Taylor Swift Effect on Football and Democrats

[j-mac]

Instead stupid white racists won. The rich successfully won you over to vote with them with WOKE. DEI.

How's the economy? How many jobs added in August? And you guys claim prices are going down and wages are going up? And Trump ended 10 wars? And picking RFK Jr. was a good idea? What other delusions do you have?

That’s what happens when you lose elections…you don’t get to pick

 

[sealybobo]

A Supreme Court ruling today? lol!

It ruled on it back in June, the ruling is a state law

• Texas law (HB 1181): A state-level rule requiring age verification for porn websites if minors could access them.
• Court’s take: The majority said Texas has a legitimate state interest in protecting minors, and because adults can still access the material (just with ID checks), it doesn’t “completely ban” adult speech. They applied intermediate scrutiny instead of strict scrutiny.
• Result: Upheld — states can regulate access within their borders.

So it applies in Texas but in 1998 Congress passed an even more restrictive bill that required much harsher restrictions but the conservative court ruled it was to restrictive and there were other work around.

The June ruling was less restrictive and a state has a right to protect their youth. In all 50 states, it is illegal for a minor, to enter an adult bookstore, strip club or any other adult venue and Proof of age must be given.

Whether the laptop story, the showering story or the lab story were truthful or not, the government has no right to suppress free speech. Biden lied and said you get the shot you won’t get Covid, a lie, you get the shot you can’t spread Covid, a lie, I am cognizant, a lie. Should the media all suppressed all of his lies? Of course not.

We as a people have a right to express our opinions, right or wrong and I would have no issues with this site, Facebook, Instagram, YouTube, TikTok or anyother media deciding what they allow for people to post, what I object to is the government interfering or pressuring the media to remove or restrict content.

So the Supreme Court ruled it's okay for states to go after my first amendment rights? How convenient.

 

[sealybobo]

A Supreme Court ruling today? lol!

It ruled on it back in June, the ruling is a state law

• Texas law (HB 1181): A state-level rule requiring age verification for porn websites if minors could access them.
• Court’s take: The majority said Texas has a legitimate state interest in protecting minors, and because adults can still access the material (just with ID checks), it doesn’t “completely ban” adult speech. They applied intermediate scrutiny instead of strict scrutiny.
• Result: Upheld — states can regulate access within their borders.

So it applies in Texas but in 1998 Congress passed an even more restrictive bill that required much harsher restrictions but the conservative court ruled it was to restrictive and there were other work around.

The June ruling was less restrictive and a state has a right to protect their youth. In all 50 states, it is illegal for a minor, to enter an adult bookstore, strip club or any other adult venue and Proof of age must be given.

Whether the laptop story, the showering story or the lab story were truthful or not, the government has no right to suppress free speech. Biden lied and said you get the shot you won’t get Covid, a lie, you get the shot you can’t spread Covid, a lie, I am cognizant, a lie. Should the media all suppressed all of his lies? Of course not.

We as a people have a right to express our opinions, right or wrong and I would have no issues with this site, Facebook, Instagram, YouTube, TikTok or anyother media deciding what they allow for people to post, what I object to is the government interfering or pressuring the media to remove or restrict content.

I said the Supreme's can cherry pick and give any justification for why they ruled like they did. I misspoke. Often, they give no reasoning. At least they gave a reason why Bush won 2000. It was bad reasoning but at least they gave us some right wing spin on why Bush won.​

​

Amy Coney Barrett Downplays Fears Of A Constitutional Crisis​

She called on Americans to trust the Supreme Court, which has sided with Trump on a number of key cases.

I believe her like I believe Ghislaine Maxwell

Worries about a constitutional crisis have grown as the executive branch has sought to expand its power including by ignoring court orders and bypassing Congress on key issues

Barrett’s comments come as President Donald Trump has attacked judges for decisions that have stymied his policies and also openly defied court orders.

The Supreme Court — which has a 6-3 conservative majority — has sided with Trump on a number of cases including policies that terminate legal protections for Venezuelan immigrants and that bar trans people from serving in the military, even as lower court judges have contested his ability to proceed on them.

Lower courts have frequently blocked Trump’s executive actions as unlawful exercises of power, only for the Supreme Court in most cases to then rule in favor of the administration via brief orders that often include no reasoning,” NBC News notes.

 

[justoffal]

I can't believe Taylor's swifties gave the NFL such a big ratings boost because they apparently do whatever she does. Then she tells them to vote for Kamala and that was too much to ask of them?

I'm ******* glad they have to drive to another state to get an abortion now. Women are idiots.

Ehhhhh......kammy was a cackling Dunce who tried to end run the primary. Amazing she got as far as she did.

 

[Papageorgio]

So the Supreme Court ruled it's okay for states to go after my first amendment rights? How convenient.

That’s not what happened drama queen, my are you this so fragile? it says if you want to watch porn, you need proof you are over 18, just like you currently have to do if you went to an adult bookstore or strip club, in every state.

 

[Papageorgio]

I said the Supreme's can cherry pick and give any justification for why they ruled like they did. I misspoke. Often, they give no reasoning. At least they gave a reason why Bush won 2000. It was bad reasoning but at least they gave us some right wing spin on why Bush won.​

​

Amy Coney Barrett Downplays Fears Of A Constitutional Crisis​

She called on Americans to trust the Supreme Court, which has sided with Trump on a number of key cases.

I believe her like I believe Ghislaine Maxwell

Worries about a constitutional crisis have grown as the executive branch has sought to expand its power including by ignoring court orders and bypassing Congress on key issues

Barrett’s comments come as President Donald Trump has attacked judges for decisions that have stymied his policies and also openly defied court orders.

The Supreme Court — which has a 6-3 conservative majority — has sided with Trump on a number of cases including policies that terminate legal protections for Venezuelan immigrants and that bar trans people from serving in the military, even as lower court judges have contested his ability to proceed on them.

Lower courts have frequently blocked Trump’s executive actions as unlawful exercises of power, only for the Supreme Court in most cases to then rule in favor of the administration via brief orders that often include no reasoning,” NBC News notes.

The courts allay provides documentation of their rulings, the have majority ruling and a minority ruling. They are usually very long opinions.

 

[sealybobo]

That’s not what happened drama queen, my are you this so fragile? it says if you want to watch porn, you need proof you are over 18, just like you currently have to do if you went to an adult bookstore or strip club, in every state.

It asks for your information. Privacy issues my man. If you were a true constitutionalist you'd understand.

You remind me of Republicans who don't mind that Trump is a socialist now. So are they now. Insane how quickly the GOP has changed. You belong to them bro. Thank god you claim to be in a blue state where your vote means nothing. Love that.

 

[Papageorgio]

It asks for your information. Privacy issues my man. If you were a true constitutionalist you'd understand.

You remind me of Republicans who don't mind that Trump is a socialist now. So are they now. Insane how quickly the GOP has changed. You belong to them bro. Thank god you claim to be in a blue state where your vote means nothing. Love that.

So then asking for ID going into a strip joint is unconstitutional?

 

[pknopp]

So then asking for ID going into a strip joint is unconstitutional?

It's easy to get around any internet restrictions. Not so easy to get in a door where you are not permitted.

 

[Papageorgio]

It's easy to get around any internet restrictions. Not so easy to get in a door where you are not permitted.

Everyone knows that. What’s your point?

 

[hadit]

They didn't have to pay Taylor Swift.

The celebrity endorsements for Trump were Kid Rock, Clint Eastwood, Chuck Norris, Hulk. Losers.

1. TRUMP! didn't buy them.
2. They were more effective than Kamala's bought and paid for endorsements.

Put those together and you are saying that free endorsements that worked were losers while bought endorsements that didn't were, what, winners?