pknopp
Diamond Member
- Jul 22, 2019
- 69,138
- 26,484
- 2,210
A State cannot interfere with interstate commerce or interfere with citizens crossing state lines
They have long been able to involve themselves in the transportion of minors.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
A State cannot interfere with interstate commerce or interfere with citizens crossing state lines
.A State cannot interfere with interstate commerce or interfere with citizens crossing state lines
More of the BS “fungible” argument
The federal government doesn’t pay for abortion……period
And you're a liar, period.
I thought liberals gave a crap about 'the children'.
I believe the Hyde Amendment is still in place. Granted, I'll have to check.
I posted a link to it. And, most Republicans and indies aren't against abortions for rape and incest victims, no matter how many commies and deviant gimps keep claiming they are.
No ... but that 'bus' has left the 'station'.
Are those concieved not all worthy of protection?
that would forcing a woman to have a child she didn't legally consent to. Of course you need to distort the issue with fake 'logic', so go ahead and pretend both positions are 'contradictory', it just makes you look as dishonest as you are anyway. That's because you and your peers have no real sense of right and wrong and don't want it.
.
Right up to their borders, yes they can.
They're talking about the part that is happening IN THE STATE OF IDAHO, but I'm not surprised that you don't understand something so simple.
.
.Actually, there are laws against that too.
You can’t stop a vehicle without suspicion of a crime being committed. Traveling to another state is not a crime. They can ban abortion in their state but can’t ban abortion in other states or restrict its citizens from interstate travel
The bus with the non-parent taking someone else's child across state lines to have an abortion should NEVER leave the station.
Depends on the legal age to obtain an abortion without parental consentMaybe the parents are okay with it, but under this law, looks like they'd be charged with 'harboring' a minor for the purposes of going across state lines for an abortion (IANAL, so I could be reading it wrong).
In any case, conservatives seem pretty damn determined to force women to remain pregnant and bring unwanted kids into the world. Of course the number of unwanted kids will invariably outnumber the loud-mouths who would be willing to drop what they're doing to place them with adoptive parents or expand welfare to pay for them.
And it would depend on the age of consent in that state for getting an abortionIf someone took the minor out of state to get the abortion they would not have procured an illegal abortion, rather a legal one.
Depends on the legal age to obtain an abortion without parental consent
Are those concieved not all worthy of protection?