Take the income tax quiz!!!

How much more in taxes does B pay than A?

  • $15,000.30

    Votes: 4 25.0%
  • $15,000.00

    Votes: 2 12.5%
  • $0.30

    Votes: 10 62.5%
  • $30.00

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    16
One of my companies is a temp agency...

Trust me...here in NY it is a majority....


So we should judge all of NY's poor based on the ones you deal with at your particular business ? That's an interesting way to come to truth.

Jeez spider...give me credit...

I was the president of my trade association...we are the largest market in the country...my firm has a database of over 30K temps...and I write a newsletter quarterly with statistics...

Get off my case.....stop trying to discredit me...and maybe learn to be wrong once in a while.

It helps one grow.
 
How is this for ya....and if you do your research you will see it is accurate....

15.8% of all temporary employment applicants in NYC say no to temp assignments for reasons other than "I got a perm job"

12% simply do not reurn the calls...ever.
of that 12%, 79% of them call us once a month for a letter they need to give to unemployment to prove they are "trying to work"

of the 15.8%, nearly half of them say they will not take a temp salary less than what they were earning when permanently employed.
 
How is this for ya....and if you do your research you will see it is accurate....

15.8% of all temporary employment applicants in NYC say no to temp assignments for reasons other than "I got a perm job"

12% simply do not reurn the calls...ever.
of that 12%, 79% of them call us once a month for a letter they need to give to unemployment to prove they are "trying to work"

of the 15.8%, nearly half of them say they will not take a temp salary less than what they were earning when permanently employed.

So what you're saying is, people who wind up seeking employment at temp agencies are often lazy.

HOW SURPRISING

I'm sure they represent a completely fair cross section of the poor in general.
 
4% accept assignements and do not show up with no call

3% show up and leave mid day...without saying a word

14% of all temps have used the excuse of "had to go to the emergency room" at least once every 6 months.

Shall I continue?
 
How is this for ya....and if you do your research you will see it is accurate....

15.8% of all temporary employment applicants in NYC say no to temp assignments for reasons other than "I got a perm job"

12% simply do not reurn the calls...ever.
of that 12%, 79% of them call us once a month for a letter they need to give to unemployment to prove they are "trying to work"

of the 15.8%, nearly half of them say they will not take a temp salary less than what they were earning when permanently employed.

So what you're saying is, people who wind up seeking employment at temp agencies are often lazy.

HOW SURPRISING

I'm sure they represent a completely fair cross section of the poor in general.

What I am saying is those that are poor are included in those numbers...and are actually a majopr part of those numbers.....as they are usually the ones that can not get a full time job.

You are just so dam stuck on being right, you refuse to understand that basic logic.

But please....you know so much.

Please tell me more about what i experience in my industry......
 
4% accept assignements and do not show up with no call

3% show up and leave mid day...without saying a word

14% of all temps have used the excuse of "had to go to the emergency room" at least once every 6 months.

Shall I continue?

No, you don't. I thought you were making comments about NY's poor, not NY's temp workers. I was mistaken.
 
4% accept assignements and do not show up with no call

3% show up and leave mid day...without saying a word

14% of all temps have used the excuse of "had to go to the emergency room" at least once every 6 months.

Shall I continue?

No, you don't. I thought you were making comments about NY's poor, not NY's temp workers. I was mistaken.

Found it....

64% of all temps are at or below the poverty level based on their income and family size of the year prior.

Try again dickhead.
 
Last edited:
What I am saying is those that are poor are included in those numbers...and are actually a majopr part of those numbers.....as they are usually the ones that can not get a full time job.

What you are saying is that poor TEMP workers fit those numbers.

what I am saying is that a majority of the able that are poor do not demonstrate drive to earn a living....IN NY....

OK?

Jeez...forget it. Whatever floats your boat.
 
What I am saying is those that are poor are included in those numbers...and are actually a majopr part of those numbers.....as they are usually the ones that can not get a full time job.

What you are saying is that poor TEMP workers fit those numbers.

what I am saying is that a majority of the able that are poor do not demonstrate drive to earn a living....IN NY....

OK?

Jeez...forget it. Whatever floats your boat.

Yeah, but you're saying it based on a sample of only one kind of worker - that makes no sense.
 
I swear its like talking to a wall.

HELLO DO I HAVE YOUR ATTENTION?


Family of 4 at poverty line PRESENT TAX SITUATION

INCOME - $20,500
FICA TAX = 0.0765*20,500=$1568
EIC CREDIT = $4819


TOTAL TAX PAID=$1568-$4819 = -$3248



Family of 4 at poverty line "FAIR TAX" SITUATION

INCOME - $20,500
TOTAL ANNUAL PREBATE=$400*12=$4800
TOTAL ANNUAL SALES TAX (ALL MONEY SPENT) = 0.23*$20,500=$4715


TOTAL TAX PAID=$4715-$4800 = -$85


-$85 IS LARGER THAN $-3248 - THEY PAY MORE TAXES UNDER FAIR TAX


Hello!! Are you that dense!

The earned income credit is the exact same thing as the prebate. People who receive the EIC do so because they do not make enough money... BUT they are still taxed. They more than likely will end up with a negative tax bill, but in the same way, someone making at or below the poverty line is not going to spend all of that $400/month giving them a "TAX CREDIT".

What is so hard to understand about that?

Immie



You're babbling again. let me try it over.




Family of 4 at poverty line PRESENT TAX SITUATION

INCOME - $20,500
FICA TAX = 0.0765*20,500=$1568
EIC CREDIT = $4819


TOTAL TAX PAID=$1568-$4819 = -$3248



Family of 4 at poverty line "FAIR TAX" SITUATION

INCOME - $20,500
TOTAL ANNUAL PREBATE=$400*12=$4800
TOTAL ANNUAL SALES TAX (ALL MONEY SPENT) = 0.23*$20,500=$4715


TOTAL TAX PAID=$4715-$4800 = -$85


-$85 IS LARGER THAN $-3248 - THEY PAY MORE TAXES UNDER FAIR TAX

It is pretty convenient to set your numbers at every dime earned being spent on taxable purchases (which is highly improbable as used items are not taxable) and assume that there would be zero tax liability and in fact a full tax credit under the current system.

By the way, where did you get your $4800 calculation for the EITC? According to this site it would be significantly lower approximately $3500.

http://homepages.nyu.edu/~jf1264/furman_2006_taxreformpoverty_taxnotes.pdf

Also, once again, IT IS NOT ONLY INCOME TAXES THAT ARE ELIMINATED

Gasoline 18.4 cents per gallon in 2008 approximately $2.20 per fill up. I fill up my tank about 3 times a week so let's say at 10 gallons per fill up we are talking about $300/year

Federal Taxes on cigarettes $1.01/carton in '09. Don't smoke myself so can't estimate that but what is the average # cartons per day for a smoker? $365/year per carton.

Telephones, tires etc. etc. etc. all of these taxes are eliminated under the Fair Tax.

Here is a link from About.com with a neutral analysis of the Fair Tax.

Fair Tax - What is the Fair Tax Plan - Definition of the Fair Tax Proposal
A group known as Americans for Fair Taxation developed the Fair Tax Act of 2003 which would abolish all federal personal and corporate income taxes, gift, estate, capital gains, alternative minimum, Social Security, Medicare, and self-employment taxes. It would replace them with a federal retail sales tax of 23% to be administered by existing state sales tax authorities. The sales tax would not apply to imports, goods used by businesses to produce other goods, or used goods.

The Fair Tax would require the repeal of the 16th Amendment. The IRS would be disbanded and defunded.
Normally, a 23% sales tax would impact the poor the most. Therefore, the Fair Tax Act proposes that a prebate be paid equivalent to 23% of the poverty level. According to the Department of Health and Human Services, the poverty guideline for a family of four in 2008 is $21,200. The Fair Tax act adds an amount to remove the marriage penalty, which raised the income level to $27,380. This means a family of four would receive a check for $525 per month, or $6,297 a year, to cover the cost of the sales tax. (Source: FairTax Prebate Explained)

It seems my numbers for the household of four was outdated. So $6300 per year is a closer estimate again bringing our numbers much closer.

Without even trying your number of -3250 raises when you add in all the non-income taxes that we pay and will be eliminated and a more reasonable figure for the EITC and the figure you came up with as if someone making $20,500 would spend every dime on taxable purchase drops which is preposterous.

Take a look at the Fair tax calculator provided.

Americans For Fair Taxation: FairTax Versus Obama Tax Plan
Earned Income Tax Credit households face the highest marginal tax rates creating a disincentive to work. Payroll taxes impose regressive rates on labor.

FairTax prebate untaxes spending up to the poverty level, literally untaxing the poor. Since taxation is based on consumption, the FairTax allows taxpayers maximum choice as to the level and timing of taxation. The FairTax rewards hard work, savings, and the accumulation of wealth, although all wealth is taxed when spent.

By the way, I don't agree with the statement, "Earned Income Tax Credit households face the highest marginal tax rates creating a disincentive to work". The disincentive to work is laziness and the desire to let the government support you while you sit around and drink beer. I do not believe that people want to work at minimum wage and raise three children. They have an incentive to get out from under the burden of such a life and most work towards that goal.

You can keep pulling numbers out of your ass in order to justify your support of the current tax system which benefits only the rich and politically powerful, but it does not change the fact that most people including the poor, would be better off under the Fair Tax.

Immie
 
You are neglecting the fact that when they spend their money they have to pay 30% more for stuff. The 4800 they get is paid back in sales tax. See math above.

And you conveniently claim that every dime earned by the poor is spent on taxable items.

You realize that used items are non-taxable right. That means if you go to a thrift store to buy clothing, you do not pay taxes on the items you purchase. That used car that you buy to get you to that minimum wage job... non-taxable. A thrifty person would seek those opportunities.

Immie
 
the figure you came up with as if someone making $20,500 would spend every dime on taxable purchase drops which is preposterous.

Yes - its preposterous to think a family of 4 making a whopping $20,500 a year would actually need to spend all $20,500 - totally preposterous.


You can keep pulling numbers out of your ass

I didn't pull any numbers out of my ass.

most people including the poor, would be better off under the Fair Tax.
I'm not sure what you mean by "better off" - but if you mean LESS BUYING POWER - you're absolutely right.
 
Last edited:
the figure you came up with as if someone making $20,500 would spend every dime on taxable purchase drops which is preposterous.

Yes - its preposterous to think a family of 4 making a whopping $20,500 a year would actually need to spend all $20,500 - totally preposterous.


You can keep pulling numbers out of your ass

I didn't pull any numbers out of my ass.

most people including the poor, would be better off under the Fair Tax.
I'm not sure what you mean by "better off" - but if you mean LESS BUYING POWER - you're absolutely right.

They won't spend every dime on taxable items. Maybe you are not frugal with your money, but a single mom raising three children on $20,500 sure as hell is.

Yes, you pulled the 4800 out of your ass. You pulled the amount of tax this hypothetical person would pay out of your ass. You must be an accountant... damned good at making things fit the way you want them to fit.

The way I see it, when you eliminate all of those taxes the purchasing power of the poor goes up, not down.

Immie
 
They won't spend every dime on taxable items.


Maybe you are not frugal with your money, but a single mom raising three children on $20,500 sure as hell is.

What isn't taxed? Used goods. But the tax is already figured into the price of the used good, because its the same market. If I have to pay a 30% tax on the price of a NEW good, then when I sell it I'm going to want just that much more to make up for it.

A family of 4 living on 20.5k hardly has room to open up a savings account, you've got to be kidding me.


Yes, you pulled the 4800 out of your ass. You pulled the amount of tax this hypothetical person would pay out of your ass.

It is a fact that the poor SPEND virtually all of their income, I didn't make that up.


The way I see it, when you eliminate all of those taxes the purchasing power of the poor goes up, not down.

You're adding a nearly 30% sales tax to goods. That REDUCES purchasing power.
 
For the poll question above:


Consider a hypothetical tax system where they are two brackets.

up to and including $100,000 = 15%
above $100,000 = 30%

Consider two taxpayers. Taxpayer A made $100,000 and taxpayer B made $100,001. How much more in taxes did B pay than A?

100,001*.3-100,000*.15=Answer A.

Point being?

Damn I forgot the $1
 
Back
Top Bottom