Summary of the recent USMB climate debate

[Dagosa]

The biggest tell on the Climate Religion, was "What if". As soon as that was said, the "science" went out the window.

What if the Earth burns up. Still hasnt, right Al Gore?
What if the oceans rise up and floods the coast. Still hasnt right AOC?
What if the Sun doesnt shine. Still has, and going to for quite a while longer.
What if all the Marxists/Democrats suddenly died of heart failure. Globull Warming would finally go away.

Moronic post. Obviously climate change is way over your head. It’s no wonder Tucker appeals to the illiterates. It is Tucker who makes a living saying “ what if.”

 

[mamooth]

This from someone unable to answer

We've answered you many times. You cry and run every time. You're not intellectually honest, so the normal people won't waste time on you.

How did Co2 melt North America and freeze Greenland at the same time....

It's true. If you all just repeat your conspiracy raving yet another time, the world will stop laughing at you.

At this stage, deniers are like Scientologists. They still make a lot of noise, they tell everyone about their "facts", they declare there's a vast secret globalist conspiracy against them ... and nobody cares. Because they're just kooks.

We were right, so we get to rub that in. We said that once the El Nino arrived, temperatures would skyrocket, and denialism would look even more absurd. As is always the case, things played out exactly as we predicted. Granted, it's not like it was hard to predict, given the facts. Deniers should have listened, instead of sticking with the cult until they rolled out the koolaid vat.

 

[ding]

Pretty idiotic. The only thing that matters is years modern man has been on earth,during the most recent ice age which technically hadn’t ended . You’re obviously an illiterate when it comes to evolution.

It's nice to see you admitting the planet is in an ice age. Then again it's not like there isn't an annual reminder every winter.

 

[ding]

We were right, so we get to rub that in. We said that once the El Nino arrived, temperatures would skyrocket, and denialism would look even more absurd. As is always the case, things played out exactly as we predicted. Granted, it's not like it was hard to predict, given the facts. Deniers should have listened, instead of sticking with the cult until they rolled out the koolaid vat.

You do realize the planet is in the middle of an ice age, right?

 

[mamooth]

You do realize the planet is in the middle of an ice age, right?

This episode of non-sequitur theater has been brought to you by the letter "D" and the numer "7".

 

[ding]

This episode of non-sequitur theater has been brought to you by the letter "D" and the numer "7".

It's not non-sequitur, it's extremely relevant to the conversation. You dismiss it as non-sequitur because of how ridiculous your claims sound when placed in the context of the climate for the past 1 million years. It's because the truth makes you uncomfortable that you dismiss it.

 

[miketx]

In short, we have clear truth here, buried by trolls trying to shout it down.

We have two and only two measures of atmospheric temps, satellites and balloons, and both showed no warming in the atmosphere despite rising CO2 before crick's taxpayer funded heroes fudged both to keep the Co2 fraud going...

Key claim against global warming evaporates

Satellite and weather balloon data used to argue that climate models were wrong and that global warming isn't really happening turns out to be based on faulty analyses, according to three new studies.

www.nbcnews.com

Their theory is that increasing Co2 in the atmosphere would warm the atmosphere

THEORY REJECTED


We have absolutely no breakout in cane activity, which would occur if oceans were actually warming.

We have no visual evidence of a single landmark on Earth "sinking" due to ocean "rise" because oceans are not rising because Antarctica is not melting at all, but rather gaining ice.

We have a planet where EVERY SINGLE PIECE OF LAND WITHIN 600 miles of a pole is in continent specific ICE AGE, and every piece of land outside of 600 miles of a pole is not, and land moves.

We have one Earth polar circle, the Antarctic, with 90% of Earth ice, surface temps 50F colder than Arctic, and puts 9 times the ice that the Arctic puts in the oceans. In short, one Earth polar circle cools Earth much more than the other. All about land near the pole. Two polar oceans and Earth has no ice. That is the driver of Earth climate change.

We have the Co2 Fraud supporters here completely unable to explain how in the past 1 million years Co2 froze Greenland and melted North America AT THE SAME TIME because it did not and ATMOSPHERE is ruled out as a cause of either... The cause is that Greenland recently moved into the "within 600 miles" to the Pole zone and NA moved out (except for Ellesmere)

In short, Co2 does ABSOLUTELY NOTHING.

Earth climate change is 99%+ about WHERE LAND IS, and LAND MOVES, and we could increase atmospheric Co2 10 fold from current levels and


IT WOULD STILL DO NOTHING

There are few debates here. Leftist scum won't allow it.

 

[EMH]

There are few debates here. Leftist scum won't allow it.

Neither will Faux, which also qualifies...

 

[EMH]

You do realize the planet is in the middle of an ice age, right?

Actually two, Antarctica and Greenland.

 

[EMH]

We've answered you many times. You cry and run every time. You're not intellectually honest, so the normal people won't waste time on you.


It's true. If you all just repeat your conspiracy raving yet another time, the world will stop laughing at you.

At this stage, deniers are like Scientologists. They still make a lot of noise, they tell everyone about their "facts", they declare there's a vast secret globalist conspiracy against them ... and nobody cares. Because they're just kooks.

We were right, so we get to rub that in. We said that once the El Nino arrived, temperatures would skyrocket, and denialism would look even more absurd. As is always the case, things played out exactly as we predicted. Granted, it's not like it was hard to predict, given the facts. Deniers should have listened, instead of sticking with the cult until they rolled out the koolaid vat.

You have NOT ANSWERED. You tried laughable BS about rainfall and were busted lying, and the answer was laughable from the start.

YOUR SIDE CANNOT EXPLAIN A MAP OF THE ARCTIC.

YOUR SIDE SHOULD NOT GET ONE DIME MORE UNTIL IT DOES...

 

[miketx]

Neither will Faux, which also qualifies...

If only I knew what you were talking about.

 

[EMH]

Pretty idiotic. The only thing that matters is years modern man has been on earth,during the most recent ice age which technically hadn’t ended . You’re obviously an illiterate when it comes to evolution.

YES OR NO

IS ANTARCTICA AN ICE AGE RIGHT NOW?

 

[Unkotare]

Is "hurricane" really so difficult to spell?

And exactly how did "Da Jooooooooos" invent hurricanes?

 

[miketx]

YES OR NO

IS ANTARCTICA AN ICE AGE RIGHT NOW?

How in the hell would we know that? Jeez...

 

[miketx]

Is "hurricane" really so difficult to spell?

And exactly how did "Da Jooooooooos" invent hurricanes?

They used a big hurricane generator built by Donald Trump.

 

[ding]

Actually two, Antarctica and Greenland.

No. One ice age marked by bipolar glaciation which is literally what makes it an ice age. You are misusing the term.

 

[ding]

If only I knew what you were talking about.

No one ever does.

 

[EMH]

No. One ice age marked by bipolar glaciation which is literally what makes it an ice age. You are misusing the term.

Your definition of the term is as pathetic as it is laughable. You still parrot McBullshit, which is outed as complete BULLSHIT right here...

The lies of Milankovich Cycles aka McBullshit - where was land mass Antarctica 70 million years ago

McBullshit claims Antarctica has been on the South Pole forever, it never moved at all. And, while it is on the South Pole, it has rapidly gone from ice age to tropical paradise and back over and over.... a Dennis Quaid theory for sure... We know that Antarctica has 70 million year old...

www.usmessageboard.com

How old were the 2.5 mile thick glaciers covering Chicago in the past 20k-5 million years?

This is where the climate debate is now stuck. Every piece of land within 600 miles of a pole is in ice age, everything outside of that is not. Nobody has attempted to dispute that. It is the clear truth of Earth today. Milankovitch Cycles, which I call McBullshit Cycles, take a very...

www.usmessageboard.com

And this is the definition of ice age, the CORRECT ONE...

Apparently we really need a "debate" over the term ICE AGE because y'all are all wrong...

What is an ICE AGE? Most apparently still believe it is a terrifying horror movie event where Earth all at once freezes up. The data has never supported such a scenario. Since 2010, there has been a massive effort to re-write Earth climate history into a series of rapid "glaciations" and ice...

www.usmessageboard.com

 

[ding]

Your definition of the term is as pathetic as it is laughable. You still parrot McBullshit, which is outed as complete BULLSHIT right here...

The lies of Milankovich Cycles aka McBullshit - where was land mass Antarctica 70 million years ago

McBullshit claims Antarctica has been on the South Pole forever, it never moved at all. And, while it is on the South Pole, it has rapidly gone from ice age to tropical paradise and back over and over.... a Dennis Quaid theory for sure... We know that Antarctica has 70 million year old...

www.usmessageboard.com

How old were the 2.5 mile thick glaciers covering Chicago in the past 20k-5 million years?

This is where the climate debate is now stuck. Every piece of land within 600 miles of a pole is in ice age, everything outside of that is not. Nobody has attempted to dispute that. It is the clear truth of Earth today. Milankovitch Cycles, which I call McBullshit Cycles, take a very...

www.usmessageboard.com

And this is the definition of ice age, the CORRECT ONE...

Apparently we really need a "debate" over the term ICE AGE because y'all are all wrong...

What is an ICE AGE? Most apparently still believe it is a terrifying horror movie event where Earth all at once freezes up. The data has never supported such a scenario. Since 2010, there has been a massive effort to re-write Earth climate history into a series of rapid "glaciations" and ice...

www.usmessageboard.com

Posting unrelated links doesn't change the fact that you are ascribing isolated polar regions as the dominant climate feature of the planet, dummy.

 

[EMH]

Posting unrelated links doesn't change the fact that you are ascribing isolated polar regions as the dominant climate feature of the planet, dummy.

Those "unrelated links" are truth you cannot refute, questions you cannot answer, and you really HATE THAT....