- Banned
- #101
Which god?No you are also wrong. Not everyone goes to Heaven. G-d is also Holy and righteous. He cannot allow sin in His presence at all. Now either we pay for our sin debt with our souls, or Christ pays that debt in our place.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Which god?No you are also wrong. Not everyone goes to Heaven. G-d is also Holy and righteous. He cannot allow sin in His presence at all. Now either we pay for our sin debt with our souls, or Christ pays that debt in our place.
How come none of these people who claim that Obergefell and Roe were wrongly decided have the guts to say that Loving was wrongly decided?
-------------------------------------Ted Cruz Says SCOTUS 'Clearly Wrong' to Legalize Gay Marriage
"Obergefell, like Roe v. Wade, ignored two centuries of our nation's history," the Republican senator said.www.newsweek.com
I just knew it would come up soon.
Sovereign G-d of Creation.Which god?
No you are also wrong. Not everyone goes to Heaven. G-d is also Holy and righteous. He cannot allow sin in His presence at all. Now either we pay for our sin debt with our souls, or Christ pays that debt in our place.
How come none of these people who claim that Obergefell and Roe were wrongly decided have the guts to say that Loving was wrongly decided?
This world will be destroyed through man's sin and G-d's wrath. Revelation 21 and 22 speak of the NEW world without sin.Christ begged God to forgive those who were nailing Him to the cross ... are you suggesting God didn't? ...
I didn't mention Heaven ... we pray that God will make things on Earth as they are in Heaven ... maybe sometimes they are ...
I just knew it would come up soon.
I did not say that they are the same, Fool! The point is that both were decided on the same constitutional principles.If you think that being black is the same as being a homosexual, you ought to drive up to a street corner in a ghetto near your domicile and share that information with the local gangstas. I bet they'd be interested in your theorem.
And they’ll overturn settled accepted Establishment Clause jurisprudence along with 14th Amendment precedent just as they did Roe/Casey.The TRUMPCourt does not care
They swore to respect precidence and case law and have substituted their far right ideology
Or that Brown was wrongly decided.How come none of these people who claim that Obergefell and Roe were wrongly decided have the guts to say that Loving was wrongly decided?
He only says what you say. Sounds like you are calling yourself a putz.Another shit decision that should have been left to the states or at least legislated in congress.
Then again Cruz is a putz for even bringing it up.....Red meat for the dems.
You magical spells and chants hold no weight,shaman.Sovereign G-d of Creation.
Not magic. G-d Himself condemns sorcery. Just THE objective absolute Truth!You magical spells and chants hold no weight,shaman.
Again, shaman, your magical incantations and threats hold no weight, here.Not magic. G-d Himself condemns sorcery. Just THE objective absolute Truth!
Wrong.If you think that being black is the same as being a homosexual, you ought to drive up to a street corner in a ghetto near your domicile and share that information with the local gangstas. I bet they'd be interested in your theorem.
I don’t often disagree with Ted Cruz. But in this issue, I do.
-------------------------------------Ted Cruz Says SCOTUS 'Clearly Wrong' to Legalize Gay Marriage
"Obergefell, like Roe v. Wade, ignored two centuries of our nation's history," the Republican senator said.www.newsweek.com
I just knew it would come up soon.
I did not say that they are the same, Fool! The point is that both were decided on the same constitutional principles.
This world will be destroyed through man's sin and G-d's wrath. Revelation 21 and 22 speak of the NEW world without sin.
Because you are neither a religious nutball or a person pandering to religious nuyballs for their votes.I don’t often disagree with Ted Cruz. But in this issue, I do.
Try though I have, I have never seen a single logical basis to justify the government sticking it’s head into the issue of which fully consenting adult person any other fully consenting adult person can marry.
I realize that part of the analysis of folks who disagree with my view may be grounded in religion. That doesn’t make them religious nutballs.Because you are neither a religious nutball or a person pandering to religious nuyballs for their votes.
Ted Cruz probably doesn't even agree with Ted Cruz.