Study: No, there is no "pause" in Global warming

Why did they change the name from global warming to climate change?
 
Have you ever noticed how every lie the UN and (paid off) scientists promote has a political agenda behind it?
 
The following are from a NOAA site.

upload_2015-11-25_9-37-28.webp


Note, this means that in 100 years the temperature will rise .6 deg C. Is that something that scares you?


upload_2015-11-25_9-38-7.webp


This confirms the .7 degree rise in 100 years.
 
Mark Twain's observation has never been more apropos than it is now w/r/t "climate change." There are lies, damn lies, and statistics.

Each side is cooking the books to prove its point.

The climate is warming and has been for quite a long time. Nobody disputes this. Human activity is contributing to the warming. Nobody disputes this.

The three relevant question are:

(1) How much will the climate be affected and over what period of time?
(2) How much of the changes are the result of human activity? and
(3) What is the rational response?

The Left has already been proven hysterically wrong in its initial projections. We are already long-past the time when people like Algore were projecting that Alaska would be a tropical paradise. Whether one finds that there has been (and continues to be) a "pause" in global warming is irrelevant; it is nothing more than statistical masturbation. The warming trend is nowhere as dramatic as we were told a few short decades ago, but it is real and we have to deal with it.

The question that the Left refuses to address rationally is this: What feasible changes in human activity will have a significant enough effect in reducing warming that it makes rational sense to make them? China and India want reliable electricity, air conditioning, and cars. They are going to get them, and those "luxuries" are going to be powered mainly by fossil fuels. NOTHING WE DO in the U.S. or Western Europe will change those facts, and thus NOTHING WE DO in the U.S. or Western Europe will REDUCE the level of global CO2 emissions; we can only slightly reduce the rate of increase.

Bottom Line: If every one in the U.S. became an organic subsistence farmer, if we gave up our SUV's, and adjusted our thermostats, and if we did everything else humanly possible to reduce the increase in atmospheric CO2, IT WOULD HAVE NO MEASURABLE EFFECT ON GLOBAL TEMPERATURES FOR AT LEAST THE NEXT 50 YEARS.

But we can and should, (A) do everything we can to optimize the efficiency of our use of carbon fuels, (B) maximize the exploitation of renewal power sources, and (C) lead the world in developing ENGINEERING solutions to the problems that we reasonably believe are unavoidable.

And calling people "deniers" is nothing but typical liberal ad hominem bullshit.
 
Why change the data? Why? Why adjust the data? Why? Why add proxies and fabrications to actual readings? Why?
 
Scientists explain how global warming deniers use short periods of time to prove that the planet has ceased to warm. They explain that when sufficiently long periods are examined, the warming trend always holds.


The study is a blow to conservatives who claim global warming stopped.

Link

New study finds ‘no substantive evidence’ of a global warming ‘pause’
The fact that you put the assessment in terms of conservatism betrays that it's entirely political and not science.
 
Using short periods of time huh. Well...we've only been driving cars for about 100 years. Only in mass numbers for 60 or so.

So....man made emissions have only happened short term. Which makes it a problem when we point out all the massive temperature swings over tens of thousands of years when we had no cars.

OR....how the temperature changes on Earth....are the same pattern as the ones on Venus...Mars...Mercury...Saturn....etc.....because THE ******* SUN is causing it. Not cars.
 
Nobody noticed the OP mentions short time spans and the GW cult bases everything off of 150 year models?
 
Does this mean I can Craig's List all the crap my older brother bought in the 70s to protect him from the coming ice age the climate dipshits warned him about?
 
Mark Twain's observation has never been more apropos than it is now w/r/t "climate change." There are lies, damn lies, and statistics.

Each side is cooking the books to prove its point.

The climate is warming and has been for quite a long time. Nobody disputes this.

No, I think that there is a lot of dispute over whether temperatures have climbed in the last 20 years.
 
15th post
Regardless, one thing is for certain. Humanity is a plague upon the Earth and our continued presence here is destroying the planet.
 
Regardless, one thing is for certain. Humanity is a plague upon the Earth and our continued presence here is destroying the planet.
Well then why dont you lead by example and remove yourself then, dear?

Suicide will never be as effective as genocide. The Earth needs a mass culling, by nature itself or by those in power.

 

Suicide will never be as effective as genocide. The Earth needs a mass culling, by nature itself or by those in power.

That is the thing about you leftwing Nazis, you always want to improve the World by getting rid of EVERYBODY ELSE, and never have the courage or honesty to start with yourself.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom