Supreme Court Lifts Limits on Immigration-Enforcement Tactics in Los Angeles (for now at least)

[BackAgain]

Once again, SCOTUS vacates a temporary hold on the a President’s policy re apprehension of illegal aliens.

Supreme Court Lifts Limits on Immigration Raids in Los Angeles — The Wall Street Journal

Order lets Trump administration proceed with patrols that earlier targeted largely Latino areas

apple.news

Maybe some national bar association can step up to educate the lower courts and the parties that the lower courts are NOT empowered to put themselves into the shoes of the President. The Judicial Branch is NOT the Executive Branch.

For now, a win for the Trump Administration and for the Constitution.

 

[martybegan]

Once again, SCOTUS vacates a temporary hold on the a President’s policy re apprehension of illegal aliens.

Supreme Court Lifts Limits on Immigration Raids in Los Angeles — The Wall Street Journal

Order lets Trump administration proceed with patrols that earlier targeted largely Latino areas

apple.news

Maybe some national bar association can step up to educate the lower courts and the parties that the lower courts are NOT empowered to put themselves into the shoes of the President. The Judicial Branch is NOT the Executive Branch.

For now, a win for the Trump Administration and for the Constitution.

 

[1srelluc]

SCOTUS needs an enforcement arm to police rouge fed courts.

 

[Sherlock Holmes]

Once again, SCOTUS vacates a temporary hold on the a President’s policy re apprehension of illegal aliens.

Supreme Court Lifts Limits on Immigration Raids in Los Angeles — The Wall Street Journal

Order lets Trump administration proceed with patrols that earlier targeted largely Latino areas

apple.news

Maybe some national bar association can step up to educate the lower courts and the parties that the lower courts are NOT empowered to put themselves into the shoes of the President. The Judicial Branch is NOT the Executive Branch.

For now, a win for the Trump Administration and for the Constitution.

It's a huge error to have federal judges picked by a president, it has always seemed very odd to me that the public do not get a say in appointing these judges.

The executive and legislative branches all involve democratic voting but the people are excluded from the selection of the heads of the judicial branch, kind of undemocratic really.

 

[Dante]

Once again, SCOTUS vacates a temporary hold on the a President’s policy re apprehension of illegal aliens.

Supreme Court Lifts Limits on Immigration Raids in Los Angeles — The Wall Street Journal

Order lets Trump administration proceed with patrols that earlier targeted largely Latino areas

apple.news

Maybe some national bar association can step up to educate the lower courts and the parties that the lower courts are NOT empowered to put themselves into the shoes of the President. The Judicial Branch is NOT the Executive Branch.

For now, a win for the Trump Administration and for the Constitution.

Try addressing all the legal arguments. Enough with the political arguments cheering shit on from the cheap seats in the Maga Peanut Gallery

 

[Dante]

really?

If you say so

 

[WEATHER53]

Once again, SCOTUS vacates a temporary hold on the a President’s policy re apprehension of illegal aliens.

Supreme Court Lifts Limits on Immigration Raids in Los Angeles — The Wall Street Journal

Order lets Trump administration proceed with patrols that earlier targeted largely Latino areas

apple.news

Maybe some national bar association can step up to educate the lower courts and the parties that the lower courts are NOT empowered to put themselves into the shoes of the President. The Judicial Branch is NOT the Executive Branch.

For now, a win for the Trump Administration and for the Constitution.

The most plain facts are this highest level are Thinkers. They are not going to go to bat for illegal invaders like this 0.5% of low level bought and paid biased “judges” have done

 

[Dante]

The most plain facts are this highest level are Thinkers. They are not going to go to bat for illegal invaders like this 0.5% of low level bought and paid biased “judges” have done

conspiracy alert!

 

[WEATHER53]

conspiracy alert!

See fool your endless attempts to assign a discrediting label of conspiracy does not work anymore plus your lack of intelligence allowed you to incorrectly feel my statement references conspiring. It didn’t so go moo some moreTDS spew

 

[Eman623]

I like how the original judge held that the "indiscriminate stops" were "discriminatory".

Dude, they are either discriminate or indiscriminate. They cannot be both.

 

[progressive hunter]

It's a huge error to have federal judges picked by a president, it has always seemed very odd to me that the public do not get a say in appointing these judges.

The executive and legislative branches all involve democratic voting but the people are excluded from the selection of the heads of the judicial branch, kind of undemocratic really.

democracies are evil and need to be eradicated,,

thats why we are a constitutional republic,,

 

[Dante]

I like how the original judge held that the "indiscriminate stops" were "discriminatory".

Dude, they are either discriminate or indiscriminate. They cannot be both.

you appear to be confused

 

[Dante]

democracies are evil and need to be eradicated,,

thats why we are a constitutional republic,,

you are totally confused on the terms and reality

 

[Eman623]

you appear to be confused

Thanks troll.

 

[Sherlock Holmes]

democracies are evil and need to be eradicated,,

See, a hatred of democracy, you don't even try to hide that.

thats why we are a constitutional republic,,

Are we though? the power to elect the members of the supreme court does not sit with the people but with the executive branch and that's probably by design since the founding fathers were more or less British if not in nationality by education.

Truly empowering the people is not how the British Empire was built.

 

[martybegan]

See, a hatred of democracy, you don't even try to hide that.

Are we though? the power to elect the members of the supreme court does not sit with the people but with the executive branch.

A pure democracy is 51 people out of a hundred voting to take all the property of the remaining 49.

 

[Dante]

Thanks troll.

You're welcome, you shit-for-brains.

 

[Sherlock Holmes]

A pure democracy is 51 people out of a hundred voting to take all the property of the remaining 49.

Well waddya know, he can count after all!

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Strange that "win" for Trump always involves being temporarily allowed to break the law.

It's like he is a criminal or something.

 

[BackAgain]

See, a hatred of democracy, you don't even try to hide that.

Are we though? the power to elect the members of the supreme court does not sit with the people but with the executive branch.

You still don’t grasp why the Framers of our (not your) Constitution were so intent on making sure that we would NOT be a democracy.

Our SCOTUS Justices aren’t elected at all. They are nominated by the President and confirmed by the Senate.

There is so much you simply do not comprehend, Shitass Homeless .