Supreme Court lifts restrictions

[Darkwind]

Shove it.

Lower court judges overseeing the avalanche of lawsuits against President Donald Trump’s powergrab are increasingly voicing their concerns and frustrations with the Supreme Court’s handling of the second Trump administration thus far.

In recent court opinions and rare media interviews, judges have critiqued the high court for overturning lower court rulings while offering little to no legal explanation. The practice, judges have said, is unleashing uncertainty throughout the federal judiciary and hampering lower courts’ abilities to defend the rule of law.

They have also accused SCOTUS of failing to protect the integrity of the judiciary amid Trump’s unprecedented assault on the courts.

Currently, no legal challenge to Trump’s second-term policies has reached the Supreme Court through ordinary proceedings.

Normally, after working their way through district and appellate courts, cases are filed to the Supreme Court’s merits docket. If accepted, merits docket cases are entitled to formal briefs and oral arguments and are resolved with lengthy written opinions detailing the legal reasoning of the majority and including any concurring and dissenting opinions.

Every action SCOTUS has taken in Trump-related cases this year has instead been through its emergency — or “shadow” — docket.

Unlike its traditional merits process, cases that go through the court’s emergency docket normally do not undergo full briefing or oral argument and are usually decided in just a few days, often through unsigned and unexplained orders.

Federal Judges Are Fed Up With SCOTUS

Read about the fight for democracy from activists, elected officials, legal experts and others.

www.democracydocket.com

Power grab....

 

[Kondor3]

SCOTUS has freed the Trump Administration to resume detaining and deporting Illegal Aliens in LA?

Excellent.

Let the Games begin...

 

[Missouri_Mike]

The liberal scotus judges are lying when they say:

“We should not have to live in a country where the government can seize anyone who looks Latino, speaks Spanish and appears to work a low wage job,” Justice Sonia Sotomayor wrote, joined by Justices Elena Kagan and Ketanji Brown Jackson.

We DO NOT 'seize anyone who looks Latino" said the 3 loony females on the court.

What we shouldn’t have to live with is three DEI judges that rule on feelings instead of the law.

 

[Thinker101]

Shove it.

Lower court judges overseeing the avalanche of lawsuits against President Donald Trump’s powergrab are increasingly voicing their concerns and frustrations with the Supreme Court’s handling of the second Trump administration thus far.

In recent court opinions and rare media interviews, judges have critiqued the high court for overturning lower court rulings while offering little to no legal explanation. The practice, judges have said, is unleashing uncertainty throughout the federal judiciary and hampering lower courts’ abilities to defend the rule of law.

They have also accused SCOTUS of failing to protect the integrity of the judiciary amid Trump’s unprecedented assault on the courts.

Currently, no legal challenge to Trump’s second-term policies has reached the Supreme Court through ordinary proceedings.

Normally, after working their way through district and appellate courts, cases are filed to the Supreme Court’s merits docket. If accepted, merits docket cases are entitled to formal briefs and oral arguments and are resolved with lengthy written opinions detailing the legal reasoning of the majority and including any concurring and dissenting opinions.

Every action SCOTUS has taken in Trump-related cases this year has instead been through its emergency — or “shadow” — docket.

Unlike its traditional merits process, cases that go through the court’s emergency docket normally do not undergo full briefing or oral argument and are usually decided in just a few days, often through unsigned and unexplained orders.

Federal Judges Are Fed Up With SCOTUS

Read about the fight for democracy from activists, elected officials, legal experts and others.

www.democracydocket.com

Alrighty, shove it where the sun don't shine. The judges may not like that.

 

[Leo123]

Shove it.

Lower court judges overseeing the avalanche of lawsuits against President Donald Trump’s powergrab are increasingly voicing their concerns and frustrations with the Supreme Court’s handling of the second Trump administration thus far.

In recent court opinions and rare media interviews, judges have critiqued the high court for overturning lower court rulings while offering little to no legal explanation. The practice, judges have said, is unleashing uncertainty throughout the federal judiciary and hampering lower courts’ abilities to defend the rule of law.

They have also accused SCOTUS of failing to protect the integrity of the judiciary amid Trump’s unprecedented assault on the courts.

Currently, no legal challenge to Trump’s second-term policies has reached the Supreme Court through ordinary proceedings.

Normally, after working their way through district and appellate courts, cases are filed to the Supreme Court’s merits docket. If accepted, merits docket cases are entitled to formal briefs and oral arguments and are resolved with lengthy written opinions detailing the legal reasoning of the majority and including any concurring and dissenting opinions.

Every action SCOTUS has taken in Trump-related cases this year has instead been through its emergency — or “shadow” — docket.

Unlike its traditional merits process, cases that go through the court’s emergency docket normally do not undergo full briefing or oral argument and are usually decided in just a few days, often through unsigned and unexplained orders.

Federal Judges Are Fed Up With SCOTUS

Read about the fight for democracy from activists, elected officials, legal experts and others.

www.democracydocket.com

How about YOU 'shove it?'

 

[dudmuck]

What we shouldn’t have to live with is three DEI judges that rule on feelings instead of the law.

 

[Missouri_Mike]

White women as stupid as those three don’t get anywhere near the SC.

 

[BackAgain]

Are they slap downs if they don't include a legal rationale, or any explanation at all? It's more like the conservatives are rubber stamping autocracy without any clarification as to why.

Hey stupid. They have already noted the SCOTUS problem with such lower court rulings.

What they just did was scuttle the time-delayed expiration of an injunction.
The SCOTUS’ legal bases for whatever decision they are probably gonna deliver (whenever) will be explained at that time.

 

[jc456]

Democraps brag they stopped Trump, for a few weeks, but are angry because 80-90% of everything they try to interfere with through judicial activism gets overturned. Then they come on here and angrily call all of us fascists, and make threats against Trump and ICE. "Well get you!!!" "Just you wait!!!"


There is always self-immolation as well. We will clean up the mess, we don't mind.

They said the judge had no standing, sounded like they were a bit passed the judge ignored their ruling from earlier in the year! Hahaha

 

[jc456]

Are they slap downs if they don't include a legal rationale, or any explanation at all? It's more like the conservatives are rubber stamping autocracy without any clarification as to why.

No standing

 

[dudmuck]

White women as stupid as those three don’t get anywhere near the SC.

 

[Missouri_Mike]

Six intelligent people that belong there vs three who got in by race and have no business doing that job.

You had better hope we never have to live under their retarded version of feelings being law.

 

[toobfreak]

The Supreme Court on Monday lifted a federal judge’s order prohibiting government agents from making indiscriminate immigration-related stops in the Los Angeles area that challengers called “blatant racial profiling.”

The Supreme Court again blocked a number of activist rogue district judges from trying to rob the Exec of his plenary power to enforce immigration, trying to make /national/ decisions which have nothing to do with their districts. Meanwhile, if you get stopped by ICE because you appear a possible suspect and they are wrong, no harm, no foul.

It is not the last word in the case, which is pending before a federal appeals court and may again reach the justices.

That'll really butter up the USSC to your cause by your constant aggravating them!

The court’s three liberal members dissented.

And no one is surprised.

“We should not have to live in a country where the government can seize anyone who looks Latino, speaks Spanish and appears to work a low wage job,” Justice Sonia Sotomayor wrote, joined by Justices Elena Kagan and Ketanji Brown Jackson.

Jackson don't even know what a woman is. But I'd rather live in a country where possible illegals are stopped and checked than a country where 40 million undocumented illegals are just freely allowed to walk right in and put up in hotels and given free food, clothing, shelter and healthcare taking our jobs and murdering our people.

“Rather than stand idly by while our constitutional freedoms are lost, “ Justice Sotomayor added, “I dissent.”

Where was Sotomayor when thousands of people merely standing around watching a protest at the capitol are months and years later charged and arrested for high crimes despite having not even entered the building nor fought with a single officer? Then thrown in a cell, starved, beaten, abused, denied bail, denied visitation, and denied due process? Funny that the only time Sotomayor worries about lost constitutional rights are for people who are not even citizens of the country.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

Oops, didn't show up in "similar threads".

You didn't mention immigration, did you?

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

Six intelligent people that belong there vs three who got in by race and have no business doing that job.

You had better hope we never have to live under their retarded version of feelings being law.

I could have sworn Kagan and Sotomayor were white, granted LatinaX may not count?

 

[Missouri_Mike]

I could have sworn Kagan and Sotomayor were white, granted LatinaX may not count?

Soromayor made a big deal about being Hispanic. It was actually her primary job qualification.

 

[toobfreak]

Soromayor made a big deal about being Hispanic. It was actually her primary job qualification.

Has anyone checked her out to see if she is legal?