A friend is going to work in a conservative religious school: no elbows or collarbones visible.
I have always thought teachers' dress requirements should generally meet those of the students.
Teachers should be models of appropriate dress and behavior, as well as instructors.
The poll is easy: yes or no. Let's not hear any snowflake whining. Give us your opinion in a sensible manner.
I vote a resounding yes.
Teachers should dress like authority figures. No one is going to respect them if they dress like the kids
The crucial term there is "authority figure".
A teacher should be a
teacher --- not an "authority figure". Authority figures are for the military. A teacher should be
offering --- not inflicting -- his or her wisdom. More like a gift than an order. If some student is doing his lesson not because it interests him but because he'll be punished if he doesn't, we've thrown away the whole concept of teaching and what it means.
Which we probably have anyway but just saying -- if we're setting them up to be authority figures then what they're doing is not teaching, but indoctrinating.
A teacher has to set an example. And. Teacher IS an authority figure. That doesn’t mean they have to be despotic. But they have to create an environment where kids can lean. That doesn’t happen in chaos
Sure, of course you keep order and you keep focused. But as you say that doesn't mean
despotic. And trying to hammer people in their childhood into cookie-cutter images of each other is where that leads.
The whole idea of mandatory public education only dates from the 19th century and as a structure it's far less about education of anything and far more about a system of
social control. A system where we teach people from the earliest age to "know their place". Because a Big State system can't function in a society of free thinkers; it needs the cookie-cutter mass produced robots. Once the System's values have been indoctrinated from the earliest and most impressionable age, it becomes far easier for the System to dictate what the next step is that serves it that week. Especially war. But that's the only reason we ever came up with the idea of teacher as
authority figure --- because it's a model that is contrived to produce the
servants... rather than the
educated. It's there to produce a society of lemmings who will OBEY.
So it starts with forcing the victims to be all alike, to behave all alike, to dress all alike and to be all the same age, all of which ignores and suppresses everything that makes them individuals with individual talents, individual interests and individual potential. Nothing about forcing those victims to look indistinguishable from one another serves any interest of education. It serves only the interests of authoritarian control.
And if one takes these thoughts above, and applies them to the reasoning given in this thread by those advocating for "uniforms" and "authority", it becomes crystal clear that that's
exactly what their goal is.
Here's one right above ---
FYI a school by definition is authoritarian and controlling the environment is part of the game.
--
Voilà. Here's a guy who thinks schooling is about authoritarianism, and comes right out and says it. No beating about the bush. He's bought the whole social control model and turns around to flip it like real estate instead of questioning what that model does. Because "school is authoritarian" is the concept he's been sold BY that system, and he doesn't dare question it, because "everybody else thinks so". He's been indoctrinated by the system of indoctrination to defend it.
I would be far more impressed by, and interested in, a teacher who expressed his/her own originality than by/in one who just went along with the dictum "because everybody else does". WAY more. I've never ever been impressed by those who just go with the flow 'because everybody else does'. It's those who refuse to sheep along who actually have something to say.
That is a role model.
There is a proper example to set. Sure beats the example of "conform because everybody else is doing it".