Zone1 Tax the Rich! Make them Pay their Fair Share!

Great idea if you change the fact that the top 1% of earners receive more than the bottom 60% in tax breaks and grants.
Having a policy argument is pre mature if you don't know (or communicate) what it is that you want.
So what do you want our tax and spend policy to accomplish?
 
No, all your leftard whining gets old.
Whinning? don't you mean winning!

1775844291491.webp


:auiqs.jpg:
 
We'll talk when that happens, which it never has and never will.
Its happening right now in states like california and drep blue cities like New York

The rich are moving their companies to low tax states like Florida and Texas

And government workers are losing their jobs
 
Two different things. If you use your money to create a foundation, that is a legacy. How much money do you have to give a kid to ensure them a good living? I think it is $5 million now, is that not adequate or do they need at least a billion?
Sadly, many heirs stop working and live entirely from their inheritance. When it's gone they are often not fit to return to a working life. However, most use their inheritance as a generational legacy. My boss and his brother, both only in their sixties, have given their kids their inheritance already as they don't need it and want their kids to get a head start financially. Two of the kids, who are in their thirties, have already purchased homes, a great way to invest part of their inheritance.
 
Don't think government, think Americans.
How do you figure that Americans in general have a larger right to what I'VE worked for than my American family does. Taxes were paid to support you and the rest of the parasites while I earned it. The rest is just more BLATANT THEFT. Democrats are known for that. That's why they don't incarcerate THIEVES---they are related!
 
15th post
You don't need stock buybacks to give stock options, twit.
  • 1982 Shift: SEC Rule 10b-18 (nicknamed safe-harbor) allows companies to buy back shares without fears of being charged with market manipulation.
 
Nah, Dubya only forced GSE's to buy $440 billion and upped their goals from 50% to 56%

Right, Clinton only forced the GSEs to make 50% of their mortgage purchases subprime mortgages.

DURR


Nah, sorry Cupcake, BJ Bill, the best conservative Prez since Ike, required 50% to meet affordability goals, AS A GOV'T SPONSORED ENTERPRISE, he allowed for a few years to COUNT SUBPRIMES, but changed the rule in 2000 as they had a much larger failure rate

IT WAS DUBYA WHO COUNTED SUBPRIMES AGAIN, IN 2004 AND PUSHED THOSE "AFFORDABILITY" GOALS UP TO 56%

TRY TO KEEP UP BUTTERCUP
 
Back
Top Bottom