- Mar 28, 2018
- Reaction score
Well first you'd have to prove that that happened.So did you ever find the link showing Sullivan appeared before Ginsburg and the USSC Justices and told them they were regarding the precedent they set in a 9-0 decision - declaring judges can not do what Sullivan is doing - days before Sullivan went 'rogue'?BZZZZT!!!!The case was dismissed. Even if the judge did sentence Flynn, the case would automatially be dismissed on appeal because the DOJ wouldn't prosecute it there.First, it's from the gateway pundit, and therefore most likely not true.Sullivan is already defying a precedent set by the USSC in a 9 -0 decision made 1 week before he started his personal 'war' against Flynn...now he says he has the 'RIGHT' to INVESTIGATE and PROSECUTE Flynn....
Judge Emmet Sullivan Bucks the Law - Says He Doesn't have to Drop Case Just Because DOJ Dropped Charges and He Has Right to Investigate Flynn! (VIDEO)This is just outrageous. The Barr Justice Department dropped its case against General Mike Flynn last month after bombshell documents were released that proved Flynn was framed by Comey’s FBI. But the Clinton-appointed Judge Emmet Sullivan made a dirty, political move to delay justice for...www.thegatewaypundit.com
Second. Sullivan doesn't have to prosecute anyone. The prosecution phase is over, Flynn admitted guilt.
Only a douchebag would defend the actions of this judge. You can't if you have any concern about justice or truth or the law.
I'm sorry, but that's incorrect.
The correct answer would have been "only a douchebag would defend this AG."
You said Sullivan did so, I asked for the link, and you never provided it.....