tigerred59
Gold Member
- Mar 17, 2015
- 21,276
- 2,882
- 290
- Banned
- #1
90 billion dollars worth of damage and only 15% of them gov. hating rich white fucks have flood insurance???? Welfare at its best!!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
90 billion dollars worth of damage and only 15% of them gov. hating rich white fucks have flood insurance???? Welfare at its best!!
Flood insurance - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia90 billion dollars worth of damage and only 15% of them gov. hating rich white fucks have flood insurance???? Welfare at its best!!
Because of the cost loss vs pay-in to insurers they will look for any excuse not to pay.90 billion dollars worth of damage and only 15% of them gov. hating rich white fucks have flood insurance???? Welfare at its best!!
I think it was after Katrina people were told they had to be able to prove that it was the water and not the wind that destroyed their homes in order to be able to collect on that flood insurance.
Because of the cost loss vs pay-in to insurers they will look for any excuse not to pay.90 billion dollars worth of damage and only 15% of them gov. hating rich white fucks have flood insurance???? Welfare at its best!!
I think it was after Katrina people were told they had to be able to prove that it was the water and not the wind that destroyed their homes in order to be able to collect on that flood insurance.
Taz, I am so fed up with states that border on desaster areas expecting tax payers to foot the bill every time a global warming event occurs. Ca. is another state that goes through this shit every year. Flood insur. should have been a mandatory mandate for all residents of Louisiana. Fed. flood insurance is very inexpensive and its fucked up that these people lacked it. Let em deal with the shit and learn the lesson.If you are going to live in a place that is prone to flooding then you should have to bear the responsibility of the cost when it happens
The fed. gov. has flood insurance.Because of the cost loss vs pay-in to insurers they will look for any excuse not to pay.90 billion dollars worth of damage and only 15% of them gov. hating rich white fucks have flood insurance???? Welfare at its best!!
I think it was after Katrina people were told they had to be able to prove that it was the water and not the wind that destroyed their homes in order to be able to collect on that flood insurance.
They were trying to pass the buck because they were losing their shirts--the homeowners insurance would say nope it was rain so flood insurance would have to pay and the flood insurer would say it was wind so the homeowners coverage would have to pay.
All insurance carriers are a racket......something congress should have investigated ions ago.90 billion dollars worth of damage and only 15% of them gov. hating rich white fucks have flood insurance???? Welfare at its best!!
I think it was after Katrina people were told they had to be able to prove that it was the water and not the wind that destroyed their homes in order to be able to collect on that flood insurance.
Look up the federal flood insurance then get back to me.The fed. gov. has flood insurance.Because of the cost loss vs pay-in to insurers they will look for any excuse not to pay.90 billion dollars worth of damage and only 15% of them gov. hating rich white fucks have flood insurance???? Welfare at its best!!
I think it was after Katrina people were told they had to be able to prove that it was the water and not the wind that destroyed their homes in order to be able to collect on that flood insurance.
They were trying to pass the buck because they were losing their shirts--the homeowners insurance would say nope it was rain so flood insurance would have to pay and the flood insurer would say it was wind so the homeowners coverage would have to pay.
All insurance carriers are a racket......something congress should have investigated ions ago.90 billion dollars worth of damage and only 15% of them gov. hating rich white fucks have flood insurance???? Welfare at its best!!
I think it was after Katrina people were told they had to be able to prove that it was the water and not the wind that destroyed their homes in order to be able to collect on that flood insurance.
My guess is that it would still be cheaper to go to a private company.The fed. gov. has flood insurance.Because of the cost loss vs pay-in to insurers they will look for any excuse not to pay.90 billion dollars worth of damage and only 15% of them gov. hating rich white fucks have flood insurance???? Welfare at its best!!
I think it was after Katrina people were told they had to be able to prove that it was the water and not the wind that destroyed their homes in order to be able to collect on that flood insurance.
They were trying to pass the buck because they were losing their shirts--the homeowners insurance would say nope it was rain so flood insurance would have to pay and the flood insurer would say it was wind so the homeowners coverage would have to pay.
Not really, if you read the Wiki article you'd understand, lots of private insurers will only cover the wealthy.My guess is that it would still be cheaper to go to a private company.The fed. gov. has flood insurance.Because of the cost loss vs pay-in to insurers they will look for any excuse not to pay.90 billion dollars worth of damage and only 15% of them gov. hating rich white fucks have flood insurance???? Welfare at its best!!
I think it was after Katrina people were told they had to be able to prove that it was the water and not the wind that destroyed their homes in order to be able to collect on that flood insurance.
They were trying to pass the buck because they were losing their shirts--the homeowners insurance would say nope it was rain so flood insurance would have to pay and the flood insurer would say it was wind so the homeowners coverage would have to pay.
Not really, if you read the Wiki article you'd understand, lots of private insurers will only cover the wealthy.My guess is that it would still be cheaper to go to a private company.The fed. gov. has flood insurance.Because of the cost loss vs pay-in to insurers they will look for any excuse not to pay.I think it was after Katrina people were told they had to be able to prove that it was the water and not the wind that destroyed their homes in order to be able to collect on that flood insurance.
They were trying to pass the buck because they were losing their shirts--the homeowners insurance would say nope it was rain so flood insurance would have to pay and the flood insurer would say it was wind so the homeowners coverage would have to pay.
Very simply, we are going to see more flooding events like this. In the areas where we expect it, we need to have building codes that reflect that fact. And flood insurance should be part of the yearly property tax. That way, all would have it. Yes, it would increase the cost of housing. However, as these events become more common, the cost is going to have to be borne by all, or the people that live in those areas are going to have to be satisfied to live in disposable shacks.
All insurance carriers are a racket......something congress should have investigated ions ago.