Not so dumb. She will probably get a lot of money out of this not to mention attention.
No, she violated her NDA and is supposed to forfeit $20 million, but that will never happen.
"NDA" huh.
---- So there IS an NDA?
For something that "never happened"?
Diga me Tonto, why would you agree to not-disclose an event that 'never happened'? By that logic Rump would have to pay off everybody he's never met.
Think about it. Mrs. Irma Schwarz of Olathe Kansas --- you've never interacted with Rump anywhere, so YOU get $130,000 and (Oprah voice) and YOU get $130,000 and YOU get $130,000.... now y'all be sure to never talk about what you never did, K?
Christ no wonder he goes bankrupt so much.
---- and why would party T
pay for party S to not-talk about something that .... "never happened"?
No Twinkles, you can't have it both ways. If there's an NDA, then there's an event. And if there's a payoff to hide that event, timed to protect an election, then there's a campaign finance question. And indeed there was -- and here we are.
Aren't we.
It will give Trump a vindictive legal leverage on claiming her earnings, whatever they may be.
Ah. So it's all about "vindictiveness" to grab somebody's earnings. By a klown who claims "I'm really really rich". This just gets digger and digger. Like Rudy Giuliani joining the board.
Her lawyer, a Dimocrat operative, has mislead and misused her.
You actually went out and got a link to Avenatti's
party registration? Really?
Oh no, don't let me interrupt. By all means, tell us more.
Partisan dichotomists. Such cat toys.