I've proven many times on USMB there is NOT a major, chronic problem of police brutality
it's only in their obsessed minds and the MSM
Ah, yes, lots of people "prove" things "all the time" on this message board. Generally they only "prove" it to themselves.
over 30 million calls for police assistance--not counting traffic stops
and about 900 police shooting deaths--even less shootings of blacks
do the math if you can
The majority of persons who requested police assistance felt the officers acted properly (93%) and were helpful (86%).
About 9 in 10 persons who requested police assistance reported that they were just as likely or more likely to contact the police again for a similar problem.
etc etc
https://www.bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/rpa11.pdf
---and idiots have tried to put up crap--like the Ferguson Report of police harassment of blacks...I've shot that down......but if you would like to put crap up like that, go ahead
reports like the '''black person said it was harassment '''' hahahhahahahaha
Then again if I do the math compared to the UK, I'll see the US has high figures.
30 million divided by about 300 will give you the answer
and that's not counting traffic stops
AND the blacks commit more violent crime/more crime per capita--so, the figure is very, very VERY low when you look at the FACTS
Yes, I'm sure if you cherry pick the facts in the UK it's even lower. But hey. Fuck the truth right?
Why are people like you defending people who truly are not raised to respect authority?
The laws of physics are at work when a black or a white is confronted by an authority figure and here is how:
Almost all black guys that commit violent crimes when confronted by an authority figure will resist when the stronger force pushes back according to statistics.
Example of laws of physics at work... stronger force WILL overcome weaker force.
To make it simpler.
A larger percentage of black men that resist arrest will have grown up without any resistance to their having their way, i.e. no father figure stronger than the kid.
Consequently the simple fact is when confronted with a "stronger figure" i.e. a cop with a gun, almost all black guys arrested will have resisting arrest as part of the charges.
I don't know how to make that fact more clear.
And the cause is :
more than
one-third (33%) of all Black children in the United States under the age of 18 live with unmarried mothers—compared to 6.5 percent of White children.
The figures reflect a general trend: During the 1960-2016 period, the percentage of children living with only their mother nearly tripled from 8 to 23 percent and the percentage of children living with only their father increased from 1 to 4 percent.
Census Bureau: Higher Percentage of Black Children Live with Single Mothers | Afro
The truth is that black female-headed households were just
18 percent of households in 1950, as opposed to about 68 percent today.
In New York City, in 1925,
85 percent of black households were two-parent households.
A study of 1880 family structure in Philadelphia shows that three-quarters [75%] of black families were two-parent households."
Black female head of households number is 68 percent
By Walter E. Williams is a professor of economics at George Mason University. (Oh by the way in the famous words of Obama..."And did I mention he's black?")
23 Obama Quotes That Turned Out To Be Broken Promises Or Cold-Hearted Lies
So what caused the statistic that over 33% of black children live with an unmarried mother?
Penalizing Marriage
A second major problem is that the means-tested welfare system actively penalizes low-income parents who do marry.
All means-tested welfare programs are designed so that a family’s benefits are reduced as earnings rise. In practice, this means that, if a low-income single mother marries an employed father, her welfare benefits will generally be substantially reduced.
The mother can maximize welfare by remaining unmarried and keeping the father’s income “off the books.”
For example, a single mother with two children who earns $15,000 per year would generally receive around $5,200 per year of food stamp benefits.
However, if she marries a father with the same earnings level, her food stamps would be cut to zero.
A single mother receiving benefits from Section 8 or public housing would receive a subsidy worth on average around $11,000 per year if she was not employed, but if she marries a man earning $20,000 per year, these benefits would be cut nearly in half. Both food stamps and housing programs provide very real financial incentives for couples to remain separate and unmarried.
Overall, the federal government operates over 80 means-tested welfare programs that provide cash, food, housing, medical care, and social services to poor and low-income individuals. Each program contains marriage penalties similar to those described above. Low-income families generally receive benefits from several programs at the same time. The marriage penalties from multiple programs when added together can provide substantial financial disincentives to marriage. For example, if a single mother who earns $20,000 per year marries a man who earns the same amount, the couple will typically lose about $12,000 a year in welfare benefits. In effect, the welfare system makes it economically irrational for most low-income couples to marry.
By contrast, the means-tested welfare system, in most cases, does not have a separate schedule for married couples. When a low-income mother and father marry, they will generally experience a sharp drop in benefits, and their joint income will fall. The anti-marriage penalty is often most severe among married couples where both parents are employed.
How Welfare Undermines Marriage and What to Do About It
I apologize for the length of this comment but sometimes TRUTH is hard to understand. The simple truth is more blacks are killed by cops because they came from no father figure to provide exposure to an authority figure. That is the TRUTH!