States would decide on their own abortion laws. Really?

[Uncensored2008]

So killing babies can sometimes be justified? I agree. Though we might disagree on the circumstances of that justification, in principle we agree that the killing of babies is sometimes justifiable.

Ah, without logical fallacy, you'd never even approach logic.

There is no equivalence, neither moral nor logical. You are painting a false Delima. In the case of the human shield, it is the one picking up the child who is killing them, not the soldier.

Get new hate points

 

[alang1216]

Very few people, I think, are going to oppose an abortion to save the life of the mother (which is a miniscule reason).

But to save the mother's desire to go clubbing?

Not so much.

Agreed. But the majority of Americans would not be as comfortable as you seem to be telling a mother she has to give birth to a baby she doesn't want.

 

[alang1216]

Ah, without logical fallacy, you'd never even approach logic.

There is no equivalence, neither moral nor logical. You are painting a false Delima. In the case of the human shield, it is the one picking up the child who is killing them, not the soldier.

Get new hate points

So you're saying that the soldier that actually chooses to pull the trigger that kills a child is justified in his action even though a child loses their life?

 

[Uncensored2008]

So you're saying that the soldier that actually chooses to pull the trigger that kills a child is justified in his action even though a child loses their life?

So you're saying that the starfish women carry before birth are shooting at the little Mengeles and it's self-defense for them to kill the starfish?

Interesting that your mentors called their victims "rodents," but you ghouls have decided that human offspring are "starfish" to justify your slaughter of them.

Is that something from the Adolf Hitler Institute, oops I mean Alan Guttmacher Institute - meh, same difference...

 

[Uncensored2008]

The mother and father of Planned Parenthood...

 

[sealybobo]

China started a trade war with US decades ago. Trump just was teh first to even try to push back a little.

I know, but it fucked with my income. It fucked with business. I know I know, you want to take on China. But how aggressively? And did it work? Not really. plus, no excuses. You promised 3% growth. You didn’t say you’d start a trade war with China. Business might not have voted for you if you were honest.

 

[Correll]

I know, but it fucked with my income. It fucked with business. I know I know, you want to take on China. But how aggressively? And did it work? Not really. plus, no excuses. You promised 3% growth. You didn’t say you’d start a trade war with China. Business might not have voted for you if you were honest.

I thought he was pretty clear with his intentions with AMERICA FIRST, and bringing the jobs back.

Did you really not get the gist of his position before voting?

 

[daveman]

Agreed. But the majority of Americans would not be as comfortable as you seem to be telling a mother she has to give birth to a baby she doesn't want.

And in your mind, killing the only completely innocent person involved is a righteous answer?

That's entirely screwed up.

 

[sealybobo]

I thought he was pretty clear with his intentions with AMERICA FIRST, and bringing the jobs back.

Did you really not get the gist of his position before voting?

And we told you starting a trade war with China would hurt us. And that his tax bill would cause debt and inflation.

 

[Correll]

And we told you starting a trade war with China would hurt us. And that his tax bill would cause debt and inflation.

So to be clear, when you say, "and we told you", you are admitting that he was clear in his intent.

So, your talk about him "not being honest" about that, that was just you being dishonest. (which moments ago, you were so bent out of shape about)



I mean, why? Being for Free Trade is a completely valid policy position. Why could you not have started with that?



Why do you NEED to not only disagree with a person, but have this NEED to paint anyone that disagrees with you, as a BAD PERSON with ILL INTENT?

 

[Cellblock2429]

So something crossed my mind today: Let's assume the leak is genuine and next month Roe vs Wade is gone. Now (as everybody says) abortion will be left up to the states. Liberal states of course will keep abortion, conservative states make it illegal, and swing states may have abortion up to X amount of weeks. Fine.

My question is what happens if the country swings hard right on the federal level as in what is being setup now? Could our federal legislatures make it illegal for the entire country to have any kind of abortions? And if so, would the GOP risk losing leadership for decades down the road?

I can't see the court ruling that abortion be exclusively a states right. What part of the Constitution would allow them to rule that way? So the question is, could this decision actually lead to outlawing abortions on a national level?

/——-/ The 10th Amendment to the Constitution
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.

 

[sealybobo]

So to be clear, when you say, "and we told you", you are admitting that he was clear in his intent.

So, your talk about him "not being honest" about that, that was just you being dishonest. (which moments ago, you were so bent out of shape about)



I mean, why? Being for Free Trade is a completely valid policy position. Why could you not have started with that?



Why do you NEED to not only disagree with a person, but have this NEED to paint anyone that disagrees with you, as a BAD PERSON with ILL INTENT?

I saw trumps true intentions even if you didn’t. Taking on China was for his ego. And he lost btw

 

[Correll]

I saw trumps true intentions even if you didn’t. Taking on China was for his ego. And he lost btw

I explicitly stated that I was aware of his intentions.


You were the one that pretended to not be. And then you admitted that you were aware, because you were arguing against his policy back then.


You are so fired up, that you are not making sense.

 

[Uncensored2008]

I saw trumps true intentions even if you didn’t. Taking on China was for his ego. And he lost btw

You mean Trump was supporting America while you sold your country out because China has slaves.

You fucking democrats can't let go of slave labor - ever.

 

[alang1216]

And in your mind, killing the only completely innocent person involved is a righteous answer?

That's entirely screwed up.

If I considered one or a couple of cells with some DNA to be a person I might agree with you. In my view, human tissue is not the same as a person. Or put another way, every person is made up of human tissue but not every human tissue is a person.

 

[Uncensored2008]

If I considered one or a couple of cells with some DNA to be a person I might agree with you. In my view, human tissue is not the same as a person. Or put another way, every person is made up of human tissue but not every human tissue is a person.

Ah, there's our ignorant science denier!

So do you plan to have Reich observers at every sex act between men and women to abort within 3 to five minutes? You know, when it is "one or several cells?"

You were conditioned to bleat "zygote" (though we showed earlier that you had no clue what it means.) To catch up lurkers - and because you're too stupid to learn, a "zygote" is the fertilized egg prior traveling down the fallopian tube to the uterus. The occurs in the first 5 days of pregnancy. Yes, it's only a zygote for 5 days. By the time the zygote implants in the uterus, it is several MILLION cells.

Fetal development: What happens during the 1st trimester?

Fetal development begins before you even know you're pregnant. Here's what happens early on.

www.mayoclinic.org

Of course, you think women carry a starfish, not a baby - so you're an anti-science moron.

 

[sealybobo]

You mean Trump was supporting America while you sold your country out because China has slaves.

You fucking democrats can't let go of slave labor - ever.

It's a global economy. I don't expect someone like you to understand Goober.

 

[alang1216]

So do you plan to have Reich observers at every sex act between men and women to abort within 3 to five minutes? You know, when it is "one or several cells?"

You're confused, it is the anti-abortion states that are empowering vigilantes to sue doctors.

 

[Uncensored2008]

It's a global economy. I don't expect someone like you to understand Goober.

You're a traitor to your nation - we all understand that.

 

[Uncensored2008]

You're confused, it is the anti-abortion states that are empowering vigilantes to sue doctors.

The only way you could abort a baby that is "one or a couple of cells" would be the have someone from the Reich in the room ready to go 5 minutes after sex.

You ghouls would do that. Ensure that no unauthorized live births occur.