Statement of the “Former JAGs Working Group” on Media Reports ofPentagon “No Quarter” Orders in Caribbean Boat Strikes

Yes, the answers are the same.

Zero days.

So, how about the former JAGs working group report? Did you read it? It's, like, a 6 minute read.
i dont like what your boogeyman is doing....show us proof the people he is blowing out of the water are not some poor slob out there fishing and i will back him to the max...until then if we were voting yes to continue no to stop...i would be with the no people...
 
show us proof the people he is blowing out of the water are not some poor slob out there fishing and i will back him to the max
Then you have taken your stance.

Because the report posted in the OP grants every accusation of them being drug runners, and still concludes:

"The Former JAGs Working Group unanimously considers both the giving and the execution of these orders, if true, to constitute war crimes, murder, or both."
 
Then you have taken your stance.

Because the report posted in the OP grants every accusation of them being drug runners, and still concludes:

"The Former JAGs Working Group unanimously considers both the giving and the execution of these orders, if true, to constitute war crimes, murder, or both."
well that aint for you or me or those former jag guys to decide.....and every one of those people in the line of command im sure, thought about what they are doing.....and they probably know more than we do....
 
well that aint for you or me or those former jag guys to decide.
But it IS for them to argue, using the law, as they have done in the statement. And they do so in a way we can all understand.

You should read it, Harry.
 
..and every one of those people in the line of command im sure, thought about what they are doing.....and they probably know more than we do....
Well, I am wondering if some of them might not feel a bit of shame. The environment is ripe for a whistle blower.
 
Well, I am wondering if some of them might not feel a bit of shame. The environment is ripe for a whistle blower.
thats true but if there aint nothing to whistle?.....only the people involved in this down to the crew on the boat know what is going on....so we will see...
 
thats true but if there aint nothing to whistle?
Then no blower to blow it, I guess.

And from all info available, it appears the NEXT time something similar happened, they DID rescue the two survivors and release them into their home countries.

(An odd act, regarding people labeled "enemy combatants". But I digress...)

So, maybe someone got in Pete's ear and told him, "Hey, idiot, that was illegal. "

Which, unfortunately, does not provide cover for Mr. Hegseth's legal exposure.
 
‘Since orders to kill survivors of an attack at sea are “patently illegal,” anyone who

issues or follows such orders can and should be prosecuted for war crimes, murder,

or both.’


Starting with Hegseth and other criminals in the Trump regime.
Who is killing survivors, except maybe sharks?
 
"
Again, the bottom line is that, since orders to kill survivors of an attack at sea are
“patently illegal,” anyone who issues or follows such orders can and should be
prosecuted for war crimes, murder, or both."
Who is killing survivors after an attack? Who gave those orders?

You leftist FAGATs invent lies and then expect to be taken seriously.
 
You should try and understand what you cut and pasted before making yourself a total buffoon. Your drug running heroes are not
Shipwrecked, wounded, and sick persons”.
What are you whining about with your “war crime” nonsense?
Good lord you're stupid. It's a war crime. Turn his drunken ass over to the Hague.

That's International Humanitarian Law from the second Geneva convention in 1949.

Key principles of IHL regarding survivors at sea:
Protected Status: Shipwrecked, wounded, and sick persons (whether enemy combatants or civilians) are considered protected persons under the Second Geneva Convention of 1949 (GC II) and customary international law. They may not be targeted, murdered, or ill-treated.

Duty to Rescue and Care: After an engagement, the attacking force is legally obliged to take all possible measures, without delay, to search for, collect, and care for the shipwrecked and wounded, as military circumstances permit. They must be provided with adequate medical care and attention based on their condition.

Prohibition of "No Quarter": Orders to give "no quarter" (meaning to kill everyone and take no prisoners) are explicitly forbidden under the 1907 Hague Convention IV and are considered a grave breach of the laws of war.

Individual Accountability: Commanders who issue orders to kill survivors, and individuals who carry out such "patently illegal orders," can be prosecuted for war crimes, murder, or both. Military personnel have a duty to disobey orders that are manifestly unlawful.


These rules apply regardless of whether the individuals were enemy combatants or civilians, provided they are no longer actively participating in hostilities
settle down, little lady.

Was the bolded text intended to add a sense of melodrama and urgency to your long, tedious, cut and paste?
 
15th post
Normal people think of all the victims of drugs and don't really care about the drug runners.
So you are just another one of the Lawless....?? YOU support lawlessness??

Is that your stand??
 
Back
Top Bottom