Study: Homophobic individuals more likely to be closet homosexuals.

It's homophobes that are losing, not gay people.
More than half of Americans now approve of gay marriage, and DADT is dead.

You and bigfoot are the reason I hate to agree with either side on this issue.

I think gays, like all Americans, should be left alone to live their own life. You as assumption extrapolate that out to mean that freedom means government must recognize and bless gay relationships and give them "benefits."

On the other hand, the right rather then just saying it isn't marriage jump to how they are blocking marriage because gay marriages somehow threaten their heterosexual ones.

It's the sad fate of libertarianism. Both sides are whacked and even if you have the right view it's for the wrong reason. If you both would just focus on freedom from government instead of having government ram your warped morality down everyone's throats, you both could still do what you want and the rest of us would be free of your hateful intolerance. Both parties are anti-choice.

If straight marriages receive benefits, gay marriages should as well. It's not a bad thing to want the same tax benefits of marriage.
 
I do NOT advocate any American being forced to allow any other American into their homes, lest they be police, or fire fighters.

Then WHY do the Gaqy Rights advocates force this shit on the rest of society pretending it's NORMAL and MUST be accepted or else?

It's a losing proposition...and they are losing.

Keep it in the bedroom. PERIOD.
It's homophobes that are losing, not gay people.
More than half of Americans now approve of gay marriage, and DADT is dead.

If that is true than SURELY some state, some locality would pass same sex marriage laws by vote instead of imposition?
 
Yeah i think there's 2 main reasons for people to be such outspoken homophobes.

1.) As the study shows, homophobes are more likely to be gay, so it's their insecurity causing it. Which is sad, as the community they live in is likely the reason for their insecurity. Luckily as a country we're fixing that.

2.) The other reason, is they're insecure about their own sexuality. Since it's normally men who are outspoken homophobes, the reason is probably because they're so bad at sex, very ugly, have a tiny dick and their wife is very much unsatisfied with him sexually. So to make up for their lack of ability at arrousing a woman, they attack gays and the sex lives of gays to feel better about themselves.
 
Yeah, women beat me in.....:cuckoo:

Reality is the bar is lowered for you in the military, less everything. You are not our equal, lesbo.....look up.

You are one sad, pathetic little whining bitch.

He got shown up on a regular basis by the women around him (wasn't that hard to do, I wager) and now he's very bitter, and has a hard time facing that he is a failure. But....whatcha gonna do?

Bitter and shrill....you probably got beat out on promotions, etc. by your female co-workers. Maybe even lost out on a girlfriend to a lesbian.
 
Then WHY do the Gaqy Rights advocates force this shit on the rest of society pretending it's NORMAL and MUST be accepted or else?

It's a losing proposition...and they are losing.

Keep it in the bedroom. PERIOD.
It's homophobes that are losing, not gay people.
More than half of Americans now approve of gay marriage, and DADT is dead.

GOOD news for the nation.

Yes, Obama...with all his faults....got rid of DADT. That was a red-letter day! :clap2::clap2::clap2:
 
Then WHY do the Gaqy Rights advocates force this shit on the rest of society pretending it's NORMAL and MUST be accepted or else?

It's a losing proposition...and they are losing.

Keep it in the bedroom. PERIOD.
It's homophobes that are losing, not gay people.
More than half of Americans now approve of gay marriage, and DADT is dead.

If that is true than SURELY some state, some locality would pass same sex marriage laws by vote instead of imposition?

And that will happen. Just like some state, some locality passed civil rights laws by vote rather than by imposition.

BTW...would you say a vote by the legislature is an "imposition"?
 
If straight marriages receive benefits, gay marriages should as well. It's not a bad thing to want the same tax benefits of marriage.

Exactly. You object to Republicans ramming their views down our throats only because they are different then the views you want to ram down our throats. You and the Republicans you hate are just two sides of the same coin.
 
Last edited:
Yeah, women beat me in.....:cuckoo:

Reality is the bar is lowered for you in the military, less everything. You are not our equal, lesbo.....look up.

He got shown up on a regular basis by the women around him (wasn't that hard to do, I wager) and now he's very bitter, and has a hard time facing that he is a failure. But....whatcha gonna do?

Bitter and shrill....you probably got beat out on promotions, etc. by your female co-workers. Maybe even lost out on a girlfriend to a lesbian.

Broken Record.
 
Using the same line of thinking it's possible that socialists are closet capitalists.

Or vice versa.

No, it's not. Capitalism and Socialism are complete opposites. Socialism is centralized economic planning and capitalism is distributed economic planning. Socialism is control. Capitalism is economic freedom. You can have systems that are socialized but allow limited capitalism, but the system is socialist because the socialists are making the choice of what they allow and what they don't, which is central planning. A socialist capitalist or a capitalist socialist is first and foremost a socialist. Any true capitalist refuses to have economic decisions driven by the central authority, which means they are not socialist.
 
Can't say these results are surprising:

Homophobes Might Be Secretly Attracted To People Of The Same Sex - International Business Times

Researchers found that homophobic people are actually attracted to the same sex. They claim that these individuals risk losing the love and approval of their parents if they admit to same sex attractions, so many people deny or repress that part of them.

"In a predominately heterosexual society, 'know thyself' can be a challenge for many gay individuals. But in controlling and homophobic homes, embracing a minority sexual orientation can be terrifying," said Weinstein.

The research also sheds light on high profile cases in which anti-gay public figures are caught engaging in same-sex sexual acts. The authors write that this dynamic of inner conflict may be reflected in such examples as Ted Haggard, the evangelical preacher who opposed gay marriage but was exposed in a gay sex scandal in 2006, and Glenn Murphy, Jr, former chairman of the Young Republican National Federation and vocal opponent of gay marriage, who was accused of sexually assaulting a 22-year-old man in 2007.

"This study shows that if you are feeling that kind of visceral reaction to an out-group, ask yourself, 'Why?'" says William Ryan, professor at the University of California in Santa Barbara. "Those intense emotions should serve as a call to self-reflection."

Discuss.

Probably.....

How can it be proven tho?

I bet it is pretty difficult to find an anti-gay homo...

I don't care what gays do just as long as they don't corrupt...

That is the problem I have with gays - they throw their gayness in individuals faces.

I don't see any militant heterosexuals - so why the fuck do gays have to be "in your face" type jackasses.

So what if someone is gay............

Those flamers are annoying tho....

I saw a gay pride parade one time and this dude was dressed like Batman with his dong hanging out.... WTF.

Do gays subscribe to common decency? Geez...
 
It's homophobes that are losing, not gay people.
More than half of Americans now approve of gay marriage, and DADT is dead.

If that is true than SURELY some state, some locality would pass same sex marriage laws by vote instead of imposition?

And that will happen. Just like some state, some locality passed civil rights laws by vote rather than by imposition.

BTW...would you say a vote by the legislature is an "imposition"?

Have they? Have other civil rights ever been put to a majority vote?
 
If that is true than SURELY some state, some locality would pass same sex marriage laws by vote instead of imposition?

And that will happen. Just like some state, some locality passed civil rights laws by vote rather than by imposition.

BTW...would you say a vote by the legislature is an "imposition"?

Have they? Have other civil rights ever been put to a majority vote?

No but in their support of measures when they appear on ballots the gay-marriage community is sending the wrong message.
That's my two cents.
 
I bet it is pretty difficult to find an anti-gay homo...

No, it's easy. The GOP is chock full of them.

I don't care what gays do just as long as they don't corrupt...

Corrupt? Corrupt who? How?

That is the problem I have with gays - they throw their gayness in individuals faces.

I don't see any militant heterosexuals - so why the fuck do gays have to be "in your face" type jackasses.

For example?

So what if someone is gay............

Those flamers are annoying tho....

I saw a gay pride parade one time and this dude was dressed like Batman with his dong hanging out.... WTF.

Do gays subscribe to common decency? Geez...

Ever been to Mardi Gras?
 
You are just a bully who has just as much hatred for others...You wrote it (about outing others as if it's some NOBEL THING, so you aren't now going to turn things on me..
you are also a hypocrite..so wear it proudly..I'm done with someone like you...bye

So, let me see if I have this straight:

A portion of the homosexual community, the closeted ones, is attacking the rest of the homosexual community, the out in the open ones, for being homosexuals, and going so far as to legislate the revocation of their basic human rights.

And you consider it rude to point out that the closeted homosexuals are in fact homosexuals themselves?

And you consider people who point out this fact "bullies"?

Are you fucking kidding me?

That has to be the single most moronic thing I have ever heard anyone say in my life.
 
Last edited:
And that will happen. Just like some state, some locality passed civil rights laws by vote rather than by imposition.

BTW...would you say a vote by the legislature is an "imposition"?

Have they? Have other civil rights ever been put to a majority vote?

No but in their support of measures when they appear on ballots the gay-marriage community is sending the wrong message.
That's my two cents.

Who is showing support? Most gays I know don't believe that civil rights should be put to a majority vote.
 
I bet it is pretty difficult to find an anti-gay homo...

No, it's easy. The GOP is chock full of them.

I don't care what gays do just as long as they don't corrupt...

Corrupt? Corrupt who? How?

That is the problem I have with gays - they throw their gayness in individuals faces.

I don't see any militant heterosexuals - so why the fuck do gays have to be "in your face" type jackasses.

For example?

So what if someone is gay............

Those flamers are annoying tho....

I saw a gay pride parade one time and this dude was dressed like Batman with his dong hanging out.... WTF.

Do gays subscribe to common decency? Geez...

Ever been to Mardi Gras?

Doesn't even have to be Mardi Gras, go to any busy night club in a big city, I saw tits and asses hangin out everywhere when I was clubbing in Houston last year.
 

Forum List

Back
Top