Supreme Court allows Trump to swiftly deport certain immigrants to 'third countries'

While legal, sending immigrants to prisons like Cecot and Sudan and not back to their home country or where they entered: 1) are unethical; 2) how much is the US paying these countries? They aren't doing it for free.
What's unethical is coming to the US illegally, not just unethical, but illegal.

The reality is this scum, are so horrible their home country won't take them....so we have to find somewhere to take them. We aren't the world's trash dump for illegal scum.
 
What's unethical is coming to the US illegally, not just unethical, but illegal.

The reality is this scum, are so horrible their home country won't take them....so we have to find somewhere to take them. We aren't the world's trash dump for illegal scum.
Many of these other countries emptied their prisons into the U.S. while hospice Joe played with himself.
 
I'm still waiting for the Dem apology. Lying Dem assholes told us nothing could be done to stop the invasion of 15 million illegals without new legislation. Then Trump reduced illegal border crossings to ZERO with existing laws and law enforcement.
 
The reality is this scum, are so horrible their home country won't take them....so we have to find somewhere to take them. We aren't the world's trash dump for illegal scum.
Actually thats kind of the point. Unless your ancestors came here already rich (in which case why?) they are were likely poor or fleeing oppression, and coming here to restart their lives.
 
Actually thats kind of the point. Unless your ancestors came here already rich (in which case why?) they are were likely poor or fleeing oppression, and coming here to restart their lives.
No, that's not the point, nobody has any problem with people immigrating here legally, like my ancestors did.

The point is illegal immigrants. Moreover, folks being deported to a third country, are being deported there because their home country won't take them back, or their home country is too dangerous, and they themselves are too dangerous to be in our country.
 
While legal, sending immigrants to prisons like Cecot and Sudan and not back to their home country or where they entered: 1) are unethical; 2) how much is the US paying these countries? They aren't doing it for free.

Don't care. Deport them all.

The tactic of just asking questions in a circle, to avoid any actual action, is over. Time to actually do shit.


You had your chance to have input. YOu choose to play games. Now it is too late.
 
No, that's not the point, nobody has any problem with people immigrating here legally, like my ancestors did.

The point is illegal immigrants. Moreover, folks being deported to a third country, are being deported there because their home country won't take them back, or their home country is too dangerous, and they themselves are too dangerous to be in our country.
I am onside with deporting them. Deporting them to third party countries is what I take issue with. How much does it cost to ship someone to Sudan? How much are we paying Sudan to take them? I am sure Administration members are getting a kickback somehow on that.
 
I am onside with deporting them. Deporting them to third party countries is what I take issue with. How much does it cost to ship someone to Sudan? How much are we paying Sudan to take them? I am sure Administration members are getting a kickback somehow on that.

Don't care. Deport them. No more talking. ACTION.
 
I am onside with deporting them. Deporting them to third party countries is what I take issue with. How much does it cost to ship someone to Sudan? How much are we paying Sudan to take them? I am sure Administration members are getting a kickback somehow on that.
Likely not cheap. We send Sudan millions in humanitarian aid every year, like we do with a lot of countries,

Sending people to third countries, is not a new thing, we have been doing it for decades. It's weird how it's just become some sort of issue. I don't recall any dembot claiming other admins were getting kickbacks from it, even admins that needed to give blanket pardons to their family.
 
While legal, sending immigrants to prisons like Cecot and Sudan and not back to their home country or where they entered: 1) are unethical; 2) how much is the US paying these countries? They aren't doing it for free.
Their home countries refuse to take them
 
I did? Interesting.

Why not just kick them back over the border to Mexico?


Don't know, don't care. DEPORT THEM.


And yes, you did. And for generations, we have TALKED about what to do, and done' NOTHING while the politcal class allowed the border to be effectively open.


Now, we are actually being a serious country again. For the first time in a long time.
 
Their home countries refuse to take them
Ok this is a fair argument. :salute:
And yes, you did. And for generations, we have TALKED about what to do, and done' NOTHING while the politcal class allowed the border to be effectively open.
So by you, you mean 'we.' Got it. No Republican or Democratic congress passed anything of worth for decades, since reagan I believe.
 
Ok this is a fair argument. :salute:

So by you, you mean 'we.' Got it. No Republican or Democratic congress passed anything of worth for decades, since reagan I believe.

WE as a nation, becasue people like YOU, ie lefties, kept talking in circles, to avoid ever actually DOING anything.


You try to make a point about which specific country they are being deported to, or how much it costs, but in reality you don't care about any of that, you want them to be able to stay, but you are dishonest about your position and intentions.


Like all liberals.
 
15th post
WE as a nation, becasue people like YOU, ie lefties, kept talking in circles, to avoid ever actually DOING anything.
Not a lefty, an AntiTrumper.
No Republican Congress did anything. No Democratic Congress did anything.
 
Not a lefty, an AntiTrumper.
No Republican Congress did anything. No Democratic Congress did anything.

Correct. No one did anything. We TALKED and people like you kept the discussion going, by constantly and dishonestly changing your positions.

Someone wanted to build a wall, you argued that a wall would be expensive, we should have more border guards.


If someone wanted more border guards you claimed that it wouldn't work, and we should go after employers.


ECT. ECT. ECT. Every discussion, you took the ANTI-ACTION position.


Now we are past the discussion phase. YOu had your chance to have real input, but you refused to engage. you instead played silly games.

Now you are out of the loop and we are deporting them. And it is only going to increase as time goes on.
 
Someone wanted to build a wall, you argued that a wall would be expensive, we should have more border guards.
I agree with that one. I am glad the BBB has increased funds for them. I quit reading the rest of your blame shifting.
 
I agree with that one. I am glad the BBB has increased funds for them. I quit reading the rest of your blame shifting.

YOur refusal to address my point honestly, is just more of the same from you guys.

WE give you a chance to engage, and instead of doing that, you play rhetorical games.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom