jc456
Diamond Member
- Dec 18, 2013
- 141,583
- 30,066
- 2,180
Better a coward than an idiot like youYou’re a coward. Can’t event stand up and make an argument. Afraid? I’d be if I were as much of a tool as you are
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Better a coward than an idiot like youYou’re a coward. Can’t event stand up and make an argument. Afraid? I’d be if I were as much of a tool as you are
Hell no he wasn’t obligated to say anything. It was a voluntary interview.Prove it. He isn’t obligated to say anythingThere is no way Flynn “forgot” about the content of his phone call without him being senile
It wasn’t recorded. So it’s hearsayStart on page 127.prove itFake news from fake news sources.
Been proven false over and over again. A zombie lie that won't die.
The agents felt he did not give physical indications of lying, however when investigating the matter, it was 100% clear that he must have been.
The decision to prosecute a lie does not rest solely on the interviewer's impression of body language.
He’s both.Better a coward than an idiot like youYou’re a coward. Can’t event stand up and make an argument. Afraid? I’d be if I were as much of a tool as you are
Except he didn’t. Comey said so. I posted the link. Read itHell no he wasn’t obligated to say anything. It was a voluntary interview.Prove it. He isn’t obligated to say anythingThere is no way Flynn “forgot” about the content of his phone call without him being senile
He chose to lie.
Except Flynn never lied the director of the fbi said so under oathContemporaneous notes and official documentation are admissible under exceptions to hearsay
The link did not have any quotes from Comey. It was all third hand hearsay.Except he didn’t. Comey said so. I posted the link. Read itHell no he wasn’t obligated to say anything. It was a voluntary interview.Prove it. He isn’t obligated to say anythingThere is no way Flynn “forgot” about the content of his phone call without him being senile
He chose to lie.
So now hearsay isn’t gonna work? HahahaThe link did not have any quotes from Comey. It was all third hand hearsay.
I posted the proof that the link was incorrect. If I’m not mistaken you ignored
So now hearsay isn’t gonna work? Hahaha
Sullivan is already defying a precedent set by the USSC in a 9 -0 decision made 1 week before he started his personal 'war' against Flynn...now he says he has the 'RIGHT' to INVESTIGATE and PROSECUTE Flynn....
Judge Emmet Sullivan Bucks the Law - Says He Doesn't have to Drop Case Just Because DOJ Dropped Charges and He Has Right to Investigate Flynn! (VIDEO) | The Gateway Pundit | by Jim Hoft
This is just outrageous.www.thegatewaypundit.com
Nope, I don’t. Never did. It’s why the fbi notes are all hearsaySo now hearsay isn’t gonna work? Hahaha
The funny thing is, you think it does?
But coney’s not? Hahaha hahahaSullivan is already defying a precedent set by the USSC in a 9 -0 decision made 1 week before he started his personal 'war' against Flynn...now he says he has the 'RIGHT' to INVESTIGATE and PROSECUTE Flynn....
Judge Emmet Sullivan Bucks the Law - Says He Doesn't have to Drop Case Just Because DOJ Dropped Charges and He Has Right to Investigate Flynn! (VIDEO) | The Gateway Pundit | by Jim Hoft
This is just outrageous.www.thegatewaypundit.com
What? You think a partisan hack like Barr matters?
Failed attempt to divert....Sullivan is already defying a precedent set by the USSC in a 9 -0 decision made 1 week before he started his personal 'war' against Flynn...now he says he has the 'RIGHT' to INVESTIGATE and PROSECUTE Flynn....
Judge Emmet Sullivan Bucks the Law - Says He Doesn't have to Drop Case Just Because DOJ Dropped Charges and He Has Right to Investigate Flynn! (VIDEO) | The Gateway Pundit | by Jim Hoft
This is just outrageous.www.thegatewaypundit.com
What? You think a partisan hack like Barr matters?
So now hearsay isn’t gonna work? HahahaThe link did not have any quotes from Comey. It was all third hand hearsay.
I posted the proof that the link was incorrect. If I’m not mistaken you ignored
Byron York: Comey told Congress FBI agents didn’t think Michael Flynn lied - Washington Examiner
In March 2017, then-FBI Director James Comey briefed a number of Capitol Hill lawmakers on the Trump-Russia investigation. One topic of intense interest was the case of Michael Flynn, the Trump White House national security adviser who resigned under pressure on Feb. 13 after just 24 days in the...www.washingtonexaminer.com
yep no transcript. Why not
Technically yes they are hearsay but a lot of evidence admitted to court is hearsay. Technically all documents are considered hearsay.Nope, I don’t. Never did. It’s why the fbi notes are all hearsaySo now hearsay isn’t gonna work? Hahaha
The funny thing is, you think it does?
Nope, I don’t. Never did. It’s why the fbi notes are all hearsay
Failed attempt to divert....
BZZZZT!!!!The case was dismissed. Even if the judge did sentence Flynn, the case would automatially be dismissed on appeal because the DOJ wouldn't prosecute it there.First, it's from the gateway pundit, and therefore most likely not true.Sullivan is already defying a precedent set by the USSC in a 9 -0 decision made 1 week before he started his personal 'war' against Flynn...now he says he has the 'RIGHT' to INVESTIGATE and PROSECUTE Flynn....
Judge Emmet Sullivan Bucks the Law - Says He Doesn't have to Drop Case Just Because DOJ Dropped Charges and He Has Right to Investigate Flynn! (VIDEO) | The Gateway Pundit | by Jim Hoft
This is just outrageous.www.thegatewaypundit.com
Second. Sullivan doesn't have to prosecute anyone. The prosecution phase is over, Flynn admitted guilt.
Only a douchebag would defend the actions of this judge. You can't if you have any concern about justice or truth or the law.
His actions have been entirely proper. If anything, he's been entirely too lenient on the coup plotters, and I include the judge in that category.BZZZZT!!!!The case was dismissed. Even if the judge did sentence Flynn, the case would automatially be dismissed on appeal because the DOJ wouldn't prosecute it there.First, it's from the gateway pundit, and therefore most likely not true.Sullivan is already defying a precedent set by the USSC in a 9 -0 decision made 1 week before he started his personal 'war' against Flynn...now he says he has the 'RIGHT' to INVESTIGATE and PROSECUTE Flynn....
Judge Emmet Sullivan Bucks the Law - Says He Doesn't have to Drop Case Just Because DOJ Dropped Charges and He Has Right to Investigate Flynn! (VIDEO) | The Gateway Pundit | by Jim Hoft
This is just outrageous.www.thegatewaypundit.com
Second. Sullivan doesn't have to prosecute anyone. The prosecution phase is over, Flynn admitted guilt.
Only a douchebag would defend the actions of this judge. You can't if you have any concern about justice or truth or the law.
I'm sorry, but that's incorrect.
The correct answer would have been "only a douchebag would defend this AG."
So did you ever find the link showing Sullivan appeared before Ginsburg and the USSC Justices and told them they were regarding the precedent they set in a 9-0 decision - declaring judges can not do what Sullivan is doing - days before Sullivan went 'rogue'?BZZZZT!!!!The case was dismissed. Even if the judge did sentence Flynn, the case would automatially be dismissed on appeal because the DOJ wouldn't prosecute it there.First, it's from the gateway pundit, and therefore most likely not true.Sullivan is already defying a precedent set by the USSC in a 9 -0 decision made 1 week before he started his personal 'war' against Flynn...now he says he has the 'RIGHT' to INVESTIGATE and PROSECUTE Flynn....
Judge Emmet Sullivan Bucks the Law - Says He Doesn't have to Drop Case Just Because DOJ Dropped Charges and He Has Right to Investigate Flynn! (VIDEO) | The Gateway Pundit | by Jim Hoft
This is just outrageous.www.thegatewaypundit.com
Second. Sullivan doesn't have to prosecute anyone. The prosecution phase is over, Flynn admitted guilt.
Only a douchebag would defend the actions of this judge. You can't if you have any concern about justice or truth or the law.
I'm sorry, but that's incorrect.
The correct answer would have been "only a douchebag would defend this AG."