Ignorant and wrong.Sure hope terrorists aren't using cell phones that the law won't allow to be hacked.
Law enforcement may obtain evidence of alleged terrorist activity pursuant to a warrant.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Ignorant and wrong.Sure hope terrorists aren't using cell phones that the law won't allow to be hacked.
That doesn’t mean we infringe upon the freedoms of the majority. Conservatives would be giddy at the prospect of giving up most of their rights under the guise of security. You do it with domestic law enforcement all of the time
That doesn’t mean we infringe upon the freedoms of the majority. Conservatives would be giddy at the prospect of giving up most of their rights under the guise of security. You do it with domestic law enforcement all of the time
This is what conservatism comes to. Supporting the police state. This after the so-called conservatives became the tax collector for the welfare state. The phony conservatives are the ones who need to be impeached. This should have been a 9-0 decision.
TAZ why did they move this?? Said it wasn't political?? A conservative judge voting with 4 liberal judges isn't political?Sure hope terrorists aren't using cell phones that the law won't allow to be hacked.
Why don’t we just spend the entire constitution and then you don’t have to wet your bed at night worrying about Muslim men with long beards
You obviously aren't worried about it. But I'd bet the dead in San Bernardino would have loved to have known what was coming
Oh and you can wet your bed when you piss yourself with joy over the ruling.
I am pleased with the ruling as should be every freedom loving American. You may want to look in the mirror and ask yourself why you are not.
TAZ why did they move this?? Said it wasn't political?? A conservative judge voting with 4 liberal judges isn't political?Sure hope terrorists aren't using cell phones that the law won't allow to be hacked.
Why don’t we just spend the entire constitution and then you don’t have to wet your bed at night worrying about Muslim men with long beards
You obviously aren't worried about it. But I'd bet the dead in San Bernardino would have loved to have known what was coming
Oh and you can wet your bed when you piss yourself with joy over the ruling.
I am pleased with the ruling as should be every freedom loving American. You may want to look in the mirror and ask yourself why you are not.
Didn't think so Either Facal or WillTAZ why did they move this?? Said it wasn't political?? A conservative judge voting with 4 liberal judges isn't political?Sure hope terrorists aren't using cell phones that the law won't allow to be hacked.
Why don’t we just spend the entire constitution and then you don’t have to wet your bed at night worrying about Muslim men with long beards
You obviously aren't worried about it. But I'd bet the dead in San Bernardino would have loved to have known what was coming
Oh and you can wet your bed when you piss yourself with joy over the ruling.
I am pleased with the ruling as should be every freedom loving American. You may want to look in the mirror and ask yourself why you are not.
Wasn’t me
Washington (CNN)The Supreme Court on Friday said the government generally needs a warrant if it wants to track an individual's location through cell phone records over an extended period of time.
The ruling is a major victory for advocates of increased privacy rights who argued more protections were needed when it comes to the government obtaining information from a third party such as a cell phone company.
The 5-4 opinion in Carpenter v. United States, was written by conservative Chief Justice John Roberts siding with the four most liberal justices.
It is a loss for the Justice Department, which had argued that an individual has diminished privacy rights when it comes to information that has been voluntarily shared with someone else.
The opinion, which was limited to cell-site location data, continues a recent trend at the court to boost privacy rights in the digital era and clarifies court precedent as it applies to data held by a third party.
starting with thomas they're scumWashington (CNN)The Supreme Court on Friday said the government generally needs a warrant if it wants to track an individual's location through cell phone records over an extended period of time.
The ruling is a major victory for advocates of increased privacy rights who argued more protections were needed when it comes to the government obtaining information from a third party such as a cell phone company.
The 5-4 opinion in Carpenter v. United States, was written by conservative Chief Justice John Roberts siding with the four most liberal justices.
It is a loss for the Justice Department, which had argued that an individual has diminished privacy rights when it comes to information that has been voluntarily shared with someone else.
The opinion, which was limited to cell-site location data, continues a recent trend at the court to boost privacy rights in the digital era and clarifies court precedent as it applies to data held by a third party.
Why thank Roberts only?
There are the other 4 judges who voted the same way he did.
They just happen to be liberals though.
Interesting. The other four conservatives voted against our privacy rights.
That doesn’t mean we infringe upon the freedoms of the majority. Conservatives would be giddy at the prospect of giving up most of their rights under the guise of security. You do it with domestic law enforcement all of the time
A couple months back you were singing our praises about your bigger paycheck, although I find it hard to believe you work for a living. You might want to remember those who went out the windows at the WTC rather than burn to death thanks to "muslim men with long beards".
You're as wishy washy as it gets...one week a Con, the next a Lib.
Roberts is a conservative; most conservatives are hostile to citizens’ rights and protected liberties, and as authoritarians most conservatives favor the power of the state over the rights of the people.Washington (CNN)The Supreme Court on Friday said the government generally needs a warrant if it wants to track an individual's location through cell phone records over an extended period of time.
The ruling is a major victory for advocates of increased privacy rights who argued more protections were needed when it comes to the government obtaining information from a third party such as a cell phone company.
The 5-4 opinion in Carpenter v. United States, was written by conservative Chief Justice John Roberts siding with the four most liberal justices.
It is a loss for the Justice Department, which had argued that an individual has diminished privacy rights when it comes to information that has been voluntarily shared with someone else.
The opinion, which was limited to cell-site location data, continues a recent trend at the court to boost privacy rights in the digital era and clarifies court precedent as it applies to data held by a third party.
Why thank Roberts only?
There are the other 4 judges who voted the same way he did.
They just happen to be liberals though.
Interesting. The other four conservatives voted against our privacy rights.
I remember when Republicans were afraid of big brother.
Now, Republicans ARE big brother.
They really need to put a muzzle on that law because it was written at a low tech level and the American public needs to be protected from the "big" bother direction. It should have the same protections as the phone tap. I should say I am a retired LEO and see the danger of info-taping can lead to.I feel much safer now that liberal judges have made it harder for police agencies to catch criminals and terrorists. ....
How long are you guys going to keep using 9-11 as an excuse to shred the Constitution?
When both conservatives and liberals hate me it’s because I’m usually right.