Zone1 Tax the Rich! Make them Pay their Fair Share!

[Toddsterpatriot]

Nah, Dubya only forced GSE's to buy $440 billion and upped their goals from 50% to 56% and got rid of Clinton's 2000 rule that didn't allow F/F to count subprimes in those same goals

BUT


"The idea that they were leading this charge is just absurd, said Guy Cecala, publisher of Inside Mortgage Finance, an authoritative trade publication. Fannie and Freddie have always had the tightest underwriting on earth & They were opposite of subprime.";




OVER 50% OF LOANS IN 2004 COULDN'T QUALIFY FOR F/F BACKING, THEY WERE NOT DOCUMENTED INCOMES.

Nah, Dubya only forced GSE's to buy $440 billion and upped their goals from 50% to 56%

Right, Clinton only forced the GSEs to make 50% of their mortgage purchases subprime mortgages.

DURR

 

[Mac-7]

Today you can pass $15 million in YOUR lifetime to anyone, or after you die, tax free. Your spouse also can.


THIRTY MILLION $$$$ ISN'T ENOUGH TO HAND DOWN TAX FREE?

Its not your money and you have no right to take it

 

[alang1216]

Why work hard, stay out of trouble, no jail to build a successful business (the American dream) paying Taxes, salaries, medical for thousands for 50 years.

The you come along and think the GOVT gets to seize it, sell it, destroy it? BECAUSE?

Because you're dead and you can't take it with you? You earned your money, YOU spend your money.

 

[Hafar1014]

Do like CA and NY tax the rich and they just leave and you get nothing. Whats better the government should have more money so it can be stolen like in Minn and CA.

 

[leftwinger]

Because you're dead and you can't take it with you? You earned your money, YOU spend your money.

In some cases you build to ensure your family's good living and your legacy. You Stain are lost.

 

[Woodznutz]

Its not your money and you have no right to take it

And taxing the rich more just means the government has more money to waste. The way to cut government waste is to not give them so much money to waste.

 

[alang1216]

Property is theft, eh comrade?

You can't take your property with you when you die, you only borrow it from the living.

 

[Woodznutz]

You can't take your property with you when you die, you only borrow it from the living.

But you can pass it on to the living.

 

[alang1216]

In some cases you build to ensure your family's good living and your legacy. You Stain are lost.

Two different things. If you use your money to create a foundation, that is a legacy. How much money do you have to give a kid to ensure them a good living? I think it is $5 million now, is that not adequate or do they need at least a billion?

 

[Woodznutz]

Gawd you guys are insane


View attachment 1241783

Glad you brought this up. We can use "payroll" as the metric. Do the rich receive more or less total "payroll" dollars than the middle and lower class?

 

[Concerned American]

Why do children get to inherit ANY money? They grew up with every advantage so shouldn't they have to make their own way in the world as an adult like everyone else? Do we really want a noble class with families passing wealth and power to people who don't deserve it?

In that same vein, why should the taxpayers give any money to welfare and social programs. Those people have the same opportunities as anyone else. You talk out both sides of your mouth.

 

[Concerned American]

Two different things. If you use your money to create a foundation, that is a legacy. How much money do you have to give a kid to ensure them a good living? I think it is $5 million now, is that not adequate or do they need at least a billion?

Again with the charity. What are you going to do when you run out of other people's money?

 

[Concerned American]

You don't mean 'suck it up', you mean give up. Nope. I don't want to take the rich out and shoot them, but I don't want the country run by oligarchs like Russia.

Naw, you don't want to take them out and shoot them you just want them to be indentured slaves providing what the talents can so that YOU can laze around and SUCK IT UP, eh?

 

[alang1216]

In that same vein, why should the taxpayers give any money to welfare and social programs. Those people have the same opportunities as anyone else. You talk out both sides of your mouth.

I don't think the child of a billionaire and the child of a welfare recipient are comparable. Both should have access to the basics, food, healthcare, safe housing, and education.

 

[alang1216]

Again with the charity. What are you going to do when you run out of other people's money?

We'll talk when that happens, which it never has and never will.

 

[alang1216]

Naw, you don't want to take them out and shoot them you just want them to be indentured slaves providing what the talents can so that YOU can laze around and SUCK IT UP, eh?

No, I just don't want to go back to the days of lords and ladies and slaves and serfs

 

[Concerned American]

I don't think the child of a billionaire and the child of a welfare recipient are comparable. Both should have access to the basics, food, healthcare, safe housing, and education.

They both do have access to all of those things you listed--the difference is one pays his way and the other is a parasite to the community.

 

[Concerned American]

We'll talk when that happens, which it never has and never will.

LOL, correct, no matter how much you beg for other people's stuff.

 

[alang1216]

They both do have access to all of those things you listed--the difference is one pays his way and the other is a parasite to the community.

How does the son of a billionaire 'pay his way'?

 

[alang1216]

LOL, correct, no matter how much you beg for other people's stuff.

I don't want other's stuff. You earn it, you spend it as you wish. If you don't earn it, that is another matter.