Sussman jury foreperson admits to jury nulification claiming we have more important things to worry about than a lie to the FBI

[Nostra]

Gee, it sounds like the jury was not impressed with Durham's performance. Color me unsurprised.

Even before the trial started.

 

[Winston]

Can Durham appeal?

NO.

nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb

It is called the fifth amendment.

 

[Hellokitty]

And this was the jury foreperson...the person who controls jury deliberation.

 

[Rye Catcher]

Can Durham appeal?

LOL: Only if the Constitution and every case tired by jury is overturned by the likes of you and trump's lawyers.

 

[scruffy]

NO.

nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb

It is called the fifth amendment.

However they can try him at the State level for the same crime. Happens all the time

 

[Rye Catcher]

And this was the jury foreperson...the person who controls jury deliberation.

Who cares, did you piss and moan when trump gave Flynn a get out of jail card?

 

[Winston]

However they can try him at the State level for the same crime. Happens all the time

Seriously? On what charge? How does the state have jurisdiction over a federal investigation? I mean wow, the lack of understanding of both the Constitution and the legal process in this country by you conservatives is embarrassing.

 

[Rye Catcher]

However they can try him at the State level for the same crime. Happens all the time

Have you ever read the bill of rights?

 

[martybegan]

Even before the trial started.

And before they saw any of the evidence, or the charges.

 

[martybegan]

LOL: Only if the Constitution and every case tired by jury is overturned by the likes of you and trump's lawyers.

If the empaneled jury already made their mind up about the case, was he even in actual jeopardy?

The foreperson's statement is far more damning than you may think.

 

[scruffy]

Have you ever read the bill of rights?

You are obviously an ignorant progtard.

Wait... we knew that already.

If you had a brain cell you'd move out of the Bay area like I did. I ain't paying premium rent to wake up to piles of human feces every morning. Then when I go clean it up I step on needles. Then when I drive to the police station to complain about the needles my car gets ripped off

And to top it all off, you brain dead libtards keep re-electing Nancy Pelosi.

 

[scruffy]

Seriously? On what charge? How does the state have jurisdiction over a federal investigation? I mean wow, the lack of understanding of both the Constitution and the legal process in this country by you conservatives is embarrassing.

You're challenging me, dumbshit brain dead progtard?

Oh goodie.

 

[ColonelAngus]

Anyone defending this as a just verdict is really really dumb.

 

[Rye Catcher]

If the empaneled jury already made their mind up about the case, was he even in actual jeopardy?

The foreperson's statement is far more damning than you may think.

You can't know what a person is thinking or was thinking during during "voir dire" and upon their decision.

Making a claim that you do is both absurd, partisan and ludicrous.

 

[Rye Catcher]

You are obviously an ignorant progtard.

Wait... we knew that already.

If you had a brain cell you'd move out of the Bay area like I did. I ain't paying premium rent to wake up to piles of human feces every morning. Then when I go clean it up I step on needles. Then when I drive to the police station to complain about the needles my car gets ripped off

And to top it all off, you brain dead libtards keep re-electing Nancy Pelosi.

Once again you've not responded to my question, because you can't. The facts are these:

No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.

 

[toobfreak]

THIS WAS A POLITICAL DECISION…AND SHE ADMITTED IT.

Now you know how so many public officials, judges, courts, lawyers and media all went along with the Big Steal:

IT WAS A POLITICAL DECISION.

 

[toobfreak]

You can't know what a person is thinking or was thinking during during "voir dire" and upon their decision.

Yes you can when they flat out tell you!

 

[toobfreak]

Admitting to rigging the verdict is fucking brazen. Wow.

Can anyone say APPEAL?

 

[toobfreak]

Wouldn't you expect the senate and house GOP leaders to complain about this jury?.... WTF.... If they will not fight for basic fairness and justice we are screwed....

Then we are screwed, until we can sweep the riff raff of the McConnel/McCarthy/Cheney GOP out of office and get uncorrupted people in there.

 

[toobfreak]

Why was this trial allowed to proceed with all of the conflicts of interest?

Probably the same reason the two impeachments were allowed to proceed with all their conflicts of interest or the J6 commission has been allowed to.