Eh, see this is where I have to disagree. How does a state make a law about what you are going to do in another state, if what you are doing is not illegal in the state you are going to. I guess you could make the argument that a state could charge them for using their highways for the commission of a crime? But the activity is not being performed in their state.
Also, if a bank robber was arrested in one state to rob a bank in another state, would the state they were arrested in be able to charge that person for traversing their state to commit a crime? Likely not, they would just be arrested for planning a crime, not for traveling to the crime.
Besides, abortion services could be considered under the umbrella of interstate commerce, which are federally regulated.
I’m just not good with states trying to prevent people from doing things in other states. If Idaho wants to ban abortion, that’s fine, but what they are trying to do is regulate what people do in other states.
This begs the question….could those other states sue idaho for preventing people from coming to their states for legal services?