Taylor Swift Effect on Football and Democrats


Yup, no one cared.

Your Kamala campaign, on the other hand, put out near-daily lists of "celebrity" endorsements in the regime media (which we later found out they paid for), and it worked on the cultists like you.



 
Yup, no one cared.

Your Kamala campaign, on the other hand, put out near-daily lists of "celebrity" endorsements in the regime media (which we later found out they paid for), and it worked on the cultists like you.



Comedy Gold!
 
yep, that's me, MAGA to the core. LOL




Hillary the war monger? No way.
Yes, Republicans said she was hawkish. Bet she wouldn't have lied us into a war, provoked our adversaries into conspiring against us, pissed off our allies or bombed Iran.

I don't mind bombing Iran even though Trump did it. But imagine if Kamala bombed Iran like that. You would have lost your MAGA mother ******* minds.

You remind me of Papageorgio who thinks Democrats are just as bad as Trump/Republicans/MAGA just because he supposedly pressured Facebook to take down fake news.

I think a President should pressure an American corporation if it's being socially irresponsible. But my definition of socially irresponsible is a lot different than Trump's/Republicans/MAGA. They think DEI is being socially irresponsible.
 
Yup, no one cared.

Your Kamala campaign, on the other hand, put out near-daily lists of "celebrity" endorsements in the regime media (which we later found out they paid for), and it worked on the cultists like you.



They didn't have to pay Taylor Swift.

The celebrity endorsements for Trump were Kid Rock, Clint Eastwood, Chuck Norris, Hulk. Losers.
 
Yes, Republicans said she was hawkish. Bet she wouldn't have lied us into a war, provoked our adversaries into conspiring against us, pissed off our allies or bombed Iran.

She helped do that in Syria.

There wasnt a war she wouldn't support.


I don't mind bombing Iran even though Trump did it. But imagine if Kamala bombed Iran like that. You would have lost your MAGA mother ******* minds.

I was against Trump doing it. I condemned it.


You remind me of Papageorgio who thinks Democrats are just as bad as Trump/Republicans/MAGA just because he supposedly pressured Facebook to take down fake news.

I think a President should pressure an American corporation if it's being socially irresponsible. But my definition of socially irresponsible is a lot different than Trump's/Republicans/MAGA. They think DEI is being socially irresponsible.

Diversity is good.
 
They didn't have to pay Taylor Swift.

The celebrity endorsements for Trump were Kid Rock, Clint Eastwood, Chuck Norris, Hulk. Losers.
bobo how can someone who has made it to the top of their profession be losers?...you said you havent made 6 figures yet at your age while they greatly surpassed you at the same age............sounds like you might be the loser....
 
bobo how can someone who has made it to the top of their profession be losers?...you said you havent made 6 figures yet at your age while they greatly surpassed you at the same age............sounds like you might be the loser....
True. They are greedy bastards. Look at Caytlyn Jenner and Kanye. Siding with Republicans because it benefits their rich asses financially. They aren't losers. You are right.

Do you still live in California? You say you are darker than blacks. Have you been approached by ICE yet? Hadn't heard from you in awhile I was worried maybe you were sitting in Alligator Alcatraz.
 
Yes, Republicans said she was hawkish. Bet she wouldn't have lied us into a war, provoked our adversaries into conspiring against us, pissed off our allies or bombed Iran.

I don't mind bombing Iran even though Trump did it. But imagine if Kamala bombed Iran like that. You would have lost your MAGA mother ******* minds.

You remind me of Papageorgio who thinks Democrats are just as bad as Trump/Republicans/MAGA just because he supposedly pressured Facebook to take down fake news.

I think a President should pressure an American corporation if it's being socially irresponsible. But my definition of socially irresponsible is a lot different than Trump's/Republicans/MAGA. They think DEI is being socially irresponsible.
So, a corporation, such as the media? The issue was Biden wasn’t suppressing fake news, he was suppressing free speech. There was no fake news about the Hunter Biden laptop that existed, there was no fake news in possible real theory that the Covid-19 outbreak began in Wuhan, China — the same city that houses the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV), one of the world’s leading centers for coronavirus research. This lab had previously studied and collected bat coronaviruses from caves in southern China, sometimes hundreds of miles from Wuhan.

So why did the Supreme Court rule against the Biden Administration because they tried to infringe on free speech?

Go ahead and spin, I need your silly explanation, I have had a good laugh today.
 
True. They are greedy bastards. Look at Caytlyn Jenner and Kanye. Siding with Republicans because it benefits their rich asses financially. They aren't losers. You are right.

Do you still live in California? You say you are darker than blacks. Have you been approached by ICE yet? Hadn't heard from you in awhile I was worried maybe you were sitting in Alligator Alcatraz.
i dont have credentials like you bobo.....and i never said i was darker than blacks....
 
bobo how can someone who has made it to the top of their profession be losers?...you said you havent made 6 figures yet at your age while they greatly surpassed you at the same age............sounds like you might be the loser....
Instead of making sales, he spends his time scoring pot and posting on message boards.
 
So, a corporation, such as the media? The issue was Biden wasn’t suppressing fake news, he was suppressing free speech. There was no fake news about the Hunter Biden laptop that existed, there was no fake news in possible real theory that the Covid-19 outbreak began in Wuhan, China — the same city that houses the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV), one of the world’s leading centers for coronavirus research. This lab had previously studied and collected bat coronaviruses from caves in southern China, sometimes hundreds of miles from Wuhan.

So why did the Supreme Court rule against the Biden Administration because they tried to infringe on free speech?

Go ahead and spin, I need your silly explanation, I have had a good laugh today.
Please. Don't get me started on the Supreme Court. If it were Trump they were ruling on, they'd come up with different opinions, justifications and rulings. What a joke our current Supreme Court is.

Today, the court’s favorable rating is 22 percentage points lower than it was in August 2020, when 70% of Americans had a positive view.

Let's guess who sees them favorably. Now, let's guess how you view the Supreme Court. I bet you view them favorably don't you? See? You side with MAGA/Republicans.
 
Please. Don't get me started on the Supreme Court. If it were Trump they were ruling on, they'd come up with different opinions, justifications and rulings. What a joke our current Supreme Court is.

Today, the court’s favorable rating is 22 percentage points lower than it was in August 2020, when 70% of Americans had a positive view.

Let's guess who sees them favorably. Now, let's guess how you view the Supreme Court. I bet you view them favorably don't you? See? You side with MAGA/Republicans.
I prefer the courts that protect our rights to free speech, unlike you that is fine with free speech that only agrees r beliefs. :rolleyes:
 
Please. Don't get me started on the Supreme Court. If it were Trump they were ruling on, they'd come up with different opinions, justifications and rulings. What a joke our current Supreme Court is.

Today, the court’s favorable rating is 22 percentage points lower than it was in August 2020, when 70% of Americans had a positive view.

Let's guess who sees them favorably. Now, let's guess how you view the Supreme Court. I bet you view them favorably don't you? See? You side with MAGA/Republicans.
i have said that this century we have witnessed the worse most inept people in the federal govt in the history of this country....
 
15th post
I prefer the courts that protect our rights to free speech, unlike you that is fine with free speech that only agrees r beliefs. :rolleyes:
When do they side with the first amendment? When it suits them. That's when. What about this?

Today’s decision in Free Speech Coalition v. Paxton is a direct blow to the free speech rights of adults. The Court ruled that “no person—adult or child—has a First Amendment right to access speech that is obscene to minors without first submitting proof of age.” This ruling allows states to enact onerous age-verification rules that will block adults from accessing lawful speech, curtail their ability to be anonymous, and jeopardize their data security and privacy. These are real and immense burdens on adults, and the Court was wrong to ignore them in upholding Texas’ law.

Yes there is fake news about Hunter's laptop. That Ashley wrote that she showered with her father. That's debatable. She never confirmed she wrote that passage. Trump would say Democrats put that fake news in the Epstein file if we found out Trump was giving Ivanka to Jeffrey. Hunter Biden's laptop. Is that your line? LOL.

Spreading fake news that the virus started in a lab? Without evidence? Probably at a time when hate crimes on asians was skyrocketing.

MAGA has duped you good.
 
Republicans are running away from the NFL yet despite that

The NFL's surge in female viewership cuts across different age demographics. Among teenage girls, NFL viewership has increased by 53 percent.

It's not Republican women pal. It's swifties. This election was close but really you're going to see it's not.
What an idiot.
EVERYONE was running away from football before Taylor Swift was a blip on social radar.

Hilarious. Just stop.
 
When do they side with the first amendment? When it suits them. That's when. What about this?

Today’s decision in Free Speech Coalition v. Paxton is a direct blow to the free speech rights of adults. The Court ruled that “no person—adult or child—has a First Amendment right to access speech that is obscene to minors without first submitting proof of age.” This ruling allows states to enact onerous age-verification rules that will block adults from accessing lawful speech, curtail their ability to be anonymous, and jeopardize their data security and privacy. These are real and immense burdens on adults, and the Court was wrong to ignore them in upholding Texas’ law.

Yes there is fake news about Hunter's laptop. That Ashley wrote that she showered with her father. That's debatable. She never confirmed she wrote that passage. Trump would say Democrats put that fake news in the Epstein file if we found out Trump was giving Ivanka to Jeffrey. Hunter Biden's laptop. Is that your line? LOL.

Spreading fake news that the virus started in a lab? Without evidence? Probably at a time when hate crimes on asians was skyrocketing.

MAGA has duped you good.
A Supreme Court ruling today? lol!

It ruled on it back in June, the ruling is a state law
  • Texas law (HB 1181): A state-level rule requiring age verification for porn websites if minors could access them.
  • Court’s take: The majority said Texas has a legitimate state interest in protecting minors, and because adults can still access the material (just with ID checks), it doesn’t “completely ban” adult speech. They applied intermediate scrutiny instead of strict scrutiny.
  • Result: Upheld — states can regulate access within their borders.

So it applies in Texas but in 1998 Congress passed an even more restrictive bill that required much harsher restrictions but the conservative court ruled it was to restrictive and there were other work around.

The June ruling was less restrictive and a state has a right to protect their youth. In all 50 states, it is illegal for a minor, to enter an adult bookstore, strip club or any other adult venue and Proof of age must be given.

Whether the laptop story, the showering story or the lab story were truthful or not, the government has no right to suppress free speech. Biden lied and said you get the shot you won’t get Covid, a lie, you get the shot you can’t spread Covid, a lie, I am cognizant, a lie. Should the media all suppressed all of his lies? Of course not.

We as a people have a right to express our opinions, right or wrong and I would have no issues with this site, Facebook, Instagram, YouTube, TikTok or anyother media deciding what they allow for people to post, what I object to is the government interfering or pressuring the media to remove or restrict content.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom