Ted Cruz And His Eligibility To Be President Of The U.S.A.!

1stRambo

Gold Member
Feb 8, 2015
6,221
1,020
255
Yo, next time you hear somebody talk shit, like Donald Trump? Tell them it`s a "Socialist Democrat" Agenda!!! Yes, Trump was a Democrat!!!

Ted Cruz[edit]
Ted Cruz announced on March 22, 2015, that he was running for the Republican Party's nomination for president in the 2016 election.[142] Cruz was born in Calgary, Alberta, Canada,[143] to a "U.S. citizen mother and a Cuban immigrant father",[144] giving him dual Canadian-American citizenship. Cruz applied to formally renounce his Canadian citizenship and ceased being a citizen of Canada on May 14, 2014.[145][146][147]

Former Solicitor General Paul Clement,[148][149] former Acting Solicitor General Neal Katyal,[148][149] University of California, Irvine School of Law Dean Erwin Chemerinsky,[150] Professor Chin (see above),[144] Temple University Law School Professor Peter Spiro,[151] Professor Akhil Amar,[152] Georgetown University Law Center Professor Randy Barnett,[153] Yale Law School Professor Jack Balkin,[153] and University of San Diego Professor Michael Ramsey[153] believe Cruz meets the constitutional requirements to be eligible for the presidency. Similarly, Bryan Garner, the editor of Black's Law Dictionary, believes the U.S. Supreme Court would find Cruz to be eligible,[154] and Case Western Reserve University School of Law professor Jonathan H. Adler agrees that no court will rule against Cruz's eligibility.[155]

Laurence Tribe of Harvard, however, described Cruz's eligibility as "murky and unsettled".[156] Harvard Law Professor Cass Sunstein believes that Cruz is eligible, but agrees with Ramsey that Cruz's eligibility is not "an easy question". Sunstein believes concerns over standing and the political-question doctrine make it unlikely that courts would rule against Cruz.[157]

Mary McManamon (see above) writing in the Catholic University Law Review[77] believes that Cruz is not eligible because he was not born in the United States.[158] Professor Einer Elhauge of Harvard,[159] Professor Robert Clinton of Arizona State University,[160] University of Chicago Professor Eric Posner,[161] former Chief Justice of the New York Court of Appeals Sol Wachtler,[82] and Professor Victor Williams of Catholic University of America's law school[162] agree that Cruz is not eligible. Alan Grayson, a Democratic Member of Congress from Florida, does not believe Cruz is a natural-born citizen, and stated he intends to file a lawsuit should Cruz be the Republican nominee.[163] Orly Taitz, Larry Klayman, and Mario Apuzzo, who each filed multiple lawsuits challenging Obama's eligibility, have also asserted that Cruz is not eligible.[164][165]

Cruz's eligibility has been questioned by some of his primary opponents, including Donald Trump,[166] Mike Huckabee, Rick Santorum, Carly Fiorina, and Rand Paul.[167]Marco Rubio, however, believes Cruz is eligible.[168]

Two November 2015 ballot challenges in New Hampshire alleging that Cruz was not a natural-born citizen were unsuccessful.[169][170] In December, a similar lawsuit was filed in Vermont,[171] and an unsuccessful lawsuit was filed in Florida.[172][173] In January 2016, a similar lawsuit was filed in Texas,[174][175] a similar unsuccessful lawsuit was filed in Utah,[176][177] and two similar unsuccessful ballot challenges were filed in Illinois.[178][179][180][181][182] In February, two similar unsuccessful lawsuits were filed in Pennsylvania[183][184][185][186][187] and one was filed in Arkansas;[188][189] a similar lawsuit was filed in Alabama;[190] similar unsuccessful ballot challenges were filed in Indiana;[191][192] and similar ballot challenges and an unsuccessful similar lawsuit were also filed in New York.[193][194][195][196] In March, a similar lawsuit was filed in New York.[196] In April, a similar ballot challenge was filed in New Jersey.[162]

Natural-born-citizen clause - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

"GTP"
d6be59b8e654d1f2695fae3b6ba92d10.jpg
 
Yo, next time you hear somebody talk shit, like Donald Trump? Tell them it`s a "Socialist Democrat" Agenda!!! Yes, Trump was a Democrat!!!

Ted Cruz[edit]
Ted Cruz announced on March 22, 2015, that he was running for the Republican Party's nomination for president in the 2016 election.[142] Cruz was born in Calgary, Alberta, Canada,[143] to a "U.S. citizen mother and a Cuban immigrant father",[144] giving him dual Canadian-American citizenship. Cruz applied to formally renounce his Canadian citizenship and ceased being a citizen of Canada on May 14, 2014.[145][146][147]

Former Solicitor General Paul Clement,[148][149] former Acting Solicitor General Neal Katyal,[148][149] University of California, Irvine School of Law Dean Erwin Chemerinsky,[150] Professor Chin (see above),[144] Temple University Law School Professor Peter Spiro,[151] Professor Akhil Amar,[152] Georgetown University Law Center Professor Randy Barnett,[153] Yale Law School Professor Jack Balkin,[153] and University of San Diego Professor Michael Ramsey[153] believe Cruz meets the constitutional requirements to be eligible for the presidency. Similarly, Bryan Garner, the editor of Black's Law Dictionary, believes the U.S. Supreme Court would find Cruz to be eligible,[154] and Case Western Reserve University School of Law professor Jonathan H. Adler agrees that no court will rule against Cruz's eligibility.[155]

Laurence Tribe of Harvard, however, described Cruz's eligibility as "murky and unsettled".[156] Harvard Law Professor Cass Sunstein believes that Cruz is eligible, but agrees with Ramsey that Cruz's eligibility is not "an easy question". Sunstein believes concerns over standing and the political-question doctrine make it unlikely that courts would rule against Cruz.[157]

Mary McManamon (see above) writing in the Catholic University Law Review[77] believes that Cruz is not eligible because he was not born in the United States.[158] Professor Einer Elhauge of Harvard,[159] Professor Robert Clinton of Arizona State University,[160] University of Chicago Professor Eric Posner,[161] former Chief Justice of the New York Court of Appeals Sol Wachtler,[82] and Professor Victor Williams of Catholic University of America's law school[162] agree that Cruz is not eligible. Alan Grayson, a Democratic Member of Congress from Florida, does not believe Cruz is a natural-born citizen, and stated he intends to file a lawsuit should Cruz be the Republican nominee.[163] Orly Taitz, Larry Klayman, and Mario Apuzzo, who each filed multiple lawsuits challenging Obama's eligibility, have also asserted that Cruz is not eligible.[164][165]

Cruz's eligibility has been questioned by some of his primary opponents, including Donald Trump,[166] Mike Huckabee, Rick Santorum, Carly Fiorina, and Rand Paul.[167]Marco Rubio, however, believes Cruz is eligible.[168]

Two November 2015 ballot challenges in New Hampshire alleging that Cruz was not a natural-born citizen were unsuccessful.[169][170] In December, a similar lawsuit was filed in Vermont,[171] and an unsuccessful lawsuit was filed in Florida.[172][173] In January 2016, a similar lawsuit was filed in Texas,[174][175] a similar unsuccessful lawsuit was filed in Utah,[176][177] and two similar unsuccessful ballot challenges were filed in Illinois.[178][179][180][181][182] In February, two similar unsuccessful lawsuits were filed in Pennsylvania[183][184][185][186][187] and one was filed in Arkansas;[188][189] a similar lawsuit was filed in Alabama;[190] similar unsuccessful ballot challenges were filed in Indiana;[191][192] and similar ballot challenges and an unsuccessful similar lawsuit were also filed in New York.[193][194][195][196] In March, a similar lawsuit was filed in New York.[196] In April, a similar ballot challenge was filed in New Jersey.[162]

Natural-born-citizen clause - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

"GTP"
View attachment 71065

Lets see...Ted Cruz not born in America vs. Trump being a liberal thinker, you can't compare Rambo.

.
 
Yo, next time you hear somebody talk shit, like Donald Trump? Tell them it`s a "Socialist Democrat" Agenda!!! Yes, Trump was a Democrat!!!

Ted Cruz[edit]
Ted Cruz announced on March 22, 2015, that he was running for the Republican Party's nomination for president in the 2016 election.[142] Cruz was born in Calgary, Alberta, Canada,[143] to a "U.S. citizen mother and a Cuban immigrant father",[144] giving him dual Canadian-American citizenship. Cruz applied to formally renounce his Canadian citizenship and ceased being a citizen of Canada on May 14, 2014.[145][146][147]

Former Solicitor General Paul Clement,[148][149] former Acting Solicitor General Neal Katyal,[148][149] University of California, Irvine School of Law Dean Erwin Chemerinsky,[150] Professor Chin (see above),[144] Temple University Law School Professor Peter Spiro,[151] Professor Akhil Amar,[152] Georgetown University Law Center Professor Randy Barnett,[153] Yale Law School Professor Jack Balkin,[153] and University of San Diego Professor Michael Ramsey[153] believe Cruz meets the constitutional requirements to be eligible for the presidency. Similarly, Bryan Garner, the editor of Black's Law Dictionary, believes the U.S. Supreme Court would find Cruz to be eligible,[154] and Case Western Reserve University School of Law professor Jonathan H. Adler agrees that no court will rule against Cruz's eligibility.[155]

Laurence Tribe of Harvard, however, described Cruz's eligibility as "murky and unsettled".[156] Harvard Law Professor Cass Sunstein believes that Cruz is eligible, but agrees with Ramsey that Cruz's eligibility is not "an easy question". Sunstein believes concerns over standing and the political-question doctrine make it unlikely that courts would rule against Cruz.[157]

Mary McManamon (see above) writing in the Catholic University Law Review[77] believes that Cruz is not eligible because he was not born in the United States.[158] Professor Einer Elhauge of Harvard,[159] Professor Robert Clinton of Arizona State University,[160] University of Chicago Professor Eric Posner,[161] former Chief Justice of the New York Court of Appeals Sol Wachtler,[82] and Professor Victor Williams of Catholic University of America's law school[162] agree that Cruz is not eligible. Alan Grayson, a Democratic Member of Congress from Florida, does not believe Cruz is a natural-born citizen, and stated he intends to file a lawsuit should Cruz be the Republican nominee.[163] Orly Taitz, Larry Klayman, and Mario Apuzzo, who each filed multiple lawsuits challenging Obama's eligibility, have also asserted that Cruz is not eligible.[164][165]

Cruz's eligibility has been questioned by some of his primary opponents, including Donald Trump,[166] Mike Huckabee, Rick Santorum, Carly Fiorina, and Rand Paul.[167]Marco Rubio, however, believes Cruz is eligible.[168]

Two November 2015 ballot challenges in New Hampshire alleging that Cruz was not a natural-born citizen were unsuccessful.[169][170] In December, a similar lawsuit was filed in Vermont,[171] and an unsuccessful lawsuit was filed in Florida.[172][173] In January 2016, a similar lawsuit was filed in Texas,[174][175] a similar unsuccessful lawsuit was filed in Utah,[176][177] and two similar unsuccessful ballot challenges were filed in Illinois.[178][179][180][181][182] In February, two similar unsuccessful lawsuits were filed in Pennsylvania[183][184][185][186][187] and one was filed in Arkansas;[188][189] a similar lawsuit was filed in Alabama;[190] similar unsuccessful ballot challenges were filed in Indiana;[191][192] and similar ballot challenges and an unsuccessful similar lawsuit were also filed in New York.[193][194][195][196] In March, a similar lawsuit was filed in New York.[196] In April, a similar ballot challenge was filed in New Jersey.[162]

Natural-born-citizen clause - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

"GTP"
View attachment 71065

So many citations, and no footnotes?
 
Yo, next time you hear somebody talk shit, like Donald Trump? Tell them it`s a "Socialist Democrat" Agenda!!! Yes, Trump was a Democrat!!!

Ted Cruz[edit]
Ted Cruz announced on March 22, 2015, that he was running for the Republican Party's nomination for president in the 2016 election.[142] Cruz was born in Calgary, Alberta, Canada,[143] to a "U.S. citizen mother and a Cuban immigrant father",[144] giving him dual Canadian-American citizenship. Cruz applied to formally renounce his Canadian citizenship and ceased being a citizen of Canada on May 14, 2014.[145][146][147]

Former Solicitor General Paul Clement,[148][149] former Acting Solicitor General Neal Katyal,[148][149] University of California, Irvine School of Law Dean Erwin Chemerinsky,[150] Professor Chin (see above),[144] Temple University Law School Professor Peter Spiro,[151] Professor Akhil Amar,[152] Georgetown University Law Center Professor Randy Barnett,[153] Yale Law School Professor Jack Balkin,[153] and University of San Diego Professor Michael Ramsey[153] believe Cruz meets the constitutional requirements to be eligible for the presidency. Similarly, Bryan Garner, the editor of Black's Law Dictionary, believes the U.S. Supreme Court would find Cruz to be eligible,[154] and Case Western Reserve University School of Law professor Jonathan H. Adler agrees that no court will rule against Cruz's eligibility.[155]

Laurence Tribe of Harvard, however, described Cruz's eligibility as "murky and unsettled".[156] Harvard Law Professor Cass Sunstein believes that Cruz is eligible, but agrees with Ramsey that Cruz's eligibility is not "an easy question". Sunstein believes concerns over standing and the political-question doctrine make it unlikely that courts would rule against Cruz.[157]

Mary McManamon (see above) writing in the Catholic University Law Review[77] believes that Cruz is not eligible because he was not born in the United States.[158] Professor Einer Elhauge of Harvard,[159] Professor Robert Clinton of Arizona State University,[160] University of Chicago Professor Eric Posner,[161] former Chief Justice of the New York Court of Appeals Sol Wachtler,[82] and Professor Victor Williams of Catholic University of America's law school[162] agree that Cruz is not eligible. Alan Grayson, a Democratic Member of Congress from Florida, does not believe Cruz is a natural-born citizen, and stated he intends to file a lawsuit should Cruz be the Republican nominee.[163] Orly Taitz, Larry Klayman, and Mario Apuzzo, who each filed multiple lawsuits challenging Obama's eligibility, have also asserted that Cruz is not eligible.[164][165]

Cruz's eligibility has been questioned by some of his primary opponents, including Donald Trump,[166] Mike Huckabee, Rick Santorum, Carly Fiorina, and Rand Paul.[167]Marco Rubio, however, believes Cruz is eligible.[168]

Two November 2015 ballot challenges in New Hampshire alleging that Cruz was not a natural-born citizen were unsuccessful.[169][170] In December, a similar lawsuit was filed in Vermont,[171] and an unsuccessful lawsuit was filed in Florida.[172][173] In January 2016, a similar lawsuit was filed in Texas,[174][175] a similar unsuccessful lawsuit was filed in Utah,[176][177] and two similar unsuccessful ballot challenges were filed in Illinois.[178][179][180][181][182] In February, two similar unsuccessful lawsuits were filed in Pennsylvania[183][184][185][186][187] and one was filed in Arkansas;[188][189] a similar lawsuit was filed in Alabama;[190] similar unsuccessful ballot challenges were filed in Indiana;[191][192] and similar ballot challenges and an unsuccessful similar lawsuit were also filed in New York.[193][194][195][196] In March, a similar lawsuit was filed in New York.[196] In April, a similar ballot challenge was filed in New Jersey.[162]

Natural-born-citizen clause - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

"GTP"
View attachment 71065

Lets see...Ted Cruz not born in America vs. Trump being a liberal thinker, you can't compare Rambo.

.

Yo, it`s been challenged many times before, Failure!!!

"GTP"
4ac5ed5252f8711836915110ea4a3aeb.jpg
 
Yo, next time you hear somebody talk shit, like Donald Trump? Tell them it`s a "Socialist Democrat" Agenda!!! Yes, Trump was a Democrat!!!

Ted Cruz[edit]
Ted Cruz announced on March 22, 2015, that he was running for the Republican Party's nomination for president in the 2016 election.[142] Cruz was born in Calgary, Alberta, Canada,[143] to a "U.S. citizen mother and a Cuban immigrant father",[144] giving him dual Canadian-American citizenship. Cruz applied to formally renounce his Canadian citizenship and ceased being a citizen of Canada on May 14, 2014.[145][146][147]

Former Solicitor General Paul Clement,[148][149] former Acting Solicitor General Neal Katyal,[148][149] University of California, Irvine School of Law Dean Erwin Chemerinsky,[150] Professor Chin (see above),[144] Temple University Law School Professor Peter Spiro,[151] Professor Akhil Amar,[152] Georgetown University Law Center Professor Randy Barnett,[153] Yale Law School Professor Jack Balkin,[153] and University of San Diego Professor Michael Ramsey[153] believe Cruz meets the constitutional requirements to be eligible for the presidency. Similarly, Bryan Garner, the editor of Black's Law Dictionary, believes the U.S. Supreme Court would find Cruz to be eligible,[154] and Case Western Reserve University School of Law professor Jonathan H. Adler agrees that no court will rule against Cruz's eligibility.[155]

Laurence Tribe of Harvard, however, described Cruz's eligibility as "murky and unsettled".[156] Harvard Law Professor Cass Sunstein believes that Cruz is eligible, but agrees with Ramsey that Cruz's eligibility is not "an easy question". Sunstein believes concerns over standing and the political-question doctrine make it unlikely that courts would rule against Cruz.[157]

Mary McManamon (see above) writing in the Catholic University Law Review[77] believes that Cruz is not eligible because he was not born in the United States.[158] Professor Einer Elhauge of Harvard,[159] Professor Robert Clinton of Arizona State University,[160] University of Chicago Professor Eric Posner,[161] former Chief Justice of the New York Court of Appeals Sol Wachtler,[82] and Professor Victor Williams of Catholic University of America's law school[162] agree that Cruz is not eligible. Alan Grayson, a Democratic Member of Congress from Florida, does not believe Cruz is a natural-born citizen, and stated he intends to file a lawsuit should Cruz be the Republican nominee.[163] Orly Taitz, Larry Klayman, and Mario Apuzzo, who each filed multiple lawsuits challenging Obama's eligibility, have also asserted that Cruz is not eligible.[164][165]

Cruz's eligibility has been questioned by some of his primary opponents, including Donald Trump,[166] Mike Huckabee, Rick Santorum, Carly Fiorina, and Rand Paul.[167]Marco Rubio, however, believes Cruz is eligible.[168]

Two November 2015 ballot challenges in New Hampshire alleging that Cruz was not a natural-born citizen were unsuccessful.[169][170] In December, a similar lawsuit was filed in Vermont,[171] and an unsuccessful lawsuit was filed in Florida.[172][173] In January 2016, a similar lawsuit was filed in Texas,[174][175] a similar unsuccessful lawsuit was filed in Utah,[176][177] and two similar unsuccessful ballot challenges were filed in Illinois.[178][179][180][181][182] In February, two similar unsuccessful lawsuits were filed in Pennsylvania[183][184][185][186][187] and one was filed in Arkansas;[188][189] a similar lawsuit was filed in Alabama;[190] similar unsuccessful ballot challenges were filed in Indiana;[191][192] and similar ballot challenges and an unsuccessful similar lawsuit were also filed in New York.[193][194][195][196] In March, a similar lawsuit was filed in New York.[196] In April, a similar ballot challenge was filed in New Jersey.[162]

Natural-born-citizen clause - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

"GTP"
View attachment 71065

So many citations, and no footnotes?

Yo, but the truth pops out at you too!!!

"GTP"
_trump-vindicated.jpg
 
Yo, next time you hear somebody talk shit, like Donald Trump? Tell them it`s a "Socialist Democrat" Agenda!!! Yes, Trump was a Democrat!!!

Ted Cruz[edit]
Ted Cruz announced on March 22, 2015, that he was running for the Republican Party's nomination for president in the 2016 election.[142] Cruz was born in Calgary, Alberta, Canada,[143] to a "U.S. citizen mother and a Cuban immigrant father",[144] giving him dual Canadian-American citizenship. Cruz applied to formally renounce his Canadian citizenship and ceased being a citizen of Canada on May 14, 2014.[145][146][147]

Former Solicitor General Paul Clement,[148][149] former Acting Solicitor General Neal Katyal,[148][149] University of California, Irvine School of Law Dean Erwin Chemerinsky,[150] Professor Chin (see above),[144] Temple University Law School Professor Peter Spiro,[151] Professor Akhil Amar,[152] Georgetown University Law Center Professor Randy Barnett,[153] Yale Law School Professor Jack Balkin,[153] and University of San Diego Professor Michael Ramsey[153] believe Cruz meets the constitutional requirements to be eligible for the presidency. Similarly, Bryan Garner, the editor of Black's Law Dictionary, believes the U.S. Supreme Court would find Cruz to be eligible,[154] and Case Western Reserve University School of Law professor Jonathan H. Adler agrees that no court will rule against Cruz's eligibility.[155]

Laurence Tribe of Harvard, however, described Cruz's eligibility as "murky and unsettled".[156] Harvard Law Professor Cass Sunstein believes that Cruz is eligible, but agrees with Ramsey that Cruz's eligibility is not "an easy question". Sunstein believes concerns over standing and the political-question doctrine make it unlikely that courts would rule against Cruz.[157]

Mary McManamon (see above) writing in the Catholic University Law Review[77] believes that Cruz is not eligible because he was not born in the United States.[158] Professor Einer Elhauge of Harvard,[159] Professor Robert Clinton of Arizona State University,[160] University of Chicago Professor Eric Posner,[161] former Chief Justice of the New York Court of Appeals Sol Wachtler,[82] and Professor Victor Williams of Catholic University of America's law school[162] agree that Cruz is not eligible. Alan Grayson, a Democratic Member of Congress from Florida, does not believe Cruz is a natural-born citizen, and stated he intends to file a lawsuit should Cruz be the Republican nominee.[163] Orly Taitz, Larry Klayman, and Mario Apuzzo, who each filed multiple lawsuits challenging Obama's eligibility, have also asserted that Cruz is not eligible.[164][165]

Cruz's eligibility has been questioned by some of his primary opponents, including Donald Trump,[166] Mike Huckabee, Rick Santorum, Carly Fiorina, and Rand Paul.[167]Marco Rubio, however, believes Cruz is eligible.[168]

Two November 2015 ballot challenges in New Hampshire alleging that Cruz was not a natural-born citizen were unsuccessful.[169][170] In December, a similar lawsuit was filed in Vermont,[171] and an unsuccessful lawsuit was filed in Florida.[172][173] In January 2016, a similar lawsuit was filed in Texas,[174][175] a similar unsuccessful lawsuit was filed in Utah,[176][177] and two similar unsuccessful ballot challenges were filed in Illinois.[178][179][180][181][182] In February, two similar unsuccessful lawsuits were filed in Pennsylvania[183][184][185][186][187] and one was filed in Arkansas;[188][189] a similar lawsuit was filed in Alabama;[190] similar unsuccessful ballot challenges were filed in Indiana;[191][192] and similar ballot challenges and an unsuccessful similar lawsuit were also filed in New York.[193][194][195][196] In March, a similar lawsuit was filed in New York.[196] In April, a similar ballot challenge was filed in New Jersey.[162]

Natural-born-citizen clause - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

"GTP"
View attachment 71065

Lets see...Ted Cruz not born in America vs. Trump being a liberal thinker, you can't compare Rambo.

.

Yo, it`s been challenged many times before, Failure!!!

"GTP"
View attachment 71068

I am not sure how this is going in New Jersey today..

TRENTON — A New Jersey judge said he would rule Tuesday if U.S. Sen. Ted Cruz of Texas is a "natural-born citizen" under the U.S. Constitution and therefore could appear on the state's June 7 Republican presidential primary ballot.

Judge Jeff Masin in Mercerville heard Monday from a group of New Jersey

N.J. judge to decide if Ted Cruz is 'natural-born citizen' and can appear on June 7 ballot
 
Yo, next time you hear somebody talk shit, like Donald Trump? Tell them it`s a "Socialist Democrat" Agenda!!! Yes, Trump was a Democrat!!!

Ted Cruz[edit]
Ted Cruz announced on March 22, 2015, that he was running for the Republican Party's nomination for president in the 2016 election.[142] Cruz was born in Calgary, Alberta, Canada,[143] to a "U.S. citizen mother and a Cuban immigrant father",[144] giving him dual Canadian-American citizenship. Cruz applied to formally renounce his Canadian citizenship and ceased being a citizen of Canada on May 14, 2014.[145][146][147]

Former Solicitor General Paul Clement,[148][149] former Acting Solicitor General Neal Katyal,[148][149] University of California, Irvine School of Law Dean Erwin Chemerinsky,[150] Professor Chin (see above),[144] Temple University Law School Professor Peter Spiro,[151] Professor Akhil Amar,[152] Georgetown University Law Center Professor Randy Barnett,[153] Yale Law School Professor Jack Balkin,[153] and University of San Diego Professor Michael Ramsey[153] believe Cruz meets the constitutional requirements to be eligible for the presidency. Similarly, Bryan Garner, the editor of Black's Law Dictionary, believes the U.S. Supreme Court would find Cruz to be eligible,[154] and Case Western Reserve University School of Law professor Jonathan H. Adler agrees that no court will rule against Cruz's eligibility.[155]

Laurence Tribe of Harvard, however, described Cruz's eligibility as "murky and unsettled".[156] Harvard Law Professor Cass Sunstein believes that Cruz is eligible, but agrees with Ramsey that Cruz's eligibility is not "an easy question". Sunstein believes concerns over standing and the political-question doctrine make it unlikely that courts would rule against Cruz.[157]

Mary McManamon (see above) writing in the Catholic University Law Review[77] believes that Cruz is not eligible because he was not born in the United States.[158] Professor Einer Elhauge of Harvard,[159] Professor Robert Clinton of Arizona State University,[160] University of Chicago Professor Eric Posner,[161] former Chief Justice of the New York Court of Appeals Sol Wachtler,[82] and Professor Victor Williams of Catholic University of America's law school[162] agree that Cruz is not eligible. Alan Grayson, a Democratic Member of Congress from Florida, does not believe Cruz is a natural-born citizen, and stated he intends to file a lawsuit should Cruz be the Republican nominee.[163] Orly Taitz, Larry Klayman, and Mario Apuzzo, who each filed multiple lawsuits challenging Obama's eligibility, have also asserted that Cruz is not eligible.[164][165]

Cruz's eligibility has been questioned by some of his primary opponents, including Donald Trump,[166] Mike Huckabee, Rick Santorum, Carly Fiorina, and Rand Paul.[167]Marco Rubio, however, believes Cruz is eligible.[168]

Two November 2015 ballot challenges in New Hampshire alleging that Cruz was not a natural-born citizen were unsuccessful.[169][170] In December, a similar lawsuit was filed in Vermont,[171] and an unsuccessful lawsuit was filed in Florida.[172][173] In January 2016, a similar lawsuit was filed in Texas,[174][175] a similar unsuccessful lawsuit was filed in Utah,[176][177] and two similar unsuccessful ballot challenges were filed in Illinois.[178][179][180][181][182] In February, two similar unsuccessful lawsuits were filed in Pennsylvania[183][184][185][186][187] and one was filed in Arkansas;[188][189] a similar lawsuit was filed in Alabama;[190] similar unsuccessful ballot challenges were filed in Indiana;[191][192] and similar ballot challenges and an unsuccessful similar lawsuit were also filed in New York.[193][194][195][196] In March, a similar lawsuit was filed in New York.[196] In April, a similar ballot challenge was filed in New Jersey.[162]

Natural-born-citizen clause - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

"GTP"
View attachment 71065

Lets see...Ted Cruz not born in America vs. Trump being a liberal thinker, you can't compare Rambo.

.

Yo, it`s been challenged many times before, Failure!!!

"GTP"
View attachment 71068

I am not sure how this is going in New Jersey today..

TRENTON — A New Jersey judge said he would rule Tuesday if U.S. Sen. Ted Cruz of Texas is a "natural-born citizen" under the U.S. Constitution and therefore could appear on the state's June 7 Republican presidential primary ballot.

Judge Jeff Masin in Mercerville heard Monday from a group of New Jersey

N.J. judge to decide if Ted Cruz is 'natural-born citizen' and can appear on June 7 ballot

Yo, lost cause, and waste of money!

"GTP"
460x (2).jpg
 
Ok I've never been into the birther movements. That said the one thing I don't understand about all of this is that in the time period that Cruz was born in Alberta, Canada did not recognize dual citizenship.

Consequently when he was born and up until he announced that he was giving up his Canadian citizenship, he was considered in Canada to be a Canadian citizen and not a Canadian American citizen.

This is Canadian law.

So how and when did America officially recognize the Junior Senator as an American citizen?
 
Ok I've never been into the birther movements. That said the one thing I don't understand about all of this is that in the time period that Cruz was born in Alberta, Canada did not recognize dual citizenship.

Consequently when he was born and up until he announced that he was giving up his Canadian citizenship, he was considered in Canada to be a Canadian citizen and not a Canadian American citizen.

This is Canadian law.

So how and when did America officially recognize the Junior Senator as an American citizen?

Yo, when he was born, 12/22/1970, to an American Citizen!

"GTP"
460x (2).jpg
 
The Constitution, other than in the Presidential qualification section, refers only to citizens and naturalized citizens. As every court to consider the issue has held, as the founders and their successors wrote, and within the text of the Constitution, if one is a citizen and NOT naturalized, then one is a natural born citizen. By virtue of being born to an American citizen, Cruz is a natural born citizen.
 
The Constitution, other than in the Presidential qualification section, refers only to citizens and naturalized citizens. As every court to consider the issue has held, as the founders and their successors wrote, and within the text of the Constitution, if one is a citizen and NOT naturalized, then one is a natural born citizen. By virtue of being born to an American citizen, Cruz is a natural born citizen.

No they haven't. The courts have explicitly found that the only way a person born outside the united states can become a citizen is through naturalization.

"A person born out of the jurisdiction of the United States can only become a citizen by being naturalized, either by treaty, as in the case of the annexation of foreign territory, or by authority of Congress, exercised either by declaring certain classes of persons to be citizens, as in the enactments conferring citizenship upon foreign-born children of citizens, or by enabling foreigners individually to become citizens by proceedings in the judicial tribunals, as in the ordinary provisions of the naturalization acts."

US. v. Wong Kim Ark

Can you cite a case contradicting that?
 
The Constitution, other than in the Presidential qualification section, refers only to citizens and naturalized citizens. As every court to consider the issue has held, as the founders and their successors wrote, and within the text of the Constitution, if one is a citizen and NOT naturalized, then one is a natural born citizen. By virtue of being born to an American citizen, Cruz is a natural born citizen.

No they haven't. The courts have explicitly found that the only way a person born outside the united states can become a citizen is through naturalization.

"A person born out of the jurisdiction of the United States can only become a citizen by being naturalized, either by treaty, as in the case of the annexation of foreign territory, or by authority of Congress, exercised either by declaring certain classes of persons to be citizens, as in the enactments conferring citizenship upon foreign-born children of citizens, or by enabling foreigners individually to become citizens by proceedings in the judicial tribunals, as in the ordinary provisions of the naturalization acts."

US. v. Wong Kim Ark

Can you cite a case contradicting that?

Both the Penn and the NJ cases, both on the merits, contradict that.
 
The Constitution, other than in the Presidential qualification section, refers only to citizens and naturalized citizens. As every court to consider the issue has held, as the founders and their successors wrote, and within the text of the Constitution, if one is a citizen and NOT naturalized, then one is a natural born citizen. By virtue of being born to an American citizen, Cruz is a natural born citizen.

No they haven't. The courts have explicitly found that the only way a person born outside the united states can become a citizen is through naturalization.

"A person born out of the jurisdiction of the United States can only become a citizen by being naturalized, either by treaty, as in the case of the annexation of foreign territory, or by authority of Congress, exercised either by declaring certain classes of persons to be citizens, as in the enactments conferring citizenship upon foreign-born children of citizens, or by enabling foreigners individually to become citizens by proceedings in the judicial tribunals, as in the ordinary provisions of the naturalization acts."

US. v. Wong Kim Ark

Can you cite a case contradicting that?

Both the Penn and the NJ cases, both on the merits, contradict that.

I'd give the Supreme Court the edge on this one.
 
IT WOULD BE GOOD TO HAVE A CANADIAN IN THE WHITE HOUSE.
 
The Constitution, other than in the Presidential qualification section, refers only to citizens and naturalized citizens. As every court to consider the issue has held, as the founders and their successors wrote, and within the text of the Constitution, if one is a citizen and NOT naturalized, then one is a natural born citizen. By virtue of being born to an American citizen, Cruz is a natural born citizen.

No they haven't. The courts have explicitly found that the only way a person born outside the united states can become a citizen is through naturalization.

"A person born out of the jurisdiction of the United States can only become a citizen by being naturalized, either by treaty, as in the case of the annexation of foreign territory, or by authority of Congress, exercised either by declaring certain classes of persons to be citizens, as in the enactments conferring citizenship upon foreign-born children of citizens, or by enabling foreigners individually to become citizens by proceedings in the judicial tribunals, as in the ordinary provisions of the naturalization acts."

US. v. Wong Kim Ark

Can you cite a case contradicting that?

Both the Penn and the NJ cases, both on the merits, contradict that.

I'd give the Supreme Court the edge on this one.

Odd though that those courts didn't.

Here is how I expect it will go down:
a) Cruz will not get nominated- issue dies- moot.
b) In the long shot that Cruz is nominated, Trump sues on eligibility- courts take case- reaches Supreme Court- and then anything could happen.
 
The Constitution, other than in the Presidential qualification section, refers only to citizens and naturalized citizens. As every court to consider the issue has held, as the founders and their successors wrote, and within the text of the Constitution, if one is a citizen and NOT naturalized, then one is a natural born citizen. By virtue of being born to an American citizen, Cruz is a natural born citizen.

No they haven't. The courts have explicitly found that the only way a person born outside the united states can become a citizen is through naturalization.

"A person born out of the jurisdiction of the United States can only become a citizen by being naturalized, either by treaty, as in the case of the annexation of foreign territory, or by authority of Congress, exercised either by declaring certain classes of persons to be citizens, as in the enactments conferring citizenship upon foreign-born children of citizens, or by enabling foreigners individually to become citizens by proceedings in the judicial tribunals, as in the ordinary provisions of the naturalization acts."

US. v. Wong Kim Ark

Can you cite a case contradicting that?

Both the Penn and the NJ cases, both on the merits, contradict that.

I'd give the Supreme Court the edge on this one.

Odd though that those courts didn't.

The Pennsylvania ruling essentially ignored this finding of Wong, failing to cite it in any capacity.
 

Forum List

Back
Top