Statement of the “Former JAGs Working Group” on Media Reports ofPentagon “No Quarter” Orders in Caribbean Boat Strikes

[scruffy]

You clearly are not.

lol - you must be the foggiest leftist.

The arguments that you have not read (obviously) clearly apply no matter the status of these people.

Really? How much in distress do you have to be? Watching someone get married, is that enough?

Yet you thought calling them terrorists was a valid rebuttal.

It was not.

No rebuttal needed. I don't much care what happens to narcoterrorists.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Really?

Yes, really. They were very clear about that, as is the law.

Yes, really.

I should have known better than to think USMB posters would read a 4 page document.

Shit, it's shorter than half of your posts, my man.

 

[Rogue AI]

And I know it is irrelevant and know you didn't bother to read their argument. If you had, you would know why what you said was very silly.

You're still peddling this anonymous trash? How pathetic.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

You're still peddling this anonymous trash? How pathetic.

Still avoiding reading it?

That's cultism for ya!

 

[Rogue AI]

Still avoiding reading it?

That's cultism for ya!

Tell me exactly who wrote it and if they have ulterior motives. No point in reading nonsense that could have been cooked up by foreigners or who knows who else. It's just as likely Russian disinformation.

 

[cnm]

Where are all the former JAGs that are writing about how what Hegseth did was perfectly legal?

Strange, they don't seem to exist.

The present ones are filling in for them. Private publication only...

 

[BackAgain]

Okay, we will put you down for " didn't read the material".

Nobody cares what you put me down as.

As I told you, the pertinent words I highlighted are the only pertinent words.

You simply don’t get it or refuse to admit your own error. Classic you.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Nobody cares what you put me down as.

As I told you, the pertinent words I highlighted are the only pertinent words.

You simply don’t get it or refuse to admit your own error. Classic you.

I get it, you just won't read it. Because you don't want to read it.

I know.

 

[Hollie]

And now we see why Admiral Alvin Holsey, head of the U.S. Southern Command (SOUTHCOM), resigned.

Not that we didn't all already kind of know. But this document in the OP casts in in clear relief.

Only you “see why” because that fantasy appeals to your TDS.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Only you “see why” because that fantasy appeals to your TDS.

How MAGA always acts ^^, when they know I am right.

 

[BackAgain]

I get it, you just won't read it. Because you don't want to read it.

I know.

I get it. You just don’t like to admit that even your cited piece concedes that it might not be true.

We all understand that you hate the truth.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

You just don’t like to admit that even your cited piece concedes that it might not be true.

An odd thing to say, considering I quoted exactly that in post #1.

Remember, that's the only reason you knew the word "if" appeared in the document, since you didn't read it.

 

[BackAgain]

An odd thing to say, considering I quoted exactly that in post #1.

Remember, that's the only reason you knew the word "if" appeared in the document, since you didn't read it.

You have no idea what I read nor do you even grasp why I noted that that phrase was the only meaningful phrase in your piece.

But keep posting your supported guesswork as if you know anything. You’re still just a dumbass troll.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

You have no idea what I read nor do you even grasp why I noted that that phrase was the only meaningful phrase in your piece.

But keep posting your supported guesswork as if you know anything. You’re still just a dumbass troll.

You clearly did not read the document.

 

[BackAgain]

You clearly did not read the document.

You’re wrong. Not just in your speculation (which is of no consequence) but also in your understanding of our legal system in general.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

You’re wrong. Not just in your speculation (which is of no consequence) but also in your understanding of our legal system in general.

Nope. You didn't read a word of the document.

Only what I quoted.