- Thread starter
- #61
Wow ... simply an amazing string of horseshit yesterday afternoon ...
No one blames it on human activity. They blame it on the Milankovich cycles
No one thinks that who has actually looked up what Milankovich cycles are ... none of the periods match the glacial/interglacial cycle ... 0% correlation ...
... Is it possible that the Fukishima earthquake that shifted the North Pole a couple of degrees is responsible for the polar vortex that seems to be plaguing the U.S. this year ...
Is Polaris four Moon-diameters away from the North celestial pole now? ... did you personally lurch 140 miles in 10 minutes during the earthquake and how is it we're all still alive? ... note when a figure skater pulls her arms in during a spin, her angular velocity increases, but her axis of rotation remains the same; both are required by the Law of Conservation of Angular Momentum ...
Rossby Waves are caused by a reduction in the temperature difference between the poles and the equator.
Rossby waves (aka planetary waves) occur along the Polar Front ... where cold polar air meets warm temperate air and rises in the air column forming the other convergence zone along with the ICZ near the equator ... the causes for the waves is poorly understood ... sometimes the amplitude of these waves is near zero, and the Polar front forms an near perfect circle around the pole; other times the amplitude is high and troughs can reach as far away as the Gulf Coast ... it is a well documented fact that these Rossby waves form near perfect hexagons on Saturn ... one of the many many many things that baffle scientists ...
You're confusing your claim with the emerging theory that because the poles are warming faster than the equator, and average power in the atmosphere is decreasing ... these Rossby waves with be propagating more slowly and have higher amplitude ... "bad" weather will last a few hours longer and be a couple degrees cooler ... and "good" weather will also last a bit longer and be a couple degrees warmer ... and will "average out" over our climatic time intervals ...
=====
All three of the above errors are errors of the basic science ... the things taught to students their first two years of college ... and one of the main reasons that curricula in climatology is started in the third year of college ... Climatology 301 as it were ...
If your claim violates any of the Laws of Nature ... you're wrong ... you need to take the time and learn these laws or be more circumspect with your wild and crazy predictions ... your local community college should offer core physics and calculus, however universities that offer core meteorology are few and far between ... at least sign up for ground school, anything would help your cases ...
Let's see a link to a good reference stating that "the average power in the atmosphere is decreasing". You might also explain what you mean by "power *in* the atmosphere".