then pushed the agenda right into his face.
From the link you didn't read my reply in RED,
"British journalist Mark Stone cornered Cruz (
Ambush interview) at the vigil and
asked him whether it was time for gun reform laws in America. (
already have thousands of gun "reform" laws) When asked why American exceptionalism is 'so awful', Cruz said: 'You know, I'm sorry you think American exceptionalism is awful. You've got your political agenda. God love you.'
After repeatedly being told 'You can't answer that' by Stone, (
badgering) Cruz turned and said: 'Why is it that people come from all over the world to America? Because it's the freest, most prosperous, safest country on Earth. Stop being a propagandist.'
'You know, it's easy to go to politics,' Cruz told
Sky News. 'Inevitably, when some violent psychopath murders people, if you want to stop violent crime,
the proposals the Democrats have — none of them would have stopped this.'
(
Correct since the killer passed the background check law when he bought firearms)
He added: 'There are 19 sets of parents who are never going to get to kiss their child tonight.'
The Texas senator then stormed out of the interview at the vigil being held by relatives and friends of those killed in the massacre on Tuesday."
===
The interviewed had clear goal of badgering Cruz for answers he can abuse for political propaganda he insinuates there have been no "reform" gun laws attacks America as a place to live (agenda).
This IS a loaded question:
"asked him whether it was time for gun reform laws in America."
The reality is that the so called journalist must have known America had already passed many gun control laws over the decades but wants readers to get the impression that people like Cruz has never been involved with gun control legislation.
You can't be that dumb?